historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

historian said:

---

The civil rights laws apply to everyone. Even a private business can be sued for discrimination based on one's ethnicity, nationality, sex, or faith.

Our society is sensitive about these issues when the person is black, trans, Muslim, etc but seems to ignore or excuse (& often promote) the most blatant dxdd as makes when the victim is a white, heterosexual, Christian or male. If the victim is all of the above, they are singled out for worse treatment. People do have the right to express themselves, even if their it's repugnant & bigoted (1st amendment), but we also have equal protection under the laws (14th amendment). This means something in a nation founded on the principle that "all men are created equal" (Declaration & undeniable biblical fact). It does NOT mean that some are more equal than others (paraphrasing Orwell) which is the view of the Left.

Put another way, would the NBA have acted the same way of the player was outspoken in expressing his Muslim faith quoting the Koran? We all know the answer.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

Did they not defame his character when the said "conduct detrimental to the team"

---

Clown World just hit Trader Joe’s and it’s even more pathetic than it sounds.

This gender-confused white leftist with the nose ring sits in the parking lot whining that he can’t go inside because there are “too many white people” and he feels out of place.

Bro… have you looked… pic.twitter.com/IH9EXavn41

— LetsGoBFLO (@HistorianUSA1) March 29, 2026

nein51 said:

---

If they are really that concerned then they likely have social anxiety disorder which is very real. Most of these folks have serious mental health issues.

It's sort of crazy how big of a mental health crisis we have in this country and rather than trying to show compassion we tell them they are "normal".

The correct course of action is to be fair and compassionate but never to affirm delusions. It's not normal to think you might die because there are "too many white people" (which, in and of itself is insane). It's not normal to put tattoos all over your face and die your hair green. It's ok to be different…but not when it causes you so much anxiety you can't go inside a Trader Joe's.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

Did they not defame his character when the said "conduct detrimental to the team"

---

Defamation requires a statement of fact. "Conduct detrimental to the team" is a statement of opinion not a statement of fact. If you don't think attorneys approved the exact language used (to avoid potential liability), not sure what to tell you. Management is unlikely to post anything of that type without legal approval.

If there are contractual damages (unlikely due to the timing) that determination could be challenged. But without contractual damages, it is simply a difference of opinion not a defamation.

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

How is it possible for an entire middle school class to be “trans?” pic.twitter.com/JKBOMZXGK6

— Liberal Tear Creator™ (@LibTearCreator1) April 2, 2026

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

So you have zero basis for your argument. Noted.
Bluster some more if it helps.

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

How is it possible for an entire middle school class to be “trans?” pic.twitter.com/JKBOMZXGK6

— Liberal Tear Creator™ (@LibTearCreator1) April 2, 2026

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

So you have zero basis for your argument. Noted.
Bluster some more if it helps.

---

I wasn't making an argument. You are the only one arguing.

There are plenty cases of people who have sued because their employer fires them and it hurts their future chances of work.

Sorry you have not heard of those.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

So you have zero basis for your argument. Noted.
Bluster some more if it helps.

---

I wasn't making an argument. You are the only one arguing.

There are plenty cases of people who have sued because their employer fires them and it hurts their future chances of work.

Sorry you have not heard of those.

---

With "plenty of cases" certainly you can provide one cause of action asserted, the facts in support of that claim, and the outcome.

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

So you have zero basis for your argument. Noted.
Bluster some more if it helps.

---

I wasn't making an argument. You are the only one arguing.

There are plenty cases of people who have sued because their employer fires them and it hurts their future chances of work.

Sorry you have not heard of those.

---

With "plenty of cases" certainly you can provide one cause of action asserted, the facts in support of that claim, and the outcome.

---

Google.com

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

How is it possible for an entire middle school class to be “trans?” pic.twitter.com/JKBOMZXGK6

— Liberal Tear Creator™ (@LibTearCreator1) April 2, 2026

---

Looking for attention.

It is the "cool" thing to do right now.

Just the same as it is cool to be gay/lesbian or just gets kids attention but they really aren't and stop doing it in high school or college.

---

It's 100% a social contagion and it puts you at the top of the victim hierarchy.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

The civil rights laws apply to everyone. Even a private business can be sued for discrimination based on one's ethnicity, nationality, sex, or faith.

Our society is sensitive about these issues when the person is black, trans, Muslim, etc but seems to ignore or excuse (& often promote) the most blatant dxdd as makes when the victim is a white, heterosexual, Christian or male. If the victim is all of the above, they are singled out for worse treatment. People do have the right to express themselves, even if their it's repugnant & bigoted (1st amendment), but we also have equal protection under the laws (14th amendment). This means something in a nation founded on the principle that "all men are created equal" (Declaration & undeniable biblical fact). It does NOT mean that some are more equal than others (paraphrasing Orwell) which is the view of the Left.

Put another way, would the NBA have acted the same way of the player was outspoken in expressing his Muslim faith quoting the Koran? We all know the answer.

---

Again, you are mad. You are entitled to be angry. But anger doesn't equate to liability.
please list the statutes, regulations, and/or common law causes of action that a suit would assert.

you continue to confuse unhappiness with civil liability.
if unhappiness was a basis for litigation, imagine the MAGA v Antifa docket.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

historian said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

nein51 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Update on those who think Woke has been put away. It hasn't been. Not even close.

The only thing that's happened is that the vanguard of what we call Wokeism lost one election, so they're temporarily unable to fully leverage the power of the state to bolster their ideological… https://t.co/zsYbCk3yRD pic.twitter.com/miG5uzyNNE

— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) March 31, 2026

---

Conduct detrimental to the team...... aka.... He voiced his own thoughts and opinions but they are not in line with the leftist ideologue so we got rid of him.

---

If he's smart he's got an attorney and will make them prove in a court of law that his conduct was detrimental. Discovery should be super fun.

---

His contract expires at the end of this season. Bulls have 7 games remaining and are not in contention for the playoffs. Little chance he is out money. They simply cut him and make a final payment on contract (if not already done).

People are acting like it is a big deal. Bulls likely decided weeks/months ago that they were not going to be resigning him. They got some Leftie positive press for doing a basic nothing.

---

It's still a big deal because of their publicly stated reasoning for their actions and the timing. If they had waited awhile and not made it political the that would be the case. The Constitution and civil rights laws apply to all Americans, including Christian's.

---

You totally missed the point of the post.
Civil litigation is based on two issues: liability and damages.

i pointed out that he had suffered no contractual damages. Are you disputing that item?
If not, what is the beef?

Constitutional protections relate to governmental actions not the actions of private businesses.
maybe leave the legal commentary to the lawyers.

you are upset. Fine. Upset doesn't require lawyers and litigation.

---

While he may not have suffered a loss of money from his current contract it does seem he has an argument that they hurt his career moving forward if he doesn't sign with another team.

I had not heard of his post or any issue surrounding him UNTIL they released him. Almost like the storm was created by the Bulls and their actions. Not by his social media posts.

So if he doesn't sign with a new team it seems he has an argument to make that they hurt his career by making a big deal out of his posts when there was none.

---

Please tell the group which statute, regulation and/or common law cause of action is implicated.

---

Not my job to do.

---

So you have zero basis for your argument. Noted.
Bluster some more if it helps.

---

I wasn't making an argument. You are the only one arguing.

There are plenty cases of people who have sued because their employer fires them and it hurts their future chances of work.

Sorry you have not heard of those.

---

With "plenty of cases" certainly you can provide one cause of action asserted, the facts in support of that claim, and the outcome.

---

Google.com

---

So more blustering and no backup.
Baylor education should produce a better result.

---

So SecWar Pete Hegseth just fired Maj. Gen. William Green Jr., the US Army’s (now former) Chief of Chaplains.

I have zero insider information on this, but I have my own theories as to why it happened.

Green’s most important event as the Chief of Chaplains was to produce the…

— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) April 3, 2026

Wait. Wait. Wait.

I thought everyone knew about the chaplain corps move. Based on my DMs, maybe not.

Navy Chaplains assigned to the Marine Corps were resistant to the cultural revolution happening across the force.

So… Admiral Gilday, the avowed defender of Ibram X. Kendi,… https://t.co/mvWWapY5d3 pic.twitter.com/d7AKs8TPyy

— John Ʌ Konrad V (@johnkonrad) April 3, 2026

This kid was getting bullied for wearing a MAGA hat, but then the teacher stepped in.pic.twitter.com/VLiV9YOUI8

— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) April 4, 2026

cowboycwr said:

---

Making a prediction here......


Within a few days someone will drop a tweet in this thread in reference to Angel Reese and how she was traded away due to racism or some other BS. Not the fact that she is not that good of a player that doesn't score, only gets rebounds because they are her missed shots, is a locker room distraction, distracts from the team, and causes headaches with her divisive tweets.

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Making a prediction here......


Within a few days someone will drop a tweet in this thread in reference to Angel Reese and how she was traded away due to racism or some other BS. Not the fact that she is not that good of a player that doesn't score, only gets rebounds because they are her missed shots, is a locker room distraction, distracts from the team, and causes headaches with her divisive tweets.

---

Who is Angel Reese?

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Making a prediction here......


Within a few days someone will drop a tweet in this thread in reference to Angel Reese and how she was traded away due to racism or some other BS. Not the fact that she is not that good of a player that doesn't score, only gets rebounds because they are her missed shots, is a locker room distraction, distracts from the team, and causes headaches with her divisive tweets.

---

Who is Angel Reese?

---

Former player for Kim Mulkey.

---

cowboycwr said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Making a prediction here......


Within a few days someone will drop a tweet in this thread in reference to Angel Reese and how she was traded away due to racism or some other BS. Not the fact that she is not that good of a player that doesn't score, only gets rebounds because they are her missed shots, is a locker room distraction, distracts from the team, and causes headaches with her divisive tweets.

---

Who is Angel Reese?

---

Former player for Kim Mulkey.

---

Joking

I knew who she is. There's only about 4-5 names in the WNBA anyone knows. She is one of the small group known more for missing bunnies and getting her own boards than she is for any skill. That and she wants the notoriety that Clark gets without earning it.

Typical WNBA wannabe

---

Don't forget she wants NBA level money and claims she has earned it. She wants revenue sharing. But she doesn't realize that you can't share revenue when your league has none and only stays alive because the NBA teams keep them afloat.

---