Harrison Bergeron said:
Or they just should release everything with zero redactions. It is a no-win situation.
In a representative form of government, transparency is one of the fundamental values. The threshhold for redacting anything should be incredibly high.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that outside of:
(1) The specific capabilities of military hardware
(2) Details about military hardware that is under development
(3) The identities of spies involved in human intelligence gathering overseas
Almost nothing should be redacted.
I'm not sure who the Justice Department is trying to shield here, but it is clear they are working hard to allow the name(s) of someone or something not to become public...and it isn't the names of victims.