Trump's first 100 days

1,007,956 Views | 16483 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by boognish_bear
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, we changed the definition of marriage and boys and girls, so why wouldn't his eligibility be subject to reinterpretation as well?

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Textbook sign of an expanding economy = structural trade deficits tend to yawn when economic activity accelerates.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bookmark this one for use when someone insists that deficits are driven by military spending and foreign aid.

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

is this Democrat propaganda to post this??




Why is this so difficult to understand? It says twice. Not twice in a row.

8 years is it. Unless you take over and serve one year 364 days. Then you could have just shy of 10 years.

I think the problem is the wording. Constitution clearly says two terms is the limit, but it does not say you cannot run even if you cannot serve.

That does not have to make sense (why run if you can't serve?) to still be a sticking point for people obsessed with minutia.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Thanks to a recent trade deal with China, Teslas are cheaper in Canada than here because they can import them directly from the Gigafactory in China.

For all the bluster of "decoupling from China", the problem is the broad tariff approach decoupled us from the world and it is slowly and steadily realigning to help China adjust. But Trump may have been saved from himself by the Supreme Court ruling. Get back to strategic targeting of China and you might actually make some headway.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Bookmark this one for use when someone insists that deficits are driven by military spending and foreign aid.


Some of us have been preaching this for a long time.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump-Backed Primary Challengers Handily Defeat Most Anti-Redistricting Indiana Republicans
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you say it enough people will believe it.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

If you say it enough people will believe it.


If you don't believe it, you're not paying attention. It's happening where I live.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smiley says credit card spending is a great thing!

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

If you say it enough people will believe it.

That certainly appears to be your reasoning for posting so many wild posts, FLBear ...
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Smiley says credit card spending is a great thing!



I listened and didn't hear him say that at all.
I understand you don't like him, and that is fine. He's probably not right on all things. However, let's not pull a lefty media thing and make up quotes.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

Smiley says credit card spending is a great thing!



I listened and didn't hear him say that at all.
I understand you don't like him, and that is fine. He's probably not right on all things. However, let's not pull a lefty media thing and make up quotes.




If you say so...
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right in schedule ...

Disagree, must be a wild quote.

Because we all know you and MAGA are reasonable adults. Hey, tariffs off Scotch! Why? Trump liked Charles. Hell of an adult data driven economic policy.

You want to cheerlead Trump, I let you have at it. I dont Trust trump as far as i can throw this fat ass, you wont let me have at it. Whose the adult here?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Right in schedule ...

Disagree, must be a wild quote.

Because we all know you and MAGA are reasonable adults. Hey, tariffs off Scotch! Why? Trump liked Charles. Hell of an adult data driven economic policy.

You want to cheerlead Trump, I let you have at it. I dont Trust trump as far as i can throw this fat ass, you wont let me have at it. Whose the adult here?

Well, I see you are still pretending I am a 'cheerleader' for Trump, despite the facts many times explained to you.

And with phrases like 'hell of an adult data driven economic policy' and 'i can throw his fat ass' from you, it's a bit much for you to imagine you are the adult here.

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, i give you the benefit of the doubt because I i like you. Because if you are not a Trump cheerleader than you are genuinely good with the off the wall behavior and grift.

EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

Smiley says credit card spending is a great thing!



I listened and didn't hear him say that at all.
I understand you don't like him, and that is fine. He's probably not right on all things. However, let's not pull a lefty media thing and make up quotes.




If you say so...


Thanks for updating the X post choice.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Ugh.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:




Ugh.

Apparently now he is asking for $1 billion for his Big Beautiful Ballroom. Up from the original price tag of $250 million. And now is is wanting the taxpayers to pay for it.

The world is literally on fire and he had a press conference at the White House today and played grab ass with UFC fighters.

Yet the Trump Fan Club STILL worships the ground he walks on. Just plain sad.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Today's market update brought to you by the letter K

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Because a Federal Judge said Congress has to get involved…

A Judge wanted the congressional pigs to be let into the trough..and they will now do what they do…eat and distribute patronage pork.

Our wonderful Federal Judges at work again
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:




Ugh.

Apparently now he is asking for $1 billion for his Big Beautiful Ballroom. Up from the original price tag of $250 million. And now is is wanting the taxpayers to pay for it.



At least get the facts straight before you fire off on the matter

Private funds were raised…Construction on going

Federal Judge intervened and said "nope, muh iconic place and even thought it's the headquarters of the Executive Branch…Congress must be involved"

[A U.S. District Judge has ordered a halt to above-ground construction of President Trump's $400 million White House ballroom, ruling that Congress must authorize the project…

Leon expressed frustration at Roth's attempts to equate the massive ballroom project with relatively modest construction work at the White House under previous administrations.

"This is an iconic symbol of this nation," the judge said.

The administration argued that other presidents didn't need congressional approval for previous White House renovation projects, large and small.

"Many of those projects were highly controversial in their time yet have since become accepted even beloved parts of the White House," government attorneys wrote.]

So now Congress is going to get involved and not because Trump was demanding it

And costs are gonna explode…because that is what Congress does.

Spends tax payer cash, launders money, and grants patronage pork

[U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (South Carolina), Katie Britt (Alabama) and Eric Schmitt (Missouri) this week introduced the White House Safety and Security Act of 2026, which provides funding for the construction of the presidential ballroom in the East Wing of the White House.]
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's time for Queen Lindsey to STFU. He has turned into an embarrassment for the great state of SC! Enough out of the Queen.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




Because a Federal Judge said Congress has to get involved…

A Judge wanted the congressional pigs to be let into the trough..and they will now do what they do…eat and distribute patronage pork.

Our wonderful Federal Judges at work again


Everyone in DC gets to feed now at the taxpayer trough. It will probably take 5 times longer, cost 5 times as much and not be as nice as the original plans. Trump Derangement Syndrome has its costs.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's been a year and a half… can we let this go now and look forward? It just feels juvenile coming from the office of the President.

First Page Last Page
Page 460 of 471
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.