For the COVID conspiracy nut jobs

2,525 Views | 42 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by Tempus Edax Rerum
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA.

Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream YEARS after their last shot.

One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later.

The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals.

According to
@AlexBerenson
, these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals.

This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as "absurd" and publicly supported vaccine mandates.

However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the "safe and effective" narrative propagated by the government and media.

As
@MidwesternDoc
explains:

"A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove 'long vax' is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it)."

As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption

Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?

Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.

Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.

In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.

There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?

You might want to watch this and learn someting.


So now I need to read all the studies the TikTok nutritionist paid for by the sugar industry cited? Sorry, **** for brains pin cushion, but it's not my job to research your argument for you. If you have some specific data you believe supports your baseless claims that healthy kids needed the vaccine, I'd suggest you share it. Otherwise, you're full of **** as usual.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption

Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?

Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.

Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.

In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.

There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?

You might want to watch this and learn someting.




Wait, you are asking people to go through each of the studies cited by your tick tocker and then tell you what the tick tocker got wrong?
Incredible, isn't it? He clearly doesn't understand the burden of proof.

I have long thought this dude was a bot paid for by Big Pharma. It's looking more and more like that is the case.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the COVID Nazi nut jobs!

TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Healthy kids needed the shot like they needed an enlarged and damaged heart. Umh wait, I meant hole in the heart, umh no I meant head...
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?



“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrojanMoondoggie said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

TrojanMoondoggie said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.

Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
You left out soccer fans.

Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
They can mock the people who utter "conspiracy" all they want.

But when you look at how liberals approached it, why wouldn't people have questions about it?

DT was accused of not taking it seriously at first. And he was demonized for it. Even though JB also was telling the people not to worry about it either.

Then it started spreading. Things didn't look good. DT started curtailing and/or closely monitoring flights coming in from Asia. He was called the "r" word by the left. (And oh yeah, remember how they later said he did nothing to stop it?). NP ran out to SF and start playing kissy kissy with the locals, without a mask, in Chinatown, probably just to spite DT.

As the virus started to really take hold, the liberals wanted a shutdown of the country. Even though they were the ones so often caught running around without a mask, letting their kids go to their private schools, while the rest of America was being demonized for not wearing a mask.

Then they blamed DT for the economy.

CA was in lockdown from the get go. FL wasn't. CA had a lot of deaths. So did FL. But FL's percentage was not that much worse. And their economy was still fine. Ours wasn't. This while our governor was caught a couple of times out hobnobbing with friends. Without a mask.

We thought covid was a highly concerning problem, governor.

Then there were the questions surrounding the true causes of deaths. My neighbor is a retired fireman and said his buddies had quite a few stories where deaths were listed as covid, when it was something entirely different that took the life of the patient/victim. But because he or she had covid in their body, that was listed as the cause of death.

I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there were way too many questions out there.

Yes, people died. But how much truth did we really get from it? It was understandable that people had questions.

And in closing, let's not forget operation warp speed. When a vaccine was developed under DT's administration. But JB and KH said they wouldn't take anything that came about under DT.

But funny how after JB won the presidency, suddenly he was all about the vaccine! And was even suggesting some mandatory vaccine idea that he floated.

The libs played politics with covid, as well as the vaccine, since day one. There's no reason why people wouldn't question it.




Except when you study the numbers, as has been done many times, and realize the vaccine saved a ton of lives.

If it did, then DT should have been reelected on that fact alone. After all, he oversaw the warp speed development of this vaccine, correct?

Yet liberals complained about how he handled the situation. And some of the more prominent left leaning people in DC questioned the vaccine itself. Undoubtedly because DT was at the helm at the time.

But of course after they took back the White House their whole attitude changed. It went from questioning the vaccine, to everyone needs to get the vaccine, to darned near mandating the vaccine.

Sorry, the libs had their confused hands all over this.

It's perfectly okay to question it. Without being a conspiracy monger.

The libs themselves gave us reason to question it.


Even worse. The voices and faces of the dei democrat party said full throated "I will not take the Donald trump Vaccine!!!!"

Then they took it. Lmao
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.