Enes Kanter and Royce White dominate in their first WNBA all star game 🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/jS6DLPvjag

— DFF (@DumbFxckFinder) August 8, 2026

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

It's funny that the lunatics pretend that dudes can be women until they actually declare for the draft then stuff gets real. They called them on their b.s. and the nuts will blink because they don't actual believe any of this crap.

---

No. What's crazy is how you (plural) have decided a struggling league you don't watch or buy tickets/jerseys for is good place to wage this culture war. It's rather selfish.

It's not all on you. The WNBA needs a new commissioner. A strong commissioner avoids these pitfalls. No is an answer. Doesn't even require a why?

---

Sonny, you realize the anti-science nutjobs launched a culture war and that it was one if its own players who sparked the latest outrage and got the nutjobs all fired up. Ten years ago biology and science were not controversial, but the LWNJs suddenly made science a culture war issue. It's weird how you guys always start culture wars and then are shocked anyone notices and then act like the normies did it.

Even you're (maybe) smart enough to recognize the rich irony of the situation:
1. WNBA player claims that men should not play in women's sports
2. Other WNBA coaches, players, and leaders have a fit
3. Two men declare for the WNBA draft
4. WNBA freaks out and needs to meet and stop them from entering

Surely, you're smart enough to connect the dots and laugh at the idiocy, right? Surely you are self-aware enough to notice the ridiculousness, no?

The problem continues to be the radical left's positions are so extreme they do not believe most of them but all pretend to do so ... so it's funny when they get called out and panic.

If I owned a WNBA team, i would field it with 10 random dudes and win every title until they finally call "uncle" and acknowledge science and reality.

---

historian said:

---

Those rules mean nothing if they cannot define "woman".

---

historian said:

---

Everyone with a functioning brain knows what a woman is and what a man is. Too many on the Left refuse to be honest because it's woke to cater to a tiny number of people with mental illness. Everything about this is insane.

---

If you ask this question on Bluesky, they will tell you that Lia Thomas was “sincere” in her fantasies that she was a woman, while other people are being “insincere.” it’s like inquisitors in 15th century Spain, trying to determine whose conversion to Christianity was real https://t.co/S5Q5PzlRj5

— Jonathan Kay (@jonkay) August 10, 2026

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

I have an idea. Since the vast majority of the WNBA seems to support trans and men in women sports, why don't we just eliminate the WNBA? All of the "girls" currently playing can get a tryout in the NBA. I wonder how many will get a spot on an NBA roster? My guess would be ZERO. Based on their virtue signaling, they should have no problem with this.

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

historian said:

---

Those rules mean nothing if they cannot define "woman".

---

We know what a woman ain't.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

If you ask this question on Bluesky, they will tell you that Lia Thomas was “sincere” in her fantasies that she was a woman, while other people are being “insincere.” it’s like inquisitors in 15th century Spain, trying to determine whose conversion to Christianity was real https://t.co/S5Q5PzlRj5

— Jonathan Kay (@jonkay) August 10, 2026

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

If you ask this question on Bluesky, they will tell you that Lia Thomas was “sincere” in her fantasies that she was a woman, while other people are being “insincere.” it’s like inquisitors in 15th century Spain, trying to determine whose conversion to Christianity was real https://t.co/S5Q5PzlRj5

— Jonathan Kay (@jonkay) August 10, 2026

---

I figured this was the next step, because it's about all they can do (other than be sane and admit men aren't women). They'll become mind readers, and some cabal will determine who has a "genuine" delusion vs who made up the delusion for "improper purposes."

Sounds like something a group of idealogue women would do.

What a train wreck.

---

Forest Bueller III said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

historian said:

---

Those rules mean nothing if they cannot define "woman".

---

We know what a woman ain't.

---

Though adults have the right to do it, anybody that superficially changes themselves from a man to a "woman" is still not a woman.

Even if they cut off the man parts and replace them with superficial women parts, you cannot change your DNA.

It's just superficial solution.

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Forest Bueller III said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

historian said:

---

Those rules mean nothing if they cannot define "woman".

---

We know what a woman ain't.

---

Though adults have the right to do it, anybody that superficially changes themselves from a man to a "woman" is still not a woman.

Even if they cut off the man parts and replace them with superficial women parts, you cannot change your DNA.

It's just superficial solution.

---

Yeah, but if you cut that thing off, you've committed to the role.

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Forest Bueller III said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

historian said:

---

Those rules mean nothing if they cannot define "woman".

---

We know what a woman ain't.

---

Though adults have the right to do it, anybody that superficially changes themselves from a man to a "woman" is still not a woman.

Even if they cut off the man parts and replace them with superficial women parts, you cannot change your DNA.

It's just superficial solution.

---

Yeah, but if you cut that thing off, you've committed to the role.

---