BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Hey Viviek, go hop on the non stop train back to India. You;re done.
It's an interesting world we live in where so-called conservatives are happier about a conservative losing to a leftist nutjob, merely because that conservative supports Israel.
Just goes to show we have a lot of people claiming to be conservative who aren't.
Actually this isnt about Israel. Its about destroying the political career of an Indian scammer that rigged an FDA adcom phase 1 trial to to a pump and dump on a failed drug. Now he wants to be president and bring infinity of his country men here. He had to lose and the GOP shouldve known better than to keep giving us these lousy candidates. Literally any normal Ohio guy couldve won this just like in SC literally any man or even woman other than Darline Graham couldve won that senate seat. The GOP deserves what it got.
Do you think that the Democrat who won is in favor of immigration?
Of course she is.
For you, perfect is the enemy of good.
It doesnt matter. Destroying Vivek is worth one term of some dem so the GOP can learn from their stupidity.
Yup! This was a perfect opportunity to hurt the GOP.
It's safe to say this administration is a wash, we weren't getting any meaningful legislation from Congress and Trump has completely lost the plot… so might as well burn it all down. Now the Dems control Congress but they won't be able to get anything done over the next two years.
Not going to lie, I wasn't expecting Republicans to lose in their own state races, but I suppose it just does more to drive our point across. Better lock-in, GOP!
Can you identify your point, and the policies these new candidates are going to run on that are going to attract a broad coalition?
We're not running candidates. We're going to stage a far-right military coup and throw you into a labor camp.
Awesome! Can't wait. I suppose I will be there with the Jews?
Let me know if you can get around to identifying those apparently difficult to identify policies.
I gave you the answer. You either ignored it or you're too stupid to understand it. I'm going with the latter.
The New Right will largely mimic Trump's policies from 2016 and parts of 2024.
I think you want me to say something more extreme so you can push that narrative of yours, but nope, it's fairly simple: We largely just want Republicans who will carry out Trumps original vision.
That's not an answer. Largely mimic Trump's policies from 2016 and parts of 2024 doesn't identify anything. It seems you're being purposely vague and obtuse.
Why so hard to be more specific?
Actually it is an answer. Everyone here remembers what Trump campaigned on. But I suppose that answer would appear vague to someone who doesn't remember.
Google is free!
Of course one can remember. But you said largely mimic and parts. That's different from endorsing his entire platform.
Again, is there a reason you can't/won't answer?
I was actually waiting for you to finally explain how Thomas Massie is an anti-Semite from a few months ago.
If you could sufficiently answer that then I'll grant your request.
LOL. "Sufficiently answer." I like the hedge that allows you an out clause. If you disagree with my characterization (which you undoubtedly have and will), then you don't have to answer my very simple question and avoid being nailed down.
Ok, young pup, I will answer you (is it the third or fourth time, now?) knowing you very likely don't have the balls to answer my question.
I don't consider Thomas Massie antisemitic simply because he opposes aid to Israel or criticizes the Israeli government. I likewise believe we provide far too much support to Israel, though I don't believe in cutting off funding altogether. But that's not my issue with Massie.
My concern is the rhetoric Massie repeatedly uses to make that case. Massie has portrayed support of Israel as the opposite of "American patriotism," suggesting that support for Israel is somehow inconsistent with loyalty to America, and he has characterized American pro-Israel political activity as foreign influence over our government. He also accused Jews for his defeat and once again suggested dual loyalties.
Those are not ordinary criticisms of US-Israeli policy. They invoke the very old antisemitic themes of dual loyalty, foreign allegiance, Jewish money, and improper control over government. You can oppose every dollar of aid to Israel without resorting to any of that. When someone repeatedly frames Jewish or pro-Israel Americans as a foreign interest whose money is corrupting or controlling Congress, I think it is entirely fair to call that rhetoric antisemitic.
I said all this knowing you will find a way to find my answer to your question "insufficient" so you don't have to answer mine. But I guess I have the nerve to stand by my positions. I hope you find yours.
