JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says "we have almost no inflation" and may drop to 1%. pic.twitter.com/hCGeGUMHcS

— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) November 7, 2025

From the "You gotta be kidding" department, Had no idea she was a FLOTUS

Liberals are now comparing Zohran Mamdani’s wife to Melania Trump, saying she’s “way hotter” and will do more for this country than Melania ever has.

What are your thoughts ?? pic.twitter.com/lZ5UdfYFRM

— Val (@TrumpsHurricane) November 7, 2025

As the Worm tuns

Tonight, I voted to proceed to debate on a resolution that would terminate the escalation of operations—covert, military, economic, or otherwise—against Venezuela without explicit approval from Congress.

I have been briefed multiple times and reviewed classified documents that…

— Sen. Lisa Murkowski (@lisamurkowski) November 7, 2025

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Steve Bannon: If we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included.
pic.twitter.com/O1iyPipz0n

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) November 6, 2025

---

Both parties upping the ante on politicizing the DOJ. Trump clearly trying to do it even more than Biden did, and guess what the Dems will do once they get back into power?

---

Clearly more than Biden? Source, please.

---

Biden did not direct prosecutions, at least not openly. Trump is saying out loud that he doesn't know of crimes people have committed, but that they need to be charged anyways. It is total banana republic zone here.

Sorry P man. but it's still multiple rigged trials used against Trump, versus some mean tweets and scary investigations for the Deep State thugs .


You're not gonna win over any reasonable people, and the ones on your side, no decent person wants on their side.

BESSENT: Many blue states are refusing to include parts of Trump’s working-class tax bill, no tax on tips, overtime, Social Security, or American made cars bc of TDS. They want to hurt their own ppl to keep them from doing well. The One BBB is retroactive and ppl have not changed… pic.twitter.com/YUqzaapwHL

— Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) November 7, 2025

Brazilian owned meatpacker JBS, through its U.S. subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride, donated $5 million to the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee, which was the largest single contribution to the fund.

As long as we don’t have country of origin labels on our beef, this is all just B.S! pic.twitter.com/Nf8Q5xNx2X

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 7, 2025

Assassin said:

---

From the "You gotta be kidding" department, Had no idea she was a FLOTUS

Liberals are now comparing Zohran Mamdani’s wife to Melania Trump, saying she’s “way hotter” and will do more for this country than Melania ever has.

What are your thoughts ?? pic.twitter.com/lZ5UdfYFRM

— Val (@TrumpsHurricane) November 7, 2025

---

Not even close. I wouldn't even give her a second look on the street. She does not look good in that picture at all.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Sorry P man. but it's still multiple rigged trials used against Trump, versus some mean tweets and scary investigations for the Deep State thugs .

You're not gonna win over any reasonable people, and the ones on your side, no decent person wants on their side.

---

Trump did violate the law though. They might have trumped up the charges, but nobody was saying "we aren't sure Trump broke the law, but let's getem anyways." Trump broke several laws. We all know it.

Even Bondi won't bring some of these charges, so Trump is ousting respected career prosecutors to put in his own personal lawyers in who will bring charges.

You are beyond reason, but I'm still replying to anyone else reading. There is no question that Trump is weaponizing the DOJ more than ever, and being quite open about it. At least that part is refreshing.

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

But she was Ayatollah-approved!

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Indeed

Scarlett Johansson calls out the rise in antisemitism while speaking with Israeli news channel.

“I think whenever people are spewing any kind of hate, I am always concerned that they’re going to be physically violent as well.” pic.twitter.com/VVphpbkjcg

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) November 7, 2025

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

Assassin said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Indeed

---

The bolded is not a DOJ prosecutor. You can blame that squarely on voters. Not Biden.

Porteroso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Indeed

---

The bolded is not a DOJ prosecutor. You can blame that squarely on voters. Not Biden.

---

You still believe there was no Garland DOJ involvement in the New York and Georgia cases?

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Indeed

---

The bolded is not a DOJ prosecutor. You can blame that squarely on voters. Not Biden.

---

You still believe there was no Garland DOJ involvement in the New York and Georgia cases?

---

Not in New York. James was always going to charge Trump. In Georgia I don't really know. If you told me Garland helped them bring charges I'd listen, but i have not really kept up with it.

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

Redbrickbear said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.

---

What about the "foundation of the economy" is stronger? Any perceived foundational improvements are built upon paper. Tariffs might be taken away by SCOTUS or Congress at any point.

Until the investment happens and manufacturing is actually brought back, any perceived improvement is a simple function of a new tax levied upon those that were already struggling.

As Ford proved, you can build billion dollar factories and still make more money not using them, than using them. For jobs to have been created by Japanese investments, they have to actually he created. Until then it is a big gamble.

---

American workers can not compete with slave wages in the 3rd world.

Or unfair protectionist practices by our geo-strategic adversaries (China) and even our allies....who protect their markets and workers....while exploiting ours

So you either give up and accept that manufacturing jobs will be expelled to other countries (including military rivals) or you do something like tariffs to even the playing field for American companies and workers.

For 30 plus years we have done nothing.....Trump is using Tariffs

Do you have another idea?


PS.....Even the Atlantic magazine has now realized if you can't build ships (or build other things) then you are going to lose a war against a large country that can. And you will also lose the ability to protect yourself and your allies

[China's shipbuilding industry is significantly larger and more dominant globally than that of the United States, which has a minimal share of the commercial market. China's capacity is estimated to be over 200 times that of the U.S. and builds thousands of commercial vessels annually compared to the U.S.'s small output]

[The USA built only two U.S. Navy ships and five commercial merchant ships in 2024.... The US built approximately 500 merchant ships alone in just 1942 and by the end of the war American shipyards had produced 5,788 warships and 66,000 landing craft. Along with thousands of merchant ships to carry goods to allied nations]

---

The American worker really can't compete against the zero wages of robotics and Ai. I'm for creating more domestic production. But let's stop selling the fantasy of jobs around it to try and tax the marketplace.

And if ship building is ever going to happen, we need some huge regulatory adjustments, and a workforce that actually can and wants to participate in it.

---

I agree we need lots f regulatory changes to make production and manufacturing workable here again.

But I push back on the idea that American workers wont do a job....they will.....if the wages and pay is worth it.

---

Polemic: if American workers are going to lose their jobs to robots, those robots better damned well be American robots.

Beware ATL's false dilemma on manufacturing. We're not trying to move the entire supply chain here. Just 10 or so percentage points of it. The tariff and investment structure we have in place should accomplish that. The trade deficit will narrow (providing some relief to the value of USD). And we will see a greater percentage of job growth in higher wage production jobs.

It's a tweak, not a revolution.

Assassin said:

---

From the "You gotta be kidding" department, Had no idea she was a FLOTUS

Liberals are now comparing Zohran Mamdani’s wife to Melania Trump, saying she’s “way hotter” and will do more for this country than Melania ever has.

What are your thoughts ?? pic.twitter.com/lZ5UdfYFRM

— Val (@TrumpsHurricane) November 7, 2025

---

um, no..

She is like a 6.. maybe

4th and Inches said:

---

Assassin said:

---

From the "You gotta be kidding" department, Had no idea she was a FLOTUS

Liberals are now comparing Zohran Mamdani’s wife to Melania Trump, saying she’s “way hotter” and will do more for this country than Melania ever has.

What are your thoughts ?? pic.twitter.com/lZ5UdfYFRM

— Val (@TrumpsHurricane) November 7, 2025

---

um, no..

She is like a 6.. maybe

---

Compared to the usual grotesquely fat leftist gal……..this 6 magically transformes to a 10+.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

You might feel differently if your wife's car was t boned by an illegal high on meth.

🚨 LMFAO! Democrats are now FUMING that the Supreme Court ruled President Trump can’t just dish out SNAP funds until Congress funds the government, for now.

They say “No Kings” then they want a king!

You can’t make this crap up 🤣

pic.twitter.com/xVJJMaaFwz

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 8, 2025

Mamdani is under fire for charging people $13 per beer at his ‘victory party’.
"I arrived thinking everything would be free, only to be charged $13 for a Bud Light. I was shocked after all the hard work I put in," one progressive campaign worker said.

This is gonna be fun! 🍿🤣 pic.twitter.com/RniVT5fdYg

— 🇺🇸 Pecan 🇺🇸 (@PecanC8) November 7, 2025

https://nypost.com/2025/11/07/us-news/zohran-mamdanis-victory-party-was-anything-but-affordable-with-pricey-cash-bar-charging-13-for-beer/

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

KaiBear said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

You might feel differently if your wife's car was t boned by an illegal high on meth.

---

They won't even if their daughters are boned by an illegal against their will high on meth.

The UniCause is the Idol.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

Assassin said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

---

Heil Harrison!

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

---

Heil Harrison!

---

Sam - Harrison, I submit Sam's re-name might "Simple Jack" or possibly "Gullible Sam" as he bites on every line in front of him

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

---

Heil Harrison!

---

You found those mass graves in Gaza yet Harry?

What's your defense for your Hamas buddies assassinating Palestinians?

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

---

Heil Harrison!

---

You found those mass graves in Gaza yet Harry?

What's your defense for your Hamas buddies assassinating Palestinians?

---

Took a massive effort, but yes...two minutes on Google.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

P man : "Trump did violate the law though"

That claim is very much in dispute. Certainly the very unprecedented methods used by Democrats to go after Trump are dubious, not the sort of thing that would pass any ethical considerations. Shewt, several of the people who charged Trump promised before they were elected that they would go after Trump.

You can believe whatever fantasies you want, but you're not going to win over reasonable people on those trials.

---

Are you talking about lying to banks, or refusing to return classified documents?

---

Reading comprehension is hard for you, I observe.

---

Boogers & Glue is the most entertaining poster on the board. He is earnestly an idiot.

---

"Boogers & Glue" - I nominate HB for our official re-namer!

---

Heil Harrison!

---

You found those mass graves in Gaza yet Harry?

What's your defense for your Hamas buddies assassinating Palestinians?

---

Took a massive effort, but yes...two minutes on Google.

---

And did anyone in those mass graves die from malnutrition as you assert? I've looked at lots of videos from Gaza. Almost everyone there seems to extremely well fed - up to obese