Trump's first 100 days

1,451,319 Views | 19731 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by boognish_bear
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:36p, 10/7/26
Is there still time to lock her up?

Reply Quote
1
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 9:38p, 10/7/26
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

Right. In other words, FEMA didn't try to withhold funds from red states, much less did Biden.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 9:42p, 10/7/26
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.
Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:35a, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

Right. In other words, FEMA didn't try to withhold funds from red states, much less did Biden.

Yes they did. An agent of FEMA tried to stop Red states/ Trump supporters from getting FEMA funding. While it was not a sanctioned agency policy it STILL HAPPENED. But you and the left want to pretend it never did.
Reply Quote
3
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 11:18a, 10/8/26
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

Right. In other words, FEMA didn't try to withhold funds from red states, much less did Biden.

Yes they did. An agent of FEMA tried to stop Red states/ Trump supporters from getting FEMA funding. While it was not a sanctioned agency policy it STILL HAPPENED. But you and the left want to pretend it never did.
Like you said, FEMA wasn't responsible.
Reply Quote
4
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:30p, 10/8/26
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:44p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 1:46p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.

Did I mention those two? No I did not. Policy promises are what we should be voting on. That is what "poli"tics are for.
A promise for one time monetary gifts are different.

Do you work for Royal Gold and make pretzels, by chance?
Reply Quote
1
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 4:47p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

Right. In other words, FEMA didn't try to withhold funds from red states, much less did Biden.

Yes they did. An agent of FEMA tried to stop Red states/ Trump supporters from getting FEMA funding. While it was not a sanctioned agency policy it STILL HAPPENED. But you and the left want to pretend it never did.

Like you said, FEMA wasn't responsible.

I never said that but if it makes you feel better to believe an alternate reality have at it.
Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 4:48p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


LOL. I guess I am his enemy then. I have never heard super intelligence from anyone other than him.

He is like the middle or high school kid trying to make a word or phrase a "catch phrase" or "in" term.
Reply Quote
2
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 4:56p, 10/8/26
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

QFP
Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 4:57p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
Sam Lowry said:
cowboycwr said:
FLBear5630 said:
Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-accused-playing-politics-florida-funding-pro-union-push

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccines-delta/2021/08/05/4359ac76-f567-11eb-a49b-d96f2dac0942_story.html

You lib clowns are tiring. This sht has been going on FOREVER

Just curious, when has another President said that if the lose a State they won't provide Federal support? Please? In your words "It has been going on forever."

Give us some links to other Presidents. Give us links to other Presidents that said if I win I will mail you a check? Should be easy... After all, FOREVER is a long time


Well technically he didn't say it either if you look at his exact words. He said he would be less likely to work with democrats. Not a direct threat but a veiled one. Still wrong in my opinion but not the exact words that it has been made out to be.

Other presidents haven't said it but they seemed to turn a blind eye when it happened under them. Like fema under Biden trying to withhold money for disaster victims in red states.

Debunked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fema-hurricane-helene-relief-b2624786.html

Proven true

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/g-s1-34188/florida-discrimination-lawsuit-fema-trump-supporters

https://oversight.house.gov/release/dhs-inspector-general-finds-fema-employees-violated-the-law-by-skipping-homes-of-trump-supporters-after-oversight-committee-investigation/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g31ln2wgo





The Florida lawsuit was dismissed with no finding of wrongdoing by FEMA. A Republican congressional investigation likewise found no evidence of systemic bias or discrimination. The DHS report is just restating the same conclusion, i.e. a few bad actors acted badly and got fired. Meanwhile, after falsely accusing Biden of diverting FEMA funds to help immigrants, Trump diverted FEMA funds to cage immigrants.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/29/fema-cleared-of-punishing-pro-donald-trump-hurricane-victims-00313825

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117731/d
ocuments/HHRG-118-GO00-20241119-SD011.pdf

Meanwhile the FACTS show it happened but that FEMA wasn't held responsible for the actions of one person.

QFP

Debunked!!!!


Man this is fun.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:59p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
2
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 5:01p, 10/8/26
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.

Did I mention those two? No I did not. Policy promises are what we should be voting on. That is what "poli"tics are for.
A promise for one time monetary gifts are different.

Do you work for Royal Gold and make pretzels, by chance?

And everything on your list was a policy promise (except "Obamaphones," which were a Republican hoax). They're not bribes just because you don't like them.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:06p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:15p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
1
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 5:34p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:


Things don't really change.

https://wacohistory.org/files/show/411
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 5:45p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:

?
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 5:47p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:

Maybe by Apache or if fuel is too expensive, a Bradley Bushmaster?
Reply Quote
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 5:55p, 10/8/26
cowboycwr said:
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


LOL. I guess I am his enemy then. I have never heard super intelligence from anyone other than him.

He is like the middle or high school kid trying to make a word or phrase a "catch phrase" or "in" term.


Kill kill kill enemy! (I always hated how we'd pray to God then scream kill when I played football)
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:22p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


Superintelligence is already a hypothetical subset of artificial intelligence, so this makes no sense.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 7:26p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


Superintelligence is already a hypothetical subset of artificial intelligence, so this makes no sense.

It is a distraction from the economy, Iran, debt, elections... He has a lot to answer for. So, if he can get us arguing over stupid **** he and Vance can keep F-ing things up.
Reply Quote
3
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 7:31p, 10/8/26
FLBear5630 said:
Sam Lowry said:
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


Superintelligence is already a hypothetical subset of artificial intelligence, so this makes no sense.

It is a distraction from the economy, Iran, debt, elections... He has a lot to answer for. So, if he can get us arguing over stupid **** he and Vance can keep F-ing things up.

I don't know...the economy, Iran, debt, and the elections already seem pretty well screwed. Maybe AI is one thing it's not too late to fix?
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 7:37p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
FLBear5630 said:
Sam Lowry said:
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why he's making this a priority right now


Superintelligence is already a hypothetical subset of artificial intelligence, so this makes no sense.

It is a distraction from the economy, Iran, debt, elections... He has a lot to answer for. So, if he can get us arguing over stupid **** he and Vance can keep F-ing things up.

I don't know...the economy, Iran, debt, and the elections already seem pretty well screwed. Maybe AI is one thing it's not too late to fix?

Yeah, AI needs Donald Trump to fix it???????
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:23p, 10/8/26
Elon falling in line

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:26p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:27p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:30p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
1
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:05p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.

Did I mention those two? No I did not. Policy promises are what we should be voting on. That is what "poli"tics are for.
A promise for one time monetary gifts are different.

Do you work for Royal Gold and make pretzels, by chance?

And everything on your list was a policy promise (except "Obamaphones," which were a Republican hoax). They're not bribes just because you don't like them.

You have a weird sense of "policy promises." According to you, any largess masked in an entitlement isn't a bribe. Most people can tell the difference between a needed entitlement or reform and a bribe. Apparently you cannot.

and by the way:
https://www.genmobile.com/blogs/news/obama-phone-and-lifeline-explained
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:07p, 10/8/26
Appears they are all LEGAL immigrants. Just saying ...
Reply Quote
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:10p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:

Got no problem with legal immigrants getting awards. I have a big problem with a lagging US education system doing too many social experiments and not enough getting the next generation ready to take over the reins.
Reply Quote
1
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:16p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:

I checked and it is supposed to be live-streamed. This is not what I would like to be happening. It will provide a video to those who wish to use it to proclaim a martyr to make future "martyrs".
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:17p, 10/8/26
boognish_bear said:
Elon falling in line



Bezos too...

Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 10:21p, 10/8/26
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.

Did I mention those two? No I did not. Policy promises are what we should be voting on. That is what "poli"tics are for.
A promise for one time monetary gifts are different.

Do you work for Royal Gold and make pretzels, by chance?

And everything on your list was a policy promise (except "Obamaphones," which were a Republican hoax). They're not bribes just because you don't like them.

You have a weird sense of "policy promises." According to you, any largess masked in an entitlement isn't a bribe. Most people can tell the difference between a needed entitlement or reform and a bribe. Apparently you cannot.

and by the way:
https://www.genmobile.com/blogs/news/obama-phone-and-lifeline-explained

Which entitlements and reforms are needed is very much a matter of opinion. That's what politics is about.
Reply Quote
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:24p, 10/8/26
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:


It's crappy, and reads like the student loan site put up by the Biden Administration, and a bunch of crappy letters from politicians in the past touting public monies like the campaign ads they were.

I'd love to see government funded bribes and campaign letters come to an end.

Public monies are spent for the common good, not to literally buy voters. You may not always agree with how they're spent (nor do I), but there is a difference.


Public monies are SUPPOSED to be spent for the COMMON good. Or did you miss that thought inside the Iranian nuclear enrichment sites, too. Voters are to determine if they believe that their tax money has been spent wisely. Campaign media for the incumbents is not money spent for the common good. It's one sided propaganda no matter who does it.


I agree, but what Trump proposes isn't even just campaign spending. It's a straight bribe.

Yes. And happens way too often by too many.

This doesn't happen often (or ever).


See list above.

Again, there's a difference. Was that new tax break or anti-gay law you voted for a bribe? Didn't think so.

Did I mention those two? No I did not. Policy promises are what we should be voting on. That is what "poli"tics are for.
A promise for one time monetary gifts are different.

Do you work for Royal Gold and make pretzels, by chance?

And everything on your list was a policy promise (except "Obamaphones," which were a Republican hoax). They're not bribes just because you don't like them.

You have a weird sense of "policy promises." According to you, any largess masked in an entitlement isn't a bribe. Most people can tell the difference between a needed entitlement or reform and a bribe. Apparently you cannot.

and by the way:
https://www.genmobile.com/blogs/news/obama-phone-and-lifeline-explained

Which entitlements and reforms are needed is very much a matter of opinion. That's what politics is about.

Glad you aren't in charge of entitlements or free speech. That is a straight fact.
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 556 of 564 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.