BREAKING: January 6 Inspector General Says at Least Two Dozen FBI Assets Were in the Crowd During Riot
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2024/12/12/the-january-6-inspector-generals-report-reveals-at-least-two-dozen-fbi-agents-in-crowd-n4935063
jbbear said:
Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.
It’s no coincidence that FBI Director Wray announced his resignation just prior to the release of the IG report exposing activities of FBI confidential human sources at the Capitol on Jan 6.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 12, 2024
For four years, I pressed for answers on this. Now the malfeasance is finally exposed.
Redbrickbear said:jbbear said:
Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.
At this point it is fairly obvious the pipe bomb planter was either a active FBI agent or a FBI asset.
It's why they have never made an arrest
paid assets, not agents..Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
midgett said:Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Wordplay by the left.
The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.
The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.
Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.
There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
A reasonable and logical theoryOsodecentx said:Redbrickbear said:jbbear said:
Amazingly they have never figured out who planted the so called "pipe bomb" that could have killed Giggles.
They set him up every chance they could get. Now it's time to set them out to pasture.
At this point it is fairly obvious the pipe bomb planter was either a active FBI agent or a FBI asset.
It's why they have never made an arrest
Link, or just your theory?
Osodecentx said:
F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.
Cant wait for DOGE vs Government. No telling where DOGE might end up goingRedbrickbear said:Osodecentx said:
F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.
Government investigates Government….finds no wrongdoing
Redbrickbear said:Osodecentx said:
F.B.I. Didn't Instruct Informants to Encourage Violence at Capitol, Report Says
The review acknowledged that several informants were in Washington on Jan. 6, but said that only a handful were collecting information for the F.B.I. that day, contrary to conspiracy theories.
Government investigates Government….finds no wrongdoing
A few initial thought reading DOJ IG report on Jan 6:
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 12, 2024
(1) The IG did not interview Chris Wray. The findings here completely contradict Wray's assertions that the FBI was caught by surprise as to the events of January 6 as well as his prevarications about the use of informants.…
A few initial thought reading DOJ IG report on Jan 6:historian said:A few initial thought reading DOJ IG report on Jan 6:
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 12, 2024
(1) The IG did not interview Chris Wray. The findings here completely contradict Wray's assertions that the FBI was caught by surprise as to the events of January 6 as well as his prevarications about the use of informants.…
If we don’t believe the FBI, why would we believe what they told the IG? https://t.co/UpqMk9NJWC
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) December 12, 2024
26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.midgett said:Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Wordplay by the left.
The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.
The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.
Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.
There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.trey3216 said:26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.midgett said:Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Wordplay by the left.
The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.
The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.
Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.
There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).Wangchung said:Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.trey3216 said:26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.midgett said:Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Wordplay by the left.
The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.
The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.
Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.
There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.
1. We have one clear case of the FBI setting up an innocent group and inciting a plot (Michigan governor)KaiBear said:
Over the last few years ; the evidence is overwhelming.
The FBI or at least sections of it have gone rogue.
Time to clean house.
You can stop pretending the Jan 6th gathering was like any other gathering as far as the FBI is concerned. We saw Epps and his treatment afterwards. We saw the barriers moved and doors opened and guided tours by police. We all asked why there wasn't more security. It is obvious to any unbiased observer that it was a set up used to go after the political opponents of democrats. Hours of security footage hidden, evidence destroyed by the Jan 6th committee, magical pipe bombs that appeared out of nowhere, Pelosi admitting fault, FBI assets throughout the crowd... only an idiot would claim it's all coincidence.trey3216 said:Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).Wangchung said:Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.trey3216 said:26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.midgett said:Osodecentx said:
FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.
Wordplay by the left.
The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.
The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.
Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.
There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.