https://x.com/Ifind******s/status/2045615227295969611

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

Why the Hell is Texas on this list? Our elected officials are failing us here in Texas. There’s no more justifying this bullshit, Abbott has sold us out! https://t.co/PDCJUalJ3K

— Anthony Aguero Live 🇺🇸 (@AnthonyAguero) April 19, 2026

IIT alumni in U.S. says if the country continues to suppress talent through unfavourable immigration policies, the ‘brain drain’ could reverse its flow, favouring Europe and India’s own burgeoning hubshttps://t.co/6SsSDcISnn

— The Hindu (@the_hindu) April 19, 2026

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

---

You are a disappointment and dishonest. You say, "secularism will be taught in the Classroom." I asked what the content of secularism is. I don't think you know. It is an unthought-through line.

You tell me.
You said schools are secular, but your word is secularism, which indicates that it is some thought through the curriculum that one would teach. Yes, I did, but said secularism as if it were a subject that was taught in school. You are in a corner and know it.
I didn't say specifically what they teach. Of course, you didn't, it's just one of those things Evangelicals say as if it had real meaning. You have yet to give any content for secularism (your word)

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

---

You are a disappointment and dishonest. You say, "secularism will be taught in the Classroom." I asked what the content of secularism is. I don't think you know. It is an unthought-through line.

---

You tell me.
You said schools are secular.
I didn't say specifically what they teach.

I said that what they teach has the traits of religious dogma. It does.

Teachers unions seem to have become more interested in leftest dogma than teaching reading and writing and math.

---

ou said schools are secular, but your word is secularism, which indicates that it is some thought through the curriculum that one would teach. Yes, I did, but said secularism as if it were a subject that was taught in school. You are in a corner and know it.
I didn't say specifically what they teach. Of course, you didn't, it's just one of those things Evangelicals say as if it had real meaning. You have yet to give any content for secularism (your word)

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

---

You are a disappointment and dishonest. You say, "secularism will be taught in the Classroom." I asked what the content of secularism is. I don't think you know. It is an unthought-through line.

---

You tell me.
You said schools are secular.
I didn't say specifically what they teach.

I said that what they teach has the traits of religious dogma. It does.

Teachers unions seem to have become more interested in leftest dogma than teaching reading and writing and math.

---

ou said schools are secular, but your word is secularism, which indicates that it is some thought through the curriculum that one would teach. Yes, I did, but said secularism as if it were a subject that was taught in school. You are in a corner and know it.
I didn't say specifically what they teach. Of course, you didn't, it's just one of those things Evangelicals say as if it had real meaning. You have yet to give any content for secularism (your word)

---

How many examples of ideological dogma being pushed in American public schools do you want me to provide?

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

---

You are a disappointment and dishonest. You say, "secularism will be taught in the Classroom." I asked what the content of secularism is. I don't think you know. It is an unthought-through line.

---

You tell me.
You said schools are secular.
I didn't say specifically what they teach.

I said that what they teach has the traits of religious dogma. It does.

Teachers unions seem to have become more interested in leftest dogma than teaching reading and writing and math.

---

ou said schools are secular, but your word is secularism, which indicates that it is some thought through the curriculum that one would teach. Yes, I did, but said secularism as if it were a subject that was taught in school. You are in a corner and know it.
I didn't say specifically what they teach. Of course, you didn't, it's just one of those things Evangelicals say as if it had real meaning. You have yet to give any content for secularism (your word)

---

How many examples of ideological dogma being pushed in American public schools do you want me to provide?

---

3

White progressives are more likely to move from minority neighbourhoods than white conservatives. Perfect case of stated vs revealed preference. https://t.co/nP9BVUbwub pic.twitter.com/5SVLNszMXO

— Hitchslap (@Hitchslap1) May 4, 2026

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.

---

A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.

---

schools aren't teaching secularism

---

You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."

and…

"schools aren't teaching secularism."

are really not compatible with each other.

---

You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?

---

Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.

---

stay focused. It's your assertion

---

You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.

---

My assertion: Schools are secular.
Your assertion: schools taught secularism.
So if I were a teacher of secularism, what would I say?

---

Schools teach what they are?

---

You are a disappointment and dishonest. You say, "secularism will be taught in the Classroom." I asked what the content of secularism is. I don't think you know. It is an unthought-through line.

---

You tell me.
You said schools are secular.
I didn't say specifically what they teach.

I said that what they teach has the traits of religious dogma. It does.

Teachers unions seem to have become more interested in leftest dogma than teaching reading and writing and math.

---

ou said schools are secular, but your word is secularism, which indicates that it is some thought through the curriculum that one would teach. Yes, I did, but said secularism as if it were a subject that was taught in school. You are in a corner and know it.
I didn't say specifically what they teach. Of course, you didn't, it's just one of those things Evangelicals say as if it had real meaning. You have yet to give any content for secularism (your word)

---

How many examples of ideological dogma being pushed in American public schools do you want me to provide?

---

3

I appreciate you sharing that perspective. It's a fair distinction to makeoften, what is true in a specific context or "bubble" can feel universal until we examine the broader educational landscape. Context definitely dictates how "widespread" a trend or behavior actually is.
I had a longer reply typed up a long time ago, but it got lost. Here are some examples.

1 . Claims that requiring students to show their work in math grows out of "white supremacy."

• True: Some equity-oriented math education materials used the phrase "white supremacy culture" to criticize certain traditional classroom norms, including "show your work."
• False or misleading: Claims that Oregon or mainstream education systems officially banned showing work, or declared math itself racist.

As for how widespread this view is:

• It was never mainstream classroom policy across American education.
• It was mostly found in a relatively small segment of equity-focused teacher-training and academic pedagogy circles.
• The controversy became much larger online than the actual adoption of the ideas in schools.

2. Teaching of various books seeking to indoctrinate young children into transgender ideology, including making fifth graders teach these absurdities to kindergartners.


Reports regarding the implementation of gender identity curriculum are accurate, and its prevalence is growing in certain regions. While most instruction is teacher-led, documented incidents do exist where older students have been tasked with teaching or mentoring younger peers on these topics.

3. Seeking to indoctrinate students with politically driven shoddy history like the 1619 project.

he 1619 Project is often defended as a necessary pedagogical tool for critical thinking rather than a mechanism for indoctrination. Advocates argue that its primary value lies in offering a "counternarrative" to traditional American history, which they believe has long minimized the central role of slavery in the nation's development. [1, 2, 3]
Key counter-arguments to the assertion that it is "politically driven shoddy history" include:

1. Focus on Critical Thinking, Not "Right Answers" [1]

• Encourages Inquiry: Many educators argue that the purpose of using such materials is to teach students how to think, rather than what to think. By presenting the 1619 Project alongside traditional texts, teachers allow students to weigh evidence and engage in historical debate.
• Antidote to Omission: Proponents suggest that "blindly celebratory" histories, which dominated for decades, were themselves a form of indoctrination by omission. The 1619 Project serves as a "much-needed corrective" to these earlier gaps. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

D. C. Bear said:

---

I'm not really interested in reading AI slop.

---

Right there with you. The only genuine transformation of a person happens when a mind is renewed, not abdicated.