Porteroso said:TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Nah, lying about being in combat is the lowest.
Lots of people avoid combat, only true slimeballs lie about being in combat.
He did not say he saw combat. You are a zealot saying zealous things and should not be taken seriously. His comment was out of place because it was not clear that he did not see combat, however it was not an actual claim to have seen combat.
Just watch this video and then try and defend the obvious lies.
He lied about his rank for nearly 20 years. It's not like the military screwed up and told him he was a retiring Command Sargent Major... he knew the difference but lied for political gain.
Then he lied about being in combat. You may try to split hairs and say that he only claimed to carry a weapon "in war" not "in combat"... but how do you defend the fact that he NEVER corrected the dozens of democrats & "journalists " who claimed he was in combat in Afghanistan & Iraq?
Not correcting the record for almost 20 years is just as bad as blatantly lying on your own.
At worst, Tim Walz is a stolen valor level liar.
At best, he allowed others to lie for him for almost 20 years.
Go ahead and defend his record of lying. Good luck.
ShooterTX