* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days

319,771 Views | 3248 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by boognish_bear
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar.
  • ICE did shoot protestors
  • Defense did attack Iran
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate
  • Son's are making money off all this
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.


I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar.
  • ICE did shoot protestors
  • Defense did attack Iran
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate
  • Son's are making money off all this
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.


I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.

Bessent DID NOT break the Bank of England, his employer, George Soros did. You keep forgetting that apparently.

The rest of your post is almost pure TDS.
"A day without sunshine is like, you know, night." — Steve Martin
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

FLBear5630 said:

I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar.
  • ICE did shoot protestors
  • Defense did attack Iran
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate
  • Son's are making money off all this
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.


I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.

Bessent DID NOT break the Bank of England, his employer, George Soros did. You keep forgetting that apparently.

The rest of your post is almost pure TDS.

And you post is pure Trump defense.

Ok, the finance team telling him how and pulling the trigger has nothing to do with it.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Assassin said:

FLBear5630 said:

I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar.
  • ICE did shoot protestors
  • Defense did attack Iran
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate
  • Son's are making money off all this
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.


I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.

Bessent DID NOT break the Bank of England, his employer, George Soros did. You keep forgetting that apparently.

The rest of your post is almost pure TDS.

And you post is pure Trump defense.

Ok, the finance team telling him how and pulling the trigger has nothing to do with it.

FL, you keep equating Soros and Bessent. One want to destroy the USA and the other wants to save it. If you cant see the difference, I feel sorry for you
"A day without sunshine is like, you know, night." — Steve Martin
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar. Treasury is defending USD, which is stable
  • ICE did shoot protestors. who needed shooting.
  • Defense did attack Iran. who needed attacking
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland. Not enough. We don't have it yet.
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate. Good. He's proven effective.
  • Son's are making money off all this. So are yours, if they're smart.
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.
Best political year of my life.

I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.

Start focusing on results rather than process, on signal rather than noise, and Trump will make a lot more sense to you.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I get that.

This is where we differ.

In his position, how he does it and the signals he sends matter.

If he was the COO of the Nation, I would agree. But he is not, he is the CEO. He is not sending a message of stability, strength and calmness to keep the population steady and productive. He is sending WWE messages, this is not the position to do that.

I give Hegseth more leeway, he is SecDef. He can play mad-dog to a certain extent and it serve a purpose. But, only if the CEO is reasonable and able to play that he is on a leash. Otherwise, it is just fear.

That is what we have now in foreign relations, just fear. What will he do next? Will he invade Greenland? Will he pull out of NATO? Will he go Nuclear? That is a problem.

Someone said that we are weakening BRIC. Not if Xi looks like a more reasonable option. (they seem to forget that reserve currency is just a choice among Nations. We got it at Bretton Woods by agreement). Same is true domestically, he has polarized, not brought together. Even war against Iran is not galvanizing! That is a problem. GOP needs to figure out that Trump has gone toxic. Time to get someone else in that position, someone that has the same programs but can calm things down. and get the Nation moving together.

But, as I said. We disagree on the "how", not the "what".
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Lots of work being put into NOT releasing these files.

Full disclosure: I'm not in the Epstein files.


Are you certain? What if Epstein quoted Baylorfans or Sicem365 somewhere?
Admittedly he likely would have preferred surly horns.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Assassin said:

FLBear5630 said:

I am commenting on Trump's actions, none of this is made up. Bessent did break the Bank of England and Trump did put him in charge of Treasury. I am not making this up.

Typical Trump-ite, you guys turn the attention to the person commenting from the actual action.

Trump's
  • Treasury is weakening the dollar.
  • ICE did shoot protestors
  • Defense did attack Iran
  • State did threaten Denmark to extort Greenland
  • State did send Trump's son in law to negotiate
  • Son's are making money off all this
None of this is made up. You cheerlead while this is all going on in one year.


I do not put Politics with liking or disliking a person. I may bust chops or get animated, but it is just a discussion and we all disagree on something. It is not a value judgement.

Bessent DID NOT break the Bank of England, his employer, George Soros did. You keep forgetting that apparently.

The rest of your post is almost pure TDS.

And you post is pure Trump defense.

Ok, the finance team telling him how and pulling the trigger has nothing to do with it.

No way, man! Soros himself put on those trades. Bessent is married and queer and worked for Soros. That right there should make the "Moral Maga" cray cray!
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

I get that.

This is where we differ.

In his position, how he does it and the signals he sends matter.

If he was the COO of the Nation, I would agree. But he is not, he is the CEO. He is not sending a message of stability, strength and calmness to keep the population steady and productive. He is sending WWE messages, this is not the position to do that.
Again, the result is more important than the message. We have a long line of Presidents who have dealt with Iran in Presidential style. And here we are, 47 years and +1500 dead Americans later, having to deal with an Iran that is weeks away from nuclear weapons capability. I. Don't. Care. what he says publicly about Iran. I just want Iran to either fold and hand over the enriched uranium, or fall from within and get the e/u from a successor regime. Looks like that's what's going to happen here. And when it does, I will thank him for getting the job done. (queue Edith Piaf here)

I give Hegseth more leeway, he is SecDef. He can play mad-dog to a certain extent and it serve a purpose. But, only if the CEO is reasonable and able to play that he is on a leash. Otherwise, it is just fear.
Our military has run thru our adversaries like shyte thru a goose. Hegseth is rocking it.

That is what we have now in foreign relations, just fear.
Sigh. So naive. Fear is the primary motivation in geopolitics. One must not just be powerful. One must leave no doubt in minds of friends and foes alike that you WILL act with alacrity when your interests are threatened.

What will he do next? Will he invade Greenland? Will he pull out of NATO? Will he go Nuclear? That is a problem.
We will not invade Greenland as long as we are in Nato. I suspect the Euros know that and will do the minimum required to keep us in.

Someone said that we are weakening BRIC. Not if Xi looks like a more reasonable option. (they seem to forget that reserve currency is just a choice among Nations. We got it at Bretton Woods by agreement).
LOL current events have just ended any threat of BRIC becoming a replacement for USD.
EX:


Same is true domestically, he has polarized, not brought together. Even war against Iran is not galvanizing! That is a problem. GOP needs to figure out that Trump has gone toxic. Time to get someone else in that position, someone that has the same programs but can calm things down. and get the Nation moving together.
Did Bush or Obama bring everyone together?
Did that accomplish anything, or did it create a bunch of problems we are now struggling to fix?


But, as I said. We disagree on the "how", not the "what".
The "how" doesn't matter if nothing gets done. And it doesn't matter very much if everything gets done.

Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Lots of work being put into NOT releasing these files.

Full disclosure: I'm not in the Epstein files.


Are you certain? What if Epstein quoted Baylorfans or Sicem365 somewhere?
Admittedly he likely would have preferred surly horns.


My dirt is oral or in PMs with people I trust. I fear young women. Now that I'm sixty I only date 80+. There is no interest in nude geriatrics.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

I get that.

This is where we differ.

In his position, how he does it and the signals he sends matter.

If he was the COO of the Nation, I would agree. But he is not, he is the CEO. He is not sending a message of stability, strength and calmness to keep the population steady and productive. He is sending WWE messages, this is not the position to do that.
Again, the result is more important than the message. We have a long line of Presidents who have dealt with Iran in Presidential style. And here we are, 47 years and +1500 dead Americans later, having to deal with an Iran that is weeks away from nuclear weapons capability. I. Don't. Care. what he says publicly about Iran. I just want Iran to either fold and hand over the enriched uranium, or fall from within and get the e/u from a successor regime. Looks like that's what's going to happen here. And when it does, I will thank him for getting the job done. (queue Edith Piaf here)

I give Hegseth more leeway, he is SecDef. He can play mad-dog to a certain extent and it serve a purpose. But, only if the CEO is reasonable and able to play that he is on a leash. Otherwise, it is just fear.
Our military has run thru our adversaries like shyte thru a goose. Hegseth is rocking it.

That is what we have now in foreign relations, just fear.
Sigh. So naive. Fear is the primary motivation in geopolitics. One must not just be powerful. One must leave no doubt in minds of friends and foes alike that you WILL act with alacrity when your interests are threatened.

What will he do next? Will he invade Greenland? Will he pull out of NATO? Will he go Nuclear? That is a problem.
We will not invade Greenland as long as we are in Nato. I suspect the Euros know that and will do the minimum required to keep us in.

Someone said that we are weakening BRIC. Not if Xi looks like a more reasonable option. (they seem to forget that reserve currency is just a choice among Nations. We got it at Bretton Woods by agreement).
LOL current events have just ended any threat of BRIC becoming a replacement for USD.
EX:


Same is true domestically, he has polarized, not brought together. Even war against Iran is not galvanizing! That is a problem. GOP needs to figure out that Trump has gone toxic. Time to get someone else in that position, someone that has the same programs but can calm things down. and get the Nation moving together.
Did Bush or Obama bring everyone together?
Did that accomplish anything, or did it create a bunch of problems we are now struggling to fix?


But, as I said. We disagree on the "how", not the "what".
The "how" doesn't matter if nothing gets done. And it doesn't matter very much if everything gets done.




Did Bush or Obama bring everyone together?

They may be doing it now as many of us long for stable politics.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

I get that.

This is where we differ.

In his position, how he does it and the signals he sends matter.

If he was the COO of the Nation, I would agree. But he is not, he is the CEO. He is not sending a message of stability, strength and calmness to keep the population steady and productive. He is sending WWE messages, this is not the position to do that.
Again, the result is more important than the message. We have a long line of Presidents who have dealt with Iran in Presidential style. And here we are, 47 years and +1500 dead Americans later, having to deal with an Iran that is weeks away from nuclear weapons capability. I. Don't. Care. what he says publicly about Iran. I just want Iran to either fold and hand over the enriched uranium, or fall from within and get the e/u from a successor regime. Looks like that's what's going to happen here. And when it does, I will thank him for getting the job done. (queue Edith Piaf here)

I give Hegseth more leeway, he is SecDef. He can play mad-dog to a certain extent and it serve a purpose. But, only if the CEO is reasonable and able to play that he is on a leash. Otherwise, it is just fear.
Our military has run thru our adversaries like shyte thru a goose. Hegseth is rocking it.

That is what we have now in foreign relations, just fear.
Sigh. So naive. Fear is the primary motivation in geopolitics. One must not just be powerful. One must leave no doubt in minds of friends and foes alike that you WILL act with alacrity when your interests are threatened.

What will he do next? Will he invade Greenland? Will he pull out of NATO? Will he go Nuclear? That is a problem.
We will not invade Greenland as long as we are in Nato. I suspect the Euros know that and will do the minimum required to keep us in.

Someone said that we are weakening BRIC. Not if Xi looks like a more reasonable option. (they seem to forget that reserve currency is just a choice among Nations. We got it at Bretton Woods by agreement).
LOL current events have just ended any threat of BRIC becoming a replacement for USD.
EX:


Same is true domestically, he has polarized, not brought together. Even war against Iran is not galvanizing! That is a problem. GOP needs to figure out that Trump has gone toxic. Time to get someone else in that position, someone that has the same programs but can calm things down. and get the Nation moving together.
Did Bush or Obama bring everyone together?
Did that accomplish anything, or did it create a bunch of problems we are now struggling to fix?


But, as I said. We disagree on the "how", not the "what".
The "how" doesn't matter if nothing gets done. And it doesn't matter very much if everything gets done.




Did Bush or Obama bring everyone together?

They may be doing it now as many of us long for stable politics.

Hate to tell you this, but at this point in their respective presidencies, Trump's polling average (all polls) is between Bush's and Obama's.

You shoulda heard the mainstream narratives about Reagan Same stuff, just as loud and almost as wild as what we hear today about Trump.

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't doubt he regrets nothing.


Unfortunately, yours is the attitude that has gotten the US in trouble since 1960. There is a difference between being strong enough to deter and ACTUALLY being a bully. Even the cultures that respect power, start looking for ways to undermine it. NOBODY likes to be dominated and be given no choice.

What America did well until we started these endless wars was using that "power" we gained after WW2 and use it to make everyone more profitable, we also had a great foil in the Soviet Union. Trump is going one step further, he is laying it on the table and forcing Nations to either bend the knee or be on the outside. (He watched the Godfather too many times...)_ He is stating that our assistance is transactional, see his comments on NATO. He is forcing conflict, if they can't win on the military front watch other fronts because it is coming.

The Hubris that you have, naively so, is that "having no choice" is the status quo. A more accurate term is they have no choice now, they are searching... Trump is not the right person for this time, it is starting to become more and more clear. He is stuck in a paradigm of his post-WW2 education and is trying to go back in time. That is dangerous.

Watch the reserve currency, that is where I think China is playing the game.

But, as you say. All is well. Nobody else on the planet has any choice but to do what we want. Right?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

I don't doubt he regrets nothing.


Unfortunately, yours is the attitude that has gotten the US in trouble since 1960. There is a difference between being strong enough to deter and ACTUALLY being a bully. Even the cultures that respect power, start looking for ways to undermine it. NOBODY likes to be dominated and be given no choice.
You are truly, profoundly clueless. Reagan complained openly about Nato members not meeting their 2% commitment, and more pointedly in private. I have also held demarches in my hands from kinder, gentler presidents which echo Trump's public comments. "....we will destroy your country, by means including....." The only thing remarkable about Trump is that he says it publicly rather than just privately. You are getting a chance to hear how power actually communicates when it really matters.

What America did well until we started these endless wars was using that "power" we gained after WW2 and use it to make everyone more profitable, we also had a great foil in the Soviet Union. Trump is going one step further, he is laying it on the table and forcing Nations to either bend the knee or be on the outside. (He watched the Godfather too many times...)_ He is stating that our assistance is transactional, see his comments on NATO. He is forcing conflict, if they can't win on the military front watch other fronts because it is coming.
See above. Everything is transactional, all the time. Israel is our greatest ally; they spy on us relentlessly. And the converse is true as well. Also applies to all of our allies. We put up with it because....it is in our interests to do so. Until it's not. And we are slowly approaching that point with Nato. For the entirety of the alliance, they've not pulled their share. And now, with a few notable exceptions, they are totally inconsequential for anything except for adding troops to our units.

The Hubris that you have, naively so, is that "having no choice" is the status quo. A more accurate term is they have no choice now, they are searching... Trump is not the right person for this time, it is starting to become more and more clear. He is stuck in a paradigm of his post-WW2 education and is trying to go back in time. That is dangerous.
No. YOU are dangerous. You are ignorant of geopolitics AND history. I will drink French wine. I will not purchase it. Do you know why? Because the French refused President Reagan's request for overflight for Operation El Dorado Canyon. So did the Spanish. Had to fly the F-111s out over the Atlantic, thru the Straits of Gibraltar, and half-way down the Med...multiple refuelings. So there is absolutely noting remarkable about what we are seeing from Europe. it's what they do. Trump got nothing to do with it. The difference is, times have changed. We do not have to tolerate European alligator-arming their alliance responsibilities. We can poke them a LOT harder. And should.

Watch the reserve currency, that is where I think China is playing the game.
Nobody with more than two rocks inside their brain is going to dump USD for Renminbi.

But, as you say. All is well. Nobody else on the planet has any choice but to do what we want. Right?
We've literally never been better. At no time in my life have we more clearly overmatched our adversaries.

Expect to see our Nato bases start to transition to former Warsaw Pact countries. They are far better allies than the fops in Western Europe. And that's before we get to the demographic and political changes in Western Europe which are dragging them out of the liberal order.

I mean, seriously. Panama cozies up to China, letting a Chinese company take over management of the Canal.....knowing what US interests are.....knowing what what their treaty obligations are....despite complaints from prior administrations. So Trump lowered the boom on them. They quickly submitted to our demands. would you rather Trump have played nice like his predecessors and let the Chinese foothold there grow? or are you going to take the win Trump got?

You are just so incredibly unserious here. LIke as out of touch as all the isolationists we have here.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

I don't doubt he regrets nothing.


Unfortunately, yours is the attitude that has gotten the US in trouble since 1960. There is a difference between being strong enough to deter and ACTUALLY being a bully. Even the cultures that respect power, start looking for ways to undermine it. NOBODY likes to be dominated and be given no choice.
You are truly, profoundly clueless. Reagan complained openly about Nato members not meeting their 2% commitment, and more pointedly in private. I have also held demarches in my hands from kinder, gentler presidents which echo Trump's public comments. "....we will destroy your country, by means including....." The only thing remarkable about Trump is that he says it publicly rather than just privately. You are getting a chance to hear how power actually communicates when it really matters.

What America did well until we started these endless wars was using that "power" we gained after WW2 and use it to make everyone more profitable, we also had a great foil in the Soviet Union. Trump is going one step further, he is laying it on the table and forcing Nations to either bend the knee or be on the outside. (He watched the Godfather too many times...)_ He is stating that our assistance is transactional, see his comments on NATO. He is forcing conflict, if they can't win on the military front watch other fronts because it is coming.
See above. Everything is transactional, all the time. Israel is our greatest ally; they spy on us relentlessly. And the converse is true as well. Also applies to all of our allies. We put up with it because....it is in our interests to do so. Until it's not. And we are slowly approaching that point with Nato. For the entirety of the alliance, they've not pulled their share. And now, with a few notable exceptions, they are totally inconsequential for anything except for adding troops to our units.

The Hubris that you have, naively so, is that "having no choice" is the status quo. A more accurate term is they have no choice now, they are searching... Trump is not the right person for this time, it is starting to become more and more clear. He is stuck in a paradigm of his post-WW2 education and is trying to go back in time. That is dangerous.
No. YOU are dangerous. You are ignorant of geopolitics AND history. I will drink French wine. I will not purchase it. Do you know why? Because the French refused President Reagan's request for overflight for Operation El Dorado Canyon. So did the Spanish. Had to fly the F-111s out over the Atlantic, thru the Straits of Gibraltar, and half-way down the Med...multiple refuelings. So there is absolutely noting remarkable about what we are seeing from Europe. it's what they do. Trump got nothing to do with it. The difference is, times have changed. We do not have to tolerate European alligator-arming their alliance responsibilities. We can poke them a LOT harder. And should.

Watch the reserve currency, that is where I think China is playing the game.
Nobody with more than two rocks inside their brain is going to dump USD for Renminbi.

But, as you say. All is well. Nobody else on the planet has any choice but to do what we want. Right?
We've literally never been better. At no time in my life have we more clearly overmatched our adversaries.

Expect to see our Nato bases start to transition to former Warsaw Pact countries. They are far better allies than the fops in Western Europe. And that's before we get to the demographic and political changes in Western Europe which are dragging them out of the liberal order.

I mean, seriously. Panama cozies up to China, letting a Chinese company take over management of the Canal.....knowing what US interests are.....knowing what what their treaty obligations are....despite complaints from prior administrations. So Trump lowered the boom on them. They quickly submitted to our demands. would you rather Trump have played nice like his predecessors and let the Chinese foothold there grow? or are you going to take the win Trump got?

You are just so incredibly unserious here. LIke as out of touch as all the isolationists we have here.

What? Trump ran on isolationism.

We do agree on the Warsaw Pact Nations, they do not want to go back. Poland will take all our German Bases in a heartbeat.

The French have been the French since the Maginot Line failed. DeGaul was no better than Macron, don't use the French as an example. We didn't "have to" in 1949. The US never HAD to support NATO. The two oceans took care of that.


Submitted to our demands? We are still going through the **** over there and Iran still controls the Straits. The Houthi's still exisist and Hezbelloah/Hamas are still around. Come on, you know this is a 20 year "police action" we will be there in large numbers for the foreseeable future. At least Europe was a good duty station, the Sandbox is a ****hole.

But, I believe that is what you want. This cheerleading is BS, you want the US in it up to our necks.

I just can't believe that actually believed that the Iranians were 2 weeks from a nuclear bomb.



Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

I don't doubt he regrets nothing.


Unfortunately, yours is the attitude that has gotten the US in trouble since 1960. There is a difference between being strong enough to deter and ACTUALLY being a bully. Even the cultures that respect power, start looking for ways to undermine it. NOBODY likes to be dominated and be given no choice.

What America did well until we started these endless wars was using that "power" we gained after WW2 and use it to make everyone more profitable, we also had a great foil in the Soviet Union. Trump is going one step further, he is laying it on the table and forcing Nations to either bend the knee or be on the outside. (He watched the Godfather too many times...)_ He is stating that our assistance is transactional, see his comments on NATO. He is forcing conflict, if they can't win on the military front watch other fronts because it is coming.

The Hubris that you have, naively so, is that "having no choice" is the status quo. A more accurate term is they have no choice now, they are searching... Trump is not the right person for this time, it is starting to become more and more clear. He is stuck in a paradigm of his post-WW2 education and is trying to go back in time. That is dangerous.

Watch the reserve currency, that is where I think China is playing the game.

But, as you say. All is well. Nobody else on the planet has any choice but to do what we want. Right?

Excellent post.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

I don't doubt he regrets nothing.


Unfortunately, yours is the attitude that has gotten the US in trouble since 1960. There is a difference between being strong enough to deter and ACTUALLY being a bully. Even the cultures that respect power, start looking for ways to undermine it. NOBODY likes to be dominated and be given no choice.
You are truly, profoundly clueless. Reagan complained openly about Nato members not meeting their 2% commitment, and more pointedly in private. I have also held demarches in my hands from kinder, gentler presidents which echo Trump's public comments. "....we will destroy your country, by means including....." The only thing remarkable about Trump is that he says it publicly rather than just privately. You are getting a chance to hear how power actually communicates when it really matters.

What America did well until we started these endless wars was using that "power" we gained after WW2 and use it to make everyone more profitable, we also had a great foil in the Soviet Union. Trump is going one step further, he is laying it on the table and forcing Nations to either bend the knee or be on the outside. (He watched the Godfather too many times...)_ He is stating that our assistance is transactional, see his comments on NATO. He is forcing conflict, if they can't win on the military front watch other fronts because it is coming.
See above. Everything is transactional, all the time. Israel is our greatest ally; they spy on us relentlessly. And the converse is true as well. Also applies to all of our allies. We put up with it because....it is in our interests to do so. Until it's not. And we are slowly approaching that point with Nato. For the entirety of the alliance, they've not pulled their share. And now, with a few notable exceptions, they are totally inconsequential for anything except for adding troops to our units.

The Hubris that you have, naively so, is that "having no choice" is the status quo. A more accurate term is they have no choice now, they are searching... Trump is not the right person for this time, it is starting to become more and more clear. He is stuck in a paradigm of his post-WW2 education and is trying to go back in time. That is dangerous.
No. YOU are dangerous. You are ignorant of geopolitics AND history. I will drink French wine. I will not purchase it. Do you know why? Because the French refused President Reagan's request for overflight for Operation El Dorado Canyon. So did the Spanish. Had to fly the F-111s out over the Atlantic, thru the Straits of Gibraltar, and half-way down the Med...multiple refuelings. So there is absolutely noting remarkable about what we are seeing from Europe. it's what they do. Trump got nothing to do with it. The difference is, times have changed. We do not have to tolerate European alligator-arming their alliance responsibilities. We can poke them a LOT harder. And should.

Watch the reserve currency, that is where I think China is playing the game.
Nobody with more than two rocks inside their brain is going to dump USD for Renminbi.

But, as you say. All is well. Nobody else on the planet has any choice but to do what we want. Right?
We've literally never been better. At no time in my life have we more clearly overmatched our adversaries.

Expect to see our Nato bases start to transition to former Warsaw Pact countries. They are far better allies than the fops in Western Europe. And that's before we get to the demographic and political changes in Western Europe which are dragging them out of the liberal order.

I mean, seriously. Panama cozies up to China, letting a Chinese company take over management of the Canal.....knowing what US interests are.....knowing what what their treaty obligations are....despite complaints from prior administrations. So Trump lowered the boom on them. They quickly submitted to our demands. would you rather Trump have played nice like his predecessors and let the Chinese foothold there grow? or are you going to take the win Trump got?

You are just so incredibly unserious here. LIke as out of touch as all the isolationists we have here.

What? Trump ran on isolationism.
He ran on America First, which is most definitely not isolationism.

We do agree on the Warsaw Pact Nations, they do not want to go back. Poland will take all our German Bases in a heartbeat.
It's almost happened a couple of times. Seems foreordained now. Russian failure in Ukraine also makes it a lot easier to pull off. Russia will hate it, but they can't do anything about it. And it also makes more sense in the context of German rearmament.

The French have been the French since the Maginot Line failed. DeGaul was no better than Macron, don't use the French as an example. We didn't "have to" in 1949. The US never HAD to support NATO. The two oceans took care of that.
You are conceding the point here...... As I said, this is not the first time leftist governments in France & Spain poked us in the eye when we acted on manifestly obvious national interest.

Submitted to our demands? We are still going through the **** over there and Iran still controls the Straits.
Stop moving the goal posts. Panama did submit to our demands. Quickly. Venezuela did, too, after we arrested their President. Cuba hasn't. Yet. But will. And we will get what we want in Iran, too.
The Houthi's still exisist and Hezbelloah/Hamas are still around.
Houthis are an ethnic group, so they'll not likely be eliminated anytime soon. Hiz/Hamas are %90+ degraded. Very dismal future for both, as organizations, although the ethnicity of each make their total elimination very, very unlikely short of genocide.
Come on, you know this is a 20 year "police action" we will be there in large numbers for the foreseeable future. At least Europe was a good duty station, the Sandbox is a ****hole.
Crazy talk. Iran is not going to last 20yrs. Closer to 20 days.

But, I believe that is what you want. This cheerleading is BS, you want the US in it up to our necks.

I just can't believe that actually believed that the Iranians were 2 weeks from a nuclear bomb.
takes about two weeks to turn 60% uranium into weapons grade material. From there, the timeline is all about testing and fitting to a delivery vehicle (plane, ship, missile). That they had the tools to do all of that is not in question. Their possession of 60% uranium is not in question.

now you're just redefining reality to fit your worldview.
Progressive Democrats do that, ya know.....
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redefine? No, I was going by Trump term 1. That is on me. In all fairness, I found this article and re-read it. Thought the interviewer did a fair job. He said he would do pretty much everything he is doing.

I am one that did not read the fine-print. I thought we were getting Mnuchin, and Pompeo. We got Bessent and Miller. So, I stand corrected, he is doing what he said. I was stupid enough to vote for him based on round 1. Shame on me.








Donald Trump TIME Interview on 2024 Transcript: Read
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



no **** mags. we figured that out long ago. You know the world done gone cray when Mags is the voice of reason.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What happened to these members of Congress that said they were going to name names? They gave demands for the full files to be released or they would get on TV or the floor of Congress and release them...... and nothing.....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember when all the docs were going to be released in 10 days because Trump won... Momentous. Like DOGE, draining the swamp. I can't even say with straight face.






I forgot, he changed. Now he thinks they are smart.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
now that the war is over and Iran only has 70% missile launchers, 65% of drones according to the CIA. Good thing they are totally obliterated and we won. Funny how they troll Trump. Oh, haven't quite got that 1 pager back yet. oh, a little matter of uranium. They ain't turning that over. One hell of a diversion from the pee pee tapes, Donnie. Oh, can we get that Nookie-Girl First Lady on the stand and see what she knows as she was brought here by Epstein and yes, your First Lady was an escort. Let's get all that up and running.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Has t he said he was going to name names? What is he waiting for?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:



Has t he said he was going to name names? What is he waiting for?


Yeah...it's getting to be time to s or get off the pot
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.