Lupita Nyong'o will play Helen of Troy in the Odyssey (DEI)

10,737 Views | 181 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Harrison Bergeron
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

BearFan33 said:

Frank Galvin said:

Porteroso said:

Frank Galvin said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

Yeah sorry. Your woke bs doesn't work here

Neither does logic or facts, so it is in good company.

Skin color aside, casting Achilles as a stick thin transgender person seems weird, doesn't it?

So did casting a black George Washington in Hamilton. It worked. Maybe this will and maybe it won't.

Artists should see things differently, otherwise lets just watch documentaries. I am not going to pre-judge this one as a problem because Christopher Nolan is good at making movies.

I'm going to try to have an open mind and likely watch it when it is available on one of the services (not at the movies). If I cant get past a small person beating up massive dudes I'll change the channel.

Achilles is dead by the time of the Odyssey, so if he appears I'm guessing it will be in the underworld. It could be they're portraying him as a much diminished version of his former self.


If so it's still a stupid take on the story

In both the Odyssey and the Divine Comedy…Achilles is encountered in the underworld by the protagonist.

And in both he is remorseful over a life thrown away and spent on sin.

Wrath in the Odyssey. And sexual lust in the Divine comedy

But he is still shown to be a powerful masculine figure…even in death…not a deformed freakish one.

He is tormented by regret

[Achilles' Despair: When Odysseus tries to praise Achilles by saying he is still a powerful king among the dead, Achilles responds bitterly, famously stating, "I would rather be a slave on earth for another man-some dirt poor tenant farmer who scrapes to keep alive- than rule down here over all the breathless dead".] ,Book 11 of the Odyssey

[Seeing them, I asked Virgil: "My teacher, who are those souls punished in this awful wind?"

"Ah!" he answered right away, "you most likely know the story of the first one up there. She was an empress over a vast kingdom of many different cultures. But she was so corrupted with every kind of lust…The one next to her is Dido, queen of Carthage, who killed herself for love of Aeneas and thus broke faith…Next is Cleopatra in love with men's lust!

And there's Helen of Troy. That woman caused years of war and woe!

Ah, and there's Troy's greatest warrior, Achilles, who, like the others, lost his life for love. And near him is Paris, who stole Helen and thus started the Trojan War…"

He kept going, naming more than a thousand and telling me how love had cut them off from life. When he had finished naming all these famous ancient souls, I was left dazed with pity and confused.] ,Canto 5


I wouldn't call it stupid until I see what Nolan does with it. Achilles is still a kind of lord in the underworld, but he has no real power. That's why he says he'd rather be alive and a slave than rule over the lifeless dead.


A fallen super masculine war hero in the after life regretting spending his earthly life seeking revenge/fame/lust

Still not seeing how that works to have that character played by a transsexual actor born a woman who is 5'1 and like 125lbs

At one point Ellen page was actually only 84 pounds

Does not sound much like someone who could play one of the great Rambo types of the Bronze Age world.

[his 2023 memoir, Pageboy, Page shared that there were periods in his life where his weight fluctuated significantly, noting that it dropped to 84 pounds during one especially difficult period in his youth.]



The Rock would have been perfect, but next time he needs to protect his heel. His only point of vulnerability.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

The Lowry crowd is so insistent on virtue signaling that they refuse to accept the two biggest points:

1) in a world where cinemas are dying, films need to give people reasons to attend the not reasons to avoid it.

2) the distributor knows they have a huge problem and that is why the marketing campaign is "Christopher Nolan shot the entire film in IMAX (not digital)" and avoiding talk of the stars in the film (the typical focus of any film marketing).

The overseas box office is also being put in peril.

The Lowry crowd feels like they win either way…….film succeeds, they told us and the world accepts the DEI narrative. Film flops and it is due to the Right and its evil ways.
They see everything in life only through a political lens.

That's some IMAX-worthy projection on your part. I'm pretty much the only one not looking at it through a political lens.

Any Nolan fan knows that pushing large formats and making himself the brand is par for the course.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not hard to imagine where they could go with it. As a ghost, Achilles has no physical power or war-fighting ability any more. He's lost everything that defined him. Will be interesting to see what they do.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

The Lowry crowd is so insistent on virtue signaling that they refuse to accept the two biggest points:

1) in a world where cinemas are dying, films need to give people reasons to attend the not reasons to avoid it.

2) the distributor knows they have a huge problem and that is why the marketing campaign is "Christopher Nolan shot the entire film in IMAX (not digital)" and avoiding talk of the stars in the film (the typical focus of any film marketing).

The overseas box office is also being put in peril.

The Lowry crowd feels like they win either way…….film succeeds, they told us and the world accepts the DEI narrative. Film flops and it is due to the Right and its evil ways.
They see everything in life only through a political lens.

Sam defending a trannie playing Achilles should be no surprise. His idea of beautiful is this:

Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah Lousery is a complete lunatic.

Lunatics like him keep pushing America further and further to the right
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

Exactly.

If Helen of Troy was historically a black woman played by a white woman, the animals of BLM would be looting and rioting

And it wouldn't be called DEI, but racist



Well in Greek mythology Helen of Troy was also the most beautiful woman that ever existed. At least try to be real.


More realistic!


yes, this one has the right look about her..

Lolita Nyong'o.

This a grown woman.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

cowboycwr said:

Sam Lowry said:

Rumor has it there are a ton of Anglo-Saxon performers in the movie as well.

Weird, weird stuff.


But did any of them get cast in roles of an African person? Egyptian? Etc?

Are any female roles being played by men?

If lily-white Robert Pattinson and Tom Holland can play olive-skinned Mediterranean characters, why can't a half-African do the same? Is she more black than they are white? By what standard if so?


Not sure the Ancient Greeks weren't more European Caucasian from their depictions of themselves. Their facial features don't seem to match modern Mediterranean faces. Even modern Greeks aren't all naturally olive skinned. The eastern invasions likely changed their appearance.



And Lupita in marble could pass for white….



She is a pretty lady no doubt…


Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, played by...........

Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The media blitz to change the narrative on The Odyssey is unparalleled. All Hands on Deck. Massive social media buys. Moved forward interviews of other key actors. Even the notoriously "not a team player on media matters" Christopher Nolan is suddenly aligned with studio talking points and doing numerous interviews. Seems like it would simply be easier not to create the storm than to keep the ship afloat in its midst.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

The media blitz to change the narrative on The Odyssey is unparalleled. All Hands on Deck. Massive social media buys. Moved forward interviews of other key actors. Even the notoriously "not a team player on media matters" Christopher Nolan is suddenly aligned with studio talking points and doing numerous interviews. Seems like it would simply be easier not to create the storm than to keep the ship afloat in its midst.

Hundreds of millions are at stake in big productions like this.

To the point that this is political, of course it is. Anything involving trans people is political. But for most, it will not be their own politics that keeps them from paying like $35 to see this movie in theaters, but the perception that these castings are purely political/ideological. Nolan decided to make his film highly political and controversial. This response was as predictable as the sun rising.

Moreover, it's fair to comment on movie casting. The only way you can deflect all this criticism is to pretend like nobody ever talks about the casting of big blockbusters, like everybody until now is like "oh, I have no opinion on RDJ as Iron Man, I'll form one after I see the first 7 movies!"

Puh Leeze. This is the same reaction all movies get. RDJ casting was heavily criticized before anyone saw Iron Man. Maybe Paige will prove to have been a stroke of genius. It just strains the mind to see how exactly. Not only does it immediately shrink the potential audience, it seems like maybe Eliot Paige could maybe play Achilles' water boy, not one of the great male figures in Greek Mythology.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe this is all a response to the criticism Nolan got for not having enough minorities or women in Dunkirk. Which was historically accurate in that sense as there were not many women or minorities involved in that event.......

And that criticism was small and from some people that have no clue about actual history..... probably the same people that did the casting for this movie.....
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" Anything involving trans people is political. "

No need for it to be, except that some insist on imposing their choices on everyone else, demanding applause and reward for it.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah and what about that time they caste Lizzo as Olive Oyl



Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They also caste the dude from Reading Rainbow as Kunta Kinte. Everybody knows slaves can't read.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess Achilles could have had high heels…. he did take a pointer from Paris.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The silly virtue signaling is silly. The forced fake diversity quotas are divisive. Hollywood has become a community college catalog.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

The silly virtue signaling is silly. The forced fake diversity quotas are divisive. Hollywood has become a community college catalog.

Community college districts in Texas now hiring outside counsel for libel suit.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting point….


Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep

Ethnonarcissism is at the heart of left/dem/progressive policy.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?

No. He is pointing out that the Didn't Earn It crowd lack the intellectual ability to create new art so they must simple deconstruct the status quo along ethnocentrism.

Is English not your first language? BTW - have you figured out how the Palestinian population increased while you and other Hamasnicks claim their was a "genocide?"
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Well in the EU and USA white people are fact the majority

Are we supposed to accept the idea that Han should not be centered in China or ethnic Japanese centered in Japan?

If you moved to Nigeria would it be reasonable for you to be resentful that Black people are centered in a Black majority nation?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
again,

lunatic lefties/dems can never see reality
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

again,

lunatic lefties/dems can never see reality

The irony of course (as usual) is the anti-intellectual left cannot acknowledge the actual reality, which is that - outside of historical situations of conquest - never has there been a society where 12% of the population carried so much political and cultural power.

How much power do bleks have in music and entertainment?
Every news case must have a blek anchor at every slot.
Every commercial either features all blek families or mixed race.

I always laugh with my wife that if an alien landed in the U.S., it would think we were a majority blek country.

So spare me the straw man outrage out "whiteness" especially given whitey's relative contribution to the world.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Well in the EU and USA white people are fact the majority

Are we supposed to accept the idea that Han should not be centered in China or ethnic Japanese centered in Japan?

If you moved to Nigeria would it be reasonable for you to be resentful that Black people are centered in a Black majority nation?

Less than 0.1% of Nigerians are white. 42% of Americans are non-white. When they hit the magic 50% mark, will it be okay for non-whites to be centered? When they hit 51%, should whites begin to be marginalized? These are the absurd debates you get into when you obsess over skin color as the defining characteristic of a nation.

Everyone across the political spectrum should just calm down. If we evolve naturally, over the course of generations America will become a mixed-race society where the average person is a bit darker than they are now. No one will bat an eye at who is or isn't cast in a movie.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

It's all based on race.

If a black girl dyes her her blonde, that's fine. If a white girl gets braids it's "cultural appropriation."
If an Asian student learns violin, it is celebrated. If a white guy sumo wrestles it's "cultural appropriation."

It's the same double standard of the LWNJs demand only actual butt pirates play gay characters while being fine with a black woman playing Anne Boleyn. It's called acting. That's the point - one pretends to be something it's not. Not sure anyone would object to Halle Barry playing Helen of Troy because she's legitimately beautiful, but just sticking in tokens is just silly at this point - hell, having the Rock play Achilles would not have anyone objecting, but having a mentally ill actress that weights 70 pounds play him is just silly.

It's all woke nonsense.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.

And the public has its own right to express praise or rebuke on those artists' efforts.

Even to the point of calling a work trash or garbage.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.

And the public has its own right to express praise or rebuke on those artists' efforts.

Even to the point of calling a work trash or garbage.

Yeah, although it carries less weight when you have yet to see the movie and don't know whether it's any good. All the comments really add up to at this point is, "We're biased against the idea of a black woman playing Helen of Troy."
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.

And the public has its own right to express praise or rebuke on those artists' efforts.

Even to the point of calling a work trash or garbage.

Yeah, although it carries less weight when you have yet to see the movie and don't know whether it's any good. All the comments really add up to at this point is, "We're biased against the idea of a black woman playing Helen of Troy."

Yes, but this kind of virtue-signaling points to the quality of the movie. I am sure there probably will be a diatribe about opposing Trump.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.


American artists are addressing what they believe society is speaking like they always have. It's not always the best way to make lasting works.

I like the old ten commandments movie for several reasons. The Anglo Egyptians isn't one of them. It takes away from its lasting appeal.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.

And the public has its own right to express praise or rebuke on those artists' efforts.

Even to the point of calling a work trash or garbage.

Yeah, although it carries less weight when you have yet to see the movie and don't know whether it's any good. All the comments really add up to at this point is, "We're biased against the idea of a black woman playing Helen of Troy."

Depends on how much information they have, seems silly to require someone to spend money on a piece of trash before they can call it such. Agree that if you are basing an opinion on nothing but assumptions, you have little if any credibility.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

Interesting point….




Does he mean the "status quo" in which white people are routinely centered and expect not to be resented for it?


Not really. Remaking a movie of Chinese stories with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make sense either. Making a movie of ancient Egypt with a bunch of Caucasians doesn't make any more sense unless Arab actors and black actors aren't available. (One reason to laugh at the old Ten Commandments movie.)

It's also difficult to resolve the conflict between "cultural appropriation" and the push for this kind of diversity. Where does one stop and the other begin?

I love the old Ten Commandments movie. It's a product of its time, like all art, but that doesn't diminish it for me. We're in a somewhat different time with somewhat different issues. Movies like the Odyssey are one way that artists address that.

And the public has its own right to express praise or rebuke on those artists' efforts.

Even to the point of calling a work trash or garbage.

Yeah, although it carries less weight when you have yet to see the movie and don't know whether it's any good. All the comments really add up to at this point is, "We're biased against the idea of a black woman playing Helen of Troy."

Nobody who read the book thought she was black. So yeah, it just doesn't seem to fit.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.