President Trump announces military strikes on Iran: Operation Epic Fury

428,596 Views | 6580 Replies | Last: 11 min ago by Danielsjackson114
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



Or a traitor.

Denaturalize and deport
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Jack Bauer said:



Or a traitor.

Denaturalize and deport


Back to Uganda.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah go back and socialize that shytehole
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

Yeah go back and socialize that shytehole


The guy's dad or mom, can't remember exactly which one, wrote a book about how Idi Amin was a pretty good guy. If you don't know who he was look him up. The apple certainly fell out of the stupid tree, hit every branch on the way down, and still didn't fall far from the tree.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

Yeah go back and socialize that shytehole


The guy's dad or mom, can't remember exactly which one, wrote a book about how Idi Amin was a pretty good guy. If you don't know who he was look him up. The apple certainly fell out of the stupid tree, hit every branch on the way down, and still didn't fall far from the tree.


The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has been one of Mike Flynn's pet projects for more than a decade now, and he came close to getting it in Trump's first term. It's not a surprise at all for the people that have been paying attention.

If BaylorFans was still around I'd be bumping old posts about it. MAGA didn't want to hear about it back then, and I'm sure they'll pretend not to notice it now.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.

Doing anything with Saudi is a huge Mistake.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

D. C. Bear said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

Yeah go back and socialize that shytehole


The guy's dad or mom, can't remember exactly which one, wrote a book about how Idi Amin was a pretty good guy. If you don't know who he was look him up. The apple certainly fell out of the stupid tree, hit every branch on the way down, and still didn't fall far from the tree.




standoff / raid on entebbe.....

- UF

{ sipping coffee }

>>
The Entebbe raid, also known as Operation Entebbe and officially codenamed Operation Thunderbolt (also retroactively codenamed Operation Yonatan), was a 1976 Israeli counter-terrorist mission in Uganda. It was launched in response to the hijacking of an international civilian passenger flight (an Airbus A300) operated by Air France between the cities of Tel Aviv and Paris.

During a stopover in Athens, the aircraft was hijacked by two Palestinian PFLPEO and two German RZ members,[8] who diverted the flight to Libya and then to Uganda, where they landed at Entebbe International Airport to be joined by other terrorists. Once in Uganda, the group enjoyed support from Ugandan dictator Idi Amin.[9][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entebbe_raid#cite_note-Hostages_freed_as_israelis_raid_uganda_airport-9][/url]
<<

movie based on events around RoE:
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_King_of_Scotland_(film)

Yonathon Netanyahu was the only ISR fatality:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yonatan_Netanyahu
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States. Looking back, perhaps we should have responded much more vigorously against Iran after their attacks on us.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
donny baby playing checkers - sweet sweet golden checkers - while the rabble picks their collective arse...........

- el UF

... and drools and stares and points and grins and .....at the great man.



D!

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.

the knitting crew arrives ....

- el UF

... fashionably late.

D!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
soldier?

- UF

p*soldier?

- tbp*

p*BID.
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



don pro quo.

- el UF

D!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There were rumors that he was into cannibalism. I hope they aren't true.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At what point will this war be too expensive?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.

There are lots of variations in between.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.


Fanatics are also infamous for their lack of self-awareness.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.


Fanatics are also infamous for their lack of self-awareness.

Ohhhhhhhhh, the irony in that post!
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.


I think we should allow Boomers to sign liability waivers that let them fight on the front line of a ground invasion of Iran since they seem to be the only group that supports it.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.

There are lots of variations in between.

My, how things change.

Imagine telling conservatives even in 2023 that anyone protesting another Middle East war was a "pacifist, traitor, and surrender monkey."
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

historian said:

That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.

There are lots of variations in between.

My, how things change.

Imagine telling conservatives even in 2023 that anyone protesting another Middle East war was a "pacifist, traitor, and surrender monkey."


It's not just conservatives he's talking about in that statement.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.


I think we should allow Boomers to sign liability waivers that let them fight on the front line of a ground invasion of Iran since they seem to be the only group that supports it.


1. Not a boomer.
2. Don't think a ground invasion of Iran was a good idea.

Iran was at war with us, we were not at war with them.
We paid for it dearly.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.


I think we should allow Boomers to sign liability waivers that let them fight on the front line of a ground invasion of Iran since they seem to be the only group that supports it.


1. Not a boomer.
2. Don't think a ground invasion of Iran was a good idea.

Iran was at war with us, we were not at war with them.
We paid for it dearly.


You will never control the strait without regime change. Regime change requires one of two things:

1) A ground invasion
2) Using unconventional weapons and allowing the demonic possession to take the wheel

Trump has already lost because 6 months from now Congress is going to be controlled by Democrats... they may even rack up a supermajority given how ****ed this all is, in which case there is a decent chance he gets impeached

I mean just when I think this admin could get any more corrupt and ******ed they go and give enriched uranium to the Saudis, the largest sponsors of Islamic terrorism in the West
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

That's very subjective and depends on too many variables. For pacifists, traitors, & surrender monkeys it was too expensive as soon as it began. They downgrade the threat Iran poses, despite 47 years of history, and are not concerned about the possibility of them getting nukes (or don't care). For those who see how dangerous Iran really is and recognize that they can never be allowed to have nukes.

Because of their fanatical ideology, we can be reasonably certain that they would use them if they had them, targeting the US ("Great Satan"), Israel ("Small Satan"), and others in their megalomaniacal fantasies of a new caliphate. It sounds crazy because it is. Fanatics don't think the same way as the rest of us and don't care about nuances.

There are lots of variations in between.

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.


I think we should allow Boomers to sign liability waivers that let them fight on the front line of a ground invasion of Iran since they seem to be the only group that supports it.


1. Not a boomer.
2. Don't think a ground invasion of Iran was a good idea.

Iran was at war with us, we were not at war with them.
We paid for it dearly.


You will never control the strait without regime change. Regime change requires one of two things:

1) A ground invasion
2) Using unconventional weapons and allowing the demonic possession to take the wheel

Trump has already lost because 6 months from now Congress is going to be controlled by Democrats... they may even rack up a supermajority given how ****ed this all is, in which case there is a decent chance he gets impeached

I mean just when I think this admin could get any more corrupt and ******ed they go and give enriched uranium to the Saudis, the largest sponsors of Islamic terrorism in the West


You are missing a third option.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

D. C. Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

D. C. Bear said:

Realitybites said:

boognish_bear said:




Number of Iranians involved in 9-11: Zero.

Number of Saudis involved in 9-11: 15.

That's just the number of actual hijackers. That doesn't count people like Omar al-Bayoumi in California who posed as a foreign student and gave logistical support to the 9-11 hijackers, or the strategic planners.

But by all means, lets give the House of Wahab nuclear technology.

Trump is an idiot.


Trump may be an idiot, but I seem to recall the sentiment that we should have been invading Iran rather than Iraq after 9/11. Historically, they had a complicated but often cooperative relationship, including AQ terrorist attacks against the United States.

2002 just called. They need their debunked propaganda back ASAP.


1998 called. They need the president to treat an act of war as an act of war and take care of the problem.


I think we should allow Boomers to sign liability waivers that let them fight on the front line of a ground invasion of Iran since they seem to be the only group that supports it.


1. Not a boomer.
2. Don't think a ground invasion of Iran was a good idea.

Iran was at war with us, we were not at war with them.
We paid for it dearly.


You will never control the strait without regime change. Regime change requires one of two things:

1) A ground invasion
2) Using unconventional weapons and allowing the demonic possession to take the wheel

Trump has already lost because 6 months from now Congress is going to be controlled by Democrats... they may even rack up a supermajority given how ****ed this all is, in which case there is a decent chance he gets impeached

I mean just when I think this admin could get any more corrupt and ******ed they go and give enriched uranium to the Saudis, the largest sponsors of Islamic terrorism in the West


You are missing a third option.

That's the very least of what he's missing.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

At what point will this war be too expensive?


First Page
Page 188 of 189
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.