2024

745,877 Views | 10970 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by boognish_bear
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:




Next meal ticket. Gold digger, through and through...
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Jacques Strap said:




Next meal ticket. Gold digger, through and through...
yeesh, the idea that anyone would find her attractive ...
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are memes on this.

We'll Always Have Paris: Jill Biden's Girlish Glance Towards Trump Sparks Mischievous Memes

https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2024/12/08/trump-jill-biden-smiling-pic-n2404832
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Jacques Strap said:




Next meal ticket. Gold digger, through and through...
yeesh, the idea that anyone would find her attractive ...


Good point, there is that...
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




I love it, but would anyone pay $199 for Trump cologne?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




I love it, but would anyone pay $199 for Trump cologne?
would anybody? Yes

Would I? No
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




I love it, but would anyone pay $199 for Trump cologne?
would anybody? Yes

Would I? No
I am with you. I can't imagine Donald channeling his inner Tom Ford
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



The ultimate troll!
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

4th and Inches said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




I love it, but would anyone pay $199 for Trump cologne?
would anybody? Yes

Would I? No
I am with you. I can't imagine Donald channeling his inner Tom Ford


Read Dunning Kruger effect
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


expedited reviews? Yes

expedited approvals? No.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Capitol Police arrested a man Tuesday night for allegedly assaulting Representative Nancy Mace (R., S.C.) over her steadfast opposition to men using women's bathrooms on Capitol Hill.
James McIntyre, 33, of Illinois was arrested for the alleged incident and is now facing a charge of assaulting a government official. McIntyre's alleged assault took place at the Rayburn House office building around 6o p.m.
"I was physically accosted tonight on Capitol grounds over my fight to protect women. Capitol police have arrested him," Mace said on X.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
President Biden's teleprompter apparently short-circuited Tuesday during one of his final speeches touting his economic record which included an abortive effort to massively expand rural high-speed internet forcing him to consult paper notes to make up for the technical difficulties.

"One of the things that's going on here they just turned off my … I lost electricity here, anyway," Biden said, visibly taken off guard just 10 minutes into his speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FBI Director Christopher Wray says he will resign before Trump takes office
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

FBI Director Christopher Wray says he will resign before Trump takes office
shocked..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He needs time to prepare for his trial!
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

He needs time to prepare for his trial!


There will be no trial.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden will pardon him. But he should be exited for his crimes along with many others.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They tried to paint Vance as "weird" but TTim is 100x weirder.

ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Word play (as was pointed out to you on the J6 thread).
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.

There is potential for abuse at virtually all levels of government.

Here's an idea, how about going after the known abuses before chasing imagined ones.

You're like the abused wife that stays in the marriage because she knows she can get groceries on a regular basis.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.

There is potential for abuse at virtually all levels of government.

Here's an idea, how about going after the known abuses before chasing imagined ones.

You're like the abused wife that stays in the marriage because she knows she can get groceries on a regular basis.
Huh?

Zuckerberg just donated 1m to Trump. Facebook, the anti-Trump. You don't think that is interesting? That is imagined. No intent for favoritism there. Mark just saw the light? Yeah, no need to watch this set up... Let's focus on the 55k a year clerk, that is the real problem...
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.

There is potential for abuse at virtually all levels of government.

Here's an idea, how about going after the known abuses before chasing imagined ones.

You're like the abused wife that stays in the marriage because she knows she can get groceries on a regular basis.
Huh?

Zuckerberg just donated 1m to Trump. Facebook, the anti-Trump. You don't think that is interesting? That is imagined. No intent for favoritism there. Mark just saw the light? Yeah, no need to watch this set up... Let's focus on the 55k a year clerk, that is the real problem...

Donors donate to get access. To both sides of the aisle........

So why is it that only a concern when a guy donates to Trump?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.

There is potential for abuse at virtually all levels of government.

Here's an idea, how about going after the known abuses before chasing imagined ones.

You're like the abused wife that stays in the marriage because she knows she can get groceries on a regular basis.
Huh?

Zuckerberg just donated 1m to Trump. Facebook, the anti-Trump. You don't think that is interesting? That is imagined. No intent for favoritism there. Mark just saw the light? Yeah, no need to watch this set up... Let's focus on the 55k a year clerk, that is the real problem...

Donors donate to get access. To both sides of the aisle........

So why is it that only a concern when a guy donates to Trump?

Trump on the debate stage in 2016 basically said "all of these people are corrupt, they take my money and do what I ask them to".

There's no doubt large donations come with strings. No one is giving money just because. I don't see the problem with Zuck hedging his bet just like he did when Democrats were in control. It's smart business practice on his part. It's terrible for the country and needs to stop but until rules are put in place to stop it then it's just reality.

And no rules to stop it are coming. Both parties love them some large donors.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




Amazing how winning does that. Threaten with DOGE to cut out Govt contracts and subsidies, watch the money roll in to Trump.

So, do we take bets on how much actually gets cut and who it effects?

You guys don't see any potential for abuse? I am the strange one saying this doesn't smell right? Elections have consequences, in this case financial.

There is potential for abuse at virtually all levels of government.

Here's an idea, how about going after the known abuses before chasing imagined ones.

You're like the abused wife that stays in the marriage because she knows she can get groceries on a regular basis.
Huh?

Zuckerberg just donated 1m to Trump. Facebook, the anti-Trump. You don't think that is interesting? That is imagined. No intent for favoritism there. Mark just saw the light? Yeah, no need to watch this set up... Let's focus on the 55k a year clerk, that is the real problem...

Donors donate to get access. To both sides of the aisle........

So why is it that only a concern when a guy donates to Trump?

Trump on the debate stage in 2016 basically said "all of these people are corrupt, they take my money and do what I ask them to".

There's no doubt large donations come with strings. No one is giving money just because. I don't see the problem with Zuck hedging his bet just like he did when Democrats were in control. It's smart business practice on his part. It's terrible for the country and needs to stop but until rules are put in place to stop it then it's just reality.

And no rules to stop it are coming. Both parties love them some large donors.
Yep. Donations get your calls answered. And they get you in the mix. That's what Zuck wants. He is signaling that he will donate more if he gets some consideration when policies are formed.

That is not a bad thing. Donor interests are not irrelevant. Capital formation and preservation are critically important. It's only when donor interests occlude common interest that they become a problem. That's how you end up maintaining globalist policies for decades after they no longer made sense = were doing great harm for no significant benefit.
First Page Last Page
Page 311 of 314
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.