Osodecentx said:
whiterock said:
Osodecentx said:
whiterock said:
Osodecentx said:
whiterock said:
Osodecentx said:
whiterock said:
Osodecentx said:
whiterock said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
After listening all day today I think this is the best defense that can be offered at this time in hearings. Something about these 8 and Sutton doesn't set well. Also the bank President got to the top because of 44 years, not qualifications. He is either stupid or wanted to appear that way as something stinks about the foreclosure sale.
I don't know where Hardin was going today but it was boring. The young attorney, Cammack, was hung out to dry by Paul and Paxton. That was the only thing I could see today that meant Paxton was the creep I suspected him to be.
I had no clue until I got Buzbee's campaign flyer today that he is a MAGA. I never would have suspected him to be associated with them.
The question is, where are the swing Senators on the question of Sutton & the Gang of 8? Not sure about that, but know for sure that no sane elected official would want to reward someone else's palace coup with victory, when they are so dependent on their own staff.
LOL. You're just gobbling up what MQS is dishing out aren't you?
High level staff, all movement conservatives, suspect illegal activity. They report it to FBI. That isn't a palace coup, that is being honest . I guess dishonest state senators might see it as "rewarding the palace coup".
Convicting Paxton and removing him from office isn't rewarding the whistle blowers. It's thinning the herd of a dishonest AG; it would be rewarding the taxpayers of Texas. Republicans would also be the winners.
LOL so you do have a hard-on for MQS. So, I post video footage of the trial pulled from a MQS post and I'm gobbling his stuff? Ever heard of genetic fallacy?
You could not have been listening to the testimony. They provided, by their own words, no evidence of any illegal activity whatsoever. They were just "concerned" that it looked like something might happen (only it didn't).
You posts here make no sense. I am concerned you might be making meth in your bathroom. Expect the cops to arrive shortly.
You are gobbling up mucous ( MQS)
Meth?
Your glide path got gummed up with mucous
You win. Paxton is the face of the Texas Republican Party
You own him
No, the people of Texas do, but thanks for revealing the "vanity uber alles" that drives your thinking.
If/when he's convicted if something, I'll lead the charge to impeach. Until then, I'm going to work to punish the numbskulls who incompetently executed up a half-baked impeachment idea that could only have been worse politics had it succeeded.
What dumba$$es…..
He is the face of Republicans
He's your boy
I'll caucus with Paxton. And MQS. And Romney. And Bush. And Trump. And RDS. They and more are welcome in my tent. I'll even hold my nose and try not to bump into those pompous *******s Christie and Hutchinson, as long as they can bring themselves to show up. I'll caucus with anyone who will help me defeat progressive agendas. Sure, I may get mud on my shoes. Or have to take pictures with people I'm not terribly excited about, like that one with John Boehner. Oh the things one has to do to help a friend raise money. I might even have to defend something I'd rather not defend.
But if you're too good for that kind of stuff, by all means you be you. Be sure to be real loud about it. Otherwise people won't know how much more virtuous you are than the rest of us. Would be a shame to make the posture and nobody see it.
You seem to be at odds with your fellow travelers. They say the Bush family are trying to take over Texas? Do you believe that "globalists" were behind the impeachment of Paxton?
Are the state reps who voted to impeach welcome in your tent? Will you caucus with Dade Phelan?
Not at odds at all. Political coalitions are full of people who don't like each other. Also full of truces during election season. Most people are smart enough to understand that "never" caucuses are cul-de-sacs of hate and division, and steer clear. If you can't say something nice about the nominee, just don't say anything. Find a way to contribute and you'll see more progress toward your preferred objectives. If you get in front of the wagon, you won't get anywhere and you're likely to get run over. Etc....queue all the sound advice parents give about picking battles.
I am going to donate to Phelan's strongest primary opponent. And if Phelan wins, I'll do everything I can to see him dethroned as Speaker. However that ends up, I know not to trust his leadership skills, judgment, and teamwork ability and will keep an eye on him. Otherwise, it'll be time to find a way to make a truce and contribute something positive somewhere. We might need one another for something down the road, end up on a committee and commission somewhere. Families are like that. We work hard to like relatives we don't actually like, because we might have to sit at the same table with them at weddings and funerals, and don't want to make it any more uncomfortable than it already is for ourselves and the rest of the family.
