Trump's first 100 days

935,217 Views | 16086 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by boognish_bear
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



This is why they should be working as hard as he is (but they aren't). They show no urgency, They should be dropping bills in a flurry. They should be impeaching activist judges. You know the ones the dems will use to prosecute him and everyone in the cabinet after they are out of office.

Instead we get speeches, tweets and fund raising adds. Very frustrating.....
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

The_barBEARian said:

Malbec said:

The_barBEARian said:




This is a real photo.

What is the location of that photo?

Image comes out of this article:

As Texas students clash over Israel-Hamas war, Gov. Greg Abbott orders colleges to revise free speech policies
[url=https://www.keranews.org/politics/2024-03-27/as-texas-students-clash-over-israel-hamas-war-gov-greg-abbott-orders-colleges-to-revise-free-speech-policies][/url]
"Colleges are expected to include the definition of antisemitism in their free speech policies, as well as establish and enforce punishments for violating those policies. Expulsion from the college could be considered an appropriate punishment, Abbott said"



Caption from the photo: " Gov. Greg Abbott attends a community gathering in support of Israel at the Congregation Agudas Achim in Austin on Oct. 9, 2023."

You are abominable. Did you also embellish the photo, since you stated that you pulled it from that linked story? You have it bad buster.




Asmongold is the biggest streamer on Twitch.

I know you ancient, out of touch Boomers dont know much about new media... they only have Fox News at the nursing homes...

But being the #1 streamer on Twitch means he is a big ****ing deal and grabs more views with young men than 20 Nick Fuentes

Israel First group has a decade left of support before the oxygen tanks of its supporters literally run out.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK, Adolf
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

OK, Adolf


Dont forget to change out your oxygen tank before you go to bed!

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

OK, Adolf


Dont forget to change out your oxygen tank before you go to bed!



Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, did your latest Mein Kampf book party fail to get even the 88 bunch to show up?

You just elected a vicious monster in NYC, you should be happy!
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

OK, Adolf


Dont forget to change out your oxygen tank before you go to bed!



Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, did your latest Mein Kampf book party fail to get even the 88 bunch to show up?

You just elected a vicious monster in NYC, you should be happy!


Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow, yet another tired and overused - not to mention failed - attempt to be witty by the ToyBearian

You must be the toast of everyone taking 7th grade ... for the fourth time.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Oh Next year…oh great

Thanks
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




He needs to use executive action to basically abolish zoning laws that keep NIMBYs and bloated local governments in the position to stop new construction.

We have had a population explosion from mass immigration over the decades that we basically need a building bonanza on the scale of the post World War II baby boom.

We either have to build enough to drop prices or we have to deport 50 million people.

I'm honeslty ok with either option.

But housing costs have to be lowered one way or another…everyone under 40 is being crushed.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

The_barBEARian said:



The Kosher Right are all insane leftist psychopaths... they have ZERO principles and will adopt identity politics whenever its convenient. Their only real values are Jewish supremacy and Israel.

man, you do rise to the hate-bait.

How about explaining, without mentioning race or the word Jew or Christian, how America is better off without a close relationship with Israel. Can you do it?


Can you tell us how we benefit from this close relationship? It feels awfully one-sided at times. I'm not being snarky, I'm open to having a genuine conversation

Some people are anti-Semitic, but a lot of us are simply scratching our heads wondering why this tiny nation in the Middle East has so much influence over American politics and politicians

The list is so long,...how can you not see it? From the philosophical (what distinguishes Western Civilization from al others is it's foundation of Judeo-Christian values) to the principled (supporting a functioning libeal democracy in a part of the world woefully lacking in such) to the pragmatic (millions of Americans either are dual citizens or count an immediate family member as an Israeli citizens), to the strategic (building a strong proxy ally to act with us or on behalf of us), to the geopolitical (a strong Israel has been central to stability in a region of enormous consequence to our economy. That's just for starters.

EX: Our boys and girls, our aircraft, were not doing the hard, dangerous job of flying all over Iran taking out one A2D2 site after another to clear a safe pathway for our B2s to do the job of destroying Iranian nuke sites. An air campaign lasting +10 days. What other country could/would have done that for us?


TELL US HOW WE ARE BETTER OFF IGNORING ISRAEL.



Thanks for responding. I would argue the foundation of western civilization derives itself from the Enlightenment, not Judeo-Christianity.
when we talk about Western Civilization, we are talking about Judeo-Christian values. They shaped the development of Europe. The Enlightenment was not a repudiation of Judeo-Christian values; it was the apogee of them. It was an effort to break the false dilemma of choosing between Greece (reason) and the Cross (faith) and find a way to put the two to work in tandem to build a just and civil society.
Not to mention, the majority of the Israeli population is secular so the nation itself has little influence on those ideas.
The same cause-effect error. the state of Israel is a result of Judeo-Christian values, not a cause of them.
And who cares if they're a liberal democracy?
It does matter in US policy whether a state is authoritarian or not.
(Even that title is heavily debated).
Only by the most poorly informed among us. Israel is a robust parliamentary democracy in which non-Jewish citizens have full, fair, equal enfranchisement.

There are liberal democracies in Africa that we have zero interest in defending?
Sure, some, but you're showing the idealist limitations of isolationist worldview. If there is a country which may have limited geopolitical value to us but who can be counted up on to genuinely support our foreign policies, doesn't that matter? Is it not also true that the spread of our ideas on social contract is preferable to being isolated in a world of authoritarian regimes?

Less than 1% of Americans are dual citizens of Israel. Israel attacked the USS Liberty, vetoed US arms sales, and sold our tech to China. They are a client state that we subsidize as they actively destabilize the region and repeatedly act against our best interests
And there it is.....identitarian nonsense. The USA does not recognize dual citizenship. One either qualifies as a US citizen or not. Any other citizenship one may hold or be eligible for is irrelevant. In fact, a very high percentage of US citizens are eligible for citizenship in other countries (something the vast majority of them do not realize). So why are only the dual Israeli citizens the problem? Is it because they are Jewish?

It is a flat-out lie that Israel "repeatedly act(s) against our best interests." The opposite is true. We have no ally who more reliably supports our policies, who is more willing to do hard, dangerous work on our behalf. The Israeli Air Force made possible the USAF bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites. They bought US aircraft. They bought US munitions. They flew their boys & girls over 1000mi to destroy Iranian A2D2 sites. No other country did that for us. Few could. Israel did.

You are just spouting isolationist claptrap that everything we do abroad is a waste of money on irrelevant things. Reality is reality - ignoring the rest of the world is not going to make all our problems go away. It's going to make them worse.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




But housing costs have to be lowered one way or another…everyone under 40 is being crushed.


BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

The_barBEARian said:



The Kosher Right are all insane leftist psychopaths... they have ZERO principles and will adopt identity politics whenever its convenient. Their only real values are Jewish supremacy and Israel.

man, you do rise to the hate-bait.

How about explaining, without mentioning race or the word Jew or Christian, how America is better off without a close relationship with Israel. Can you do it?


Can you tell us how we benefit from this close relationship? It feels awfully one-sided at times. I'm not being snarky, I'm open to having a genuine conversation

Some people are anti-Semitic, but a lot of us are simply scratching our heads wondering why this tiny nation in the Middle East has so much influence over American politics and politicians

The list is so long,...how can you not see it? From the philosophical (what distinguishes Western Civilization from al others is it's foundation of Judeo-Christian values) to the principled (supporting a functioning libeal democracy in a part of the world woefully lacking in such) to the pragmatic (millions of Americans either are dual citizens or count an immediate family member as an Israeli citizens), to the strategic (building a strong proxy ally to act with us or on behalf of us), to the geopolitical (a strong Israel has been central to stability in a region of enormous consequence to our economy. That's just for starters.

EX: Our boys and girls, our aircraft, were not doing the hard, dangerous job of flying all over Iran taking out one A2D2 site after another to clear a safe pathway for our B2s to do the job of destroying Iranian nuke sites. An air campaign lasting +10 days. What other country could/would have done that for us?


TELL US HOW WE ARE BETTER OFF IGNORING ISRAEL.



Thanks for responding. I would argue the foundation of western civilization derives itself from the Enlightenment, not Judeo-Christianity.
when we talk about Western Civilization, we are talking about Judeo-Christian values. They shaped the development of Europe. The Enlightenment was not a repudiation of Judeo-Christian values; it was the apogee of them. It was an effort to break the false dilemma of choosing between Greece (reason) and the Cross (faith) and find a way to put the two to work in tandem to build a just and civil society.
Not to mention, the majority of the Israeli population is secular so the nation itself has little influence on those ideas.
The same cause-effect error. the state of Israel is a result of Judeo-Christian values, not a cause of them.
And who cares if they're a liberal democracy?
It does matter in US policy whether a state is authoritarian or not.
(Even that title is heavily debated).
Only by the most poorly informed among us. Israel is a robust parliamentary democracy in which non-Jewish citizens have full, fair, equal enfranchisement.

There are liberal democracies in Africa that we have zero interest in defending?
Sure, some, but you're showing the idealist limitations of isolationist worldview. If there is a country which may have limited geopolitical value to us but who can be counted up on to genuinely support our foreign policies, doesn't that matter? Is it not also true that the spread of our ideas on social contract is preferable to being isolated in a world of authoritarian regimes?

Less than 1% of Americans are dual citizens of Israel. Israel attacked the USS Liberty, vetoed US arms sales, and sold our tech to China. They are a client state that we subsidize as they actively destabilize the region and repeatedly act against our best interests
And there it is.....identitarian nonsense. The USA does not recognize dual citizenship. One either qualifies as a US citizen or not. Any other citizenship one may hold or be eligible for is irrelevant. In fact, a very high percentage of US citizens are eligible for citizenship in other countries (something the vast majority of them do not realize). So why are only the dual Israeli citizens the problem? Is it because they are Jewish?

It is a flat-out lie that Israel "repeatedly act(s) against our best interests." The opposite is true. We have no ally who more reliably supports our policies, who is more willing to do hard, dangerous work on our behalf. The Israeli Air Force made possible the USAF bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites. They bought US aircraft. They bought US munitions. They flew their boys & girls over 1000mi to destroy Iranian A2D2 sites. No other country did that for us. Few could. Israel did.

You are just spouting isolationist claptrap that everything we do abroad is a waste of money on irrelevant things. Reality is reality - ignoring the rest of the world is not going to make all our problems go away. It's going to make them worse.


It is not a "flat-out lie" as they have quite literally acted against our best interests over multiple instances across many different decades. And you're projecting, I'm not an isolationist, I want a relationship that serves America first, not one where we write blank checks. But whatever, keep defending this parasitic relationship, times are changing
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

whiterock said:

The_barBEARian said:



The Kosher Right are all insane leftist psychopaths... they have ZERO principles and will adopt identity politics whenever its convenient. Their only real values are Jewish supremacy and Israel.

man, you do rise to the hate-bait.

How about explaining, without mentioning race or the word Jew or Christian, how America is better off without a close relationship with Israel. Can you do it?


Can you tell us how we benefit from this close relationship? It feels awfully one-sided at times. I'm not being snarky, I'm open to having a genuine conversation

Some people are anti-Semitic, but a lot of us are simply scratching our heads wondering why this tiny nation in the Middle East has so much influence over American politics and politicians

The list is so long,...how can you not see it? From the philosophical (what distinguishes Western Civilization from al others is it's foundation of Judeo-Christian values) to the principled (supporting a functioning libeal democracy in a part of the world woefully lacking in such) to the pragmatic (millions of Americans either are dual citizens or count an immediate family member as an Israeli citizens), to the strategic (building a strong proxy ally to act with us or on behalf of us), to the geopolitical (a strong Israel has been central to stability in a region of enormous consequence to our economy. That's just for starters.

EX: Our boys and girls, our aircraft, were not doing the hard, dangerous job of flying all over Iran taking out one A2D2 site after another to clear a safe pathway for our B2s to do the job of destroying Iranian nuke sites. An air campaign lasting +10 days. What other country could/would have done that for us?


TELL US HOW WE ARE BETTER OFF IGNORING ISRAEL.



Thanks for responding. I would argue the foundation of western civilization derives itself from the Enlightenment, not Judeo-Christianity.
when we talk about Western Civilization, we are talking about Judeo-Christian values. They shaped the development of Europe. The Enlightenment was not a repudiation of Judeo-Christian values; it was the apogee of them. It was an effort to break the false dilemma of choosing between Greece (reason) and the Cross (faith) and find a way to put the two to work in tandem to build a just and civil society.
Not to mention, the majority of the Israeli population is secular so the nation itself has little influence on those ideas.
The same cause-effect error. the state of Israel is a result of Judeo-Christian values, not a cause of them.
And who cares if they're a liberal democracy?
It does matter in US policy whether a state is authoritarian or not.
(Even that title is heavily debated).
Only by the most poorly informed among us. Israel is a robust parliamentary democracy in which non-Jewish citizens have full, fair, equal enfranchisement.

There are liberal democracies in Africa that we have zero interest in defending?
Sure, some, but you're showing the idealist limitations of isolationist worldview. If there is a country which may have limited geopolitical value to us but who can be counted up on to genuinely support our foreign policies, doesn't that matter? Is it not also true that the spread of our ideas on social contract is preferable to being isolated in a world of authoritarian regimes?

Less than 1% of Americans are dual citizens of Israel. Israel attacked the USS Liberty, vetoed US arms sales, and sold our tech to China. They are a client state that we subsidize as they actively destabilize the region and repeatedly act against our best interests
And there it is.....identitarian nonsense. The USA does not recognize dual citizenship. One either qualifies as a US citizen or not. Any other citizenship one may hold or be eligible for is irrelevant. In fact, a very high percentage of US citizens are eligible for citizenship in other countries (something the vast majority of them do not realize). So why are only the dual Israeli citizens the problem? Is it because they are Jewish?

It is a flat-out lie that Israel "repeatedly act(s) against our best interests." The opposite is true. We have no ally who more reliably supports our policies, who is more willing to do hard, dangerous work on our behalf. The Israeli Air Force made possible the USAF bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites. They bought US aircraft. They bought US munitions. They flew their boys & girls over 1000mi to destroy Iranian A2D2 sites. No other country did that for us. Few could. Israel did.

You are just spouting isolationist claptrap that everything we do abroad is a waste of money on irrelevant things. Reality is reality - ignoring the rest of the world is not going to make all our problems go away. It's going to make them worse.


It is not a "flat-out lie" as they have quite literally acted against our best interests over multiple instances across many different decades. And you're projecting, I'm not an isolationist, I want a relationship that serves America first, not one where we write blank checks. But whatever, keep defending this parasitic relationship, times are changing

Yes, it is a flat out lie. It completely misrepresents the plain course of history. They are a sovereign country. They are going to have disagreements with us. In some instances even a divergence of interests. And then there are times when US administrations (particularly Obama/Biden policies toward Iran) have been highly injurious to Israel. But if we compare that template to our history with Western European allies, they rank very high. I mean, are you still mad that the British burned the White House? I was pretty steamed when France refused Reagan's request for our F-111s to overfly French territory en route to bombing Libya, but I didn't try to make them an adversary. I have not forgotten Pearl Harbor, but who could argue that our interests mostly align today with Japan, or that Japan has not been a reliable ally?

Few countries have done less to impede and more to facilitate US policy interests than Israel.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




This is part of the reason that many on the Right are disenfranchised right now. Trump is making the same tone-deaf geriatric comments that Biden was making regarding the economy
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.

What about the "foundation of the economy" is stronger? Any perceived foundational improvements are built upon paper. Tariffs might be taken away by SCOTUS or Congress at any point.

Until the investment happens and manufacturing is actually brought back, any perceived improvement is a simple function of a new tax levied upon those that were already struggling.

As Ford proved, you can build billion dollar factories and still make more money not using them, than using them. For jobs to have been created by Japanese investments, they have to actually he created. Until then it is a big gamble.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.

What about the "foundation of the economy" is stronger? Any perceived foundational improvements are built upon paper. Tariffs might be taken away by SCOTUS or Congress at any point.

Until the investment happens and manufacturing is actually brought back, any perceived improvement is a simple function of a new tax levied upon those that were already struggling.

As Ford proved, you can build billion dollar factories and still make more money not using them, than using them. For jobs to have been created by Japanese investments, they have to actually he created. Until then it is a big gamble.


American workers can not compete with slave wages in the 3rd world.

Or unfair protectionist practices by our geo-strategic adversaries (China) and even our allies....who protect their markets and workers....while exploiting ours

So you either give up and accept that manufacturing jobs will be expelled to other countries (including military rivals) or you do something like tariffs to even the playing field for American companies and workers.

For 30 plus years we have done nothing.....Trump is using Tariffs

Do you have another idea?


PS.....Even the Atlantic magazine has now realized if you can't build ships (or build other things) then you are going to lose a war against a large country that can. And you will also lose the ability to protect yourself and your allies

[China's shipbuilding industry is significantly larger and more dominant globally than that of the United States, which has a minimal share of the commercial market. China's capacity is estimated to be over 200 times that of the U.S. and builds thousands of commercial vessels annually compared to the U.S.'s small output]

[The USA built only two U.S. Navy ships and five commercial merchant ships in 2024.... The US built approximately 500 merchant ships alone in just 1942 and by the end of the war American shipyards had produced 5,788 warships and 66,000 landing craft. Along with thousands of merchant ships to carry goods to allied nations]

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.

What about the "foundation of the economy" is stronger? Any perceived foundational improvements are built upon paper. Tariffs might be taken away by SCOTUS or Congress at any point.

Until the investment happens and manufacturing is actually brought back, any perceived improvement is a simple function of a new tax levied upon those that were already struggling.

As Ford proved, you can build billion dollar factories and still make more money not using them, than using them. For jobs to have been created by Japanese investments, they have to actually he created. Until then it is a big gamble.


American workers can not compete with slave wages in the 3rd world.

Or unfair protectionist practices by our geo-strategic adversaries (China) and even our allies....who protect their markets and workers....while exploiting ours

So you either give up and accept that manufacturing jobs will be expelled to other countries (including military rivals) or you do something like tariffs to even the playing field for American companies and workers.

For 30 plus years we have done nothing.....Trump is using Tariffs

Do you have another idea?


PS.....Even the Atlantic magazine has now realized if you can't build ships (or build other things) then you are going to lose a war against a large country that can. And you will also lose the ability to protect yourself and your allies

[China's shipbuilding industry is significantly larger and more dominant globally than that of the United States, which has a minimal share of the commercial market. China's capacity is estimated to be over 200 times that of the U.S. and builds thousands of commercial vessels annually compared to the U.S.'s small output]

[The USA built only two U.S. Navy ships and five commercial merchant ships in 2024.... The US built approximately 500 merchant ships alone in just 1942 and by the end of the war American shipyards had produced 5,788 warships and 66,000 landing craft. Along with thousands of merchant ships to carry goods to allied nations]


I understand the dilemma. It would be great if we could simply talk to every other nation and convince them to band together to make China play fair. But impossible.

All I'm saying is that we have a new tax upon Americans called tariffs, and very little benefit so far. The tariff is the foundation you can build manufacturing up on, but it can be taken away by Congress at any time. Or the Supreme Court, in the next few days.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

We are a very impatient people. The foundation of the economy is much better than it was last year. Unfortunately, we haven't started seeing the wall framing going up yet.

Most of our older generations worked their way up the ladder to gain whatever success they had as their goal. Post WWII generations - all of them - were blessed with a lot more opportunities than people before that war. A younger generation that sees a time of contraction gets nervous that they won't have those same opportunities. The vast majority of them are not starving, but they are having a harder time getting started than their parents.
Gen X faced this coming out of the rampant inflation of the late 70's and the booming cost of housing. This is not new, except to the ones who haven't experienced it - the younger generation of the time.

We still live in a place with a lot more opportunities than just about any other. We just had a misguided couple of administrations weakening the economic foundations of the country. The last one in particular. It will take more than 8 months to get the economy turned.

What about the "foundation of the economy" is stronger? Any perceived foundational improvements are built upon paper. Tariffs might be taken away by SCOTUS or Congress at any point.

Until the investment happens and manufacturing is actually brought back, any perceived improvement is a simple function of a new tax levied upon those that were already struggling.

As Ford proved, you can build billion dollar factories and still make more money not using them, than using them. For jobs to have been created by Japanese investments, they have to actually he created. Until then it is a big gamble.


American workers can not compete with slave wages in the 3rd world.

Or unfair protectionist practices by our geo-strategic adversaries (China) and even our allies....who protect their markets and workers....while exploiting ours

So you either give up and accept that manufacturing jobs will be expelled to other countries (including military rivals) or you do something like tariffs to even the playing field for American companies and workers.

For 30 plus years we have done nothing.....Trump is using Tariffs

Do you have another idea?


PS.....Even the Atlantic magazine has now realized if you can't build ships (or build other things) then you are going to lose a war against a large country that can. And you will also lose the ability to protect yourself and your allies

[China's shipbuilding industry is significantly larger and more dominant globally than that of the United States, which has a minimal share of the commercial market. China's capacity is estimated to be over 200 times that of the U.S. and builds thousands of commercial vessels annually compared to the U.S.'s small output]

[The USA built only two U.S. Navy ships and five commercial merchant ships in 2024.... The US built approximately 500 merchant ships alone in just 1942 and by the end of the war American shipyards had produced 5,788 warships and 66,000 landing craft. Along with thousands of merchant ships to carry goods to allied nations]


I understand the dilemma. It would be great if we could simply talk to every other nation and convince them to band together to make China play fair. But impossible.

All I'm saying is that we have a new tax upon Americans called tariffs, and very little benefit so far. The tariff is the foundation you can build manufacturing up on, but it can be taken away by Congress at any time. Or the Supreme Court, in the next few days.


What you're saying is you don't like the taste of the medicine to cure the illness.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This morning my wife and I paid $2.46 for a dozen jumbo eggs here in Waco. Not a sale price or using a coupon. Just FWIW.

Why? Because President Trump won't do things like the previous administration did, such as ordering the killing of massive flocks of laying chickens across the country simply because they might contract avian flu.

Which was the equivalent of dropping a MOAB to kill a single housefly, such as out-of-touch bureaucrats are wont to do.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



The house should absolutely be passing bills daily funding critical elements of the govt. Let Schumer and his party continue to vote no on those.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Just a few Senate Democrats abandon their doomed opposition to the clean CR, and voil, the ATCs get paid. Stunning in its simplicity.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Only thanks to Trump can Ford dumb this bad truck model.

Unions need to connect the dots .
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn homie

First Page Last Page
Page 299 of 460
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.