The Constitutional Crisis continues to be the judicial overreach of the nation-wide injunction that reaches beyond the plaintiffs standing. It enables political judges to anti-democratically revoke or write laws outside the will of the electorate. And both parties are hypocrites - there are thousands of examples of Democrats bemoaning the anti-democratic nature of nationwide injunctions only to deploy them.
Here is a good summary:
Commentators broadly agree that nationwide injunctions as currently understood did not exist in the pre-Founding English courts of equity, that no nationwide injunctions issued in the early years of the Republic, and that such injunctions have become more common in the last two decades
51 In a May 2019 address, Attorney General William Barr stated that federal courts "issued only
27 nationwide injunctions in all of the 20th century."52 By contrast, as of February 2020, the Department of Justice (DOJ) had identified
12 nationwide injunctions issued during the presidency of George W. Bush,
19 issued during Barack Obama's presidency and
55 such injunctions issued against the Trump Administration.53 Beyond the general agreement that nationwide injunctions have increased in recent years, scholars debate many significant points, including when the first nationwide injunction issued, whether other types of injunctive relief provide historical precedent for current nationwide injunctions, and the extent to which historical precedent is relevant to the legality of nationwide injunctions today.
