Which tears taste better?

2,624 Views | 74 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by historian
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

historian said:

Actually, I have observed MSM using the tactics of Goebbels for 40+ years. I have done some historical research into Nazi propaganda, spending a few months in Berlin for that purpose.
What tactics? Stoking fear is not a Goebbels tactic, it's normal for politics everywhere for all of time. Having a monopoly on information is not a Goebbels tactic. In a free market, it means people voted for that with their wallets. And I would not say CNN/MSNBC enjoy a lack of competition. More watch Fox News than either.

I'm not trying to speak for Historian, but an obvious example is the MSM's constant use of the Goebbels "Big Lie" tactic - such as virtually in unison repeating over and over that Trump is Hitler and his supporters are Nazis. It's clearly a total lie if anyone is even somewhat historically informed, but enough of the "masses" have bought it (as Goebbels sadly predicted roughly 90 years ago) that relationships are now ending and family members are becoming estranged over it. It's despicable and shameful.

If you paid attention, you would see that the CNN employees are careful to not actually make many direct comparisons. What they do is have guests on their shows that make the comparison, or they report that others are making the comparison.

That is another issue with legacy media, but it is more related to the rise of technology and therefore mass information dumps. The voice of a crazy can be amplified to the extreme, whereas in days past it was just their families that had to put up with their slobbery ravings.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

historian said:

Porteroso said:

I have to say, the tears are just sad this time. A friend reposted a post saying fascism and rape are the new normal. She is actually afraid. I feel bad for her. It is not entirely her fault- she simply listened to the "news." Nobody in America should live in that much fear.

That's one of the primary propaganda tactics of totalitarians: instill fear, even paranoia to keep the sheep compliant. It often works.

To call the legacy media totalitarians is a pretty big miss, and exactly what you are pretending to criticize. Overly simplifying complex politics into good v evil is also a totalitarian move, no?
While literally you're correct, it is an over-simplification.

But it is hard to deny the level of planned disinformation engaged in by the left-wing, legacy media to influence elections in 2020 and 2024 may be unprecedented in American history. While not fully controlled by the government, the collusion and alignment poses a real threat to democracy and has lead to unprecedented division in the country. Most of what the LWNJ believe about Trump is complete disinformation. So on one hand, I think their intolerance and hate is problematic, I also have sympathy for all the lies and disinformation they have been sold.

I only applied historians "logic" to the post I replied to.

I think it is not a problem to have biased news sources, but given the decline of American education critical thinking, the real issue is opinion masquerading as fact and news. Whether these people are telling you what to think about the facts, or telling the facts themselves, is at all times unclear. It can certainly be cleaned up. They should imo be responsible for labeling any segment of their show opinion, when not reporting facts. Same way the paper would have opinion columns, and editorials.
It is not an issue of news or opinion. The issue is the legacy media intentionally parroting disinformation as "news." That is where historian is correct - the legacy media has been parroting regime propaganda masquerading as news since Trump was elected the first time.

I think that is behind a decent amount of the LWNJ hysterics - they actually believe the disinformation they have been fed by the regime.

The legacy media has been regurgitating the party line for decades. Only it's more obvious now as they don't try to pretend otherwise. Anyone who regularly listened to Rush Limbaugh a few years ago will remember his montages of the media "reporting" on an event: they all used the exact some descriptive phrase. It was almost as if there was an agreement on exactly how to spin a narrative with no pretense at objectivity or real journalism. Most of their tactics are more subtle but they are often clear when one looks for it.
those reports had a great deal of gravitas
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

historian said:

Actually, I have observed MSM using the tactics of Goebbels for 40+ years. I have done some historical research into Nazi propaganda, spending a few months in Berlin for that purpose.
What tactics? Stoking fear is not a Goebbels tactic, it's normal for politics everywhere for all of time. Having a monopoly on information is not a Goebbels tactic. In a free market, it means people voted for that with their wallets. And I would not say CNN/MSNBC enjoy a lack of competition. More watch Fox News than either.

I'm not trying to speak for Historian, but an obvious example is the MSM's constant use of the Goebbels "Big Lie" tactic - such as virtually in unison repeating over and over that Trump is Hitler and his supporters are Nazis. It's clearly a total lie if anyone is even somewhat historically informed, but enough of the "masses" have bought it (as Goebbels sadly predicted roughly 90 years ago) that relationships are now ending and family members are becoming estranged over it. It's despicable and shameful.

If you paid attention, you would see that the CNN employees are careful to not actually make many direct comparisons. What they do is have guests on their shows that make the comparison, or they report that others are making the comparison.

That is another issue with legacy media, but it is more related to the rise of technology and therefore mass information dumps. The voice of a crazy can be amplified to the extreme, whereas in days past it was just their families that had to put up with their slobbery ravings.

If you paid attention you would've seen that not only their "guests" but also their normal paid contributors frequently brought up the Hitler and Nazi stuff and there was never any pushback on it from their main commentators on networks like CNN, MSDNC, and the legacy outlets. Shoot, just consider for a moment the incredible lies Joe and Mika routinely told and tell on their morning show, along with the women on The View. The "Big Lie" tactic is and has been very alive in the MSM for quite some time and that's very Joseph Goebbels-ish.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

historian said:

Actually, I have observed MSM using the tactics of Goebbels for 40+ years. I have done some historical research into Nazi propaganda, spending a few months in Berlin for that purpose.
What tactics? Stoking fear is not a Goebbels tactic, it's normal for politics everywhere for all of time. Having a monopoly on information is not a Goebbels tactic. In a free market, it means people voted for that with their wallets. And I would not say CNN/MSNBC enjoy a lack of competition. More watch Fox News than either.

I'm not trying to speak for Historian, but an obvious example is the MSM's constant use of the Goebbels "Big Lie" tactic - such as virtually in unison repeating over and over that Trump is Hitler and his supporters are Nazis. It's clearly a total lie if anyone is even somewhat historically informed, but enough of the "masses" have bought it (as Goebbels sadly predicted roughly 90 years ago) that relationships are now ending and family members are becoming estranged over it. It's despicable and shameful.

If you paid attention, you would see that the CNN employees are careful to not actually make many direct comparisons. What they do is have guests on their shows that make the comparison, or they report that others are making the comparison.

That is another issue with legacy media, but it is more related to the rise of technology and therefore mass information dumps. The voice of a crazy can be amplified to the extreme, whereas in days past it was just their families that had to put up with their slobbery ravings.

If you paid attention you would've seen that not only their "guests" but also their normal paid contributors frequently brought up the Hitler and Nazi stuff and there was never any pushback on it from their main commentators on networks like CNN, MSDNC, and the legacy outlets. Shoot, just consider for a moment the incredible lies Joe and Mika routinely told and tell on their morning show, along with the women on The View. The "Big Lie" tactic is and has been very alive in the MSM for quite some time and that's very Joseph Goebbels-ish.

If you consider that these are not actually journalists working for CNN, but instead media entertainers who are selling a narrative for money, you start to realize that they are simply framing the news in a certain way, which is what political commentators have always done in America.

There was never a golden age of unbiased reporting, but there was a long period of time when the consumers of news demanded facts and made their own judgements, as opposed to consumers of "news" swallowing a narrative whole, and thinking they got news.

It is not a good idea to start policing narratives, or comparisons to Hitler. One poster on this board said "throw anyone who compared Trump to Hitler in jail!" Bad, un-American. And the same idea as what you just posted.

But what you can do, is make an effort to have facts labeled as facts, opinions as opinion, so that someone interested in an unbiased worldview can at least be certain when they are hearings fact or opinion or narrative or interpretation.

The big networks could do so with a trivial effort, and though some attempt to game the system would be made, it would on the whole, be good for the country.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also Hunter's laptop, the Russia collusion hoax, trans insanity, climate alarmism, everything about covid (origins, masks, the vax, etc), anti-gun narratives (especially in the aftermath of a lunatic shooting up a bunch of innocent people), George Floyd (& almost every other instance of cops shooting a black criminal), Daniel Penny, etc, etc, etc

There are dozens of examples every year.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.