nein51 said:KaiBear said:nein51 said:KaiBear said:boognish_bear said:Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026
Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD
NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.
US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.
There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.
South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.
Respectfully disagree.
The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.
If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .
Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.
But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.
The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).
Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.
Here's the problem with your analysis: It presumes that armed invasion by a peer competitor is our only risk.
Not so......
