Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
AG Ken Paxton on glide path to impeachment
101,232 Views |
971 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by boognish_bear
That's the nicest thing you can say about him, actually. He's also unrepentant, unashamed and self-centered. It's one thing to do wrong; Its an entirely different thing to do wrong, try to cover it up, and then tell people you've been wronged and cheated when you get called out. I wonder where he learned it.Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
so who is really doing all the damage to the party?GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
That we know of.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
boognish_bear said:Listen to Attorney General Paxton's full remarks from today's press conference: pic.twitter.com/pWnj0Ijc6G
— Texas Attorney General (@TXAG) May 26, 2023
Will Paxton testify? Would be an interesting cross examination
Ken lacks humility and has an air of self importance beyond his office. He hasn't really changed since he was a student at Baylor, he carried himself in much the same way even back then.
Breaking: Nate Paul, an Austin real-estate developer known for his connection to suspended Attorney General Ken Paxton’s misconduct, was booked into the Travis County Jail Thursday on a federal warrant requested by the FBI. https://t.co/6xXnBLbhpc
— Texas Tribune (@TexasTribune) June 9, 2023
Uh oh. Here comes the log rolling.boognish_bear said:Breaking: Nate Paul, an Austin real-estate developer known for his connection to suspended Attorney General Ken Paxton’s misconduct, was booked into the Travis County Jail Thursday on a federal warrant requested by the FBI. https://t.co/6xXnBLbhpc
— Texas Tribune (@TexasTribune) June 9, 2023
whiterock said:That we know of.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
You can always tell who - deep down - approved of the Stasi. They get all giggly when a political opponent gets targeted by a Dirty Trick.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:That we know of.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
You're obviously a Republican, like me, and for the life of me I cannot understand how the party label should protect a crooked S O B.
There are some strange things going on here. It wouldn't surprise me to find that bigger slimy monsters are willing to sacrifice a little one to protect their own butts.Aliceinbubbleland said:
You're obviously a Republican, like me, and for the life of me I cannot understand how the party label should protect a crooked S O B.
I would much rather see Daylight shined on everyone in this matter, including the ones who find themselves playing the role of Righteous Prosecutors.
Let's turn over all the stones, please.
My B-I-L was a chamberman and loves the guy. Can't say enough good about him. IChamberman said:
Ken lacks humility and has an air of self importance beyond his office. He hasn't really changed since he was a student at Baylor, he carried himself in much the same way even back then.
Depends on which one Dems fear most.Osodecentx said:Quote:That we know of.Quote:Quote:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Quote:Ken is dishonest.Quote:
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
whiterock said:Depends on which one Dems fear most.Osodecentx said:Quote:That we know of.Quote:Quote:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Quote:Ken is dishonest.Quote:
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
Will Paxton testify before the Senate if prosecutors get to cross examine him?
Have no idea. I would imagine not, for all the usual reasons.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:Depends on which one Dems fear most.Osodecentx said:Quote:That we know of.Quote:Quote:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Quote:Ken is dishonest.Quote:
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
Will Paxton testify before the Senate if prosecutors get to cross examine him?
I’ve asked Team Impeachment for comment on this, will update if/when they respond
— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) June 9, 2023
The Ken Paxton lawyers speculate that Nate Paul was jailed so that he could be flipped on Paxton. Another possibility is that Nate Paul was about to leave the U.S. See if he is released today with an ankle monitor and his passports forfeited. pic.twitter.com/y81VuHltbB
— Jim Boyle (@JimGBoyle) June 9, 2023
JUST IN: Nate Paul, the man at the center of the Ken Paxton Impeachment has been indicted on 8 counts of making false statements to get loans. Paul told banks he had millions when his bank account had "less than $13,000." Paxton is not mentioned in indictment. #txlege @FOX4 pic.twitter.com/VgS9gpukiY
— Steven Dial (@StevenDialFox4) June 9, 2023
Osodecentx said:whiterock said:That we know of.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
Nevermind. Trump just set a mark that Paxton can't touch
Telling that you focus on accusations, not proof.Osodecentx said:Osodecentx said:whiterock said:That we know of.Osodecentx said:whiterock said:LOL, Melvin P. Thorpe speaks:Osodecentx said:Ken is dishonest.GrowlTowel said:OsoCoreyell said:OK. He seems to think this is a piece of normal litigation with the rules of evidence and procedure where he gets to drag out the process. Whether or not he's allowed to do that is really up to the Senate members themselves. One might reflect that the reason this ended up the way it did was because Ken refused to resign during the primaries, and when he was in the general, the party didn't want to/couldn't force him out of the race because that would've handed the AG office to the Dems. So they had to wait until the normal session to take action. Ken conveniently paints this as some kind of last-minute sandbagging when he knows good-and-well that the timing was basically responsive to the choices he left folks. We'll see if those same people are interested in a long, drawn out trial that is bad for the party and the State of Texas. One thing that Ken has made abundantly clear, he dosn't give a rip about what's good for anyone but Ken.Osodecentx said:OsoCoreyell said:Who better to defend a bunch of garbage than the garbage man?Osodecentx said:
From DMN:
Buzbee anticipated that if the case is not tossed out quickly, proceedings could last for a long time. He said they identified 66 witnesses to question and thousands of documents to gather.
"If this isn't dismissed summarily, then we are girded up for a fight," he said. "The whole thing is a sham engineered by someone with a personal vendetta against Attorney General Paxton and if it takes us a year to show that, then we'll take a year to do it."
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/06/07/houston-lawyer-tony-buzbee-will-lead-texas-ag-ken-paxtons-impeachment-defense/
Buz is formidable
Hit the nail on the head. Only reason we are here is because Paxton didn't yield to Bush in the primaries.
Dang those voters who picked wrong.
"Texas has a *****-house in it!"
And the biggest ***** in Texas was in Office of the AG
O/U who gets more indictments? Trump or Paxton?
Nevermind. Trump just set a mark that Paxton can't touch
Oopsy
Investor Linked to Paxton's Impeachment Is Charged With Lying to Lenders
Nate Paul, the real estate investor at the center of the impeachment case against the attorney general of Texas, Ken Paxton, has been jailed at the request of the F.B.I.
Federal prosecutors have brought charges of making false statements to financial institutions against the businessman at the center of the allegations swirling around Ken Paxton, the impeached attorney general of Texas.
The man Nate Paul, a real estate investor in Austin and a donor to Mr. Paxton's campaign appeared before a magistrate judge for 30 minutes on Friday morning, wearing a blue shirt, faded jeans and sneakers. He did not enter a plea, and was allowed to go home after the hearing.
Prosecutors accused Mr. Paul of exaggerating the value of his assets, telling mortgage companies and credit unions that he had more money that he actually did.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/09/us/nate-paul-paxton-arrest.html
Investor Linked to Paxton's Impeachment Is Charged With Lying to Lenders
Nate Paul, the real estate investor at the center of the impeachment case against the attorney general of Texas, Ken Paxton, has been jailed at the request of the F.B.I.
Federal prosecutors have brought charges of making false statements to financial institutions against the businessman at the center of the allegations swirling around Ken Paxton, the impeached attorney general of Texas.
The man Nate Paul, a real estate investor in Austin and a donor to Mr. Paxton's campaign appeared before a magistrate judge for 30 minutes on Friday morning, wearing a blue shirt, faded jeans and sneakers. He did not enter a plea, and was allowed to go home after the hearing.
Prosecutors accused Mr. Paul of exaggerating the value of his assets, telling mortgage companies and credit unions that he had more money that he actually did.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/09/us/nate-paul-paxton-arrest.html
OK, so in Oso world, not only do accusations count as proof, so does guilt by association.
And what would we find if we turned over a few stones near the Speaker?
Paxton may be guilty as sin, but I will wait for the evidence.
In the end, I have strong doubts we will get the full truth or find all the snakes in this matter.
And what would we find if we turned over a few stones near the Speaker?
Paxton may be guilty as sin, but I will wait for the evidence.
In the end, I have strong doubts we will get the full truth or find all the snakes in this matter.
Isn't it a coincidence that Mr. Paul got arrested contemporaneously with the impeachment process?Oldbear83 said:
OK, so in Oso world, not only do accusations count as proof, so does guilt by association.
And what would we find if we turned over a few stones near the Speaker?
Paxton may be guilty as sin, but I will wait for the evidence.
In the end, I have strong doubts we will get the full truth or find all the snakes in this matter.
What do you think it means?whiterock said:Isn't it a coincidence that Mr. Paul got arrested contemporaneously with the impeachment process?Oldbear83 said:
OK, so in Oso world, not only do accusations count as proof, so does guilt by association.
And what would we find if we turned over a few stones near the Speaker?
Paxton may be guilty as sin, but I will wait for the evidence.
In the end, I have strong doubts we will get the full truth or find all the snakes in this matter.
Did it all happen while somebody was at church serving as godfather during his nephew's baptism?whiterock said:Isn't it a coincidence that Mr. Paul got arrested contemporaneously with the impeachment process?Oldbear83 said:
OK, so in Oso world, not only do accusations count as proof, so does guilt by association.
And what would we find if we turned over a few stones near the Speaker?
Paxton may be guilty as sin, but I will wait for the evidence.
In the end, I have strong doubts we will get the full truth or find all the snakes in this matter.
boognish_bear said:The Ken Paxton lawyers speculate that Nate Paul was jailed so that he could be flipped on Paxton. Another possibility is that Nate Paul was about to leave the U.S. See if he is released today with an ankle monitor and his passports forfeited. pic.twitter.com/y81VuHltbB
— Jim Boyle (@JimGBoyle) June 9, 2023
Broncos fan?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
More like Florida Gator. It would be more his style.
Also striking resemblence to that Jersey boy that runs aggy sports forum.
Texas’ highest criminal court has ruled that suspended Attorney General Ken Paxton’s securities fraud trial will remain in Houston.
— Texas Tribune (@TexasTribune) June 14, 2023
The ruling overturns lower-court decisions that had moved the case to Collin County, where Paxton lives. https://t.co/XUtJ4H9EHl
Paxton impeachment defense lawyer Tony Buzbee reacts to the Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that keeps Paxton’s securities fraud trial in Harris County: pic.twitter.com/CXMVV6w0fk
— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) June 14, 2023
Buzbee is no dummy, unfortunately, for those of us hoping this is a slam dunk conviction.
A reminder that the Texas campaign fundraising moratorium lifts today > https://t.co/ymMdp5Lmf0
— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) June 19, 2023