* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days

213,042 Views | 2537 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mitch Henessey said:

whiterock said:

Mitch Henessey said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Henessey said:

Trump Derangement Syndrome...or maybe he's just the massive POS we all said he was all along.

It would be hilarious to watch the house of cards crumble around him as he literally ****s his pants on live television (which happened yesterday, look it up) if it wasn't so damn sad for the country I love so dearly.

I think it's weird you're not outraged about the intentional transing of kids for pedophiles.

I would think it's real weird that you're still clinging to right-wing talking points at a time when your entire movement is being exposed as nothing more than pedophiles, but I've read enough of your posts to not be surprised.

LOL anyone who disagrees with him is a pedophile.....

You're very good at projecting

nah. that's the realm of the left. Every accusation is an admission.
All I know is that I've never voted for anyone, be it at the local or federal level, who's shown up in the Epstein Files. Let alone for someone who shows up over 38,000 times. But that's just me.

I'll leave it to the radical right to continue to attempt to be the country's moral police whilst electing actual perverts to serve as their representatives.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

All I know is that I've never voted for anyone, be it at the local or federal level, who's shown up in the Epstein Files.

How would you know? They've just recently been released. Are you clairvoyant? You didn't vote for Clinton 30+ years ago because you foresaw he'd end up in the Epstein files?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wake me up when someone can make some intelligible sense of all this.

To this point, all I've seen is groypers yelling "goyim," Republicans pointing at Clinton, Democrats pointing at Trump, and other people pointing out that a lot of the stuff from the files was abject nonsense.

If an actual adult tries to get their arms around this thing at some point, it would be interesting to see what they can make of it. But that's going to take more work than 15 minutes of scrolling social media for confirmation rage bait.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

Mitch Henessey said:

All I know is that I've never voted for anyone, be it at the local or federal level, who's shown up in the Epstein Files.

How would you know? They've just recently been released. Are you clairvoyant? You didn't vote for Clinton 30+ years ago because you foresaw he'd end up in the Epstein files?
Because you can search the files for names. And no one I've ever voted for is in what's been released to this point.

As to your last question, no, I never voted for Clinton, primarily for 2 reasons:

1) I was not of voting age when he was running for office.
2) I voted (R) in every Presidential election of my adult life until the Republican party decided that Donald J. Trump was the best they could come up with.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember the Wayfair 'conspiracy'.

is it normal to spend $8,453 on a single item at Wayfair?

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welp

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Not a fan of public hearings. Transcript releases, ok. Clown show, no thanks.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw something today where Bill Gates did an interview yesterday or today and he was asked about the files…. His response was he never went to an island, party etc. and that these "emails" were fakes sent by JE to JE "probably" as some sort of cover for himself.

He did make one good point that a lot of wealthy people actually did do legitimate business with JE in his finance stuff and some people have been in the list merely because of mentions, or other means (I forget what he said on how that was) without actually having ties to JE
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

Wake me up when someone can make some intelligible sense of all this.

To this point, all I've seen is groypers yelling "goyim," Republicans pointing at Clinton, Democrats pointing at Trump, and other people pointing out that a lot of the stuff from the files was abject nonsense.

If an actual adult tries to get their arms around this thing at some point, it would be interesting to see what they can make of it. But that's going to take more work than 15 minutes of scrolling social media for confirmation rage bait.

Katie Couric is actually trying. She has an attorney that know document review and it putting it together. From the initial listen on my way to work, it is pretty balanced on the politics, better than I expected. They simply going into what is in there, how it is cross-referenced and how messed up the files are. Worth listening to if interested in a less social media approach.

I AM NOT saying it is correct, I agree or that the rest of the show is worth listening to. Just passing along someone that seemed to at least explain the state of the Epstein files and who is mentioned.

Epstein Files, Nationalizing Elections, and Training Agents: What To Know
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have bigger issues to handle..like a missing Grandma

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well. Hillary is going to be the heroine here. She is requiring Public Meeting and wants it televised. She said if we are going to do this, let's do it. She is asking for Trump to go on after Bill under oath.


I would do pay per view to watch that...


Hillary Clinton pushes for public House hearing in Jeffrey Epstein probe
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Common MAGA, you bunch of MEOWs. Rip the band aid off and let the pee pee games begin!. Here is the one BIG ONE which would be most awesome to know. Where in the hell did Epstein get Billions? He was a freaking teacher. Teach by and large don't do ***** who was financing? Trumpy bear, maybe?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



She is not someone I would want to mess with. Bill is just a likable scoundrel, she is downright mean.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is trying to buddy up to the Clintons now because he knows they can burn him to the ground.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably not the topic for him to weigh in on

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

Trump is trying to buddy up to the Clintons now because he knows they can burn him to the ground.


I want the public hearing.... Actually on Hillary's side on this count.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe the most remarkable thing of 2025-26 is how morons actually believe Trump is implicated in the Epstein files as if Biden would have have released every detail if he had been.

How are people so freaking stupid.
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

We have bigger issues to handle..like a missing Grandma



This is absurd. We don't do this for all the children that go missing (stolen) each year...
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:



She is not someone I would want to mess with. Bill is just a likable scoundrel, she is downright mean.

She is the absolute worse human being. My neighbor was a private pilot and few her and some cronies around one year - - said it was the worse experience he ever had. He ended up quitting the contract half way through because she was so awful.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Maybe the most remarkable thing of 2025-26 is how morons actually believe Trump is implicated in the Epstein files as if Biden would have have released every detail if he had been.

How are people so freaking stupid.
Maybe because Biden didn't choose to weaponize the DOJ against his political opponents? I'm under no illusion that Biden was a good president, but he at least adhered to the American tradition of allowing the DOJ to be impartial, or at least politically neutral.

The Epstein Files were sealed by the DOJ, and while Biden could have ordered them to be unsealed, he never chose to do so.

It's really not that difficult to understand unless you're actively looking for reasons to defend Trump, which gets harder to do by the day.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluesBear said:

Jack Bauer said:

We have bigger issues to handle..like a missing Grandma



This is absurd. We don't do this for all the children that go missing (stolen) each year...

We also don't burn loot and murder for an entire summer, kill at least 14 people, cause more than $2B in property damage for every violent brother high on fentanyl ... but we did.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

nMaybe the most remarkable thing of 2025-26 is how morons actually believe Trump is implicated in the Epstein files as if Biden would have have released every detail if he had been.

How are people so freaking stupid.

Maybe because Biden didn't choose to weaponize the DOJ against his political opponents? I'm under no illusion that Biden was a good president, but he at least adhered to the American tradition of allowing the DOJ to be impartial, or at least politically neutral.

The Epstein Files were sealed by the DOJ, and while Biden could have ordered them to be unsealed, he never chose to do so.

It's really not that difficult to understand unless you're actively looking for reasons to defend Trump, which gets harder to do by the day.

I'm sorry .. are you a literal ****ing rhegard or just playing one on this site.

You know Biden pioneered weaponize the DOJ. You're not this ****ing stupid are you?

I swear we cannot have nice things because we let idiotic morons like you vote.

BTW you ****ing ass clow ... Biden's team released Trump's taxes illegally and released a SCOTUS pre-decision also illegally. I swear you cannot be this be of an idiot. I have lost all patience for you morons that live in fantasy land.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.