For the COVID conspiracy nut jobs

1,734 Views | 38 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by historian
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA.

Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream YEARS after their last shot.

One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later.

The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals.

According to
@AlexBerenson
, these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals.

This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as "absurd" and publicly supported vaccine mandates.

However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the "safe and effective" narrative propagated by the government and media.

As
@MidwesternDoc
explains:

"A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove 'long vax' is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it)."

As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption

Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?

Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.

Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.

In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.

There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?

You might want to watch this and learn someting.


So now I need to read all the studies the TikTok nutritionist paid for by the sugar industry cited? Sorry, **** for brains pin cushion, but it's not my job to research your argument for you. If you have some specific data you believe supports your baseless claims that healthy kids needed the vaccine, I'd suggest you share it. Otherwise, you're full of **** as usual.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption

Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?

Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.

Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.

In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.

There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?

You might want to watch this and learn someting.




Wait, you are asking people to go through each of the studies cited by your tick tocker and then tell you what the tick tocker got wrong?
Incredible, isn't it? He clearly doesn't understand the burden of proof.

I have long thought this dude was a bot paid for by Big Pharma. It's looking more and more like that is the case.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the COVID Nazi nut jobs!

Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.