Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

184,966 Views | 2542 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Mothra
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 5:29a, 4/28/26
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?


you are avoiding the question to defend a most egregiously dishonest allegation.

There is no direct cost to these "benefits" afforded to US citizens. They are merely extending certain legal protections to US citizens who choose to volunteer to serve in the Israeli Army in a conflict in which we are also directly engaged.

And stop it with the dual citizenship nonsense. US law does not recognize the existence of dual citizenship. If you earn US citizenship, you are a citizen. That's it. No benefit or penalty for having citizenship or claims on citizenship elsewhere, as the existence of it or lack thereof it is not recognized.
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 7:49a, 4/28/26
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whiterock • 9:00a, 4/28/26
whiterock said:

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?


1. The American Volunteer Group's Curtiss P-40B Warhawk aircraft, though marked with Chinese colors, flew under American control. They first flew in combat after the United States and Japan declared war.

...and because I love old warbirds:



2. On 29 September 1942, the three Eagle Squadrons were transferred from the RAF to the Eighth Air Force of the United States Army Air Forces, with the American pilots becoming officers in the USAAF.

Obviously neither of these situations covers giving benefits intended for American soldiers and veterans to individuals whose military careers were spent serving in foreign militaries.
Reply Quote
3
3 edits
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 9:09a, 4/28/26
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.


This country has been defined by "grievance politics" since the 60ties. Whoever whines the hardest gets the most back from this society. Long gone are the days of Anglo stoicism and self-reliance.
Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 9:50a, 4/28/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.


This country has been defined by "grievance politics" since the 60ties. Whoever whines the hardest gets the most back from this society. Long gone are the days of Anglo stoicism and self-reliance.

Alienating and targeting a large, voting bloc in favor of a minority people group isn't going to get you what you want, IMO, and makes for bad politics.

Grievance politics is why Trump is in office. But if you think following the leftist playbook is a good strategy, knock your socks off.

BTW, been meaning to ask, do you hate your boomer parents? Hold them responsible for putting the Jews in charge?
Reply Quote
3 edits
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 9:53a, 4/28/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.


This country has been defined by "grievance politics" since the 60ties. Whoever whines the hardest gets the most back from this society. Long gone are the days of Anglo stoicism and self-reliance.




We used to be a proper country, everyone looked out for their neighbors and did their part.

The melting pot has destroyed us.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
2
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 10:37a, 4/28/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.


This country has been defined by "grievance politics" since the 60ties. Whoever whines the hardest gets the most back from this society. Long gone are the days of Anglo stoicism and self-reliance.




We used to be a proper country, everyone looked out for their neighbors and did their part.

The melting pot has destroyed us.

Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 10:53a, 4/28/26
The_barBEARian said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
whiterock said:
The_barBEARian said:
historian said:
Do you hate that Americans fought in the Lincoln Brigades against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War or that some fought for the British against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor? It's the same kind of thing and there are lots of American Jews with ties to Israel, including family who live there.

Antisemites might believe Jews have no right to exist or to express their opinions but all Americans, including Jews, have the same rights as everyone else. That's what equality actually means.


apparently neither you nor the people posting those links actually read the (incredibly poorly written) article.

the "benefits" are for US citizens serving in the iDF, not all IDF soldiers.

i.e. let's say Lower Slobovia passed a law requiring arrest & prosecution of any IDF personnel for (whatever) war crimes. Then a US citizen on vacation with his family in LS has a little too much to drink at a restaurant one night. Gets arrested. Traces indicate he had served in the IDF at some point in the past, and gets charged with a capital offense.

This law is designed to protect US Citizens from scenarios like that.


Why should US citizens who worked for a foreign military be eligible for the same benefits as US military veterans? Are you insane? This is exactly why dual citizenship needs to be removed.
You have confirmed you did not read the article. The "benefits" are quite limited, mostly "immunity for specific legal protections."

Also, Republicans have 6 months before Democrats retake congress and this is where their priorities are... doing everything they can for Israel and nothing for the American people.
The bill was filed in 2024

Here's another part of the article you did not understand:
" Under 50 U.S.C. 3914, US citizens serving with the forces of a nation allied with the United States in the prosecution of a war or military action may receive SCRA protections if their service is similar to US military service. This provision is narrow and context-dependent, applying only where the allied force is engaged alongside the United States in a qualifying conflict. "

You are getting mad about things you did not even attempt to understand.

Ever heard of the Flying Tigers or the Eagle Squadrons?

What the hell is wrong with you?



It is incredible to me how much the woke right has embraced grievance politics. It's as if they've learned nothing from their leftist counterparts. Hatred of particular people groups might've worked in Nazi Germany, but it's doubtful it will work here.


This country has been defined by "grievance politics" since the 60ties. Whoever whines the hardest gets the most back from this society. Long gone are the days of Anglo stoicism and self-reliance.




We used to be a proper country, everyone looked out for their neighbors and did their part.

The melting pot has destroyed us.


Do you hate your boomer parents? Blame them for the world's ills?
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 3:02p, 4/28/26
Fuentes is a buffoon and a vile person. But he has a point here: Dem leaders have made it clear they want to jail republicans. They've said so repeatedly.
Reply Quote
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:10p, 4/28/26


"Diversity does not make a nation"
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
1
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 11:29p, 4/28/26
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.

Diversity of ideas can be useful if accompanied by tolerance (which Leftists often lack) and moderation. Marxist ideas are only useful when effectively refuted and exposed for how evil they are.
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 12:04a, 4/29/26
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.
Exactly.

And Trump is telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 6:49a, 4/29/26
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.

Exactly.

And Trump telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.

Many countries have "the rule of law". The question is if you have the "rule of righteous Christian law"...and that is indelibly tied to our heritage as Americans.
Reply Quote
5
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 10:32a, 4/29/26
Realitybites said:
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.

Exactly.

And Trump telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.

Many countries have "the rule of law". The question is if you have the "rule of righteous Christian law"...and that is indelibly tied to our heritage as Americans.

What do you mean by the rule of righteous Christian law?
Reply Quote
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:42a, 4/29/26
Sam Lowry said:
Realitybites said:
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.

Exactly.

And Trump telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.

Many countries have "the rule of law". The question is if you have the "rule of righteous Christian law"...and that is indelibly tied to our heritage as Americans.

What do you mean by the rule of righteous Christian law?

(.....pass out the popcorn here.....)
Reply Quote
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:46p, 4/29/26


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
2
Osodecentx
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 5:45p, 4/29/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

In this case I'm sympathetic to Fuentes
Reply Quote
3
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 6:53p, 4/29/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.
Reply Quote
1 edit
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 7:43p, 4/29/26
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.


Well the case was dismissed so it looks like you do indeed get to do that
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
2
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:52p, 4/29/26
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.
Exactly.

And Trump is telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.

The Dems do not believe in the rule of law. They are the party of crime & perversion. They pervert justice routinely and oppose all efforts of genuine justice.
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 12:34a, 4/30/26
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.

Reply Quote
2
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 8:59a, 4/30/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.


Well the case was dismissed so it looks like you do indeed get to do that

Context is important. It wasn't merely dropped, at least according to this report. He apparently entered into a deferred prosecution agreement, and had to take a class on violence. Then the "victim" was given the option of pursuing it criminally or civilly, and she chose the latter.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/2026/04/23/nick-fuentes-victim-says-no-proof-he-completed-community-service-drops-criminal-charges-for-civil-suit

I mean, yeah, you can assault someone, but it does have consequences.
Reply Quote
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 9:04a, 4/30/26
Sam Lowry said:
Realitybites said:
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
There are different kinds of diversity. The Leftists love the superficial variety, mainly defined by ethnicity or sexual perversion, but only when convenient. They can be the most vile racists imaginable when talking about Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell.

Exactly.

And Trump telling us the same thing, that our heritage as Americans is based on our identity rather than the rule of law. No radical leftist could have said it better.

Many countries have "the rule of law". The question is if you have the "rule of righteous Christian law"...and that is indelibly tied to our heritage as Americans.

What do you mean by the rule of righteous Christian law?

Not Sharia or the Code of Hammurabi.
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 12:38p, 4/30/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.
Reply Quote
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 12:43p, 4/30/26
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.
Reply Quote
2
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to muddybrazos • 12:59p, 4/30/26
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 1:14p, 4/30/26
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.

Hey we also get that you somehow feel like a virtuous person by calling everyone that disagrees with you a racist so we will let you have that message board victory. You and the woke left have a lot in common in that regard.
Reply Quote
2
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 1:55p, 4/30/26
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.


That's not the same situation he's referring to. His address was doxxed in 2024 and had hundreds of people go and harass him. The worst case was a man who came to his house with a gun, Nick called the police and the man died in a shootout with the cops. Naturally he's paranoid.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
2
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to muddybrazos • 7:36a, 5/1/26
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.

Hey we also get that you somehow feel like a virtuous person by calling everyone that disagrees with you a racist so we will let you have that message board victory. You and the woke left have a lot in common in that regard.

Lots of projection here. I reserve the racist label for those who say racist things - something you do regularly.

And I am still waiting on you to explain why Jews dying of starvation and disease in Nazi prison camps as opposed to gas chambers is an important distinction that "needs to be discussed." Let me know if you develop the courage to explain it.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 7:39a, 5/1/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.


That's not the same situation he's referring to. His address was doxxed in 2024 and had hundreds of people go and harass him. The worst case was a man who came to his house with a gun, Nick called the police and the man died in a shootout with the cops. Naturally he's paranoid.

My point is, if that happened, why are you confronting this woman on your front porch with a can of pepper spray? It's taking a huge chance.
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 2:23p, 5/1/26
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.

Hey we also get that you somehow feel like a virtuous person by calling everyone that disagrees with you a racist so we will let you have that message board victory. You and the woke left have a lot in common in that regard.

Lots of projection here. I reserve the racist label for those who say racist things - something you do regularly.

And I am still waiting on you to explain why Jews dying of starvation and disease in Nazi prison camps as opposed to gas chambers is an important distinction that "needs to be discussed." Let me know if you develop the courage to explain it.


Mothra: wHy ArE yOu sO ObSeSSed wItH tHe jEwS?

Every Member of Congress:







Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 3:48p, 5/1/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
muddybrazos said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:


Emperor defending his home from troglodyte invader.

Yeah, so you don't get to do that, as much as one might wish he or she could. At your door, outside of your home, and no threat. Can't assault someone who comes to your door, for whatever reason.



I do wish sometimes I could pepper spray the eyes of sales people that come to my door, and push them down the steps onto the payment.

But unfortunately I'd likely be cited for assault like Nicky.

You might react a little differently if you had someone come to your door to try and shoot you as well as a lot of others coming by your house to harass you bc your address was doxed on tik tok.

If I had someone come to my home to try and shoot me, I wouldn't answer the door, much less assault that person with mere pepper spray. I would have my shotgun ready and waiting, just in case.

Look, I get it you racists want to defend your fellow white supremacist, but there's a reason he got charged with assault for pepper spraying a woman half his size (and he's already tiny) and pushing her down the steps.

Hey we also get that you somehow feel like a virtuous person by calling everyone that disagrees with you a racist so we will let you have that message board victory. You and the woke left have a lot in common in that regard.

Lots of projection here. I reserve the racist label for those who say racist things - something you do regularly.

And I am still waiting on you to explain why Jews dying of starvation and disease in Nazi prison camps as opposed to gas chambers is an important distinction that "needs to be discussed." Let me know if you develop the courage to explain it.


Mothra: wHy ArE yOu sO ObSeSSed wItH tHe jEwS?

Every Member of Congress:








Buy are you triggered by Jews.

Wow.
Reply Quote
2
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:29p, 5/1/26


They switched to Nick Fuentes
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Reply Quote
3
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 11:53p, 5/1/26
So what? Jewish members of Congress will celebrate their heritage and culture. Blacks and Hispanics do the same, as do polish-Americans, Irish-Americans, and every other group. Usually it's harmless. Your bigotry blinds you to reality.
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 11:55p, 5/1/26
historian said:
So what? Jewish members of Congress will celebrate their heritage and culture. Blacks and Hispanics do the same, as do polish-Americans, Irish-Americans, and every other group. Usually it's harmless. Your bigotry blinds you to reality.


What white racial group has an entire month to celebrate themselves?
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.