Trump Federalizes DC police and sends in the national guard

24,945 Views | 390 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by boognish_bear
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 12:56p, 9/10/25
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
boognish_bear said:


Did not listen but agree - National Guard should not be sent to cities without a request from the state or emergency.


Actually both Noem and Trump are quoted as saying the Fed has no right unless asked by Gov.

I think each state's National Guard should be trained by the Federals as to how to go into a city and restore order, break up gangs, stop illegal protests and so forth. Set this up, then first in the future, the state and city officials can call for their own troops; if they fail to do that, the Feds come in at their own discretion

But it is up to the Governor to use the National Guard and then ASK for Federal assistance. Unless there is a specific Federal law that is being enforced, like segregation under Eisenhower, Feds need to stay out of States. Both Noem and Trump have stated that in the past, before this Administration. DC is different, no issues.

Not really arguing that. I'm saying that there is an alternative. Have NATIONAL agencies train the Texas National Guard in Texas, for example, to be able to go into the depths of Houston or Austin or any other city with high murder rates. This way the Governors can call on them in a moment. If the Governors are like Pritzer and eating their crime stats, the National guard might call up the Illinois National Guard to do what the fat man has never done, attempt to prevent crime in his state
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
1
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 2:44p, 9/10/25
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
boognish_bear said:


Did not listen but agree - National Guard should not be sent to cities without a request from the state or emergency.


Actually both Noem and Trump are quoted as saying the Fed has no right unless asked by Gov.

I think each state's National Guard should be trained by the Federals as to how to go into a city and restore order, break up gangs, stop illegal protests and so forth. Set this up, then first in the future, the state and city officials can call for their own troops; if they fail to do that, the Feds come in at their own discretion

But it is up to the Governor to use the National Guard and then ASK for Federal assistance. Unless there is a specific Federal law that is being enforced, like segregation under Eisenhower, Feds need to stay out of States. Both Noem and Trump have stated that in the past, before this Administration. DC is different, no issues.

Not really arguing that. I'm saying that there is an alternative. Have NATIONAL agencies train the Texas National Guard in Texas, for example, to be able to go into the depths of Houston or Austin or any other city with high murder rates. This way the Governors can call on them in a moment. If the Governors are like Pritzer and eating their crime stats, the National guard might call up the Illinois National Guard to do what the fat man has never done, attempt to prevent crime in his state

Gotcha. No issues here with it if the Govs ask for the assistance.
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 3:35p, 9/10/25
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
boognish_bear said:
'


Did not listen but agree - National Guard should not be sent to cities without a request from the state or emergency.


Actually both Noem and Trump are quoted as saying the Fed has no right unless asked by Gov.

I think each state's National Guard should be trained by the Federals as to how to go into a city and restore order, break up gangs, stop illegal protests and so forth. Set this up, then first in the future, the state and city officials can call for their own troops; if they fail to do that, the Feds come in at their own discretion

But it is up to the Governor to use the National Guard and then ASK for Federal assistance. Unless there is a specific Federal law that is being enforced, like segregation under Eisenhower, Feds need to stay out of States. Both Noem and Trump have stated that in the past, before this Administration. DC is different, no issues.

Not really arguing that. I'm saying that there is an alternative. Have NATIONAL agencies train the Texas National Guard in Texas, for example, to be able to go into the depths of Houston or Austin or any other city with high murder rates. This way the Governors can call on them in a moment. If the Governors are like Pritzer and eating their crime stats, the National guard might call up the Illinois National Guard to do what the fat man has never done, attempt to prevent crime in his state

Gotcha. No issues here with it if the Govs ask for the assistance.

It was the only thing I could come with, thinking 'outside the box'. Imagine it being like th Texas Rangers, 'One Ranger, one riot'. Maybe a small community needs help as they have gangs or meth labs, it's too much for the local cops/county and they send in a dozen Texas National Guard to help clean the situation up
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
2 edits
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 5:43p, 9/10/25
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Assassin said:
FLBear5630 said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
boognish_bear said:
'


Did not listen but agree - National Guard should not be sent to cities without a request from the state or emergency.


Actually both Noem and Trump are quoted as saying the Fed has no right unless asked by Gov.

I think each state's National Guard should be trained by the Federals as to how to go into a city and restore order, break up gangs, stop illegal protests and so forth. Set this up, then first in the future, the state and city officials can call for their own troops; if they fail to do that, the Feds come in at their own discretion

But it is up to the Governor to use the National Guard and then ASK for Federal assistance. Unless there is a specific Federal law that is being enforced, like segregation under Eisenhower, Feds need to stay out of States. Both Noem and Trump have stated that in the past, before this Administration. DC is different, no issues.

Not really arguing that. I'm saying that there is an alternative. Have NATIONAL agencies train the Texas National Guard in Texas, for example, to be able to go into the depths of Houston or Austin or any other city with high murder rates. This way the Governors can call on them in a moment. If the Governors are like Pritzer and eating their crime stats, the National guard might call up the Illinois National Guard to do what the fat man has never done, attempt to prevent crime in his state

Gotcha. No issues here with it if the Govs ask for the assistance.

It was the only thing I could come with, thinking 'outside the box'. Imagine it being like th Texas Rangers, 'One Ranger, one riot'. Maybe a small community needs help as they have gangs or meth labs, it's too much for the local cops/county and they send in a dozen Texas National Guard to help clean the situation up

You guys get me wrong, I have no issues with what he is doing. I just want to see him use the processes that the US has in place AND doing it in non-destructive manner. I think the policies are good, the execution is bad
Reply Quote
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Harrison Bergeron • 8:53p, 9/10/25
I understand the sentiment of allowing those cities to suffer the consequences of repeated stupid votes but I cannot go that far. It's just wrong. Besides, the problems in those cities & states often spill over to the rest of the country. How many illegals that were pampered by California ended up committing heinous crimes in other states? IIRC the murderer of Laken Riley in Georgia was one. I know Singh, the Indian with a CDL who cannot read road signs & who killed three migrants in Florida, was another. There are probably dozens of hundreds of examples.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
1
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:33p, 9/11/25
This doesn't seem very satirical:

https://babylonbee.com/news/7-radical-ideas-to-make-our-cities-safer
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 8:33p, 9/11/25
historian said:
This doesn't seem very satirical:

https://babylonbee.com/news/7-radical-ideas-to-make-our-cities-safer

It's not, he probably intended to put it on notthebee.com
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
1
Redbrickbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:25p, 9/14/25
Reply Quote
2
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Redbrickbear • 8:39p, 9/14/25
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?
Reply Quote
3
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 8:43p, 9/14/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


That twitter account skews Dem... so the replies are probably tilted that direction.
Reply Quote
Redbrickbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 10:13p, 9/14/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Redbrickbear • 11:46p, 9/14/25
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.
Reply Quote
Redbrickbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:16a, 9/15/25
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.


Senator Fetterman understood that Democrats need to pivot away from be the anti-law and order party

It's good politics to not fight with the President about cleaning up DC using the national guard
Reply Quote
1
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:27a, 9/15/25
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.

Reply Quote
4
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Redbrickbear • 8:38a, 9/15/25
Redbrickbear said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.


Senator Fetterman understood that Democrats need to pivot away from be the anti-law and order party

It's good politics to not fight with the President about cleaning up DC using the national guard

He was asked about other cities across the country, not just DC. Pritzker's statement a couple of weeks ago was right on the mark. Should be required reading.
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:51a, 9/15/25
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.


Senator Fetterman understood that Democrats need to pivot away from be the anti-law and order party

It's good politics to not fight with the President about cleaning up DC using the national guard

He was asked about other cities across the country, not just DC. Pritzker's statement a couple of weeks ago was right on the mark. Should be required reading.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-shootings-weekend-least-19-shot-2-fatally-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/17817507/
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
2
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 8:55a, 9/15/25
Assassin said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.


Senator Fetterman understood that Democrats need to pivot away from be the anti-law and order party

It's good politics to not fight with the President about cleaning up DC using the national guard

He was asked about other cities across the country, not just DC. Pritzker's statement a couple of weeks ago was right on the mark. Should be required reading.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-shootings-weekend-least-19-shot-2-fatally-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/17817507/

Fearmongering to justify authoritarianism? How original.
Reply Quote
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 9:04a, 9/15/25
KaiBear said:
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.



We good.
Reply Quote
1
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:35a, 9/15/25
Sam Lowry said:
Assassin said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
Sam Lowry said:
Redbrickbear said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Redbrickbear said:


Lots of replies not liking fetterman anymore. I wonder how many are real people?


Yea… most likely bots

Sen. Fetterman is probably the hardest Democrat to unseat in a purple/battleground State right now.

Because he keeps making such common sense statements and taking solid middle of the road rational positions on National issues/topics/controversies

If he is doing it for pure political reasons or because he really believes it…either way the guy is building a strong base of support among average Pennsylvania folks and widening his electoral margins

It was a really poor answer with no sign that he understood the issue at all. Of course we all like to think our NG are good guys. That's not a reason to misuse them and send them where they aren't wanted or needed.


Senator Fetterman understood that Democrats need to pivot away from be the anti-law and order party

It's good politics to not fight with the President about cleaning up DC using the national guard

He was asked about other cities across the country, not just DC. Pritzker's statement a couple of weeks ago was right on the mark. Should be required reading.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-shootings-weekend-least-19-shot-2-fatally-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/17817507/

Fearmongering to justify authoritarianism? How original.

I didnt mean to scare you.
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
4
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mitch Blood Green • 10:44a, 9/15/25
Mitch Blood Green said:
KaiBear said:
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.



We good.

Hundreds murdered annually in Chicago....the vast majority of whom are black.

Carry on.
Reply Quote
2
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 11:12a, 9/15/25
KaiBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
KaiBear said:
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.



We good.

Hundreds murdered annually in Chicago....the vast majority of whom are black.

Carry on.


So, we good and you good.
Reply Quote
1
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 11:37a, 9/15/25
KaiBear said:
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.

The DOJ statistics show that since the department began collecting the data in 1976, Chicago is the most corrupt federal judicial district in the nation, and that Illinois, on a per capita basis, is the third most corrupt state.

https://pols.uic.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/273/2021/02/Corruption-Spikes-in-IL-Anti-Corruption-Rpt-13-final2.-1.pdf
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
2
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mitch Blood Green • 11:39a, 9/15/25
Mitch Blood Green said:
KaiBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
KaiBear said:
Thank God Trump is now sending the National Guard to Memphis instead of Chicago.

Where the crime problem is at least as bad……yet the help of the Guard is wanted by the locals.

I genuinely feel sorry for the innocent people living in Chicago. More are going to be killed and the Democratic machine doesn't care.



We good.

Hundreds murdered annually in Chicago....the vast majority of whom are black.

Carry on.


So, we good and you good.


I am not at all 'good' with the consistent murders of innocent people.

Unlike you skin color is not a thing with me.

Trump is saving lives in DC …..mostly black lives.

He will now do the same in Memphis.
Reply Quote
4
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:06p, 9/22/25
Reply Quote
1
BearFan33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 2:12p, 9/22/25
boognish_bear said:

This doesn't bother me. We spend taxpayer money on such ridiculous things. At least we are getting some return on this....safety and some aesthetics in the nations capitol.
Reply Quote
3
Redbrickbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:21p, 9/25/25
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:36p, 10/3/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:48p, 10/7/25
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:09p, 10/23/25
Reply Quote
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:22p, 10/23/25
Crime is down in DC

Crime is down in Memphis

It's good to be the KING.
Reply Quote
1
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:41p, 10/23/25
Pleasantly surprised that SF is going to step to the plate. Good for them. This could be the start of the break in the big blue California wall.

My guess is that Hollywood will not do the same for LA

Trump backs away from sending federal troops to San Francisco after pleas from tech leaders
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:36p, 10/29/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:29p, 10/29/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:42p, 10/30/25
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:31a, 11/1/25
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.