I appreciate Oldbear taking so much trouble to prove my point.

Oldbear83 said:

---

"The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident," he told Fox News.

It is the first public confirmation of the FBI's classified judgement of how the pandemic virus emerged.

Many scientists point out there is no evidence that it leaked from a lab.

And other US government agencies have drawn differing conclusions to the FBI's.

Some of them have said - but with a low level of certainty - that the virus did not start in a lab but instead jumped from animals to humans.

The White House has said there is no consensus across the US government on the origins.

A joint China-World Health Organization (WHO) investigation in 2021 called the lab leak theory "extremely unlikely".

However, the WHO investigation was deeply criticised and its director-general has since called for a new inquiry, saying: "All hypotheses remain open and require further study."

A few days ago, the US Department of Energy said it had found the virus was most likely the result of a lab leak in Wuhan but could only reach that conclusion with "low confidence".

In response to that, many scientists who have studied the virus said this week that there is no new scientific evidence pointing to a lab leak.

A natural origin is still the more likely theory, said Professor David Robertson, head of viral genomics and bioinformatics at University of Glasgow.

"There's been an accumulation of evidence (what we know about the viruses biology, the close variants circulating in bats and locations of early human cases) that firmly points to a natural origin centred on the Huanan market in Wuhan city," he said.

On Monday, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said that US President Joe Biden supports "a whole-of-government effort" to discover how Covid began.

"We're just not there [at consensus] yet," he said. "If we have something that is ready to be briefed to the American people and the Congress, we will do that."

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

< chuckle >

Poor Sam, tries so hard.

No son, one quote from one of the sources does not prove you were right at all.

On this topic, you are the saddest of sacks, and you lost the point years ago.

---

We all wonder if Hamas Harry goes more crazy for anti-Jewish propaganda or covid stupidity. Guy's a weird bird.

Fauci's diary is a collection of over 1,000 pages of personal notes and journal entries by Dr. Anthony Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing his private thoughts, interactions, and assessments of the crisis.
Overview
Fauci's diary, released by Senator Rand Paul, spans entries from December 2019 through December 2022, covering the period when Fauci served as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and as a key member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force
kgou.org
kgou.org
+1
. The diary includes Fauci's personal reflections, emails, and notes documenting his daily activities, scientific assessments, and interactions with political leaders, media, and celebrities
The Hill
The Hill
+1
.

Key Contents
COVID-19 Origins: Fauci expressed early uncertainty about the virus's origins, noting both natural spillover and lab-leak possibilities. He recorded discussions with international scientists, some of whom considered deliberate insertion plausible, while publicly he often emphasized natural origins
The Hill
The Hill
+2
.
Public vs. Private Statements: The diary shows instances where Fauci's private estimates of COVID-19's case fatality rate (0.20.3%) differed from what he later told Congress (around 1%),
Yahoo
Yahoo
. It also documents his influence on local and state decisions, such as school and business closures, despite public statements minimizing his direct role
Forbes
Forbes
+1
.
Interactions with Political Figures: Fauci wrote candidly about President Trump, Vice President Pence, governors, and other officials, sometimes critical of their handling of the pandemic and at other times noting cooperative moments
The Hill
The Hill
+1
.
Media and Fame: The diary reflects Fauci's awareness of his growing public profile, including media appearances, merchandise, and celebrity interactions. He described feeling both flattered and burdened by his fame, noting threats to his personal security
The Hill
The Hill
+1
.
Controversies: Fauci's diary entries have been cited in debates over gain-of-function research, the lab-leak theory, and his alleged contradictions between private notes and public statements. Critics argue the diary reveals inconsistencies, while supporters note the context of rapidly evolving scientific knowledge
kgou.org
kgou.org
+2
.
Release and Reception
The diary was released ahead of Fauci's testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Senator Rand Paul
kgou.org
kgou.org
+1
. The release has sparked political debate, with some viewing it as evidence of Fauci's private doubts and others cautioning that the diary has not been independently verified and may reflect partisan framing
factually.co
factually.co
. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during the hearing, declining to answer certain questions about the diary
Forbes
Forbes
.

Significance
Fauci's diary provides a rare, detailed look into the decision-making and personal reflections of a top U.S. public health official during a global pandemic. It highlights the tension between scientific uncertainty, public communication, and political pressures, offering insight into both the pandemic response and the scrutiny faced by public health leaders
The Hill
The Hill
+1

We can hope it is officially released.
.

Will he get any time behind bars ?

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

This is a rhetorical question, right?

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

He won't. What he did was constitutional. (Legal).

How many bobbleheads do you have?

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

He won't. What he did was constitutional. (Legal).

---

Agree and disagree.

Fauci did commit crimes, but he won't be prosecuted. Here's why:

There are basically three camps here - the pro-Fauci folks who like increasing state control and want to protect government employees who help them do this, the anti-Fauci folks currently in power, and people who don't really care about the guy.

The state control crowd, and this includes some Republicans, will not go after a guy who does what they like, and the people who hate Fauci will not go after him because a) he might be able to look like a victim, b) the process is long and slow and they'd rather make an emotional argument about 'bad Democrats' than risk a trial which they might lose, and c) if they were serious about Fauci his time in front of Congress would have been last year.

And the people who don't care, don't want government wasting time and resources on Fauci when there are other things they do want addressed.

303Bear said:

---

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

This is a rhetorical question, right?

---

No Im just curious and was wondering what y'all thought.

DAC said:

---

303Bear said:

---

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

This is a rhetorical question, right?

---

No Im just curious and was wondering what y'all thought.

---

0% chance. Congress can only approve a contempt citation, the full chamber still has to vote on the citation and then he would still need to be convicted through the DOJ. Though theoretically this DOJ might pursue him, the precedent set would not be something anyone who makes DC their career is actually interested in.

Eric Holder did no jail time for Fast and Furious, which was a much cleaner case if you dig into it.

Nothing will come of this. Its just good show for the republicans ahead of the midterms.

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

How many bobbleheads do you have?

---

One for every time you have been laid this year, so 0.

303Bear said:

---

DAC said:

---

303Bear said:

---

DAC said:

---

Will he get any time behind bars ?

---

This is a rhetorical question, right?

---

No Im just curious and was wondering what y'all thought.

---

Eric Holder did no jail time for Fast and Furious, which was a much cleaner case if you dig into it.

---

Indeed it was.

Let's gooooo

boognish_bear said:

---

It’s official: letters to prosecute Fauci have been hand delivered to @DOJ. pic.twitter.com/d6hrIJRx1Z

— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) August 6, 2026

---

It's painful to think of the high hopes I had for Rand Paul once upon a time. What a disgrace.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

It’s official: letters to prosecute Fauci have been hand delivered to @DOJ. pic.twitter.com/d6hrIJRx1Z

— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) August 6, 2026

---

It's painful to think of the high hopes I had for Rand Paul once upon a time. What a disgrace.

---

Odd, I feel the same way about you.

---

No you don't.

Domestic terrorist, Anthony Fauxi, is a saint of the left. Can you expect anything else from a die hard left lunatic like Hamas Harry aka Sam Lousery?

Chances of Hamas Harry aka Sam Lousery having Fauxi bobbleheads is probably high. Also still masking in his car when he is alone LOL

Adios, Fauxi

You lying POS

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Domestic terrorist, Anthony Fauxi, is a saint of the left. Can you expect anything else from a die hard left lunatic like Hamas Harry aka Sam Lousery?

Chances of Hamas Harry aka Sam Lousery having Fauxi bobbleheads is probably high. Also still masking in his car when he is alone LOL

---

Don't see how you prosecute him and not the people that actually authorized the actions. Fauci had no power, no authority. He was an advisor.

[Tony Fauci Superstar

I went to dinner last night with some friends, and over dessert - we all got to talking about Dr. Fauci and Covid. One of the guys at the table said that his grandfather died alone in the hospital; the family was unable to visit him. "I think he died mostly of loneliness," said the man.

Others had stories. By the time we were done, I think we were all ready to put Fauci in the dock at Nuremberg not just for what he had done, but for what Sen. Rand Paul's release of the Fauci Diaries showed about what a petty, vain man he had been during that time.

Peggy Noonan wrote a powerful WSJ column about this very thing (https://www.wsj.com/opinion/anthony-fauci-unmasks-himself).

She compared Fauci to Samuel Pepys, the 17th century London civil servant who recorded in his famous diary what it was like to witness the Great Fire of London. Noonan quotes some of Pepys' (pron. "peeps") descriptions, which rip your heart out, and give you an idea of how catastrophic it all was.

Noonan:

With this frame, alas, I read the first five months of Dr. Fauci's pandemic diary.

As has been reported, it isn't about witnessing or capturing the size and scale of a crisis, or feeling shock or anxiety. It is about other things.

On Jan. 6, 2020, he goes to a "Super A list" party. At a meeting later that month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hugs and kisses him and tells everyone "how great I am." At another, President Trump tells Dr. Fauci, "Lou Dobbs . . . told me that you were one of the smartest, knowledgeable and outstanding persons he knows." Dr. Fauci was "very pleased," others "stunned and impressed."

Jan. 30: "All my friends kept saying I was a national hero" and that they " 'felt safe in my arms.' "

March 8: "Nice profiles of me in Politico and NY Times today."

March 15: "I did all 5 Sunday Shows today (my 3rd 'Fauci 5')." Apparently this is his version of "the full Ginsburg," named for Monica Lewinsky's attorney, William Ginsburg, when he did five Sunday shows in one morning.

March 26: "Donuts are being named after me; T shirts have my picture on them."

April 7: "Press still hot and heavy about me."

May 21: "POTUS seems to be enamored of me."

That's before he gets to the movie star sending him flowers.

In one sense, it screams Seven Deadly Sins -he gave in to his pride. But it also makes the history in which he took such a big part look banal and inhuman: Your historic emergency is his media opportunity.

It goes on. She continues:

I end with a thought that may sound extreme, but I think there's some degree of truth in it.

Looking back on the public-leadership aspect of the pandemic, while we were in the trauma and fear of the first months, while we were banging pots at 7 p.m. to thank hospital workers, and scientists were zooming to find out more about treatments and protocols, and earnest medical officials were showing up on cable explaining what they believed to be true a lot of people tried to do a lot of good things. But it all became pretty political pretty fast, pretty insidery and group-thinky, and pretty smug as the previously obscure became famous overnight.

It all came together and yielded a little societal Chernobyl.

The reactor blew, causing a calamity. The politicians lied and couldn't be trusted, the bureaucrats lied and couldn't be trusted, the government scientists lied about the data in front of their eyes, the national press was a propaganda machine. As much as anything, Chernobyl contributed to the toppling of the Soviet Union.

Hollywood Fauci, and his media sycophants, destroyed so much public trust. And so:

My fear is that next time, and there likely will be a next time, regular people will think: There's no one to trust. We're on our own.

She's right, but I ask you to sit with that thought for a moment. When I say, quoting Arendt, that "social atomization" was by far the leading cause of the coming of totalitarianism to both Germany and Russia, this is part of what "social atomization" means: people who had lived in what they believed to be a solid social order, governed by competent people who could be trusted, got to the point where they ceased believing that. "We're on our own" means "nobody is going to help us, because we can't trust those who are supposed to have our backs." We are not part of a cohesive community; we are on our own.

In my study of Russian history in particular, reading historian Yuri Slezkine's great doorstop of a book The House of Government: A Saga of the Russian Revolution I learned that two particular disasters knocked down pillars of Tsarist authority: the botched government response to the great famine of 1891, and the shocking loss to Japan in the war of 1904-05. Faith in the imperial order was weakening anyway, but those two events were milestones on the road to 1917.] -Rod Dreher

I get that and he needs to be there. My question is what about the rest??? Congress, Governors, Presidents, and a whole host enabled this guy. He had no authority, only advice.