Trump's first 100 days

740,206 Views | 13688 Replies | Last: 26 min ago by FLBear5630
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Good for Tillis
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump has whined about legal warfare against himself, but his DOJ has been active with legal actions against others.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did Maher say something about him recently that pissed him off?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully his colleagues listen and cut out the childish BS antics

cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:



This is revisionist history. Or just flat out lying.

Other presidents have bombed more countries.

Then there is the stretch of the word "bomb"

Or the fact some of these actions are continued missions that have happened in these countries since Obama......

That is what you are caught up on???? Others may have bombed more? The "What about-ism" is strong in this room. It is the answer for anything Trump does.

Pointing out factual errors is not what about ism. It is pointing out factual errors.

He has bombed a lot of Nations. Got it.

Are you familiar with the concept of accuracy versus precision?

Don't spend so much time on precision when accuracy is that point. The exact number or whether Trump is #1 or #2 misses the point. This must be a Board full of accountants...


No sorry. Facts are facts.

Don't claim something or someone is the most when the facts don't back that up. Whether it is Trump, Biden or Baylor football.

But you are so blinded by your Trump hate you miss that I regularly call him out on things. On this thread or others.

But I can also give him praise when he dos something good.

But I can also call out BS when I see it that is twisting things to make him look worse, like this.

Been there with Flbear as well. Flbear doesn't realize when his posts become an attempt to stereotype to try to gain ground in a discussion. I know he's not the only one on here who does, but FlBear seems to think he doesn't do that on purpose. Not even close to as bad as JR.


Yeah he doesn't realize that everyone that disagrees with him is not always 100% "for Trump"


What is the old saying- Dont piss down my back and tell me its raining ...

That sums up alot of my discussions with MAGA and pro-Trumpers. No matter what is said, it is a positive for Trump. ICE shot 32 people over the year, it was all their fault. Trump is named 5500 times in Epstein files, nothing there. Your comment on bombing, others bombed just as much. These are not win or lose arguments. Nobody is trying to gain position. Sadly, they are things actually happening. I am not keep score, you guys are more into that than me... They are actually important enough to talk about.


Blah blah blah.

Again you take all comments by anyone who has supported Trump and combine them all into one until you miss the point of what is being said.

I have plenty of criticisms of Trump on these boards.

I have gone after him about doge and how none of those cuts have become permanent. Or how he said Americans would get a check for the savings.

The bombing statement was not a defense of Trump. It is a correction of a factual error.

Is someone said the Dallas Cowboys won the Super Bowl in 2018 and another person corrected them and said no actually the Eagles won that year. It is not hating on Dallas or supporting the eagles. It is correcting a false statement.

That is it.

So for another example…. If I were to correct you that ICE has not shot 32 people but rather that number shows the number of people who have died in ICE custody for various reasons.

That is correcting a factual error on your part.

That is not defending ICE, attacking ICE or anything to do with Trump.

It is merely correcting your error of claiming they were shot.

That is it.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




He has said he would give checks out numerous times. For both the doge cuts and the tariff surplus
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gates has supported Big Brother programs for decades. Still hasn't occurred to him most people don't want that crap.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man he looks old there
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



What does this even mean? Pretty darned vague and ambiguous.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

boognish_bear said:




Good for Tillis

The Fed economists are mostly outdated ill -trained obsolete hacks.......

Need to cut the staff there in half.

Scrap the new bldg.

- UF

D!

Just my dos centavos.

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Have they done that? Has VA enacted far left agenda after running on moderate platform?

Has Clinton or Obama take part in policy development for VA?

Does anyone have actual exsamples?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:



What does this even mean? Pretty darned vague and ambiguous.


Why are we now entering Crypto as a Nation? Isn't it extremely volatile? Are there any rules in place on these investments?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:



What does this even mean? Pretty darned vague and ambiguous.



- UF

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donuts }

D!

Go Bears!!

Buy ArbysCoin!!!

edit:

scattershooting whilst pondering why Herr Popeil didn't use his own product: Spray On Hair.



PA.
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



when does SCrOTUS opine???

PA.

- UL

... and, as always, TIA.

BID.

{ sipping covfefe }

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:



What does this even mean? Pretty darned vague and ambiguous.


Why are we now entering Crypto as a Nation? Isn't it extremely volatile? Are there any rules in place on these investments?

Bessent has already stated publicly that no taxpayer money will be used to support Cryptocurrency.

I would love to see us go ahead and sell the Crypto we have and pay down the debt before it is worth $0.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

FLBear5630 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:



What does this even mean? Pretty darned vague and ambiguous.


Why are we now entering Crypto as a Nation? Isn't it extremely volatile? Are there any rules in place on these investments?

Bessent has already stated publicly that no taxpayer money will be used to support Cryptocurrency.

I would love to see us go ahead and sell the Crypto we have and pay down the debt before it is worth $0.

Thanks, didn't know that about Bessent. Not sure how that works, but...


With you on debt.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



It's helpful to consider the source and realize WSJ also published lies that attempted to destroy someone's career, but ultimately could not.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bizarre

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 387 of 392
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.