KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Woke insanity
140,561 Views |
1838 Replies |
Last: 1 hr ago by whitetrash
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
I just couldn't stand to be so limited in where I could actually go with such a tub.
Seems self defeating.
What is the old saying… the only thing better than owning boat is having a friend who owns a boat.
Realitybites said:
The paradox of boat ownership is that the larger your boat is, the more comfortable you will be while simultaneously restricting the places you can go.
There are a lot of really nice nooks and crannies on earth that a 30 footer could get to that a 287 foot one could not.
35-45 is the sweet spot.
A 287' yacht has a tender boat on board for those excursions. There are lots of places you're not coming near a dock with a ship that size.
GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
We have a friend in Miami with a fairly sizable yacht. He has a 68' Viking and a 43' Midnight Express as well. The dock/slip fees for his 68' are around $13,000/mo. Every time we take it out the fuel bill is a couple thousand dollars.
The bigger expense of a 287' is a full time captain, paying a channel captain to bring it to port, a full time crew, chef, mechanic and on and on and on.
There's a 0% chance Zuck ever gets to drive that boat more than a couple miles in the middle of the ocean with someone watching him like a 2yr old.
nein51 said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
We have a friend in Miami with a fairly sizable yacht. He has a 68' Viking and a 43' Midnight Express as well. The dock/slip fees for his 68' are around $13,000/mo. Every time we take it out the fuel bill is a couple thousand dollars.
The bigger expense of a 287' is a full time captain, paying a channel captain to bring it to port, a full time crew, chef, mechanic and on and on and on.
There's a 0% chance Zuck ever gets to drive that boat more than a couple miles in the middle of the ocean with someone watching him like a 2yr old.
Going to Key West this Thursday for a week of fishing.
Will be happy to take your friends 287 out for a spin.
No charge for my time !
KaiBear said:nein51 said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
We have a friend in Miami with a fairly sizable yacht. He has a 68' Viking and a 43' Midnight Express as well. The dock/slip fees for his 68' are around $13,000/mo. Every time we take it out the fuel bill is a couple thousand dollars.
The bigger expense of a 287' is a full time captain, paying a channel captain to bring it to port, a full time crew, chef, mechanic and on and on and on.
There's a 0% chance Zuck ever gets to drive that boat more than a couple miles in the middle of the ocean with someone watching him like a 2yr old.
Going to Key West this Thursday for a week of fishing.
Will be happy to take your friends 287 out for a spin.
No charge for my time !
Oh he's got a nice boat but it's not a 287'. Like an 87' give or take. Plenty big enough for a real serious party though.
nein51 said:Realitybites said:
The paradox of boat ownership is that the larger your boat is, the more comfortable you will be while simultaneously restricting the places you can go.
There are a lot of really nice nooks and crannies on earth that a 30 footer could get to that a 287 foot one could not.
35-45 is the sweet spot.
A 287' yacht has a tender boat on board for those excursions. There are lots of places you're not coming near a dock with a ship that size.
There are a lot of interesting places a 287 footer can't get within reasonable tender range of. Most yachts, even small ones, travel with tenders.
Realitybites said:nein51 said:Realitybites said:
The paradox of boat ownership is that the larger your boat is, the more comfortable you will be while simultaneously restricting the places you can go.
There are a lot of really nice nooks and crannies on earth that a 30 footer could get to that a 287 foot one could not.
35-45 is the sweet spot.
A 287' yacht has a tender boat on board for those excursions. There are lots of places you're not coming near a dock with a ship that size.
There are a lot of interesting places a 287 footer can't get within reasonable tender range of. Most yachts, even small ones, travel with tenders.
Yeah that's literally what I said.
nein51 said:KaiBear said:nein51 said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:GrowlTowel said:KaiBear said:
Honestly can't comprehend the need for such a monstrosity.
Sigmund Freud enters the chat. . .
Interesting
Please explain to me the rationale behind spending 120-240million dollars for a ship that is severely limited in the ports it can enter and whose upkeep will be additional millions of dollars every year ?
I was merely insinuating that Zuckerberg is short dicked.
The biggest rationale for the ship is prestige and bragging rights.
The other involves rich people economics. Zuckerberg is worth 230 billion. A $250 million yacht is roughly 0.10% of his net worth - that is the equivalent of a family making $50k purchasing a fictional used car for $50.00.
Other fun facts:
A yacht of this size usually depreciates between 5-10% annually until it reaches 50% depreciation - then it is only 1-2% for the remainder of the ship's life.
Maintenance and use costs would be around $12.5 - 25 million per year.
A lease for this ship would be between 500k - 1million per week.
We have a friend in Miami with a fairly sizable yacht. He has a 68' Viking and a 43' Midnight Express as well. The dock/slip fees for his 68' are around $13,000/mo. Every time we take it out the fuel bill is a couple thousand dollars.
The bigger expense of a 287' is a full time captain, paying a channel captain to bring it to port, a full time crew, chef, mechanic and on and on and on.
There's a 0% chance Zuck ever gets to drive that boat more than a couple miles in the middle of the ocean with someone watching him like a 2yr old.
Going to Key West this Thursday for a week of fishing.
Will be happy to take your friends 287 out for a spin.
No charge for my time !
Oh he's got a nice boat but it's not a 287'. Like an 87' give or take. Plenty big enough for a real serious party though.
I can be flexible !
"Unlike scientific inquiry, feminist studies rarely initiate self-correction when research and data demand it. The field tends to be isolated within an ideological echo chamber unfit for academia. Ideology reigns over empirical inquiry." pic.twitter.com/JdisDkq0Eu
— James L. Nuzzo, PhD (@JamesLNuzzo) December 9, 2025
Ana Kasparian is basically the same as Riley Gaines on this topic...amazing.
🚨NEW: Bill Maher *STUNNED* as Ana Kasparian opposes biological males in female spaces🚨
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) December 8, 2025
KASPARIAN: "Is it bad that I don't want to see a d*ck in the women's locker room? I just don't!"
MAHER: "So good to hear you say that. Really good. I did not expect that."@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/RfsPvp6X9N
Jack Bauer said:🚨NEW: Bill Maher *STUNNED* as Ana Kasparian opposes biological males in female spaces🚨
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) December 8, 2025
KASPARIAN: "Is it bad that I don't want to see a d*ck in the women's locker room? I just don't!"
MAHER: "So good to hear you say that. Really good. I did not expect that."@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/RfsPvp6X9N
Personally, I don't want to see a dong in the women's locker-room either. That certainly would have killed the Porky's franchise.
Or God forbid Booger exclaiming We Have Dong! in Revenge of the Nerds.
Oops..
BREAKING🚨: Eight teenagers from Philadelphia, visiting Florida for a youth football championship, were arrested after allegedly stealing over $2,000 worth of merchandise from a Dick's Sporting Goods store.
— Officer Lew (@officer_Lew) December 9, 2025
The group, members of a local youth team, reportedly believed they could… pic.twitter.com/DZDiyC4jWt
I'm back on social media, I'm back in the fight, and i'm here to stay.
— Kyle Rittenhouse (@rittenhouse2a) December 10, 2025
For a quick update, 6 months ago I made the best decision of my life and married my best friend. @BellRittenhouse, I couldn’t be happier. I love you beautiful.
More big announcements coming soon... pic.twitter.com/7gjG3wwZgy
This woman is not helping the Democrats...
Jennifer Welch complains that Erika Kirk wants women to know the joy of motherhood, claims she "weaponizes her gender," hates that she's young and beautiful, says "no one wants to be a Christian" because of her. pic.twitter.com/TOY59o5zSW
— Libby Emmons (@libbyemmons) December 10, 2025
Jack Bauer said:
This woman is not helping the Democrats...Jennifer Welch complains that Erika Kirk wants women to know the joy of motherhood, claims she "weaponizes her gender," hates that she's young and beautiful, says "no one wants to be a Christian" because of her. pic.twitter.com/TOY59o5zSW
— Libby Emmons (@libbyemmons) December 10, 2025
Those two on the left look like the kind that down 3-4 mimosas before 11am.