Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

Always a good sign

---

Lock up the all the media or just the "bad" media?

---

More irrational fear about things that might happen? come on

Republicans have long shown more deference to our Constitution and the liberties it provides than the Left has

---

You're right, we shouldn't believe what she said. Good point

---

I don't see anywhere that Pam Bondi said she would go after the Media

Do you have a link?

---

You.

Quote:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

---

Liberal Anchors at a propaganda outfit not liking her is a good sign yes

Means she is probably conservative and will take a hard look at the DOJ practices that were going on under Biden

Again....do you have a link where she said she would "go after the Media"?

---

Here's the link (again)
Trump said it. Do you not believe Bondi will obey the boss?

More specifically, Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

---

i think she will do her job..

i also think you get worked up over nothing and like to set verbal gotchas

Have fun with that and happy thanksgiving!

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

Always a good sign

---

Lock up the all the media or just the "bad" media?

---

More irrational fear about things that might happen? come on

Republicans have long shown more deference to our Constitution and the liberties it provides than the Left has

---

You're right, we shouldn't believe what she said. Good point

---

I don't see anywhere that Pam Bondi said she would go after the Media

Do you have a link?

---

You.

Quote:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

---

Liberal Anchors at a propaganda outfit not liking her is a good sign yes

Means she is probably conservative and will take a hard look at the DOJ practices that were going on under Biden

Again....do you have a link where she said she would "go after the Media"?

---

Trump said it. Do you not believe Bondi will obey the boss?

More specifically, Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

---

Bondi will mostly likely follow where the law takes her and perform her duties as AG in a reasonable manner

Do you have any proof she will not?

Trump disliking some Media outlets (that have often lied about him) does not mean she is going to "go after the Media"

And you don't appear to have any proof of that at all.

---

Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.

---

I see Jill Biden has hijacked Oso's account ... again.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

Always a good sign

---

Lock up the all the media or just the "bad" media?

---

More irrational fear about things that might happen? come on

Republicans have long shown more deference to our Constitution and the liberties it provides than the Left has

---

You're right, we shouldn't believe what she said. Good point

---

I don't see anywhere that Pam Bondi said she would go after the Media

Do you have a link?

---

You.

Quote:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

---

Liberal Anchors at a propaganda outfit not liking her is a good sign yes

Means she is probably conservative and will take a hard look at the DOJ practices that were going on under Biden

Again....do you have a link where she said she would "go after the Media"?

---

Trump said it. Do you not believe Bondi will obey the boss?

More specifically, Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

---

Bondi will mostly likely follow where the law takes her and perform her duties as AG in a reasonable manner

Do you have any proof she will not?

Trump disliking some Media outlets (that have often lied about him) does not mean she is going to "go after the Media"

And you don't appear to have any proof of that at all.

---

Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.

---

Again....and I am sure you can read

Why are you accusing Bondi of things she never said and promises she never made?

Its almost like you are looking for excuses to oppose all of President Trump's nominees

---

I think Bondi is qualified.



Why do you hate truth, justice and the American way?

---

Then why are you lying and trying to imply that she is "going to attack the Media"

Why do you have Bondi and hate America?

---

LOL. I do have Bondi, not your boy Gaetz
You got to step up your game!

---

Your game seems to be making up lies about people like Bondi and implying she would break the law

That's not my game

Bondi deserves the benefit of the doubt and a chance to clean up the corrupt DOJ that you are a fan boy of

---

I thought Gaetz was your guy

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

Always a good sign

---

Lock up the all the media or just the "bad" media?

---

More irrational fear about things that might happen? come on

Republicans have long shown more deference to our Constitution and the liberties it provides than the Left has

---

You're right, we shouldn't believe what she said. Good point

---

I don't see anywhere that Pam Bondi said she would go after the Media

Do you have a link?

---

You.

Quote:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

---

Liberal Anchors at a propaganda outfit not liking her is a good sign yes

Means she is probably conservative and will take a hard look at the DOJ practices that were going on under Biden

Again....do you have a link where she said she would "go after the Media"?

---

Trump said it. Do you not believe Bondi will obey the boss?

More specifically, Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

---

Bondi will mostly likely follow where the law takes her and perform her duties as AG in a reasonable manner

Do you have any proof she will not?

Trump disliking some Media outlets (that have often lied about him) does not mean she is going to "go after the Media"

And you don't appear to have any proof of that at all.

---

Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.

---

Again....and I am sure you can read

Why are you accusing Bondi of things she never said and promises she never made?

Its almost like you are looking for excuses to oppose all of President Trump's nominees

---

I think Bondi is qualified.



Why do you hate truth, justice and the American way?

---

Then why are you lying and trying to imply that she is "going to attack the Media"

Why do you have Bondi and hate America?

---

LOL. I do have Bondi, not your boy Gaetz
You got to step up your game!

---

Your game seems to be making up lies about people like Bondi and implying she would break the law

That's not my game

Bondi deserves the benefit of the doubt and a chance to clean up the corrupt DOJ that you are a fan boy of

---

I thought Gaetz was your guy

---

You are the one who is creepily obsessed with the guy

Seriously sister just come out of the closet already

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

Always a good sign

---

Lock up the all the media or just the "bad" media?

---

More irrational fear about things that might happen? come on

Republicans have long shown more deference to our Constitution and the liberties it provides than the Left has

---

You're right, we shouldn't believe what she said. Good point

---

I don't see anywhere that Pam Bondi said she would go after the Media

Do you have a link?

---

You.

Quote:

---

MSNBC anchors seem to fear her quite a bit.

---

---

Liberal Anchors at a propaganda outfit not liking her is a good sign yes

Means she is probably conservative and will take a hard look at the DOJ practices that were going on under Biden

Again....do you have a link where she said she would "go after the Media"?

---

Trump said it. Do you not believe Bondi will obey the boss?

More specifically, Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

---

Bondi will mostly likely follow where the law takes her and perform her duties as AG in a reasonable manner

Do you have any proof she will not?

Trump disliking some Media outlets (that have often lied about him) does not mean she is going to "go after the Media"

And you don't appear to have any proof of that at all.

---

Trump has pledged to toss reporters in jail and strip major television networks of their broadcast licenses as retribution for coverage he didn't like.

---

Again....and I am sure you can read

Why are you accusing Bondi of things she never said and promises she never made?

Its almost like you are looking for excuses to oppose all of President Trump's nominees

---

I think Bondi is qualified.



Why do you hate truth, justice and the American way?

---

Then why are you lying and trying to imply that she is "going to attack the Media"

Why do you have Bondi and hate America?

---

LOL. I do have Bondi, not your boy Gaetz
You got to step up your game!

---

Your game seems to be making up lies about people like Bondi and implying she would break the law

That's not my game

Bondi deserves the benefit of the doubt and a chance to clean up the corrupt DOJ that you are a fan boy of

---

I thought Gaetz was your guy

---

You are the one who is creepily obsessed with the guy

Seriously sister just come out of the closet already

---

So you're no longer for Gaetz? Do you hate Trump?

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

Experimental cancer causing Vaccine mandates for the "pandemic", denying HCQ and IVM, any Dei warriors, border czars and those complicit

Fre3dombear said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

Experimental cancer causing Vaccine mandates for the "pandemic", denying HCQ and IVM, any Dei warriors, border czars and those complicit

---

The denying IVM is a big one to me... that says big $ pharma in bed with politicians all day.

Idk how u tackle that one. Would love to see it done.

Married A Horn said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

Experimental cancer causing Vaccine mandates for the "pandemic", denying HCQ and IVM, any Dei warriors, border czars and those complicit

---

The denying IVM is a big one to me... that says big $ pharma in bed with politicians all day.

Idk how u tackle that one. Would love to see it done.

---

Yeah and HCQ millions of people take it every day and have for decades for things like lupus.

Start with faucci and let a former baylor bear get to the bottom of the scam

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

These are the crimes?
What crimes did the prosecutors commit? Should they be in prison?

Married A Horn said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

Experimental cancer causing Vaccine mandates for the "pandemic", denying HCQ and IVM, any Dei warriors, border czars and those complicit

---

The denying IVM is a big one to me... that says big $ pharma in bed with politicians all day.

Idk how u tackle that one. Would love to see it done.

---

Ahh, the IVM felony
Prison is too good for them

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Exactly how is NOT prosecuting someone who broke law because of their political affiliation bad policy?

KaiBear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

These are the crimes?
What crimes did the prosecutors commit? Should they be in prison?

---

Someone is in prison for the Russia hoax. One guy, for making a slight edit to an email to change its meaning 180 degrees (in ways that propelled the narrative forward). The outrage is that he's the least, most minor player in the whole affair. Numerous false representations were made to a FISA court, and......poof.....no one got criminally investigated, much less prosecuted. Meanwhile, Trump was impeached twice for totally made up BS and Republicans are are getting early morning SWAT raids for process crimes.

The double standard gots to stop

---

Only way this flagrant double standard can end is through a thorough and complete overhaul of the federal bureaucracy beginning with the DOJ and FBI.

The courts will definitely slow Trump down. So it's vital Trump restore the economy and avoid foreign wars……so the American electorate will elect JD Vance to continue the house clean in 2028.

---

There is a fine line between restructuring for "efficiency" and self-benefit.

Just read an article that Musk wants DOE, NASA and DOD cut, to focus on public-private partnerships. No one else sees an issue with these guys doing away with Agency positions that control their access to Federal money? All three are Agencies that TESLA, SPACEX and his data companies had to go through for permitting and grants. So, get rid of the decision makers giving you a hard time. You have no issues here?

I bet Vivek goes after the Health field because that is where his companies have to meet Fed regulations. Used to call it the Fox guarding the Hen house, now you guys call it efficiency? Sorry, it smells just as rotten as the Libs plans.

It's generally a terrible idea to allow criminals to go unpunished. Politics should never be part of the equation but the fascists have done so much of that the past decade or so it's probably inevitable now.

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Exactly how is NOT prosecuting someone who broke law because of their political affiliation bad policy?

---

That's exactly what Dems will say in 2029 when the Republican perp walks begin

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

These are the crimes?
What crimes did the prosecutors commit? Should they be in prison?

---

Someone is in prison for the Russia hoax. One guy, for making a slight edit to an email to change its meaning 180 degrees (in ways that propelled the narrative forward). The outrage is that he's the least, most minor player in the whole affair. Numerous false representations were made to a FISA court, and......poof.....no one got criminally investigated, much less prosecuted. Meanwhile, Trump was impeached twice for totally made up BS and Republicans are are getting early morning SWAT raids for process crimes.

The double standard gots to stop

---

Only way this flagrant double standard can end is through a thorough and complete overhaul of the federal bureaucracy beginning with the DOJ and FBI.

The courts will definitely slow Trump down. So it's vital Trump restore the economy and avoid foreign wars……so the American electorate will elect JD Vance to continue the house clean in 2028.

---

There is a fine line between restructuring for "efficiency" and self-benefit.

Just read an article that Musk wants DOE, NASA and DOD cut, to focus on public-private partnerships. No one else sees an issue with these guys doing away with Agency positions that control their access to Federal money? All three are Agencies that TESLA, SPACEX and his data companies had to go through for permitting and grants. So, get rid of the decision makers giving you a hard time. You have no issues here?

I bet Vivek goes after the Health field because that is where his companies have to meet Fed regulations. Used to call it the Fox guarding the Hen house, now you guys call it efficiency? Sorry, it smells just as rotten as the Libs plans.

---

Who better to get rid of unneeded unwanted wasteful bureaucratic Departments the people who have had the pain in dealing with them?

Sic Em

KaiBear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Exactly how is NOT prosecuting someone who broke law because of their political affiliation bad policy?

---

That's exactly what Dems will say in 2029 when the Republican perp walks begin

---

You seem content to pretend the Dems didn't begin this garbage.

---

Not at all. I'd like to see it end, not escalate

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Exactly how is NOT prosecuting someone who broke law because of their political affiliation bad policy?

---

That's exactly what Dems will say in 2029 when the Republican perp walks begin

---

Wrong. They will slow their roll and give 2nd thoughts before trying again:

'Wait, this didnt work out to well for us the first time. Let's try something different.'

And, nice assumption that your oarty wins everything back in '28. Wishful thinking?

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Exactly how is NOT prosecuting someone who broke law because of their political affiliation bad policy?

---

That's exactly what Dems will say in 2029 when the Republican perp walks begin

---

Wrong. They will slow their roll and give 2nd thoughts before trying again:

'Wait, this didnt work out to well for us the first time. Let's try something different.'

And, nice assumption that your oarty wins everything back in '28. Wishful thinking?

---

Dems will win again in the future. If Republicans focus on retribution & who won in 2020, Dems will win sooner.

Oh, I agree they'll win again at some point. But where I disagree is that if this current republican administration doesnt put the criminals in jail, the dems will win sooner.

We elected them to drain the swamp. If they dont, it will be quite discouraging and kill voter turnout for the right. Trump and this cabinet are our best chance in decades, if not ever, to clean up Washington.

Leftists cannot distinguish between real crime & fake crimes. No surprise there: they don't know the difference between fake women & real women, fake men & real men, fake marriages & real marriages, fake science & real science, etc.

Married A Horn said:

---

Oh, I agree they'll win again at some point. But where I disagree is that if this current republican administration doesnt put the criminals in jail, the dems will win sooner.

We elected them to drain the swamp. If they dont, it will be quite discouraging and kill voter turnout for the right. Trump and this cabinet are our best chance in decades, if not ever, to clean up Washington.

---

I thought Musk/Vivek effort would be the best chance to drain the swamp.

Married A Horn said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Pam Bondi, AG from Florida is the new nominee

---

Much better choice.

---

Bad policy. When the next Democrat president is elected, will his AG prosecute the prosecutors who prosecute Biden's prosecutors. Bondi'd investigators will be investigated,. Lawfare never ends this way.

Pam Bondi, Trump's AG pick, said 'prosecutors will be prosecuted'
"The prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones," Bondi declared on Fox News in 2023, soon after Trump's fourth set of criminal charges. "The investigators will be investigated."
Bondi, a former Florida state attorney general, is drawing newfound attention since President-elect Trump announced his plans to nominate her to lead the Justice Department as U.S. attorney general.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/23/pam-bondi-doj-attorney-general-trump-pick/

---

you have it precisely backasswards.

It never ends if we do not have 2-3 perp walks for the most egregious examples of lawfare.

BOTH sides have fear the other. BOTH sides have to administer their days in power with the understanding that anything they do to the other side, the other side can do to them (the next time the other side wins an election). The devil on one shoulder whispering "do it" must be counterbalanced by the angel on the other whispering "would I want this done to me?"

Democrats moved so far outside of that structure that it suggested they were planning to never lose another election.

---

Committing bad policy vigorously doesn't transmute it into good policy. When Dems eventually come in they will prosecute your prosecutors & you'll be doing the perp walk

---

Oso: 'dont prosecute the treasonous criminal element of our party. There will be payback.'

How about we prosecute criminals and stop lawfare on everyone else?

---

That's exactly what the Democrats will say when they prosecute yall

---

They already do.

---

Do you believe that is good policy?

---

You confuse lawfare with prosecuting criminals.

Intentionally.

---

What crimes did the "criminals "commit. Please be specific

---

Hillary suiciding everyone.
Miley informing China.
Russia hoax - everyone that ordered and carried it out.
Pelosi's millions on making 175k per year.
Election fraud (although that is probably a system change more than criminal prosecution.)

Epstein island.

---

These are the crimes?
What crimes did the prosecutors commit? Should they be in prison?

---

Someone is in prison for the Russia hoax. One guy, for making a slight edit to an email to change its meaning 180 degrees (in ways that propelled the narrative forward). The outrage is that he's the least, most minor player in the whole affair. Numerous false representations were made to a FISA court, and......poof.....no one got criminally investigated, much less prosecuted. Meanwhile, Trump was impeached twice for totally made up BS and Republicans are are getting early morning SWAT raids for process crimes.

The double standard gots to stop

---

Only way this flagrant double standard can end is through a thorough and complete overhaul of the federal bureaucracy beginning with the DOJ and FBI.

The courts will definitely slow Trump down. So it's vital Trump restore the economy and avoid foreign wars……so the American electorate will elect JD Vance to continue the house clean in 2028.

---

There is a fine line between restructuring for "efficiency" and self-benefit.

Just read an article that Musk wants DOE, NASA and DOD cut, to focus on public-private partnerships. No one else sees an issue with these guys doing away with Agency positions that control their access to Federal money? All three are Agencies that TESLA, SPACEX and his data companies had to go through for permitting and grants. So, get rid of the decision makers giving you a hard time. You have no issues here?

I bet Vivek goes after the Health field because that is where his companies have to meet Fed regulations. Used to call it the Fox guarding the Hen house, now you guys call it efficiency? Sorry, it smells just as rotten as the Libs plans.

---

Who better to get rid of unneeded unwanted wasteful bureaucratic Departments the people who have had the pain in dealing with them?

Sic Em

---

Yeah and you will be the first *****ing of corruption when it impacts you. When there are flyovers by your home or being forced into an Electric car because Elon is all about EV. You were all over the COVID vaccine, do a little research on Vivek's past and where he makes his money. Yeah, you will be the first *****ing...

Come on Big guy, let's discuss actual Agencies. How about Elon wanting to eliminate the CFBB? Look it up, it was put in place AFTER 2008 to make sure it doesn't happen again. It is basically a police for the banking industry funded through the Fed Reserve. Elon is tweeting to eliminate it. Look it up. Seem like a good idea to you. Let's start talking specifics. Name an agency, what it does and why it should be eliminated. Should be easy with all the waste, right???