Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

354,497 Views | 4200 Replies | Last: 48 min ago by BigGameBaylorBear
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spencer Pratt understands what ails America and antisemitism is only part of the problem:



Here's an excellent essay elaborating in this points;

https://notthebee.com/takes/op-ed-when-spencer-pratt-meets-judges-19

How can America be fixed? The short answer is also obvious: turn back to following God. As with ancient Israel, America can get back on track (became great again) by once again being a Christian nation that makes Jesus Christ a priority.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Getting called "anti-Semite" by Mothra is a badge of honor on these forums.

Only to the brownshirts that constitute your cohorts.

You're just a little pipsqueak. You'll likely get older and wiser, and turn from your foolishness, stupidity and Jew-hate.


Hopefully I don't ever become an evil racist like you.

From what I read, you walked down that road a long way, while pointing fingers at Mothra and some others.

Btw, your friend next to you who goes by 'Bill'? The rest of his name is Z. Bubb.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Getting called "anti-Semite" by Mothra is a badge of honor on these forums.

Only to the brownshirts that constitute your cohorts.

You're just a little pipsqueak. You'll likely get older and wiser, and turn from your foolishness, stupidity and Jew-hate.


Hopefully I don't ever become an evil racist like you.


Btw, your friend next to you who goes by 'Bill'? The rest of his name is Z. Bubb.




I have no idea what you're talking about right here
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Getting called "anti-Semite" by Mothra is a badge of honor on these forums.

Only to the brownshirts that constitute your cohorts.

You're just a little pipsqueak. You'll likely get older and wiser, and turn from your foolishness, stupidity and Jew-hate.


Hopefully I don't ever become an evil racist like you.


Btw, your friend next to you who goes by 'Bill'? The rest of his name is Z. Bubb.




I have no idea what you're talking about right here

That's been true this whole thread.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Getting called "anti-Semite" by Mothra is a badge of honor on these forums.

Only to the brownshirts that constitute your cohorts.

You're just a little pipsqueak. You'll likely get older and wiser, and turn from your foolishness, stupidity and Jew-hate.


Hopefully I don't ever become an evil racist like you.


Btw, your friend next to you who goes by 'Bill'? The rest of his name is Z. Bubb.




I have no idea what you're talking about right here

That's been true this whole thread.


You're speaking gibberish, grandpa… time for bed. You have a long day of eating oatmeal and watching Fox News tomorrow.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Oldbear83 said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Getting called "anti-Semite" by Mothra is a badge of honor on these forums.

Only to the brownshirts that constitute your cohorts.

You're just a little pipsqueak. You'll likely get older and wiser, and turn from your foolishness, stupidity and Jew-hate.


Hopefully I don't ever become an evil racist like you.


Btw, your friend next to you who goes by 'Bill'? The rest of his name is Z. Bubb.




I have no idea what you're talking about right here

That's been true this whole thread.


You're speaking gibberish, grandpa… time for bed. You have a long day of eating oatmeal and watching Fox News tomorrow.


So you're proving you are an ageist as well as a racist.

Ok
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Book exposing the 'Free Palestine' Hoax:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/phantom-nation-obliterates-the-free-palestine-hoax/

This should be obvious to anyone who knows history. It helps to understand the propaganda techniques, derived from Lenin & Goebbels, used by our fascist media (aka the MSM).

Conclusion:

'The author observes, "Pro-'Palestinian' Jewish leftists are oblivious to the age-old, religious hostility of the Muslim world to the State of Israel and to the significant absence of a Muslim counterpart to Christian Zionism." Of course, the same can be said of many Western leaders, academics, and media personalities who continue to remain woefully ignorant of world history, religion, and other realities. Multitudes suffer as a result.'
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Good
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




She's wrong but how is this humiliation?
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

boognish_bear said:




She's wrong but how is this humiliation?

Ethan Levins says it is........
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Book exposing the 'Free Palestine' Hoax:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/phantom-nation-obliterates-the-free-palestine-hoax/

This should be obvious to anyone who knows history. It helps to understand the propaganda techniques, derived from Lenin & Goebbels, used by our fascist media (aka the MSM).

Conclusion:

'The author observes, "Pro-'Palestinian' Jewish leftists are oblivious to the age-old, religious hostility of the Muslim world to the State of Israel and to the significant absence of a Muslim counterpart to Christian Zionism." Of course, the same can be said of many Western leaders, academics, and media personalities who continue to remain woefully ignorant of world history, religion, and other realities. Multitudes suffer as a result.'

Semantic self-stroking at its most embarrassing.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

boognish_bear said:




Good



Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

boognish_bear said:




Good








Just another case of politicians saying what they are paid to say.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


It does put a somewhat more sinister spin on the "make heaven crowded" theme.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:



Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

historian said:





Look at that - mad at the Babylon Bee for nailing it as usual.

"Mother Mary." LOL.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:





Look at that - mad at the Babylon Bee for nailing it as usual.

"Mother Mary." LOL.


Look at that - criticize Israel and Mothra scurries out of his hole.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly. It's not funny. So why would anyone post it, except to be a troll?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Exactly. It's not funny. So why would anyone post it, except to be a troll?


Babylon Bee has had a few posts about our Lady throughout the years so perhaps they are the trolls. I think it's bad taste but that's my opinion.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:





Look at that - mad at the Babylon Bee for nailing it as usual.

"Mother Mary." LOL.


Look at that - criticize Israel and Mothra scurries out of his hole.

Where did the post criticize Israel? I didn't see any criticism.

What I found hilarious was so many people's obsession with all things Israel. I mean, Israel lives rent free in your pea brains. It's incredible when we've gotten to the point of criticizing a parody newspaper for not making fun of Israel.

You guys are loons.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."

Oof indeed! Christ is telling His disciple John to take care of his mother after his passing. He's not telling you, me or anyone else we have a new spiritual mother. Such an interpretation would be pretty tortured (though I know that won't stop the Catholics).

SMH.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."

Oof indeed! Christ is telling His disciple John to take care of his mother after his passing. He's not telling you, me or anyone else we have a new spiritual mother. Such an interpretation would be pretty tortured (though I know that won't stop the Catholics).

SMH.


That verse is widely accepted as establishing a spiritual family. It's not a mistranslation either, the Greek meaning is consistent.

It's a shame you reject your Mother but embrace Bibi as your daddy
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."

Oof indeed! Christ is telling His disciple John to take care of his mother after his passing. He's not telling you, me or anyone else we have a new spiritual mother. Such an interpretation would be pretty tortured (though I know that won't stop the Catholics).

SMH.


That verse is widely accepted as establishing a spiritual family in the Catholic and (to a lesser extent) Orthodox traditions, but not among the Protestants. It's not a mistranslation either, the Greek meaning is consistent.

It's a shame you reject your Mother but embrace Bibi as your daddy


FIFY.

I would be happy to debate your position, but so far, you've done nothing to support it, other than claiming some faith traditions claim that it means Mary is now our spiritual mother.

But let's take a look at the plain language of the verses, shall we?

First, nobody said it was a mistranslation. The question isn't what the Greek says. The question is what the text actually teaches. And the text says Jesus told John (i.e. the disciple whom Jesus loved) to take care of His mother and told Mary to accept John's care. That's it. It's a private instruction to two specific people standing at the foot of the cross. There is nothing else suggested in the plain language of the text.

Feel free to point to evidence that is not what the text says or means, and that it instead creates some sort of "spiritual family," or was an instruction to ALL Christianity - concepts unmentioned in the text.

Mary is a mortal that was blessed among women. She's not my mama, nor yours for that matter.

As for Bibi, my dad will be surprised to hear it.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."

Oof indeed! Christ is telling His disciple John to take care of his mother after his passing. He's not telling you, me or anyone else we have a new spiritual mother. Such an interpretation would be pretty tortured (though I know that won't stop the Catholics).

SMH.


That verse is widely accepted as establishing a spiritual family in the Catholic and (to a lesser extent) Orthodox traditions, but not among the Protestants. It's not a mistranslation either, the Greek meaning is consistent.

It's a shame you reject your Mother but embrace Bibi as your daddy


FIFY.

I would be happy to debate your position, but so far, you've done nothing to support it, other than claiming some faith traditions claim that it means Mary is now our spiritual mother.

But let's take a look at the plain language of the verses, shall we?

First, nobody said it was a mistranslation. The question isn't what the Greek says. The question is what the text actually teaches. And the text says Jesus told John (i.e. the disciple whom Jesus loved) to take care of His mother and told Mary to accept John's care. That's it. It's a private instruction to two specific people standing at the foot of the cross. There is nothing else suggested in the plain language of the text.

Feel free to point to evidence that is not what the text says or means, and that it instead creates some sort of "spiritual family," or was an instruction to ALL Christianity - concepts unmentioned in the text.

Mary is a mortal that was blessed among women. She's not my mama, nor yours for that matter.

As for Bibi, my dad will be surprised to hear it.


Speak for yourself. I'm a Christian and she's my spiritual Mother.

Christ tells John, "Behold, your mother", and tells Mary, "Woman, behold your son". John represents all of the disciples. Thus, Jesus is establishing the spiritual family.

Revelation 12:17 "Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspringthose who keep God's commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus."

The offspring of this unnamed woman, are followers of Christ, aka Christians.

Earlier in the chapter, this same woman is mentioned giving birth to Jesus.

Revelation 12:5 "She gave birth to a son, a male child, who "will rule all the nations with an iron scepter."

This woman is Mary, and her children are Christians.

The author of Revelation is believed to be John the Apostle.




Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Well, she is a mother and her name is Mary. Not sure what's funny?

She's not my mother.


Oof! John 26:27 "When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home."

Oof indeed! Christ is telling His disciple John to take care of his mother after his passing. He's not telling you, me or anyone else we have a new spiritual mother. Such an interpretation would be pretty tortured (though I know that won't stop the Catholics).

SMH.


That verse is widely accepted as establishing a spiritual family in the Catholic and (to a lesser extent) Orthodox traditions, but not among the Protestants. It's not a mistranslation either, the Greek meaning is consistent.

It's a shame you reject your Mother but embrace Bibi as your daddy


FIFY.

I would be happy to debate your position, but so far, you've done nothing to support it, other than claiming some faith traditions claim that it means Mary is now our spiritual mother.

But let's take a look at the plain language of the verses, shall we?

First, nobody said it was a mistranslation. The question isn't what the Greek says. The question is what the text actually teaches. And the text says Jesus told John (i.e. the disciple whom Jesus loved) to take care of His mother and told Mary to accept John's care. That's it. It's a private instruction to two specific people standing at the foot of the cross. There is nothing else suggested in the plain language of the text.

Feel free to point to evidence that is not what the text says or means, and that it instead creates some sort of "spiritual family," or was an instruction to ALL Christianity - concepts unmentioned in the text.

Mary is a mortal that was blessed among women. She's not my mama, nor yours for that matter.

As for Bibi, my dad will be surprised to hear it.


Speak for yourself. I'm a Christian and she's my spiritual Mother.

Christ tells John, "Behold, your mother", and tells Mary, "Woman, behold your son". John represents all of the disciples. Thus, Jesus is establishing the spiritual family.

Revelation 12:17 "Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspringthose who keep God's commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus."

The offspring of this unnamed woman, are followers of Christ, aka Christians.

Earlier in the chapter, this same woman is mentioned giving birth to Jesus.

Revelation 12:5 "She gave birth to a son, a male child, who "will rule all the nations with an iron scepter."

This woman is Mary, and her children are Christians.

The author of Revelation is believed to be John the Apostle.


"John represents all disciples" is not in the text. It's the bridge your argument requires, but simply asserting it doesn't prove it. John 19 says Jesus spoke to Mary and John. It then says John took her into his home. Nothing about that passage tells the reader that John is a stand-in for all future Christians.

Likewise, Revelation 12 is heavily symbolic and has been understood by many Christians as referring to Israel, God's people, or the covenant community, not merely Mary as an individual. Citing a disputed interpretation of Revelation to prove a disputed interpretation of John doesn't really advance the argument.

You're certainly free to believe Mary is your spiritual mother. But that's different from showing that Scripture clearly teaches it. The texts you've certainly don't state as such. The conclusion is theological, not the plain meaning of the passages themselves.
First Page
Page 120 of 121
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.