Assassin said:

---

Cant wait to see the undoing of the Biden Crime Family aka Giuseppe Bideno Famiglia

---

Hope it happens...but not holding my breath.

Deep State has their own reasons to protect him and his family.

historian said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

IMO this is an extreme selection.

---

That's the whole point. We need a MAGA Darth Vader to go into the FBI and force choke every third employee.

---

Only concern is that he is going to do exactly what he complains the Dems did by weaponizing the FBI except for Trump's use

---

It's not weaponizing the government to expose lies and prosecute genuine criminals. That's government doing what we hire them to do but rarely get.

---

If the goal is accountability AND ending this type of abuse, it has to be done carefully. Or, it will not look like what you said to half the Nation.

Using an IG, would be the cleanest way. Patel gets involved, it is political whether you think so or not.

historian said:

---

“Patel nomination is an affront to professionals at the FBI.”

When you explain why the nomination happened and accidentally endorse it, but don’t realize it. https://t.co/EVDS8ofHCn

— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) December 1, 2024

---

Click on the Harry Litman part of it and read the replies. He is getting reamed

Assassin said:

---

historian said:

---

“Patel nomination is an affront to professionals at the FBI.”

When you explain why the nomination happened and accidentally endorse it, but don’t realize it. https://t.co/EVDS8ofHCn

— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) December 1, 2024

---

Click on the Harry Litman part of it and read the replies. He is getting reamed

---

Id like to... but not enough to get a social media account.

Married A Horn said:

---

Assassin said:

---

historian said:

---

“Patel nomination is an affront to professionals at the FBI.”

When you explain why the nomination happened and accidentally endorse it, but don’t realize it. https://t.co/EVDS8ofHCn

— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) December 1, 2024

---

Click on the Harry Litman part of it and read the replies. He is getting reamed

---

Id like to... but not enough to get a social media account.

---

here are a few notes:

Free To Speak
@FreeToSpeak71

Dec 1
Who are the mysterious "professionals" at the FBI?
- The ones who lied about Hunters laptop for over a year?
- The agents hunting down parents speaking at school board public meetings?
- The ones still ha ha investigating the Trump assassination attempts *yawn*
- The ones who
Show more
Hodgetwins

Dec 1
Traitors in the FBI are going to prison
AdamInHTownTX


Dec 1
"professionals at the FBI"

You're hilarious, Harold.
Marc Escens
@Marc_Escens

Dec 1
The more you object

The more it is proof they have the right guy for the job
Mark Delbridge
@DelbridgeMark1

Dec 1
Your tears sustain me in this time of joy.
James Kirkpatrick
@VDAREJamesK

Dec 1
Abolish this illegitimate agency
RED2024
@RED2024official

Dec 1
The FBI has lost the trust of the majority of this country. That's the real "affront." Kash is just as qualified, perhaps more so given his stint at DNI, as Comey was when Obama appointed him Director. I think the real probelm you have is with his race. Did I do that correctly?
Show more
EducatdHillbilly
@RobProvince


Dec 1
LOL Operation Mockingbird is very worried
Detroit84
@scbrown84

Dec 1
You're a garbage propagandist
@LivesObi

Dec 1
The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.


The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.

Assassin said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Assassin said:

---

historian said:

---

“Patel nomination is an affront to professionals at the FBI.”

When you explain why the nomination happened and accidentally endorse it, but don’t realize it. https://t.co/EVDS8ofHCn

— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) December 1, 2024

---

Click on the Harry Litman part of it and read the replies. He is getting reamed

---

Id like to... but not enough to get a social media account.

---

here are a few notes:

Free To Speak
@FreeToSpeak71

Dec 1
Who are the mysterious "professionals" at the FBI?
- The ones who lied about Hunters laptop for over a year?
- The agents hunting down parents speaking at school board public meetings?
- The ones still ha ha investigating the Trump assassination attempts *yawn*
- The ones who
Show more
Hodgetwins

Dec 1
Traitors in the FBI are going to prison
AdamInHTownTX


Dec 1
"professionals at the FBI"

You're hilarious, Harold.
Marc Escens
@Marc_Escens

Dec 1
The more you object

The more it is proof they have the right guy for the job
Mark Delbridge
@DelbridgeMark1

Dec 1
Your tears sustain me in this time of joy.
James Kirkpatrick
@VDAREJamesK

Dec 1
Abolish this illegitimate agency
RED2024
@RED2024official

Dec 1
The FBI has lost the trust of the majority of this country. That's the real "affront." Kash is just as qualified, perhaps more so given his stint at DNI, as Comey was when Obama appointed him Director. I think the real probelm you have is with his race. Did I do that correctly?
Show more
EducatdHillbilly
@RobProvince


Dec 1
LOL Operation Mockingbird is very worried
Detroit84
@scbrown84

Dec 1
You're a garbage propagandist
@LivesObi

Dec 1
The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.


The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.

---

Sweetness. Lol... all great!

Thanks!

Married A Horn said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Assassin said:

---

historian said:

---

“Patel nomination is an affront to professionals at the FBI.”

When you explain why the nomination happened and accidentally endorse it, but don’t realize it. https://t.co/EVDS8ofHCn

— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) December 1, 2024

---

Click on the Harry Litman part of it and read the replies. He is getting reamed

---

Id like to... but not enough to get a social media account.

---

here are a few notes:

Free To Speak
@FreeToSpeak71

Dec 1
Who are the mysterious "professionals" at the FBI?
- The ones who lied about Hunters laptop for over a year?
- The agents hunting down parents speaking at school board public meetings?
- The ones still ha ha investigating the Trump assassination attempts *yawn*
- The ones who
Show more
Hodgetwins

Dec 1
Traitors in the FBI are going to prison
AdamInHTownTX


Dec 1
"professionals at the FBI"

You're hilarious, Harold.
Marc Escens
@Marc_Escens

Dec 1
The more you object

The more it is proof they have the right guy for the job
Mark Delbridge
@DelbridgeMark1

Dec 1
Your tears sustain me in this time of joy.
James Kirkpatrick
@VDAREJamesK

Dec 1
Abolish this illegitimate agency
RED2024
@RED2024official

Dec 1
The FBI has lost the trust of the majority of this country. That's the real "affront." Kash is just as qualified, perhaps more so given his stint at DNI, as Comey was when Obama appointed him Director. I think the real probelm you have is with his race. Did I do that correctly?
Show more
EducatdHillbilly
@RobProvince


Dec 1
LOL Operation Mockingbird is very worried
Detroit84
@scbrown84

Dec 1
You're a garbage propagandist
@LivesObi

Dec 1
The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.


The "professionals" at the
@FBI
staged a COUP against a sitting President to cover up the stolen 2020 election.

How do I know?

I was there, and recorded it.

Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland are going to be charged with 18USC1001 at the minimum.

---

Sweetness. Lol... all great!

Thanks!

---

I think Litman is most concerned for his 'friends' that are about to get a full anal reaming. It's coming and no matter how good a lawyer he is, they are gonna get bent over

I suppose one could say that everything the government is political to some degree. With the Left that's definitely the case. However one describes it, something must be done to clean up the rot.

historian said:

---

I suppose one could say that everything the government is political to some degree. With the Left that's definitely the case. However one describes it, something must be done to clean up the rot.

---

I don't think we can fully obliterate all far left liberals, can we? Total eradication, kinda like spraying for cockroaches?

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Their punishment should be way worse than what those people got. I assume Trump is going to pardon most if not all the J6ers? Haven't heard one way or the other - but they are all political prisoners who have been stripped of due process.

Married A Horn said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Their punishment should be way worse than what those people got. I assume Trump is going to pardon most if not all the J6ers? Haven't heard one way or the other - but they are all political prisoners who have been stripped of due process.

---

They just had a Presidential Historian lady on Fox talking about that. She hated the Biden pardon and didnt recommend that Trump pardon the J6 folk, mainly due to the damage caused, from what I understood.

Of course not! They are still humans and there still is hope for some of them. (Not that I took that statement very seriously). However, I don't label them as "liberal" because it's not accurate. They are Leftists, socialists, communists, or fascists. I often find the last is the most accurate.

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

FLBear5630 said:

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

---

The fbi was all over the place.
There is actually good investigative journalism all over it at revolver news.

https://revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/?_gl=1*17un4cw*_ga*Njc3OTMyMjE5LjE3MzMyODE3NzU.*_ga_XJ99YMQQS8*MTczMzI4MTc3NS4xLjEuMTczMzI4MTg0OS4wLjAuMA..

Sniffing the contents of Melania's underwear drawer was the unforgivable sin.

BearFan33 said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

---

The fbi was all over the place.
There is actually good investigative journalism all over it at revolver news.

https://revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/?_gl=1*17un4cw*_ga*Njc3OTMyMjE5LjE3MzMyODE3NzU.*_ga_XJ99YMQQS8*MTczMzI4MTc3NS4xLjEuMTczMzI4MTg0OS4wLjAuMA..

---

Revolver news? You really need to check bias in your sources and not believe everything put out there. Here is a site that will tell you if the source is valid. Revolver is questionable at best. There are no fact checks that support this view. Don't tell me, ALL the others are in on it? There is no evidence to support this but questionable sites.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=Revolver

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

---

The fbi was all over the place.
There is actually good investigative journalism all over it at revolver news.

https://revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/?_gl=1*17un4cw*_ga*Njc3OTMyMjE5LjE3MzMyODE3NzU.*_ga_XJ99YMQQS8*MTczMzI4MTc3NS4xLjEuMTczMzI4MTg0OS4wLjAuMA..

---

Revolver news? You really need to check bias in your sources and not believe everything put out there. Here is a site that will tell you if the source is valid. Revolver is questionable at best. There are no fact checks that support this view. Don't tell me, ALL the others are in on it? There is no evidence to support this but questionable sites.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=Revolver

---

You may want to check bias on the page you cited for checking bias... https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=CNN, slight to moderate liberal? How about far left fringe lunacy?

---

NPR was listed as factual and lean left LOL.

I'm thinking mediabiasfactcheck leans left.

With that said if you go through the revolver stuff with an open mind, its quite compelling, When Wray was questioned about some of it he squirmed and turned red and went to the old ongoing investigation dodge.

When Kash pulls back the curtain, I think we are going to find the revolver work was spot on.

BearFan33 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

---

The fbi was all over the place.
There is actually good investigative journalism all over it at revolver news.

https://revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/?_gl=1*17un4cw*_ga*Njc3OTMyMjE5LjE3MzMyODE3NzU.*_ga_XJ99YMQQS8*MTczMzI4MTc3NS4xLjEuMTczMzI4MTg0OS4wLjAuMA..

---

Revolver news? You really need to check bias in your sources and not believe everything put out there. Here is a site that will tell you if the source is valid. Revolver is questionable at best. There are no fact checks that support this view. Don't tell me, ALL the others are in on it? There is no evidence to support this but questionable sites.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=Revolver

---

You may want to check bias on the page you cited for checking bias... https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=CNN, slight to moderate liberal? How about far left fringe lunacy?

---

NPR was listed as factual and lean left LOL.

I'm thinking mediabiasfactcheck leans left.

With that said if you go through the revolver stuff with an open mind, its quite compelling, When Wray was questioned about some of it he squirmed and turned red and went to the old ongoing investigation dodge.

When Kash pulls back the curtain, I think we are going to find the revolver work was spot on.

---

Compelling is different than facts. I agree with compelling, but there is still no proof. I am sick of people showing things as fact when there is no proof. Usually it goes "but when we see the real data it will show". It rarely does.

Married A Horn said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Gonna be really interesting to find out if the rumors about FBI agents being part of the Jan 6th crowd incognito are true. Did they spur the crowd on? What part did they play in it?

---

Thats been pretty well documented. It's not a question of whether or not the FBI has undercover operatives on J6 to instigate a riot, it's a question of how many and how far they went. The CIA was also there, supposedly.

---

Documented by whom? I cannot find one fact check that agrees with you on J6.

---

The fbi was all over the place.
There is actually good investigative journalism all over it at revolver news.

https://revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/?_gl=1*17un4cw*_ga*Njc3OTMyMjE5LjE3MzMyODE3NzU.*_ga_XJ99YMQQS8*MTczMzI4MTc3NS4xLjEuMTczMzI4MTg0OS4wLjAuMA..

---

Revolver news? You really need to check bias in your sources and not believe everything put out there. Here is a site that will tell you if the source is valid. Revolver is questionable at best. There are no fact checks that support this view. Don't tell me, ALL the others are in on it? There is no evidence to support this but questionable sites.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=Revolver

---

You may want to check bias on the page you cited for checking bias... https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=CNN, slight to moderate liberal? How about far left fringe lunacy?

---

NPR was listed as factual and lean left LOL.

I'm thinking mediabiasfactcheck leans left.

With that said if you go through the revolver stuff with an open mind, its quite compelling, When Wray was questioned about some of it he squirmed and turned red and went to the old ongoing investigation dodge.

When Kash pulls back the curtain, I think we are going to find the revolver work was spot on.

---

Compelling is different than facts. I agree with compelling, but there is still no proof. I am sick of people showing things as fact when there is no proof. Usually it goes "but when we see the real data it will show". It rarely does.

---

You can't do that anymore - otherwise we'd still think Hunter's laptop was disinformation and the Russia Russia Russia was real. Rule of Thumb: If a democrat politician says it, its a lie. Start there and you'll be right 95% of the time.

---

A solid place to start.

Wray resigned.

BearFan33 said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Wray resigned.

---

Good riddance. He turned out to be huge disappointment. Continued the weaponization and politization of the department.

---

Let's see how much actually changes, last time Trump put Wray in. He is now the devil...

Will Patel get confirmed and if so let's see what he does when he has to actually perform, as well as reform.

As you said, Wray was a disappointment. All these disappointments? Why? Maybe when you actually have to do the job they see the data and info they realize there is not much they can do and still deliver? Oh maybe a firing or two like Strzok and Page.

So, do we get reform or some token sacrifices? Promote those that agree with Trump, basically more of the same?

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Wray resigned.

---

Good riddance. He turned out to be huge disappointment. Continued the weaponization and politization of the department.

---

Let's see how much actually changes, last time Trump put Wray in. He is now the devil...

Will Patel get confirmed and if so let's see what he does when he has to actually perform, as well as reform.

As you said, Wray was a disappointment. All these disappointments? Why? Maybe when you actually have to do the job they see the data and info they realize there is not much they can do and still deliver? Oh maybe a firing or two like Strzok and Page.

So, do we get reform or some token sacrifices? Promote those that agree with Trump, basically more of the same?

---

Cover pages
Cover stories
Fabricated stories

Nothing to see folks. Move along.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Wray resigned.

---

Good riddance. He turned out to be huge disappointment. Continued the weaponization and politization of the department.

---

Let's see how much actually changes, last time Trump put Wray in. He is now the devil...

Will Patel get confirmed and if so let's see what he does when he has to actually perform, as well as reform.

As you said, Wray was a disappointment. All these disappointments? Why? Maybe when you actually have to do the job they see the data and info they realize there is not much they can do and still deliver? Oh maybe a firing or two like Strzok and Page.

So, do we get reform or some token sacrifices? Promote those that agree with Trump, basically more of the same?

---

Cover pages
Cover stories
Fabricated stories

Nothing to see folks. Move along.

---

Only difference is political slant....