The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

Apparently an 18 year old kid rejecting a job offer was worthy of national media attention by Jew News... these people are so incredible vile and repulsive... they make Mamdani look like a choir boy.

"I want his life to be ruined!"

Fox News' Emily Compagno, 46, demands 19-year-old college student Austin Franco have his life ruined for saying in a private email that he's "not interested in working for a Jew."

Cancel culture is back—Fox News & Palantir are leading the charge. pic.twitter.com/mJLZszPEua

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 15, 2026

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I hope this kid sues Fox News, Gabe Eichorn, and Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-Founder into oblivion!

I’m a defamation attorney. You most certainly do not have a viable defamation case.

As for doxxing, only Washington state recognizes a civil cause of action. Even if WA had jurisdiction, you wouldn’t have a doxxing claim, because you doxxed yourself. https://t.co/aFNQ8biimF

— Aaron Cress (@latenight_law) June 15, 2026

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

"White supremacy" was always a fraudulent concept, but it really is past time to clarify "White." And, who, exactly, enjoys "supremacy" in America. https://t.co/Wm7rNerzp9

— Buckley Carlson (@buckleycarlson) June 15, 2026

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

Apparently an 18 year old kid rejecting a job offer was worthy of national media attention by Jew News... these people are so incredible vile and repulsive... they make Mamdani look like a choir boy.

"I want his life to be ruined!"

Fox News' Emily Compagno, 46, demands 19-year-old college student Austin Franco have his life ruined for saying in a private email that he's "not interested in working for a Jew."

Cancel culture is back—Fox News & Palantir are leading the charge. pic.twitter.com/mJLZszPEua

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 15, 2026

---

An easy way to solve this is not to say racist things out loud or in writing. An even easier way is not to be a racist.

I'm shocked his parents didn't educate him on this reality.

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I hope this kid sues Fox News, Gabe Eichorn, and Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-Founder into oblivion!

I’m a defamation attorney. You most certainly do not have a viable defamation case.

As for doxxing, only Washington state recognizes a civil cause of action. Even if WA had jurisdiction, you wouldn’t have a doxxing claim, because you doxxed yourself. https://t.co/aFNQ8biimF

— Aaron Cress (@latenight_law) June 15, 2026

---

Gonna be hard to maintain a defamation claim, given the fact that the people reporting this are merely repeating the young man's words.

Probably best for the young man to apologize and say that he is seeking help for his hateful and racist views. That's what any PR firm would tell him.

Saying racist things has consequences in today's society.

---

"To be a Jew today sometimes is like the humans that come to the Planet of the Apes and meeting people like him!"

Chabad of Bel Air Rabbi Chaim Mentz on Fox News compares goyim to the apes in Planet of the Apes in attack on 19-year-old college student Austin Franco. pic.twitter.com/Y7bNt7XvnP

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 16, 2026

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

Apparently an 18 year old kid rejecting a job offer was worthy of national media attention by Jew News... these people are so incredible vile and repulsive... they make Mamdani look like a choir boy.

"I want his life to be ruined!"

Fox News' Emily Compagno, 46, demands 19-year-old college student Austin Franco have his life ruined for saying in a private email that he's "not interested in working for a Jew."

Cancel culture is back—Fox News & Palantir are leading the charge. pic.twitter.com/mJLZszPEua

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 15, 2026

---

An easy way to solve this is not to say racist things out loud or in writing. An even easier way is not to be a racist.

I'm shocked his parents didn't educate him on this reality.

---

If the roles were reversed and a Jew wrote that he isnt interested in working for a white man would Fox News have covered it with a bunch of ugly postmenopausal hags crowing about this is how the holodomor happened and how his life should be utterly destroyed on national television?

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I hope this kid sues Fox News, Gabe Eichorn, and Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-Founder into oblivion!

I’m a defamation attorney. You most certainly do not have a viable defamation case.

As for doxxing, only Washington state recognizes a civil cause of action. Even if WA had jurisdiction, you wouldn’t have a doxxing claim, because you doxxed yourself. https://t.co/aFNQ8biimF

— Aaron Cress (@latenight_law) June 15, 2026

---

Gonna be hard to maintain a defamation claim, given the fact that the people reporting this are merely repeating the young man's words.

Probably best for the young man to apologize and say that he is seeking help for his hateful and racist views. That's what any PR firm would tell him.

Saying racist things has consequences in today's society.

---

If demanding the utter destruction of an 18 year old private citizen on national television because he politely expressed in a private message he wasn't interested in working for you isnt defamation then there is no such thing as defamation and this country has no honor anymore and deserves to be destroyed.

Those hags on Fox News did everything short of saying someone should kill him.

And that thug in the DOJ department should be fired immediately. Government officials shouldn't be attacking private citizens for exercising their right to freedom of association... that is straight up communism

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

boognish_bear said:

---

"To be a Jew today sometimes is like the humans that come to the Planet of the Apes and meeting people like him!"

Chabad of Bel Air Rabbi Chaim Mentz on Fox News compares goyim to the apes in Planet of the Apes in attack on 19-year-old college student Austin Franco. pic.twitter.com/Y7bNt7XvnP

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 16, 2026

---

The most insane people. We're living on the planet with complete crazies. They can justify genocide but the smallest slight is said to be a genocide to them. They feel threatened by a 19yo who wrote a private email. Everything is out of proportion with these people.

— American Screed (@american_screed) June 16, 2026

Fox News ran at least *six* segments yesterday attacking 19-year-old college student Austin Franco over a private email he sent saying he's "not interested in working for a Jew."

America's Newsroom interviewed the doxer—Gabriel Z. Einhorn—then it was covered by The Faulkner… https://t.co/PoVPj2pX6G pic.twitter.com/G8V2NbDhNA

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) June 16, 2026

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

President Trump calls out Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel for intentionally targeting civilians in Lebanon.

Trump says Israel is blowing up civilian homes under the pretext of searching for "terrorists."

"Too many people are being killed." pic.twitter.com/v9NqvFXg5q

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) June 16, 2026

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Lesson No. 2: When Jews do bad things they should be held accountable. Most people do not believe the "chosen" people are exempt from accountablility.

Lesson No. 3: Do not hold whites to standards you dont hold jews to.

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of *establishment Republicans*, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of *establishment Republicans*, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

Fixed.

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I hope this kid sues Fox News, Gabe Eichorn, and Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-Founder into oblivion!

I’m a defamation attorney. You most certainly do not have a viable defamation case.

As for doxxing, only Washington state recognizes a civil cause of action. Even if WA had jurisdiction, you wouldn’t have a doxxing claim, because you doxxed yourself. https://t.co/aFNQ8biimF

— Aaron Cress (@latenight_law) June 15, 2026

---

Gonna be hard to maintain a defamation claim, given the fact that the people reporting this are merely repeating the young man's words.

Probably best for the young man to apologize and say that he is seeking help for his hateful and racist views. That's what any PR firm would tell him.

Saying racist things has consequences in today's society.

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of traditional conservatives, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of traditional conservatives, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

Tucker and Candace are podcast hosts, aka the entertainment industry, their job is to garner clicks. Ideally, more people will continue to step up to fill the role.

I know what you're saying, how can we get independent voters to vote Republican? My view is that if Trump can win in 2016, then make a comeback in 2024, anybody can win. He's a narcissistic, womanizing, convicted felon. And as BS as January 6th was (imo), the left and independents view it as an insurrection. He still won the popular vote.

We don't need to settle for neo-con purgatory. There is an appetite for a true right-wing leader in this country. Look across the pond, Rupert Lowe, I reckon someone like that would be successful over here.

Remember, the left already thinks Trump is a fascist dictator, and the far-left thinks voting for Trump signs your death-warrant (Charlie Kirk). I believe we have a little room to move further right on the political spectrum than most people want to admit.

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of traditional conservatives, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

Tucker and Candace are podcast hosts, aka the entertainment industry, their job is to garner clicks. Ideally, more people will continue to step up to fill the role.

I know what you're saying, how can we get independent voters to vote Republican? My view is that if Trump can win in 2016, then make a comeback in 2024, anybody can win. He's a narcissistic, womanizing, convicted felon. And as BS as January 6th was (imo), the left and independents view it as an insurrection. He still won the popular vote.

We don't need to settle for neo-con purgatory. There is an appetite for a true right-wing leader in this country. Look across the pond, Rupert Lowe, I reckon someone like that would be successful over here.

Remember, the left already thinks Trump is a fascist dictator, and the far-left thinks voting for Trump signs your death-warrant (Charlie Kirk). I believe we have a little room to move further right on the political spectrum than most people want to admit.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

I would say I'm shocked you are defending this but then you have made it abundantly clear you are not a conservative and have no principles other than Jewish Supremacy

---

LOL. I love this line of attack.

I'd put my conservative credentials up against you any day of the week. I'd say across the board, I am far more traditionally conservative than you.

Put your credentials on the table if you wish and we will compare.

---

Lesson #1:

Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, dont whine about nazis and racism.

That is the tool of the enemy. Whenever you piss and moan and cry racism you are giving legitimacy to that tactic the next time the left uses it.

---

Lesson No. 1: When a white person complains about Jews incessantly, and insinuates that they are responsible for the world's ills and that a Jewish cabal runs the world, chances are they aren't conservative at all, but instead one of the non-conservative racists that comprise the groyper movement. These individuals, while claiming to be conservative, are far more akin to their leftist counterparts. Identity and grievance politics is their thing, and their whiteness is of paramount importance. They don't care as much about other conservative issues - because they aren't.

If conservatives want to win elections in the future, purging the party of these goons is the only appropriate tactic.

---

Mothra, I'm curious. You talk a lot about tactics for winning elections, but what's the point of winning elections if the "conservatives" we elect aren't doing conservative things. Wouldn't it be better to purge the party of these neo-conservatives?

---

Republicans not living up to their promises has been a stalwart of politics forever. That is often times the problem with republics and representative democracy in general. Like it or not, we have another party that roughly half the country supports, and their morals and goals are often times diametrically opposed to conservative causes. It takes two to tango, which is why we often times see Republicans compromise.

I am generally no fan of the current make up of the party, but the question is, who are their replacements? Therein lies the problem. If the replacements are people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, MTG and the like, instead of traditional conservatives, then this is an instance in which the cure is worse than the disease. Identity and grievance politics is not the answer, and it is certainly not going to win any general elections, given the current make up of the country.

I realize you disagree, and think figures such as these have a legitimate shot at winning. But all of the evidence is to the contrary in a country that is no longer majority white. And there are also too many white, traditional conservatives who don't like the tactics of individuals of their ilk.

Find me a viable alternative, and I am willing to consider it. I just don't see it out there at this time.

Edit: I am curious how you define "neo-conservatives."

---

Tucker and Candace are podcast hosts, aka the entertainment industry, their job is to garner clicks. Ideally, more people will continue to step up to fill the role.

I know what you're saying, how can we get independent voters to vote Republican? My view is that if Trump can win in 2016, then make a comeback in 2024, anybody can win. He's a narcissistic, womanizing, convicted felon. And as BS as January 6th was (imo), the left and independents view it as an insurrection. He still won the popular vote.

We don't need to settle for neo-con purgatory. There is an appetite for a true right-wing leader in this country. Look across the pond, Rupert Lowe, I reckon someone like that would be successful over here.

Remember, the left already thinks Trump is a fascist dictator, and the far-left thinks voting for Trump signs your death-warrant (Charlie Kirk). I believe we have a little room to move further right on the political spectrum than most people want to admit.

---

Give me Massie/MTG in 2028.

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

He didn't say that he wouldn't work for a Semite.

He said he wouldn't work for a Jew.

To clarify things using another race and religion, it is the difference between saying "I won't work for a Persian" vs "I won't work for a Shia Muslim."

I'm sure you'd think twice before taking a job where your direct supervisor was, say, a part of the Nation of Islam.

This is why precision in language is so important, and one of the causes of your confusion in all these discussions.

---

Rep. Claudia Tenney on Knicks parade: "I'm worried about the violence. Look at Jalen Brunson. What an amazing American citizen. His wife is Jewish. She's a physical therapist. Are we gonna see more antisemitism at this parade? I hope not" pic.twitter.com/BmthfITxjE

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 16, 2026

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

He didn't say that he wouldn't work for a Semite.

He said he wouldn't work for a Jew.

To clarify things using another race and religion, it is the difference between saying "I won't work for a Persian" vs "I won't work for a Shia Muslim."

I'm sure you'd think twice before taking a job where your direct supervisor was, say, a part of the Nation of Islam.

This is why precision in language is so important, and one of the causes of your confusion in all these discussions.

---

Speaking of lack of precision, you're trying to draw a clean line between "Jew" and "Semite," but the problem is that you don't understand what the word Jew actually refers to. "Jew" is not just a religious label like Shia Muslim. It's an ethno-religious identity - a people with shared ancestry, history, culture, and, yes, a religion. So when someone says, "I won't work for a Jew," they're not rejecting a theological doctrine. They're rejecting a people. In other words, you're comparing two separate categories with a term that spans both.

---

This guy?! The guy with 40 full time analysts and a network of 50,000 lawyers attacking White American Men™? pic.twitter.com/kFWmOkLpfl

— The Savage Nate Johnson (@LiberN8) June 17, 2026

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Useless reporting. pic.twitter.com/H2aouhPlVY

— Raguel - (@TheGovernance0) June 13, 2026

---

So you won't work for a person of a certain race because of other "unpleasant" interactions with people of the same race.

Don't approve of the doxxing, but yup, that's called racism, unfortunately. In this day and age of social media, probably not a good idea to be sharing a racist opinion with others.

Unless of course you do it anonymously, like Barbearian.

---

He didn't say that he wouldn't work for a Semite.

He said he wouldn't work for a Jew.

To clarify things using another race and religion, it is the difference between saying "I won't work for a Persian" vs "I won't work for a Shia Muslim."

I'm sure you'd think twice before taking a job where your direct supervisor was, say, a part of the Nation of Islam.

This is why precision in language is so important, and one of the causes of your confusion in all these discussions.

---

Speaking of lack of precision, you're trying to draw a clean line between "Jew" and "Semite," but the problem is that you don't understand what the word Jew actually refers to. "Jew" is not just a religious label like Shia Muslim. It's an ethno-religious identity - a people with shared ancestry, history, culture, and, yes, a religion. So when someone says, "I won't work for a Jew," they're not rejecting a theological doctrine. They're rejecting a people. In other words, you're comparing two separate categories with a term that spans both.

---

"Jew" is absolutely is a religious label. A Jew is a practicioner of Judaism. There are Semitic Jews, Askenazi Jews, Ethopian Jews...These Jews are not remotely related by race, only by religion. "Semite", on the other hand is a specific term that address biological descent/racial identity. A Semite can be Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Atheist, or even Buddhist. While the young man in question may not have been rejecting a specific theological point, it is the sum total of the behaviors those theological points might cause that caused him to decline to work for someone who practiced a specific religion. Just as you would decline to work for someone who practiced the faith of the Nation of Islam because of they way they thought/behaved, rather than because they were black.

It's really all quite clear, but clarity destroys your ability to level charges of anti-semitism.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

This guy?! The guy with 40 full time analysts and a network of 50,000 lawyers attacking White American Men™? pic.twitter.com/kFWmOkLpfl

— The Savage Nate Johnson (@LiberN8) June 17, 2026

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

This guy?! The guy with 40 full time analysts and a network of 50,000 lawyers attacking White American Men™? pic.twitter.com/kFWmOkLpfl

— The Savage Nate Johnson (@LiberN8) June 17, 2026

---

More of the identity politics. Sounds like he was attacking racists, not white men.

---

He needs to be removed from his position immediately. https://t.co/AYgcd72gha

— Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX (@JustTheTweets17) June 16, 2026