canoso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Republicans must have caved

---

Senate reaches deal: The Senate is voting now on a bipartisan deal to fund the government through January 30 in a major sign the shutdown is poised to end, according to two people familiar with the discussions. A critical group of at least eight Senate Democratic centrists agreed to vote for the measure in exchange for a future vote on extending enhanced Affordable Care subsidies, according to two people familiar with the discussions even as the rest of their party has openly pilloried the deal.

---

I'd venture to say that said Democrat centrists are breathing a sigh of relief over Republicans having upped said centrists' chances of re-election.

---

If what I've been reading at Twitter is any indication, the opposite is true. Democrat base is livid

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

That's a lie.

---

Yes it is. Some here just make **** up
Ignore is your friend

Oldbear83 said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

More ranting.

You sound like Hakeen Jeffries, actually.

---

So as a lifelong bean counter, do you really think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? A simple YES or NO will suffice.

---

I see you are opposed to context.

---

LOLOLOL!!!! Is that your final answer? Probably the weakest response to a simple question I have ever seen here.

I'll ask one more time. Do you think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? YES or NO?

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

Are you sure? He seems to be libertarian/conservative. I just cannot imagine remembering the old forum that well.

One thing to remember a position someone took, but to remember positions they did not take? Man that is one heck of a memory.

---

It isn't hard to remember that he basically never criticized Obama. He always criticized Bush. Never criticized Biden and now always criticizing Trump just like he did in his first term. Not hard to remember the pattern.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

That's a lie.

---

And no facts still….

Sam Lowry said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

Are you sure? He seems to be libertarian/conservative. I just cannot imagine remembering the old forum that well.

One thing to remember a position someone took, but to remember positions they did not take? Man that is one heck of a memory.

---

Did Cowboy ever deny being an undocumented Muslim communist with herpes? Because I sure didn't hear it.

---

And still no facts so you jump to name calling. Provide one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.

Because the facts for years have shown a pattern. You criticize everything a republican president does but not the Dem presidents.

Osodecentx said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

That's a lie.

---

Yes it is. Some here just make **** up
Ignore is your friend

---

If you can't afford food provide evidence of him criticizing Obama's drone strikes please share.

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

Are you sure? He seems to be libertarian/conservative. I just cannot imagine remembering the old forum that well.

One thing to remember a position someone took, but to remember positions they did not take? Man that is one heck of a memory.

---

Did Cowboy ever deny being an undocumented Muslim communist with herpes? Because I sure didn't hear it.

---

And still no facts so you jump to name calling. Provide one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.

Because the facts for years have shown a pattern. You criticize everything a republican president does but not the Dem presidents.

---

Completely untrue.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

Are you sure? He seems to be libertarian/conservative. I just cannot imagine remembering the old forum that well.

One thing to remember a position someone took, but to remember positions they did not take? Man that is one heck of a memory.

---

Did Cowboy ever deny being an undocumented Muslim communist with herpes? Because I sure didn't hear it.

---

And still no facts so you jump to name calling. Provide one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.

Because the facts for years have shown a pattern. You criticize everything a republican president does but not the Dem presidents.

---

Completely untrue.

---

And still not providing just one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.


That is all you have to do. Just one.

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

More ranting.

You sound like Hakeen Jeffries, actually.

---

So as a lifelong bean counter, do you really think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? A simple YES or NO will suffice.

---

I see you are opposed to context.

---

LOLOLOL!!!! Is that your final answer? Probably the weakest response to a simple question I have ever seen here.

I'll ask one more time. Do you think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? YES or NO?

---

OK, since you obviously have no direct experience with mortgages, it happens that very few people who got the traditional thirty year mortgage actually spend thirty years paying it off

Some simply pay down their mortgage early, and many clear the mortgage when they sell their home.

Same principle here, even if it's beyond you to understand the concept. Hence context matters.

Oldbear83 said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

More ranting.

You sound like Hakeen Jeffries, actually.

---

So as a lifelong bean counter, do you really think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? A simple YES or NO will suffice.

---

I see you are opposed to context.

---

LOLOLOL!!!! Is that your final answer? Probably the weakest response to a simple question I have ever seen here.

I'll ask one more time. Do you think 50 year mortgages are a good idea? YES or NO?

---

OK, since you obviously have no direct experience with mortgages, it happens that very few people who got the traditional thirty year mortgage actually spend thirty years paying it off

Some simply pay down their mortgage early, and many clear the mortgage when they sell their home.

Same principle here, even if it's beyond you to understand the concept. Hence context matters.

---

I probably "have no direct experience with mortgages." Hmmmm. Okay. Your anger bleedeth through in your response. Not real sure why.

I will take your response as a YES. That disappoints me. Thought you were smarter than that. Your undying devotion to Trump seems to have clouded your judgment. You are not alone. There are many here just like you.

50 year mortgages are a bad idea....for the buyer.

Will make actually owning your home even more difficult.

Many folks would be better off renting.

<chuckles>

You're lying, both about me and about the point, but you want to sell the claim that I am somehow the 'angry' guy.


Sure, Jan

KaiBear said:

---

50 year mortgages are a bad idea....for the buyer.

Will make actually owning your home even more difficult.

Many folks would be better off renting.

---

Good post Kaibear. Thank you. Maybe you can take OldBear out for a beer and explain it to him.

Oldbear83 said:

---

<chuckles>

You're lying, both about me and about the point, but you want to sell the claim that I am somehow the 'angry' guy.


Sure, Jan

---

Chuckles right back atcha, Sunshine.

You can call me Jim but if you prefer Jan, that is fine.

KaiBear said:

---

go bears!

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

50 year mortgages are a bad idea....for the buyer.

Will make actually owning your home even more difficult.

Many folks would be better off renting.

---

Good post Kaibear. Thank you. Maybe you can take OldBear out for a beer and explain it to him.

---

Would never suggest a 50 year mortgage to anyone.

IMO only the bankers would benefit.

Will be in Dallas again November 20th.

Visiting my 77 year old sister. We have been very good friends all of our lives; and she is not feeling well.

KaiBear said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

50 year mortgages are a bad idea....for the buyer.

Will make actually owning your home even more difficult.

Many folks would be better off renting.

---

Good post Kaibear. Thank you. Maybe you can take OldBear out for a beer and explain it to him.

---

Would never suggest a 50 year mortgage to anyone.

IMO only the bankers would benefit.

Will be in Dallas again November 20th.

Visiting my 77 year old sister. We have been very good friends all of our lives; and she is not feeling well.

---

Yes, the big banks are probably salivating over the possibility of government encouraged 50 year mortgages.

Sorry to hear about your sister. Family is what is really important. All the crap all of us spar and debate on this board is really not important in the big scheme of things.

Be safe in your travels.

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

50 year mortgages are a bad idea....for the buyer.

Will make actually owning your home even more difficult.

Many folks would be better off renting.

---

Good post Kaibear. Thank you. Maybe you can take OldBear out for a beer and explain it to him.

---

Would never suggest a 50 year mortgage to anyone.

IMO only the bankers would benefit.

Will be in Dallas again November 20th.

Visiting my 77 year old sister. We have been very good friends all of our lives; and she is not feeling well.

---

Yes, the big banks are probably salivating over the possibility of government encouraged 50 year mortgages.

Sorry to hear about your sister. Family is what is really important. All the crap all of us spar and debate on this board is really not important in the big scheme of things.

Be safe in your travels.

---

Dallas in November
Key West in December
Scottsdale in January
Dallas and Las Vegas in February

Going to be an interesting stretch .

whiterock said:

---

canoso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Republicans must have caved

---

Senate reaches deal: The Senate is voting now on a bipartisan deal to fund the government through January 30 in a major sign the shutdown is poised to end, according to two people familiar with the discussions. A critical group of at least eight Senate Democratic centrists agreed to vote for the measure in exchange for a future vote on extending enhanced Affordable Care subsidies, according to two people familiar with the discussions even as the rest of their party has openly pilloried the deal.

---

I'd venture to say that said Democrat centrists are breathing a sigh of relief over Republicans having upped said centrists' chances of re-election.

---

If what I've been reading at Twitter is any indication, the opposite is true. Democrat base is livid

---

Twitter is not the Democrat base. It's the fringe of both parties. You can't take anything you see on Twitter re: politics seriously.

But any deal where both sides are angry is likely a good deal.

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum just said fighting a war against drug cartels is unlawful because it would violate the rights of drug traffickers and it would be "fascist."

"Returning to the war against the narco is not an option. First, because it is outside the framework… pic.twitter.com/yxv5q83HwF

— George (@BehizyTweets) November 6, 2025

---

Good to see a president who understands and respects the Constitution. It's just too bad it isn't the US president.

---

I never saw you saying that about drone strikes against terrorists under Obama…. I wonder why?????

---

Yes you did.

---

No I didn't.

---

I too remember the second grade.

---

Well when dealing with Sam (or you) one must type at a second grade level for the two of you to understand. He cannot provide evidence of his stance. But evidence is not something the two of you like.

---

You remind me of KaiBear. He wasn't even reading this forum during the Obama years, yet claimed he never saw me complain about Obama's drone strikes. Same exact thing. Just total bs.

---

Lol. Well he may not of read this forum during much of the Obama years as most of us were still on Baylorfans at that time before the merger.

But yeah Sam was not upset at drone strikes then.

---

Are you sure? He seems to be libertarian/conservative. I just cannot imagine remembering the old forum that well.

One thing to remember a position someone took, but to remember positions they did not take? Man that is one heck of a memory.

---

Did Cowboy ever deny being an undocumented Muslim communist with herpes? Because I sure didn't hear it.

---

And still no facts so you jump to name calling. Provide one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.

Because the facts for years have shown a pattern. You criticize everything a republican president does but not the Dem presidents.

---

Completely untrue.

---

And still not providing just one instance where you criticized his drone strikes. Just one.


That is all you have to do. Just one.

---

kinda hard to provide facts in a two word post. but he sure does try.

nein51 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

canoso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Republicans must have caved

---

Senate reaches deal: The Senate is voting now on a bipartisan deal to fund the government through January 30 in a major sign the shutdown is poised to end, according to two people familiar with the discussions. A critical group of at least eight Senate Democratic centrists agreed to vote for the measure in exchange for a future vote on extending enhanced Affordable Care subsidies, according to two people familiar with the discussions even as the rest of their party has openly pilloried the deal.

---

I'd venture to say that said Democrat centrists are breathing a sigh of relief over Republicans having upped said centrists' chances of re-election.

---

If what I've been reading at Twitter is any indication, the opposite is true. Democrat base is livid

---

Twitter is not the Democrat base. It's the fringe of both parties. You can't take anything you see on Twitter re: politics seriously.

But any deal where both sides are angry is likely a good deal.

---

I follow a lot of lefties on Twitter. Gotta know what your enemy is up to. And it's unanimous on team blue. Electeds, influencers, etc.....those posting are all livid about being rolled by the Orange Man. Granted, not everyone is posting. No pith from Carville today....



There is no joy in Democrat Mudville at the moment. They got nothing.

I believe they were promised a vote on ACA subsidies. If there is more to it, I'm not sure. It is the deal Repubs have been offering for a while.

This is a good resolution. The extremes did not get what they wanted, abd truth be told, they got plenty of attention drawn to the issue already. They can always hold the government hostage at a later date.

I do hope Repubs will make a real effort to combat healthcare costs, and not just say the free market will take care of it.

whiterock said:

---

nein51 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

canoso said:

---

Assassin said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Republicans must have caved

---

Senate reaches deal: The Senate is voting now on a bipartisan deal to fund the government through January 30 in a major sign the shutdown is poised to end, according to two people familiar with the discussions. A critical group of at least eight Senate Democratic centrists agreed to vote for the measure in exchange for a future vote on extending enhanced Affordable Care subsidies, according to two people familiar with the discussions even as the rest of their party has openly pilloried the deal.

---

I'd venture to say that said Democrat centrists are breathing a sigh of relief over Republicans having upped said centrists' chances of re-election.

---

If what I've been reading at Twitter is any indication, the opposite is true. Democrat base is livid

---

Twitter is not the Democrat base. It's the fringe of both parties. You can't take anything you see on Twitter re: politics seriously.

But any deal where both sides are angry is likely a good deal.

---

I follow a lot of lefties on Twitter. Gotta know what your enemy is up to. And it's unanimous on team blue. Electeds, influencers, etc.....those posting are all livid about being rolled by the Orange Man. Granted, not everyone is posting. No pith from Carville today....

There is no joy in Democrat Mudville at the moment. They got nothing.

---

They are all given a sheet of talking points and they simply parrot them to each other. A lie repeated often enough becomes the truth and whatnot.

Always hilarious to see 50 accounts with the exact same tweet. Not RT but the exact same words. Like it was an original thought.

“All money left over from the $2000 payments made to low and middle income USA Citizens, from the massive Tariff Income pouring into our Country from foreign countries, which will be substantial, will be used to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT.” - President Trump pic.twitter.com/mw7CWpjGhp

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 10, 2025

we need to hold an 'elder shoe' raffle............



- uncle fred

D!

Go Bears!!

Beat The Utes!!!

Suelten los perros, amigos!!!!

Bombs Away, Petey!!!!!

boognish_bear said:

---

“All money left over from the $2000 payments made to low and middle income USA Citizens, from the massive Tariff Income pouring into our Country from foreign countries, which will be substantial, will be used to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT.” - President Trump pic.twitter.com/mw7CWpjGhp

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 10, 2025

---

I see this as "Lets win the midterrms with these gifts, abolish Income Tax and the IRS", then "Reduce the National Debt"

Without winning the midterms, National Debt will flourish

None of which happens with Trump's tariffs

Assassin said:

---

---

Socialism is when greedy Leftists use a corrupt govt to steal from everyone else

Trump's new White House ballroom:

We don’t think most people actually know what Trump’s ballroom project is really about. 😳😅@Follow360News ✔️ pic.twitter.com/q3cnL0I9Kw

— Christian 360° News (@Follow360News) November 8, 2025

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

---

Socialism is when greedy Leftists use a corrupt govt to steal from everyone else

---

And using TERROR when they dont get their way...

BearFan33 said:

---

foxnews.com/politics/doj-accuses-federal-judge-making-mockery-separation-powers-snap-appeal#&_intcmp=fnhpbt4

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-accuses-federal-judge-making-mockery-separation-powers-snap-appeal

Federal judge orders executive branch to pay all snap benefits,,,like now! Uses all sorts of emotional arguments for his ruling.

Executive branch appeals

key point for me....

"This is a crisis, to be sure, but it is a crisis occasioned by congressional failure, and that can only be solved by congressional action," they added.

While it sucks for the true needy people that rely on snap, the burden of fixing a congress problem shouldn't be dumped on the executive.

Our congress continues to fail in so many ways.

If the order sticks it ought to open up the executive to find novel ways to solve the funding gap. I'm guessing the left wont like the fix and will sue to stop the fix.

---

Maybe should suspend all pay for Leftist federal judges to pay for it!

A friend suggested that every day Congress is late getting a budget passed, they should not be allowed any alcohol.

Assassin said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Republicans must have caved

---

Senate reaches deal: The Senate is voting now on a bipartisan deal to fund the government through January 30 in a major sign the shutdown is poised to end, according to two people familiar with the discussions. A critical group of at least eight Senate Democratic centrists agreed to vote for the measure in exchange for a future vote on extending enhanced Affordable Care subsidies, according to two people familiar with the discussions even as the rest of their party has openly pilloried the deal.

---

Essentially, this is the deal that the Republicans offered before the Schumer shutdown began.

boognish_bear said:

---

“All money left over from the $2000 payments made to low and middle income USA Citizens, from the massive Tariff Income pouring into our Country from foreign countries, which will be substantial, will be used to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT.” - President Trump pic.twitter.com/mw7CWpjGhp

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 10, 2025

---

There's no point in trying to pay down the debt until the budget is balanced year after year.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

A friend suggested that every day Congress is late getting a budget passed, they should not be allowed any alcohol.

---

We need a law that no one on Capitol Hill gets paid when the govt shuts down, including staffers. Not one person there deserves one cent before the lower ranks of the armed forces (not the brass at the Pentagon), air traffic controllers, border patrol, TSA, etc.