FBI had 2 dozen assets at Capitol on J6

7,451 Views | 188 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by Assassin
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This should surprise no one.

BREAKING: January 6 Inspector General Says at Least Two Dozen FBI Assets Were in the Crowd During Riot

https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2024/12/12/the-january-6-inspector-generals-report-reveals-at-least-two-dozen-fbi-agents-in-crowd-n4935063
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fbi initially posted a bunch of wanted people pictures, some of the most violent actors, only to remove them quickly thereafter from their website. These are the unindicted co-conspirators who participated but oddly weren't charged. It's like one part of the fbi was not talking to the other.

It was an inside job, coordinated with some capitol police and Pelosi to make Trump look bad and give the fbi pretext to persecute and further spy on conservatives. Sure there were plenty of idiots who participated organically, but that doesn't change the fact that it was a set up.

Don't forget the cinematically dramatic national guard troops (deployed too late to do anything) and fencing used by Nancy to get her photo ops.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is that called in legal terms? Entrapment?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jbbear said:

Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.


At this point it is fairly obvious the pipe bomb planter was either a active FBI agent or a FBI asset.

It's why they have never made an arrest
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can we prosecute the agents and whoever had a hand in that?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is a reason the Stalin Show Trial destroyed all its records and the Democrats would not release the videos.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't wait for Trump to move in place. Gonna be one hell of a firestorm

Expect the liberal networks to come into line quickly and a lot of liberal newscasters to be at the unemployment office. The first network besides FOX to come on board is gonna get a lot of political capital.

Add, it's gonna be really, really interesting to find out all the politicians paid off by drug cartels who don't want to lose that $20 billion a year in biz deals in the USA. Drug smuggling, kidnapping, paid hits, creating fentynal, you name it. Expect all the major cities Cali, Chicago and NYC politicians to get hit really, really hard. And how high up the chain do the payoffs go?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

jbbear said:

Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.


At this point it is fairly obvious the pipe bomb planter was either a active FBI agent or a FBI asset.

It's why they have never made an arrest


Link, or just your theory?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
paid assets, not agents..

If that makes you feel better

Paid assets tried to kidnap the Mich gov
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jan 20th can't come soon enough. Time for the clowns to exit.
midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden pardoned a woman today for running the worst presidential campaign ever. Will Hillary want the same?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midgett said:

Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.



To put it in context:


Starsky and Hutch were not there on J6, but 26 Huggy Bears were.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

jbbear said:

Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.


At this point it is fairly obvious the pipe bomb planter was either a active FBI agent or a FBI asset.

It's why they have never made an arrest


Link, or just your theory?
A reasonable and logical theory

Unlikely that your favorite alphabet agency will ever come out and tell the American people the truth.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.

Government investigates Government….finds no wrongdoing
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.

Government investigates Government….finds no wrongdoing
Cant wait for DOGE vs Government. No telling where DOGE might end up going
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.

Government investigates Government….finds no wrongdoing



Again Jan 20th can't come soon enough l. Time for the clowns to pack up and get the f out of DC.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://revolver.news/2024/12/doj-finally-releases-suppressed-ig-report-on-jan-6-heres-what-theyre-still-covering-up/

The whole story is on this site. They have been reporting on it for years. It is what investigative journalism is supposed to look like, not the advocacy journalism we get from most places.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:



A few initial thought reading DOJ IG report on Jan 6:

(1) The IG did not interview Chris Wray. The findings here completely contradict Wray's assertions that the FBI was caught by surprise as to the events of January 6 as well as his prevarications about the use of informants.

(2) Former FBI Deputy Director David Bowdich, who sat for an interview with J6 committee, also declined to participate in an interview.

(3) This report does not fully account for the informants embedded in "militia" groups or online chats before January 6. We know from Proud Boys trial several CHSes were making inflammatory comments in group chats but (very likely) did not travel to DC. The total number of informants somehow involved in Jan 6 is possibly in the hundreds.

(4) To wit: Informants tied to at least 14 FBI field offices were surveilling subjects, chatter about Jan 6

(5) And just like the deployment of National Guard, we are expected to believe that confusion, lack of preparedness, and failure to follow protocol resulted in the FBI "missing" intelligence about Jan 6 rather than the product of something far more sinister.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whether they're agents or informants is irrelevant.

Did the FBI direct people to cause mob mentality? If so, there needs to be justice and retribution for such actions.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's see: stop it so no harm comes to anyone, including getting shot & killed inside our capital.

Or: incite it cause Orange Man bad and we can use it against him.

The left is EVIL - not politically different. If you want to discuss taxes, education, welfare, etc - great. That is a difference of political opinion. That's not what they are anymore... they are pure evil.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
America's Left today are fascists and they use the tactics of historical fascists from a century ago: the FBI acts like the Gestapo, mobs of thugs terrorize the population like the brown shirts or black shirts, corrupt prosecutors & judges pervert the law to persecute the innocent while violating their rights (J6ers, Trump, Daniel Penny, etc), censorship, collusion with large corporations at the expense if everyone else, gross distortions of the economy with harmful results, etc.
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midgett said:

Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

midgett said:

Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.
Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

trey3216 said:

midgett said:

Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.
Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.
Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Over the last few years ; the evidence is overwhelming.

The FBI or at least sections of it have gone rogue.

Time to clean house.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Over the last few years ; the evidence is overwhelming.

The FBI or at least sections of it have gone rogue.

Time to clean house.
1. We have one clear case of the FBI setting up an innocent group and inciting a plot (Michigan governor)

2. No one can explain the Ray Epps situation (when myriad others who did exponentially less were treated like terrorists)

3. Why did Nancy Pelosi not properly order security?

4. Why did the Democrats refuse to release all the tapes?

5. Why did the January 6 Stalin Show Trial destroy its records?

It was purely the Reichstag Fire ... appropriate for regressive fascists.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Wangchung said:

trey3216 said:

midgett said:

Osodecentx said:

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.


Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.
Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.
Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).
You can stop pretending the Jan 6th gathering was like any other gathering as far as the FBI is concerned. We saw Epps and his treatment afterwards. We saw the barriers moved and doors opened and guided tours by police. We all asked why there wasn't more security. It is obvious to any unbiased observer that it was a set up used to go after the political opponents of democrats. Hours of security footage hidden, evidence destroyed by the Jan 6th committee, magical pipe bombs that appeared out of nowhere, Pelosi admitting fault, FBI assets throughout the crowd... only an idiot would claim it's all coincidence.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Political theater. Dems thought it will help them more. It didn't.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.