Realitybites said:
The post Soviet Russians have expressed a desire to be allied with the west for decades. We see how that is working out. Such overtures can be rejected, and Israel may decide that apart from looting our treasury they won't "ally" with us.
Sam Lowry said:sombear said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Realitybites said:Quote:
How does abandoning the best ally we have
When you start from the wrong premise, you reach the wrong conclusions.
My point exactly. None of the Israel critics have even attempted to explain how we would be better off without Israel as an ally.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
Trump's progress in the Middle East, our strong relations with the Saudis, Jordan, Qatar, and others, and the middle east turning on Iran proved Mearsheimer embarrassingly wrong. If he had morals, he would issue a retraction to his own book . . . .
The problems he describes have only gotten worse since then. The US-supported genocide in Gaza and attacks on Qatar, Iran, etc. are fast convincing Middle Eastern countries that the Western empire can't be trusted.
sombear said:Sam Lowry said:sombear said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Realitybites said:Quote:
How does abandoning the best ally we have
When you start from the wrong premise, you reach the wrong conclusions.
My point exactly. None of the Israel critics have even attempted to explain how we would be better off without Israel as an ally.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
Trump's progress in the Middle East, our strong relations with the Saudis, Jordan, Qatar, and others, and the middle east turning on Iran proved Mearsheimer embarrassingly wrong. If he had morals, he would issue a retraction to his own book . . . .
The problems he describes have only gotten worse since then. The US-supported genocide in Gaza and attacks on Qatar, Iran, etc. are fast convincing Middle Eastern countries that the Western empire can't be trusted.
They all turned on Iran and Hezbollah.
More countries are supporting and singing up for the peace process.
They privately could not care less about the Palestinians, especially after the Oct massacre.
There was nothing close to a genocide.
The_barBEARian said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
RealEstateBear said:
Israel government control and power over our elected leaders couldn't more evident then right now. The attacks on Tucker and JD is coming from that faction. They're losing power and influence over us and they are getting disparate.
Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semitic people, and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
The_barBEARian said:Realitybites said:Quote:
And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
What do you mean by that?
And moving foward, are we to settle on "practicioners of Judaism" as the meaning of the term "Jew" since there are non-semitic people who practice it?
Another point to consider is that Judaism - and therefore the term "Jew" - has no meaning before Moses and the giving of the law. Abraham was the father of what we call the Semitic people - all the Semitic people - but he himself was Sumerian or maybe Akkadian. He did not practice the same religion that Moses and David did, because that religion did not exist yet.Quote:
Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
And that's a point of view that I'm open to having, so long as AIPAC registers as a foreign agent and Israel pays its own way. I'm not inherently against cooperating with Israel when our interests converge. In fact, that should be the basis of *all* our foreign dealings.
This is where I started but Israel and its Jewish and Boomer followers will literally kill any American who attempts to peacefully free America from their talons.
The Yiddish mafia of Bugsy Seagal, Dutch Schultz, and Meyer Lansky never went away.... it took over.
EatMoreSalmon said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semitic people, and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Ever notice that those who take the line your peddling always end up lumping all those who practice Judaism, Semitic people, and Israeli leadership into an international cabal out to get everyone else?
Therein lies the problem with announced hatred of "the Jews." The hatred gets smothered over with anecdotal and misrepresented events like barbecue sauce on poorly cooked meat. underneath, it is still a hatred of a people.
Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
This post was about as predictable as the sunrise.
Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.
Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
Mothra said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Did you catch the part in the beginning where Graham is essentially arguing Jews are still God's chosen people? Found that interesting.
As for his idea that Jews run the banks and what not, know, don't agree with that. It's factually just not a true statement. As for the synagogue of Satan, indeed that is a group of unbelieving Jews who were persecuting Christians in the latter days of Revelation.
muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
Do you know which records the recordings presented on the X post come from?
muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
Do you know which records the recordings presented on the X post come from?
Looks like it was real and then BIlly got the call and had to apoligize for his opinions.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/03/us/billy-graham-apologizes-to-jews-for-his-remarks-on-nixon-tapes.html
Billy Graham Apologizes to Jews For His Remarks on Nixon Tapes
Mar 3, 2002 Mr. Graham, 83, apologized for his words captured on audiotape 30 years ago. The conversation was among 500 hours of Nixon tapes released l
EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
Do you know which records the recordings presented on the X post come from?
Looks like it was real and then BIlly got the call and had to apoligize for his opinions.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/03/us/billy-graham-apologizes-to-jews-for-his-remarks-on-nixon-tapes.html
Billy Graham Apologizes to Jews For His Remarks on Nixon Tapes
Mar 3, 2002 Mr. Graham, 83, apologized for his words captured on audiotape 30 years ago. The conversation was among 500 hours of Nixon tapes released l
There are 950 hours of tapes now - just White House tapes. There are hundreds more hours of other audio records.
I wonder which ones were used, as there are obviously at least two clips in the X post.
muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
Do you know which records the recordings presented on the X post come from?
Looks like it was real and then BIlly got the call and had to apoligize for his opinions.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/03/us/billy-graham-apologizes-to-jews-for-his-remarks-on-nixon-tapes.html
Billy Graham Apologizes to Jews For His Remarks on Nixon Tapes
Mar 3, 2002 Mr. Graham, 83, apologized for his words captured on audiotape 30 years ago. The conversation was among 500 hours of Nixon tapes released l
There are 950 hours of tapes now - just White House tapes. There are hundreds more hours of other audio records.
I wonder which ones were used, as there are obviously at least two clips in the X post.
That i couldnt tell you but if you deep dive on google it may be findable but if the NYT wrote an article about him apologizing when the remarks became public I assume they're real.
found this
EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:EatMoreSalmon said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Who has these "Nixon Tapes" that have this on them? Or is this another fake Billy Graham ai voice?
a significant portion of the Nixon White House tapes is publicly available, largely due to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974. The materials are preserved and released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum and other platforms.
Over 2000 hours of the Nixon tapes are publicly available.
The Nixon tapes contain numerous recordings of conversations between President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, including discussions about various topics from the Vietnam War to Nixon's speeches. The tapes offer insight into their personal and political relationship, with Graham offering encouragement and political commentary, such as his comments on a 1971 Vietnam-related speech by Nixon.
Examples of taped conversationsKey topics discussed
- June 27, 1972: A phone call captured by the White House Telephone taping system, known as Conversation 026-016.
- February 1, 1972: A conversation recorded by the Oval Office taping system, known as Conversation 662-004.
- April 11, 1973: A meeting in the Oval Office and a subsequent phone call (Conversation 044-143) are documented, with Graham and a White House operator present during the initial meeting.
- April 30, 1973: Nixon received calls from several supporters, including Graham, following a televised address about the Watergate scandal.
- April 7, 1971: A conversation on this date is included in the Presidential Recordings Digital Edition.
- Political commentary: In a 1971 call, Graham gave Nixon feedback on a speech, mentioning how he included a sentence about former senators who supported the Tonkin resolution.
- Encouragement: Graham offered Nixon encouragement, telling him that he had many people praying for him and that it meant a lot to the President.
- Public opinion: Graham commented on public reaction to Nixon's speeches, suggesting that while editorial writers might have a different opinion, the public would likely love a specific address.
Do you know which records the recordings presented on the X post come from?
Looks like it was real and then BIlly got the call and had to apoligize for his opinions.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/03/us/billy-graham-apologizes-to-jews-for-his-remarks-on-nixon-tapes.html
Billy Graham Apologizes to Jews For His Remarks on Nixon Tapes
Mar 3, 2002 Mr. Graham, 83, apologized for his words captured on audiotape 30 years ago. The conversation was among 500 hours of Nixon tapes released l
There are 950 hours of tapes now - just White House tapes. There are hundreds more hours of other audio records.
I wonder which ones were used, as there are obviously at least two clips in the X post.
That i couldnt tell you but if you deep dive on google it may be findable but if the NYT wrote an article about him apologizing when the remarks became public I assume they're real.
found this
If they are real, then they should have been linked in the post. That they are not tells me the clips don't tell all, or are doctored. Disclosure is needed when the burden of proof is on the proclaimer.
muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Right leaning, white identitarianism is very obviously a reaction against a decade of anti-white rhetoric and policy driven by the media and Democratic Party starting in ~2013. This has subsided in recent years but the racial detente was already broken. https://t.co/C1jrV5WKPg
— RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS (@SaladBarFan) November 18, 2025
muddybrazos said:Mothra said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Did you catch the part in the beginning where Graham is essentially arguing Jews are still God's chosen people? Found that interesting.
As for his idea that Jews run the banks and what not, know, don't agree with that. It's factually just not a true statement. As for the synagogue of Satan, indeed that is a group of unbelieving Jews who were persecuting Christians in the latter days of Revelation.
The banks thing is true and obvious. The Rothschilds ran the banking of all of Europe and that what led Hitler to kidnap one of them at the time to make him scrub floors.
Redbrickbear said:Right leaning, white identitarianism is very obviously a reaction against a decade of anti-white rhetoric and policy driven by the media and Democratic Party starting in ~2013. This has subsided in recent years but the racial detente was already broken. https://t.co/C1jrV5WKPg
— RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS (@SaladBarFan) November 18, 2025
Mothra said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:muddybrazos said:Mothra said:sombear said:Realitybites said:sombear said:Realitybites said:EatMoreSalmon said:
Jew hatred has been a scourge of the West for centuries. It is always lurking and always ready to raise its ugly head in any circumstances it deems it can use Jews as scapegoats. It will do so even when it must use pretzel logic to try and draw others into its sphere. Jew blamers have found their own echo chambers in every generation for far too many centuries.
Now here we are once again with more of the duped trying to dupe others... and acting like their thinking is something new and enlightened. These Western Jew blamers' hatred has stewed in obscurity since WW2. Now they believe they have an opening to exploit. Like flat-earthers, they have found a bully pulpit to pronounce their beliefs and disguise them (to others and to themselves) in the troubles of the day. These Jew blamers are actually part of a stinking and rotting skeleton that has been trying to resurrect from a pit.
Never forget. Disagreeing with a Jew is one thing. Making Jews out to be the scourge of the earth is quite another. Don't be taken in by a tale almost as old as time.
Ever notice how the people who take this line never want to distinguish between people who practice Judaism, Semites people and the National Government of Israel? "Jew" is their fall back term, followed by "anti-semitic" in a dying effort to portray disagreements about foreign policy, domestic policy, and religion as "racisssssssss". They are intentionally imprecise in their language, and frankly engage in the same tactics that the NAACP and BLM have.
Great, so post for all to see that you have no problem whatsoever with Jews, and you're only problem is with wat you think is Israel's oversized influence here.
I've been extremely clear. I continue to be extremely clear.
(1) I have no issue with people of *any* ethnic background, including Semites.
(2) As of 2025 A.D., Judaism is a false pagan religion on par with Islam. I do not believe in it. Christian Zionism is a heresy. Semitic practioners of Judaism - or for that matter Ethophian practicioners of Judaism (different race, same religion in case that wasn't obvious to the public school crowd) - in the modern age are cleaving to a Mosaic covenant that has been made obsolete and thereby excluding themselves from the Abrahamic one (Galatians 5:2).
(3) I do not want *any* foreign government bribing our politicians.
This is why Christian Zionists are losing the argument. In contrast to the extremely precise, clear positions stated above they only respond with "jew hater!", "anti-semite!"
Fair.
But I submit most with your views are just as imprecise as the other side. Many of the more prominent influencers do not differentiate between their beliefs on Israel and Jews. In fact, many use quite vulgar language against Jews.
FWIW, my support for Israel has never been about the Bible or my Christian faith. Rather, it's always been about Israel being an ally democracy in the middle of hell, a strategic partner, and mostly on the "right" side.
However, I very much understand my fellow Christians who do base their support on their Biblical view. And I do not agree with your view that the Jews of the Bible are not today's Jews.
Indeed. Like a lot of his views, there is nothing biblical about replacement theology.
But he lacks the scriptural knowledge to debate anyone on those topics.Billy Graham- “This stranglehold the Jews have on the banks and the Media has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain. “
— Uncommon Sense (@Uncommonsince76) December 18, 2024
Richard Nixon- “I could never say it, but I believe it.”
pic.twitter.com/rmkYWoyhTO
Would you say that you agree or disagree with what Billy Graham has to say here on these Nixon tapes?
Did you catch the part in the beginning where Graham is essentially arguing Jews are still God's chosen people? Found that interesting.
As for his idea that Jews run the banks and what not, know, don't agree with that. It's factually just not a true statement. As for the synagogue of Satan, indeed that is a group of unbelieving Jews who were persecuting Christians in the latter days of Revelation.
The banks thing is true and obvious. The Rothschilds ran the banking of all of Europe and that what led Hitler to kidnap one of them at the time to make him scrub floors.
Well, I guess Billy's thoughts that the Jews are still a chosen people is probably a difficult pill for you to swallow.
But what did you think that clip proves, other than your antisemitism?
Nick Fuentes on the America First message and presents an ultimatum 🇺🇸
— Charging… (@RedPillSayian) November 18, 2025
“If you disavow Tucker you will not get the votes, if you disavow Israel like Thomas Massie we will show up for you” pic.twitter.com/ncTPBqrd4N
Nick Fuentes gloats about Trump refusing to disavow him
— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) November 18, 2025
"Maybe if I attack him for 3 years like Vance I'll be the Vice President" 😂 pic.twitter.com/ScsXRJaUpB
Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:sombear said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Realitybites said:Quote:
How does abandoning the best ally we have
When you start from the wrong premise, you reach the wrong conclusions.
My point exactly. None of the Israel critics have even attempted to explain how we would be better off without Israel as an ally.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
Trump's progress in the Middle East, our strong relations with the Saudis, Jordan, Qatar, and others, and the middle east turning on Iran proved Mearsheimer embarrassingly wrong. If he had morals, he would issue a retraction to his own book . . . .
The problems he describes have only gotten worse since then. The US-supported genocide in Gaza and attacks on Qatar, Iran, etc. are fast convincing Middle Eastern countries that the Western empire can't be trusted.
If anything, the attacks have actually strengthened our relations with the ME in general, most of whom loathe the countries in question.
Mothra said:Redbrickbear said:Right leaning, white identitarianism is very obviously a reaction against a decade of anti-white rhetoric and policy driven by the media and Democratic Party starting in ~2013. This has subsided in recent years but the racial detente was already broken. https://t.co/C1jrV5WKPg
— RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS (@SaladBarFan) November 18, 2025
So now both sides are into identity politics. Sad.
sombear said:Realitybites said:
I was referencing the argument that the Jews being God's chosen people are not the Jews of today.
Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Realitybites said:Quote:
How does abandoning the best ally we have
When you start from the wrong premise, you reach the wrong conclusions.
My point exactly. None of the Israel critics have even attempted to explain how we would be better off without Israel as an ally.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
LOL
in this post we see a garden-variety crackpot citing a well-known crackpot to buttress garden variety crackpottery.
If I lobby Congress not to infringe on the 2nd Amendment, does that make me a German agent (since HK is a German company)? Does that make me an Austrian agent (since Glock is an Austrian company)? Does that make me an Italian agent (since Beretta is an Italian company)? I have a Sako Safari grade 375 H&H. Does that make me a Finnish agent? I have an Army/Navy 28ga boxlock. Does that make me a British agent?
A post full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The realist argument is well explained, supported by facts, and there for you to engage with if you choose.
To your question, Mearsheimer's only allusion to FARA is to call AIPAC a "de facto" foreign agent. So technically the answer is probably no.
whiterock said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Sam Lowry said:whiterock said:Realitybites said:Quote:
How does abandoning the best ally we have
When you start from the wrong premise, you reach the wrong conclusions.
My point exactly. None of the Israel critics have even attempted to explain how we would be better off without Israel as an ally.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
LOL
in this post we see a garden-variety crackpot citing a well-known crackpot to buttress garden variety crackpottery.
If I lobby Congress not to infringe on the 2nd Amendment, does that make me a German agent (since HK is a German company)? Does that make me an Austrian agent (since Glock is an Austrian company)? Does that make me an Italian agent (since Beretta is an Italian company)? I have a Sako Safari grade 375 H&H. Does that make me a Finnish agent? I have an Army/Navy 28ga boxlock. Does that make me a British agent?
A post full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The realist argument is well explained, supported by facts, and there for you to engage with if you choose.
To your question, Mearsheimer's only allusion to FARA is to call AIPAC a "de facto" foreign agent. So technically the answer is probably no.
LOL Mearsheimer has been wrong about almost everything on Russia, thereby doing harm to foreign policy realist arguments.
I along with a majority of Americans believe the US/Israeli relationship is of significant benefit to the USA. Reasonable people can disagree on that, but the "disagree" camp is unable to make a compelling argument and is therefore reduced to ad hominem arguments - calling anyone who supports Israel and Israeli agent.
Tell us how we would be better off if Israel went away.
