If you have teenagers, this election is dam- serious.

If you aren't thinking about ww3 in this election, you are clearly not a student of history. We are very close to being pulled into a middle east war or European war. Russia, China, and Iran are devising strategies to destabilize the West and take back land. You know it to be the case. Each month Putin continues his fight, the more likely he is to seek allies to weaken Ukraines benefactors.

If we one domino falls and pulls the US in - Ukraine, Middle East, or Taiwan, then they all will likely fall.

We've known peace for so long that we can't imagine the DRAFT returning, but I believe that we're close now. Pray for peace because I believe that the next president will determine whether or not your sons and daughters are sacrificed in the trenches on behalf of the oligarchs in Europe.

I don't know that any president will be able to avoid war, but I know for sure that Harris and Walz are in the pockets of the oligarchs and will do their bidding. God help our kids if they win this election.

So again, If you have teenagers, this election is damn serious.

For those of you with teens, how will your kids serve if the draft is revved back up? Draft or enlist or other job?

The draft will never be fully enacted ever again.

Our entitled masses would instantly go berserk.

Unfortunately, half of the country too concerned with pronouns, gender affirming care for minors, and supporting 12 million+ illegal aliens to concern themselves with such trivial matters as WWIII.

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

KaiBear said:

---

The draft will never be fully enacted ever again.

Our entitled masses would instantly go berserk.

---

While I agree with you generally, if war starts I still believe that the draft absolutely can and will be used soon. They're even trying to get women to register. The propaganda will be in full force, the media will ensure that it is the only line. European youth will bear the brunt of it, but after a couple of years, media full on prepping" our society, we will start running out of our enlisted and will fill the gaps with draftees.

But when the draft is instituted you will see liberals all of the sudden dropping their globalist nonsense and running for cover.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

The draft will never be fully enacted ever again.

Our entitled masses would instantly go berserk.

---

While I agree with you generally, if war starts I still believe that the draft absolutely can and will be used soon. They're even trying to get women to register. The propaganda will be in full force, the media will ensure that it is the only line. European youth will bear the brunt of it, but after a couple of years, media full on prepping" our society, we will start running out of our enlisted and will fill the gaps with draftees.

But when the draft is instituted you will see liberals all of the sudden dropping their globalist nonsense and running for cover.

---

No offense, but not a chance in the world.

Minorities would immediately declare any draft to be inherently racist.

The poor and middle class will point out how the rich are immune

And riots will begin within a week.

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

KaiBear said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

The draft will never be fully enacted ever again.

Our entitled masses would instantly go berserk.

---

While I agree with you generally, if war starts I still believe that the draft absolutely can and will be used soon. They're even trying to get women to register. The propaganda will be in full force, the media will ensure that it is the only line. European youth will bear the brunt of it, but after a couple of years, media full on prepping" our society, we will start running out of our enlisted and will fill the gaps with draftees.

But when the draft is instituted you will see liberals all of the sudden dropping their globalist nonsense and running for cover.

---

No offense, but not a chance in the world.

Minorities would immediately declare any draft to be inherently racist.

The poor and middle class will point out how the rich are immune

And riots will begin within a week.

---

You make a ton of sense here, and I'd normally agree. But we've seen the power of the media to program people. With 2 years of drumbeating they will convince the vast majority that there is no other way.

We easily see how gullible and malleable people are. In a matter of a couple years they've convinced every one of their sheep that women can have *****es and men can give birth, and that transitioning kids is OK. Imagine what they could do with a war effort and two to three years of prep time.

You may be right tho, it's even hard for me to see such weak minded entitled people going to war, I guess I just think they're weak minded enough to be media-programmed into accepting it. Hope we don't have to find out.

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

---

It will start in ether Hawaii or Alaska for US involvement, not mainland. Maybe Panama Canal zone on the outside. If US goes full in and draft it will be a US state that is hit. Hawaii, Guam and Wake make most sense if China Alaska if Russia is lead, just to get US focusing outside of Europe.

Draft will occur and I would bet offer of citizenship for those that serve.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Agree with you here, Ronnie. I gotta think Putin's Army is weary, bruised, and battered. Especially now that Ukraine is taking territory in Russia.

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

---

I don't listen to talk radio. I looked it up before posting because I found it interesting that Ukraine has lasted as long as it has and was curious about both sides. Ukraine is short on youth-aged-men to fight. Why did you bother posting, clearly you didn't look it up?

Edit: I just looked it up again to make sure I didn't miss-remember anything. But no I didn't. Your reactionary post is so strange. A basic search on your part would have shown the news on their shortages is everywhere. Ukraine ain't gonna last without soldiers,and they're running out.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

---

I don't listen to talk radio. I looked it up before posting because I found it interesting that Ukraine has lasted as long as it has and was curious about both sides. Ukraine is short on youth-aged-men to fight. Why did you bother posting, clearly you didn't look it up?

Edit: I just looked it up again to make sure I didn't miss-remember anything. But no I didn't. Your reactionary post is so strange. A basic search on your part would have shown the news on their shortages is everywhere. Ukraine ain't gonna last without soldiers,and they're running out.

---

I think your main issue here is a firm grasp on words. Running out and shortage are not the same. The US has a shortage of medical professionals but we are not running out.

I also asked for specific numbers. If you don't know them then what you are doing is repeating conclusions other people made for you.

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

---

I don't listen to talk radio. I looked it up before posting because I found it interesting that Ukraine has lasted as long as it has and was curious about both sides. Ukraine is short on youth-aged-men to fight. Why did you bother posting, clearly you didn't look it up?

Edit: I just looked it up again to make sure I didn't miss-remember anything. But no I didn't. Your reactionary post is so strange. A basic search on your part would have shown the news on their shortages is everywhere. Ukraine ain't gonna last without soldiers,and they're running out.

---

I think your main issue here is a firm grasp on words. Running out and shortage are not the same. The US has a shortage of medical professionals but we are not running out.

I also asked for specific numbers. If you don't know them then what you are doing is repeating conclusions other people made for you.

---

LOL, trying to nuance your way out of a stupid post. Got it. You say they're not running out. I say they have a shortage, they can't fill their ranks because people are dying or running away. So yeah they're running out. You nitpick all you want, you're still looking stupid.

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Thankfully Ukraine is whipping that Russian asssssss

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

---

Without a direct threat to US territory there is no reason to go to war to begin with.

No one wants WW3, including Russia and China.

ATL Bear said:

---

No one wants WW3, including Russia and China.

---

No, but Russia wants Ukraine. China wants Taiwan and maybe more. Iran may just want Israel.

Not sure Germany wanted a ww either when it first started its thing. Things escalated.

ATL Bear said:

---

No one wants WW3, including Russia and China.

---

They was the consensus in 1913 too.

KaiBear said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

---

Without a direct threat to US territory there is no reason to go to war to begin with.

---

I don't disagree.

A thought, in both WW 1 and 2 the US had that mentality. Both times the US ended up in the war when it had escalated beyond control. Both times we entered politically when we were not prepared (WW2, more than WW1). Both times it was catastrophic for the world. If the US had committed earlier could that have been averted and kept regional? Examples after in Korea and the dreaded "proxy" wars that followed were much less impactful than WW. Do these proxy wars serve a purpose to diffuse wars that we will be involved with anyway but later on our enemies terms and less prepared?

Not looking for a fight, just a concept to discuss.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

---

I don't listen to talk radio. I looked it up before posting because I found it interesting that Ukraine has lasted as long as it has and was curious about both sides. Ukraine is short on youth-aged-men to fight. Why did you bother posting, clearly you didn't look it up?

Edit: I just looked it up again to make sure I didn't miss-remember anything. But no I didn't. Your reactionary post is so strange. A basic search on your part would have shown the news on their shortages is everywhere. Ukraine ain't gonna last without soldiers,and they're running out.

---

I think your main issue here is a firm grasp on words. Running out and shortage are not the same. The US has a shortage of medical professionals but we are not running out.

I also asked for specific numbers. If you don't know them then what you are doing is repeating conclusions other people made for you.

---

LOL, trying to nuance your way out of a stupid post. Got it. You say they're not running out. I say they have a shortage, they can't fill their ranks because people are dying or running away. So yeah they're running out. You nitpick all you want, you're still looking stupid.

---

Ukraine just lowered the Draft Age to 25 from 27 (very high, US was 18). They are well aware of hollowing of generations. The issue with Ukraine will not be on the male side of the equation, but the female. 800k women left for the EU. How many will come back? If Russia wins, none. Ukraines only chance of a future is winning and entering EU/NATO to attract back its female breeding population and more. Sorry, but this is an all in for Ukraine. There is no future if Russia wins.

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

Those of you who have draft eligible children, I recommend that you have a plan B in place that doesn't have them wearing a uniform in Milley's ****** Army and dying for 10% for the big guy.

The easiest solution is to send them to college in Belgrade, Budapest, or another neutral country. Maybe Zurich, but I have less faith in Swiss neutrality than I used to.

Canada won't shelter kids from the GWFGR like they did during Vietnam.

Realitybites said:

---

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

---

These are horrible numbers and do not even reflect the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian wounded.

Many of whom are permanently crippled.

And all due to the miscalculations of Putin and Biden over the 'merits' of NATO membership.

You Dems who are all hot about Harris because of abortion or because she is a woman…..keep in mind.

This fool went to Europe after Putin put over 200,000 soldiers along the Ukraine border …..and again called for Ukraine to join NATO.

Putin invaded shortly afterward.

Biden - Harris are responsible for the worst foreign policy blunder by the United States since the Korean War.

And yet you want THIS bimbo to be our Commander in Chief ?

Are you willing to live or die based on the decisions of this bimbo ?

KaiBear said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

---

Without a direct threat to US territory there is no reason to go to war to begin with.

---

but Putin who they tell us is getting his ass kicked by Ukraine will then conquer all of Europe if we don't send Ukraine billions. They tell us. They being the Marxist democrats

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

No one wants WW3, including Russia and China.

---

No, but Russia wants Ukraine. China wants Taiwan and maybe more. Iran may just want Israel.

Not sure Germany wanted a ww either when it first started its thing. Things escalated.

---

That's been the case for 30+ years.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

lmao, no where near ww3. Nobody will start a war that will get steam rolled. Maybe in 5-10 years from now things will be different. This is why it is important to keep Russia begging for scraps

---

Get educated please before posting and do your namesake proud.

What happens when Putin takes the Ukraine? He will most undoubtedly take it without assistance from the West. Ukrainians are running out of youth. Gonna kill off this generation soon and then be left with fathers and seniors to take up their rifles.

My guess is that we will see a Ukrainian surrender/settlement or there will be troops from the West. I do think a settlement is most likely but given that the Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially part of the western alliance, do you think the west won't send in troops if needed?

---

How many youth did they have 5 years ago and how many do they have now? If you don't know this and you spread that talking point you might want to question why you listen to talk radio all day.

---

I don't listen to talk radio. I looked it up before posting because I found it interesting that Ukraine has lasted as long as it has and was curious about both sides. Ukraine is short on youth-aged-men to fight. Why did you bother posting, clearly you didn't look it up?

Edit: I just looked it up again to make sure I didn't miss-remember anything. But no I didn't. Your reactionary post is so strange. A basic search on your part would have shown the news on their shortages is everywhere. Ukraine ain't gonna last without soldiers,and they're running out.

---

I think your main issue here is a firm grasp on words. Running out and shortage are not the same. The US has a shortage of medical professionals but we are not running out.

I also asked for specific numbers. If you don't know them then what you are doing is repeating conclusions other people made for you.

---

LOL, trying to nuance your way out of a stupid post. Got it. You say they're not running out. I say they have a shortage, they can't fill their ranks because people are dying or running away. So yeah they're running out. You nitpick all you want, you're still looking stupid.

---

. You have a shortgage of brain cells but have billions left. The difference in meaning of those words are not nuanced.

Realitybites said:

---

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

Those of you who have draft eligible children, I recommend that you have a plan B in place that doesn't have them wearing a uniform in Milley's ****** Army and dying for 10% for the big guy.

The easiest solution is to send them to college in Belgrade, Budapest, or another neutral country. Maybe Zurich, but I have less faith in Swiss neutrality than I used to.

Canada won't shelter kids from the GWFGR like they did during Vietnam.

---

I'm sure everyone here was waiting for your recommendation.

KaiBear said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

---

These are horrible numbers and do not even reflect the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian wounded.

Many of whom are permanently crippled.

And all due to the miscalculations of Putin and Biden over the 'merits' of NATO membership.

You Dems who are all hot about Harris because of abortion or because she is a woman…..keep in mind.

This fool went to Europe after Putin put over 200,000 soldiers along the Ukraine border …..and again called for Ukraine to join NATO.

Putin invaded shortly afterward.

Biden - Harris are responsible for the worst foreign policy blunder by the United States since the Korean War.

And yet you want THIS bimbo to be our Commander in Chief ?

Are you willing to live or die based on the decisions of this bimbo ?

---

You might want to poll all the dead Americans scattered around Asian jungles and middle eastern deserts.

ron.reagan said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

---

These are horrible numbers and do not even reflect the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian wounded.

Many of whom are permanently crippled.

And all due to the miscalculations of Putin and Biden over the 'merits' of NATO membership.

You Dems who are all hot about Harris because of abortion or because she is a woman…..keep in mind.

This fool went to Europe after Putin put over 200,000 soldiers along the Ukraine border …..and again called for Ukraine to join NATO.

Putin invaded shortly afterward.

Biden - Harris are responsible for the worst foreign policy blunder by the United States since the Korean War.

And yet you want THIS bimbo to be our Commander in Chief ?

Are you willing to live or die based on the decisions of this bimbo ?

---

You might want to poll all the dead Americans scattered around Asian jungles and middle eastern deserts.

---

You are so absolutely hopeless.

The next time you consider posting something so ridiculously stupid; just keep in mind......

it's not in fact 'clever'.

KaiBear said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

We constantly maintain 4-6 'boomer' subs of the coast of Russia. Each armed with 21 missiles and each missile can be armed with up to 4 independently trackable hydrogen bombs.

Launch time to detention over a target ……less than 40 minutes. In many cases less than 20 minutes.


And the Russians maintain a similar number of hydrogen bomb carrying submarines off the coast of the US.


This has been the case for decades.


If Harris unintentionally gets us into a war with Russia( and it goes nuclear…..it's going to be a very short war.


Not just for the US and Russia; but for most of the northern hemisphere.

---

Sure but I think we can be involved in a war without it going nuclear. Assuming all sides don't invade the mainlands.

---

Without a direct threat to US territory there is no reason to go to war to begin with.

---

We're still expecting our enemies to attack us a la World Trade Center, 9/11 method. IMO, the majority of the threats to U.S. territory currently reside within the continental 49 states. No external invasion will be necessary to wreak havoc here. We've witnessed low-level events of this over the past couple of decades.

KaiBear said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

The population of Ukraine has been cut in half compared to before the war. About a half million Ukrainians killed, the rest left the country.

---

These are horrible numbers and do not even reflect the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian wounded.

Many of whom are permanently crippled.

And all due to the miscalculations of Putin and Biden over the 'merits' of NATO membership.

You Dems who are all hot about Harris because of abortion or because she is a woman…..keep in mind.

This fool went to Europe after Putin put over 200,000 soldiers along the Ukraine border …..and again called for Ukraine to join NATO.

Putin invaded shortly afterward.

Biden - Harris are responsible for the worst foreign policy blunder by the United States since the Korean War.

And yet you want THIS bimbo to be our Commander in Chief ?

Are you willing to live or die based on the decisions of this bimbo ?

---

You might want to poll all the dead Americans scattered around Asian jungles and middle eastern deserts.

---

You are so absolutely hopeless.

The next time you consider posting something so ridiculously stupid; just keep in mind......

it's not in fact 'clever'.

---

The point is that you were completely wrong and doubt you even agree with yourself