Off Broadway play about a J6 protester turned in by his son

5,644 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by Harrison Bergeron
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance." (A.Einstein")

However, a couple of you are obviously suffering from complications due to having both. So far only one has given a serious articulate response which had merit. My bet is that y'all will continue to play around but not one will give a serious response to my question, stated earlier. There are those who would say such behavior would be bullying or cowardice; however, we both know that it is not that simple. Correct?
Don't you think it best just to let this one slide and move on?
BUDOS80
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

"The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance." (A.Einstein")

However, a couple of you are obviously suffering from complications due to having both. So far only one has given a serious articulate response which had merit. My bet is that y'all will continue to play around but not one will give a serious response to my question, stated earlier. There are those who would say such behavior would be bullying or cowardice; however, we both know that it is not that simple. Correct?
Don't you think it best just to let this one slide and move on?


Did you have a question from earlier?
What was it?
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I recall correctly, you already responded.
BUDOS80
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

BUDOS said:

"The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance." (A.Einstein")

However, a couple of you are obviously suffering from complications due to having both. So far only one has given a serious articulate response which had merit. My bet is that y'all will continue to play around but not one will give a serious response to my question, stated earlier. There are those who would say such behavior would be bullying or cowardice; however, we both know that it is not that simple. Correct?
Don't you think it best just to let this one slide and move on?


Did you have a question from earlier?
What was it?



His question was how can anyone vote for Trump because he incited/caused January 6th, the greatest attack on or democracy since the War of 1812.

When it was pointed out Trump neither caused nor incited January 6th, he changed the question to how can you vote for Trump when he did nothing to stop the Capital riot, people asked for clarification as to what he thought Trump could have done to stop the riot after the FBI and Capital police allowed the crowd into the Capital.

From there he kept asking the last question over and over again despite posters answering his question.


He seems fixated on January 6th. I suppose he bought the made for television event that the Congressional television producers put together.

In the end he will vote for the least qualified candidate to run for president since 1789.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

"The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance." (A.Einstein")

However, a couple of you are obviously suffering from complications due to having both. So far only one has given a serious articulate response which had merit. My bet is that y'all will continue to play around but not one will give a serious response to my question, stated earlier. There are those who would say such behavior would be bullying or cowardice; however, we both know that it is not that simple. Correct?
Don't you think it best just to let this one slide and move on?
But you're doing the same thing to my question for you - "how long have you been beating your wife?" And no, I'm not going to accept the answer that you disagree with the premise because it's false, because you're not accepting that answer either regarding your question.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

BUDOS said:




And then there are those who, on January 6th watched it on live TV, watched leading Republicans condemn Trump for his actions in addition to members of his own staff, such as the following:

Former Trump aide Griffin: I will never not get sick to my stomach thinking about the fact Donald Trump sat in the room off the Oval Office watching Fox News, scrolling through Twitter, seeing police officers being beaten, hearing Mike Pence was moved to a secure location because his life was in danger, and said 'so what?'

And then there are those who say so what that's history what does that matter now? They didn't seem to want to respond to the question of what if he had been successful. No, they just rationalize it away and vote for him anyway. This is where we are as a nation, and we are to blame. We gripe and troll, but most of us do little else.

Okay, but make your argument as to why we should then vote for those who said "so what" to our cities burning based on a false narrative THEY built, to rampant crime due to their soft on crime policies, to flooding our country with unprecedented levels of unvetted illegal immigrants, and to nude men with their *****es hanging out walking freely in ladies' rooms. And that's just for starters. Fact free assertion

Your question isn't new. It's been brought up here many times. What none of you have presented is a compelling case as to why the alternative "so what" is the lesser evil. You're telling us there's a fly in our drink so we should drink the cup of poison instead.
Specious reasoning without merit
Waco1947 ,la
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

BUDOS said:




And then there are those who, on January 6th watched it on live TV, watched leading Republicans condemn Trump for his actions in addition to members of his own staff, such as the following:

Former Trump aide Griffin: I will never not get sick to my stomach thinking about the fact Donald Trump sat in the room off the Oval Office watching Fox News, scrolling through Twitter, seeing police officers being beaten, hearing Mike Pence was moved to a secure location because his life was in danger, and said 'so what?'

And then there are those who say so what that's history what does that matter now? They didn't seem to want to respond to the question of what if he had been successful. No, they just rationalize it away and vote for him anyway. This is where we are as a nation, and we are to blame. We gripe and troll, but most of us do little else.

Okay, but make your argument as to why we should then vote for those who said "so what" to our cities burning based on a false narrative THEY built, to rampant crime due to their soft on crime policies, to flooding our country with unprecedented levels of unvetted illegal immigrants, and to nude men with their *****es hanging out walking freely in ladies' rooms. And that's just for starters. Fact free assertion

Your question isn't new. It's been brought up here many times. What none of you have presented is a compelling case as to why the alternative "so what" is the lesser evil. You're telling us there's a fly in our drink so we should drink the cup of poison instead.
Specious reasoning without merit


Your signature is on that post, but nothing else.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any window licker that thinks January 6th was anything more than a small, 3 hour unarmed riot just needs to be shown this with a healthy dose of middle finger;

Oh and Trump is evil because he didn't put on his Superman suit and fly down and stop the riot? Kamala advertised and supported bailing out the ****ing rioters from the blm riots.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your specialty!
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's what fascists do: create chaos and blame others.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearBall said:



Please do not forget about this very dangerous and scary man. He himself could overthrow the gov along with 10 grandma's.


It's incredible to me how Americans can't accept the realities involved around the January 6th riot.

The entire Dem narrative is ridiculous.

How can UNARMED old folks produce a viable 'insurrection' ?

STxBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dems even had the White House fenced. Probly still is. Would love to see the bill for that job. Probably 1000x the cost
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

BearBall said:



Please do not forget about this very dangerous and scary man. He himself could overthrow the gov along with 10 grandma's.


It's incredible to me how Americans can't accept the realities involved around the January 6th riot.

The entire Dem narrative is ridiculous.

How can UNARMED old folks produce a viable 'insurrection' ? Hold a few congress people hostage?


Waco1947 ,la
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

KaiBear said:

BearBall said:



Please do not forget about this very dangerous and scary man. He himself could overthrow the gov along with 10 grandma's.


It's incredible to me how Americans can't accept the realities involved around the January 6th riot.

The entire Dem narrative is ridiculous.

How can UNARMED old folks produce a viable 'insurrection' ? Hold a few congress people hostage?





Yes

Unarmed grandmothers and grandfathers were going to overpower armed capital hill police ……

kidnap a ' few congresspeople'; and over throw the government of the United States .


Beyond stupid.


TrojanMoondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

BUDOS said:

Ok, then answer the question about what you think about him sitting on his butt watching his citizens fighting and injuring each other but he refused to stop it for hours? You are going to vote for this person, despite what he did, which was not putting America first. Your rationalizations speak for themselves. Loudly.
It's a simple question. And the answer is as well . Come on people, think about what type of person would do what he did, and what he is eagerly looking forward to doing. You are going to be complicit in those actions.


You have gone 'full aggy' with your repetitive comments.

It's never good to go 'full aggy'.

Vote for your gal. She remains the dumbest vice president in the last 100 years.

But magically Harris will make a brilliant president and commander in chief. Little doubt she will continue the proxy war with Russia. What could possibly go wrong ?

Enjoy another 10 million illegals entering the country demanding free food, shelter and medical care.

Enjoy her proposed massive tax increases.

Most of all enjoy the inevitable restrictions on free speech.


Have a wonderful day.



And lest we forget how she "handled" her own response to the riots. Before January 6 ever happened. That was easily deemed as egging on of criminal behavior. She wasn't just standing by. She was telling them she would bail them out. Not my idea of a real leader.
TrojanMoondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Any window licker that thinks January 6th was anything more than a small, 3 hour unarmed riot just needs to be shown this with a healthy dose of middle finger;

Oh and Trump is evil because he didn't put on his Superman suit and fly down and stop the riot? Kamala advertised and supported bailing out the ****ing rioters from the blm riots.
Ya beat me to it! Amazing how selective they are about things, hey?

What do you expect though? They also see DT as the mean orange man. Because he calls out politicians and the media (who often deserve it)? Yet their lib politicians are fine. Even though they are actually calling the VOTERS names to their faces. "Dog faced pony solider," "deplorables," "racists," "Nazis," and the list goes on. And to one voter's face, the president tells him he's "full of (excrement)."

Yeah, they are so nice, aren't they?

I'm not going to say DT hasn't said disagreeable things, but for them to play this "high horse" game is laughable at best. And completely disingenuous at worst.


historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just take a deep breath and realize Americans did not realize the disinformation they were fed about the January 6 "insurrection" or most of the disinformation about Trump the Nazi media tried to sell them.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.