President Trump announces military strikes on Iran: Operation Epic Fury

121,732 Views | 2617 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by Oldbear83
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




... if you are "winning" you dont enlist old men either...

Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



I have a very good money guy managing a portion of my assets.

I mean very good.

He got ahead of the war and I'm only down around 2% from pre-war levels and up for the year.

He reached out yesterday with a recommendation that I have a minimum of 25% dry powder/dry powder equivalents in the assets I am managing.

What you're seeing is manipulation of the financial markets by a president's tweets possibly combined with insider trading.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
  • No pause from Tehran, war footing deepens: Iran denies requesting Donald Trump's 10-day halt
  • Escalation on all fronts: IRGC HQ targeted by US-Israsel; Iran signals expansion by naming UAE targets, hitting Kuwait ports and sending drones on Riyadh
  • Israel doubles down amid reports of manpower strain: IDF chief warns of manpower pressure even as Defense Minister Katz vows to "intensify and expand" strikes.
  • Risk rises that Iran is holding back more advanced missiles for a prolonged war: WSJ writes "The US and Israel are pounding Iran's missile-launching sites... But Tehran's missiles keep flying."
Friday AM update.

EDIT: Markets down 0.5%-0.8% premarket depending on the index. Gold up. Crypto -4%. Vix up almost 9%.

Are we seeing the end of the ability of this administration to jawbone the markets?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.



LOL

Combat zones never have suitable living arrangements for east coast yuppies.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.



LOL

Combat zones never have suitable living arrangements for east coast yuppies.

Yeah, that's what it is...
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.



LOL

Combat zones never have suitable living arrangements for east coast yuppies.

Yeah, that's what it is...


Exciting input………would read again.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.



LOL

Combat zones never have suitable living arrangements for east coast yuppies.

Yeah, that's what it is...


Exciting input………would read again.

Would think missiles would be linked to uninhabitable. The NY Times article ended by saying how well the US operates when remote.

"Sergeant Bryant, a former Air Force special operator, pointed out that one area that the U.S. military excels at is what he called "decentralized execution," or the ability to continue to do its job even from far afield.


"You could cut off the head of the snake and down to the last individual soldier, we're still going to be operating," he said."

The OP made it sound like the AF guys were not willing to stay in combat level accommodations.

Here are a few articles on it.

Iran's Attacks Force U.S. Troops to Work Remotely - The New York Times


'13 US Bases Uninhabitable': Iran Strikes Force Troops Into 'Remote War' | World News - News18
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.


All this may be true but I would be very cautious of "statements from unnamed US defense officials." We have been down this road before. I would also like to know how many "regional bases" are there total to put this in context. 6 months from now we may find out the "regional bases" were no more than a shack with an IT connection and no living quarters to start with.

KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.



LOL

Combat zones never have suitable living arrangements for east coast yuppies.

Yeah, that's what it is...


Exciting input………would read again.

Would think missiles would be linked to uninhabitable. The NY Times article ended by saying how well the US operates when remote.

"Sergeant Bryant, a former Air Force special operator, pointed out that one area that the U.S. military excels at is what he called "decentralized execution," or the ability to continue to do its job even from far afield.


"You could cut off the head of the snake and down to the last individual soldier, we're still going to be operating," he said."

The OP made it sound like the AF guys were not willing to stay in combat level accommodations.

Here are a few articles on it.

Iran's Attacks Force U.S. Troops to Work Remotely - The New York Times


'13 US Bases Uninhabitable': Iran Strikes Force Troops Into 'Remote War' | World News - News18

Do not trust anything from the NYT. Total liberal propaganda rag that loses money almost every year.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Realitybites said:

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.


All this may be true but I would be very cautious of "statements from unnamed US defense officials." We have been down this road before. I would also like to know how many "regional bases" are there total to put this in context. 6 months from now we may find out the "regional bases" were no more than a shack with an IT connection and no living quarters to start with.



Between 10 and 20, depending on how you define them. Iran has hit a majority of the larger ones.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.


It's necessary to project such resolve otherwise your enemy has no motivation to negotiate constructively .
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.

Over under on cryptic tweet from the President an hour before the markets open Monday about "productive talks" over the weekend?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Realitybites said:

Central Command: US Casualties Now 300

No update on the KIA number, which magically remains at 13.

300 UNNECESSARY Deaths of our people. Unacceptable. You Maggots should be outraged.


Ridiculous assumption.

The US does not have anything approaching 300 KIA's.

Dumbass does not even know the difference between "casualty" and "KIA."
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.

Over under on cryptic tweet from the President an hour before the markets open Monday about "productive talks" over the weekend?

Over her complete lack of ability to understand what she sees.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Realitybites said:

Central Command: US Casualties Now 300

No update on the KIA number, which magically remains at 13.

300 UNNECESSARY Deaths of our people. Unacceptable. You Maggots should be outraged.


Ridiculous assumption.

The US does not have anything approaching 300 KIA's.

Dumbass does not even know the difference between "casualty" and "KIA."

Judging by his posts, he also does not understand the important difference between 'discussing the issue' and 'parroting seditious venom'.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.


Trump told us 5 weeks... so this should be wrapped up in the next 10 days... unless he lied.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Realitybites said:

Central Command: US Casualties Now 300

No update on the KIA number, which magically remains at 13.

300 UNNECESSARY Deaths of our people. Unacceptable. You Maggots should be outraged.


Ridiculous assumption.

The US does not have anything approaching 300 KIA's.

Dumbass does not even know the difference between "casualty" and "KIA."

Judging by his posts, he also does not understand the important difference between 'discussing the issue' and 'parroting seditious venom'.

In which case you would be the expert!
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.


It's necessary to project such resolve otherwise your enemy has no motivation to negotiate constructively .


The enemy is Israel.

Trump cant control them.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Realitybites said:

Central Command: US Casualties Now 300

No update on the KIA number, which magically remains at 13.

300 UNNECESSARY Deaths of our people. Unacceptable. You Maggots should be outraged.


Ridiculous assumption.

The US does not have anything approaching 300 KIA's.

Dumbass does not even know the difference between "casualty" and "KIA."

Judging by his posts, he also does not understand the important difference between 'discussing the issue' and 'parroting seditious venom'.

In which case you would be the expert!

At discussing the issue and calling out the snakes, yes.

Your inferred claim is, of course, false.

We are in a war where we either win or lose. I choose to make sure we win. You do you.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Looking like we are seriously considering a prolonged war. Sad.

Over under on cryptic tweet from the President an hour before the markets open Monday about "productive talks" over the weekend?

Imagine that. I wonder why no one knew this would happen...

Let's hear how prolonging the war and sending troops in is really a good thing...
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only people who support this war are boomers, jews, and foreigners.


Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



So the suicide mission is about to commence.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:




No life threatening injuries and one aircraft damaged. Hoping that is correct.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.