Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

290,993 Views | 3471 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:23a, 7/24/26
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:48a, 7/24/26
Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 8:13a, 7/24/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:


Mothra:



Oh man, Nick making sense.

The Jews must have gotten to him - right wokester?


They've certainly gotten to you.

You blessed Israel... now we're all blessed with $100 a barrel oil and an entirely new and insidious Federal bureaucracy dedicated to serving Israeli interests over American interests.

I guess Nick didn't get the memo. Damn.
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 8:14a, 7/24/26
The_barBEARian said:
Mothra said:
The_barBEARian said:
Realitybites said:
"More than 4,200 Israeli settlers, alongside members of the Israeli Knesset, stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in occupied East Jerusalem on Thursday to mark Tisha B'Av, one of the largest incursions this year.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also entered Al-Aqsa under heavy police protection. Ben-Gvir praised the people who took over the site, saying they "felt like owners."

As part of the incursion, Israeli forces restricted Palestinian worshippers' access to the site, assaulting several."


Boomers paved the way for Israel to reclaim their third temple by sacrificing this:



So hilarious but on point for you to blame boomers and Jews for a mosque.


You truly are a one note Johnny.


Equally on point for you to deflect blame and take delight in the suffering and extinction of native white Europeans from their native lands.

You have truly earned your place in goy heaven now go recite your seven noahide laws like a good dog.

LOL. Ever the drama queen.

Go get a life. Try to get a girlfriend, if you can.
Reply Quote
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:37a, 7/24/26


No way he could win but go for it, bro.
Reply Quote
3
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:48a, 7/24/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:09p, 7/24/26
Reply Quote
3
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to muddybrazos • 2:25p, 7/24/26
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
1
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 2:31p, 7/24/26
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.

Well, I think he is appealing to people who are sick of the status quo and the orginal Maga people buit he will get destroyed again by AIPAC. You cant be a serious presidiential candidate if you dont kiss the wall. Maybe that will change in 10-20 years but its still a prerequistie.
Reply Quote
3
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45p, 7/24/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:38a, 7/25/26
Reply Quote
1
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 2:02p, 7/25/26
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.
Reply Quote
1
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 2:56p, 7/25/26
And how many Libertarian candidates have won a presidential election in US history? None. None have ever come close. Is there any reason to believe one who could not even win his congressional primary could do it? Of course not. The idea is absurd.

If he were on that hypothetical stage righ those extremely hypothetical candidates (Ted Cruz is not going to run again), the worst who could do is help the fascist or commie win (like TR in 1912 or Perot in 1992). He still would lose. And by helping the ultra-radical Left gain power hd would solidify his position as one of the greatest traitors in American history.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 2:57p, 7/25/26
Realitybites said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.


If Massie runs as an independent/outside party candidate, Republicans will absolutely lose in 2028... not that they'll need any extra help after this disastrous Presidency
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 4:01p, 7/25/26
Realitybites said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.

It's a very different word from the days of Ross Perot.

And no, Massie has zero chance of getting into a debate on the same stage with the Republican and Democrat nominees. For that matter, in terms of chops no one considers Massie a serious contender; to get there he needs to prove he can get major policies moving and build a coalition. Right now he's just a noisy gadfly.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 4:04p, 7/25/26
The_barBEARian said:
Realitybites said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.


If Massie runs as an independent/outside party candidate, Republicans will absolutely lose in 2028... not that they'll need any extra help after this disastrous Presidency

Massie will have no effect on the 2028 election. Only the truly delusional believe Massie has more influence than a fart in a stadium.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 8:01p, 7/25/26
The_barBEARian said:

"one of the most popular American political bloggers? Whose views have a significant influence on the US Audience?"

Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 8:55p, 7/25/26
Realitybites said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.


lol. Yeah those third party candidates do so well in American elections.

You are absolutely delusional.
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 8:56p, 7/25/26
historian said:
And how many Libertarian candidates have won a presidential election in US history? None. None have ever come close. Is there any reason to believe one who could not even win his congressional primary could do it? Of course not. The idea is absurd.

If he were on that hypothetical stage righ those extremely hypothetical candidates (Ted Cruz is not going to run again), the worst who could do is help the fascist or commie win (like TR in 1912 or Perot in 1992). He still would lose. And by helping the ultra-radical Left gain power hd would solidify his position as one of the greatest traitors in American history.


It's another ridiculous take from one of the dumbest posters on this board.
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 8:57p, 7/25/26
The_barBEARian said:
Realitybites said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


It depends on how he does it.

If he is one of a wide GOP field of a dozen candidates, probably not.

If he is the Libertarian nominee and stands on a three man debate stage with, say Ted Cruz and either AOC or Gavin Newsom as an equal...look out.

It is going to make the Perot factor look like peanuts.


If Massie runs as an independent/outside party candidate, Republicans will absolutely lose in 2028... not that they'll need any extra help after this disastrous Presidency


Well at least you'll be happy with a Gavin Newsome presidency.
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 12:11a, 7/26/26
historian said:
And how many Libertarian candidates have won a presidential election in US history? None. None have ever come close. Is there any reason to believe one who could not even win his congressional primary could do it? Of course not. The idea is absurd.

If he were on that hypothetical stage righ those extremely hypothetical candidates (Ted Cruz is not going to run again), the worst who could do is help the fascist or commie win (like TR in 1912 or Perot in 1992). He still would lose. And by helping the ultra-radical Left gain power hd would solidify his position as one of the greatest traitors in American history.

Ted Cruz (or whichever hypothetical Republican you prefer) would be the one helping the left win in that scenario. He should step aside for a true conservative like Massie.
Reply Quote
3
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 10:00a, 7/26/26
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…
Reply Quote
2
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:02p, 7/26/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:06p, 7/26/26
...
Reply Quote
1 edit
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 12:33p, 7/26/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…

You say that as if you don't know Trump's primary election history.

Massie is a gnat in relative terms, politically.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
2
BigGameBaylorBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldbear83 • 12:44p, 7/26/26
Oldbear83 said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…

You say that as if you don't know Trump's primary election history.

Massie is a gnat in relative terms, politically.


No one in politics took Trump seriously?
Reply Quote
1
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 2:54p, 7/26/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Oldbear83 said:
BigGameBaylorBear said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…

You say that as if you don't know Trump's primary election history.

Massie is a gnat in relative terms, politically.


No one in politics took Trump seriously?

Def not true since March 2016.

And only a complete idiot would imagine Massie 2026 has the same influence and staying power in a campaign that Trump had in 2015.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
2
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:22p, 7/26/26
Reply Quote
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 3:27p, 7/26/26
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
And how many Libertarian candidates have won a presidential election in US history? None. None have ever come close. Is there any reason to believe one who could not even win his congressional primary could do it? Of course not. The idea is absurd.

If he were on that hypothetical stage righ those extremely hypothetical candidates (Ted Cruz is not going to run again), the worst who could do is help the fascist or commie win (like TR in 1912 or Perot in 1992). He still would lose. And by helping the ultra-radical Left gain power hd would solidify his position as one of the greatest traitors in American history.

Ted Cruz (or whichever hypothetical Republican you prefer) would be the one helping the left win in that scenario. He should step aside for a true conservative like Massie.

Very few conservatives agree with your perspective. Labeling Massie a "true conservative" is comical. He's more of a lone ranger mostly interested in himself and increasingly making bizarre public statements designed to alienate the voters. If that's not his purpose then he's a moron. Either way, his appeal is extremely narrow which takes me back to my previous conclusion: he is not a serious presidential contender.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
2
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 3:35p, 7/26/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…

Yes, Trump is our president because millions of people voted for an outsider who promised to deliver on what they wanted. Then when in power he did several things that no previous leader had the courage or will even to attempt: moving our embassy to Jerusalem, forcing our trading partners snd our allies to cease taking advantage, closing our borders and deporting illegals, etc, etc. In addition, he appointed many judges that are more willing to follow the constitution, giving freedom and Justice loving Americans many real victories: Roe v Wade was overturned, affirmative action is gone, DEI is on the way out, same with trans, etc, etc.

Despite all his flaws and incomplete accomplishments, Trump has done more for America than any president since Reagan. No one else is even close.

As Victor Davis Hanson has pointed out, Trump is a counter revolutionary who is making significant strides in undoing and reversing the disasters of the past 60 years.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:36p, 7/26/26
Tucker Carlson Has Gone Bat Poop Crazy, Wants Trump Tried for Treason

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/07/26/tucker-carlson-has-gone-bat-poop-crazy-n4955468
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 3:53p, 7/26/26
BigGameBaylorBear said:
historian said:
muddybrazos said:


No way he could win but go for it, bro.

There is nothing serious about that proposition. He's more of a fringe politician who cannot attract masses of voters from various demographics and regions. Besides, a candidate who loses a primary in his own district will not have much national appeal. He would be lucky to be around on Super Tuesday.


You say this as Donald Trump is literally our sitting President…


This is truly is an apples to bowling balls comparison. Trump had his name on hotels all over the world and the highest rated show on TV for about a 5 year period before he decided to run. He was a pop culture icon.

Massie on the other hand…

It ain't happening. Pointing to Trump as a basis for the idea that Massie can win an election is just absurd. And I say that as someone who is much more aligned with Massie in my politics (save the anti-Jew positions).
Reply Quote
1
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 3:55p, 7/26/26
historian said:
Sam Lowry said:
historian said:
And how many Libertarian candidates have won a presidential election in US history? None. None have ever come close. Is there any reason to believe one who could not even win his congressional primary could do it? Of course not. The idea is absurd.

If he were on that hypothetical stage righ those extremely hypothetical candidates (Ted Cruz is not going to run again), the worst who could do is help the fascist or commie win (like TR in 1912 or Perot in 1992). He still would lose. And by helping the ultra-radical Left gain power hd would solidify his position as one of the greatest traitors in American history.

Ted Cruz (or whichever hypothetical Republican you prefer) would be the one helping the left win in that scenario. He should step aside for a true conservative like Massie.

Very few conservatives agree with your perspective. Labeling Massie a "true conservative" is comical. He's more of a lone ranger mostly interested in himself and increasingly making bizarre public statements designed to alienate the voters. If that's not his purpose then he's a moron. Either way, his appeal is extremely narrow which takes me back to my previous conclusion: he is not a serious presidential contender.


Sam isnt a conservative and never has been.
Reply Quote
historian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 3:59p, 7/26/26
True, but he was pretending to know what conservatives think.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to historian • 4:08p, 7/26/26
historian said:
True, but he was pretending to know what conservatives think.

More like Sam was hoping GOP would run Massie, and thereby make it easier for his Democrats to win.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.