I havent mentioned Cambodian girls in years. You must have been around longer than your name suggests.

But you are correct. I suspect they still do.

Now back to you. Do you pay extra for your vehicles just to help America's manufacturing?
Do you want everyone to be forced to do it.?

Seems like in a free society we should have the choice to overpay.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I havent mentioned Cambodian girls in years. You must have been around longer than your name suggests.

But you are correct. I suspect they still do.

Now back to you. Do you pay extra for your vehicles just to help America's manufacturing?
Do you want everyone to be forced to do it.?

Seems like in a free society we should have the choice to overpay.

---

You mention returning to Cambodia often enough.

LOL

Back to me ?
You don't determine the ground rules of this or any other discussion.

Trump is constitutionally ineligible for a third term. All his talk about it was a dog whistle for rabid fascists. He's trolling them big time and they fell for it.

WSJ:

Quote:

---

President Trump on Tuesday received and discussed a draft copy of a book by lawyer Alan Dershowitz that studies whether Trump could constitutionally serve a third term as commander in chief, according to the veteran legal adviser.

In an interview Wednesday with The Wall Street Journal, Dershowitz said he told Trump the Constitution wasn't clear on the issue.

In a meeting in the Oval Office, Dershowitz handed Trump a draft of the book, titled "Could President Trump Constitutionally Serve a Third Term?," which is set to be published next year. Dershowitz said the book lays out a host of scenarios in which an individual could serve a third term.

---

There is an amendment from 1870 or 1890 the makes it illegal for a previous president to serve or even be elected as a vice president. But of course it is an old rule. They could probably twist it to mean something else like they try to do with the birthright amendment.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

There is an amendment from 1870 or 1890 the makes it illegal for a previous president to serve or even be elected as a vice president. But of course it is an old rule. They could probably twist it to mean something else like they try to do with the birthright amendment.

---

If you are referring to the 12th amendment that says no person that is constitutionally ineligible for president can be VP that is from around 1800-1810.

The only amendment in the time frame you mentioned is the 15th.

Yes, thats the one. Thanks.

President Donald Trump broke off from a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago Monday to once more brag about his new $400 million White House ballroom.

"It's... After realizing we're going to do the inauguration in that building... It's got all bulletproof glass. It's got all drone, they call it drone-free roof. Drones won't touch it. It's a big… It's a big, beautiful, safe building."

It was not previously known that the next presidential inauguration ceremony is intended to be held in the ballroom. The Independent has reached out to the White House for more details.

Sam Lowry said:

---

WSJ:

Quote:

---

President Trump on Tuesday received and discussed a draft copy of a book by lawyer Alan Dershowitz that studies whether Trump could constitutionally serve a third term as commander in chief, according to the veteran legal adviser.

In an interview Wednesday with The Wall Street Journal, Dershowitz said he told Trump the Constitution wasn't clear on the issue.

In a meeting in the Oval Office, Dershowitz handed Trump a draft of the book, titled "Could President Trump Constitutionally Serve a Third Term?," which is set to be published next year. Dershowitz said the book lays out a host of scenarios in which an individual could serve a third term.

---

---

oh, you mean the same Dershowitz that is all over the Epstein files. yeah, that guy and eff Trump. He can't be gone to the next life soon enough .

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Nice in theory, but at 4 percent unemployment, the only people in the U.S. that don't have a job don't want a job.

---

You need to stop looking at U3 and start looking at U6 to get a true picture of unemployment in America. U3 may be 4%, but U6 is almost double that. Job creation is anemic by historical standards. Continuing deportations and ending the H1B program will go a long way towards creating a future where "the only Americans who don't have a job are those who don't want one". That future doesn't exist today.

...and no, I'm not voting for Trump again. (1) Unconstitutional. (2) He's too old.