WNBA DOUBLES DOWN ON TRANS GARBAGE

20,124 Views | 277 Replies | Last: 6 min ago by quash
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.

That would be best but I don't think it will happen. The Leftists are too arrogant & childish to admit they are wrong, especially if it means also admitting that Trump was correct about something, and I think they will try to make it go away. They will always have the media lying for them and covering for them like they always do for the fascist politicians.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.

That would be best but I don't think it will happen. The Leftists are too arrogant & childish to admit they are wrong, especially if it means also admitting that Trump was correct about something, and I think they will try to make it go away. They will always have the media lying for them and covering for them like they always do for the fascist politicians.

Yup. If need be they will declare them eligible but have some sort of backroom agreement between all teams to not draft them just to make it go away. Then they can change their point/argument just like leftists do when their argument gets destroyed by facts.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You get dumber and dumber daily
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Professional virtue signaling
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is embarrassing this is still a topic. The left destroys anything it touches
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.
Is it necessarily on Kanter and White to prove they are women? I honestly don't know if that's true. New York State for example has laws protecting gender expression

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/S1047

Without anything specific in place, laws in more liberal states have pretty, well, liberal definitions of who can describe themselves as a woman.

A court case limiting Kanter's and White's self-identity could potentially set a precedent that supporters of the trans community might actually not be in favor of.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.

I'll as you as a "reasonably intelligent" citizen. Do you believe these two identify as women?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?


I'm not attempting to define a woman. I'm defining these two men.

If I told you I were a "Jehovahs witness" you'd expect that I "watchtower" you to death.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lol
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?


I'm not attempting to define a woman. I'm defining these two men.


You are a moving target then. You said the burden of proof is on the men to prove they are women. Fine.

But how can anyone prove he/she is a woman if a woman cannot be defined?
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?


I'm not attempting to define a woman. I'm defining these two men.

If I told you I were a "Jehovahs witness" you'd expect that I "watchtower" you to death.
Which, by definition, would define women as they are the binary alternative to men.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Insanity lol
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No shame in folding.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?


I'm not attempting to define a woman. I'm defining these two men.


You are a moving target then. You said the burden of proof is on the men to prove they are women. Fine.

But how can anyone prove he/she is a woman if a woman cannot be defined?


You're moving the goal posts. I'm asking why are people ****ting on this league. You defending two dudes doing the think you're opposed to "playing in women sports" at the expense of the WNBA.

Again, I'm asking why. You and I know these are dudes. ****ting on these women for a culture war?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every liberal lunatic on this board does the same thing
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.
That they have XY chromosomes and an SRY gene? Awesome. Now just get the WNBA to officially adopt that policy and all of this will go away.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.
That they have XY chromosomes and an SRY gene? Awesome. Now just get the WNBA to officially adopt that policy and all of this will go away.


Why is this a WNBA issue? Do you know of anyone with XY chromosome in the W?

Yet, people are protesting at their games. Threatening to declare for the draft. In effect, folks have chosen to **** in their pool when this ain't their issue.
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.
That they have XY chromosomes and an SRY gene? Awesome. Now just get the WNBA to officially adopt that policy and all of this will go away.


Why is this a WNBA issue? Do you know of anyone with XY chromosome in the W?

Yet, people are protesting at their games. Threatening to declare for the draft. In effect, folks have chosen to **** in their pool when this ain't their issue.

Business Reason
IMO this is a WNBA issue because it's their stated policy to only employ "women" as their well-paid, high-profile players without defining what that means in a time when a lot of people can't seem to state a definition on what that means either.

Different people for all different kinds of reasons will always be on the lookout for high-paying high-profile jobs and if the WNBA doesn't set clear eligibility guidelines and/or follow them, that could be considered discriminatory hiring practices and they can be sued. Would they lose the case? I don't know. But the possibility is absolutely there.

So basically, they are like any other company that has to consider what their stated hiring practices are, if they are legal, and then follow them or risk being sued or charged with discrimination.

Social Reason
I disagree with the implication that this topic just fell into the WNBA's lap. As an organization, they have publicly supported trans athletes in the past through social media and statements made by high profile people within the league
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.


So your are attempting to define a woman based on presentation?


I'm not attempting to define a woman. I'm defining these two men.


You are a moving target then. You said the burden of proof is on the men to prove they are women. Fine.

But how can anyone prove he/she is a woman if a woman cannot be defined?


You're moving the goal posts. I'm asking why are people ****ting on this league. You defending two dudes doing the think you're opposed to "playing in women sports" at the expense of the WNBA.

Again, I'm asking why. You and I know these are dudes. ****ting on these women for a culture war?

Hardly. You asked them to prove that they are women. I asked how can they do that when woman is not a defined term.

If you want to know why these men are "forcing" this issue on the WBNA - look back over all your threads. You have been asking that question in various forms for several weeks. And many people provided answers.

The simple fact is that the WNBA is more committed to their politics than to their basketball. If the league is going to focus on politics then it should surprise no one that it is caught in the middle of a political issue.

In order to defeat this absurd idea that a man can become a woman, it is going to take brave individuals to stand up to the Alphabet Mafia - Men joining woman leagues and girls and women refusing to compete against the mutants.

Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The WNBA is an arm of the unserious left

No different than CNN or the view
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kanter & White don't have to prove anything. By the Left's one standards, a man who identifies as a woman magically becomes a woman. It's written in stone and they must be treated as such because their mental illness overrides reality. Many people have been persecuted, including losing their jobs, for refusing to lie.

The whole point is to expose the insanity of the trans cult and wokeism. The WNBA have boxed themselves into a corner with their idiotic obsession with Leftist lies.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


They don't have to prove anything. The mantra of the left is gender is fluid and it is whatever a person "feels" it is.

They have pushed multiple guys as women without any "proof."

Now all of a sudden you and everyone else on the left wants to"proof".

Why?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

GrowlTowel said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

historian said:

Sad! WNBA source says league will not accept NBA players who now identify as brave women

https://notthebee.com/article/sad-wnba-says-it-will-not-accept-nba-players-who-now-identify-as-brave-women

It looks like the WNBA is trying to have it both ways. What a cowardly cop out!


I hope they follow through with a lawsuit like they said they would. Just to force the league to define a woman and put this silly trans stuff to rest.


It's his time. The proof falls on Kanter and White. They have to prove they are women. WNBA doesn't have to prove they are men.

I hope it's a jury trial and you're on the jury. I'd love to see you prestle up to say those dudes are girls.

Those would be some big ass women.


How do you prove something that cannot be defined?


I'd start with how they present themselves. This is an obvious rouse. Make any argument you'd like, these are not trans women.

League should sue them for negatively affecting their business.

I'll as you as a "reasonably intelligent" citizen. Do you believe these two identify as women?


Again the left for years has said it is not about "presenting" or dressing in dresses or any other certain type of clothes but how a person feels.

They have pushed multiple trans "women" that did not wear makeup, clothes from the women's section or come across as female in any outer way…. They just identified as women.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Professional mental gymnastics like FLunaticbear
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/
As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.
That they have XY chromosomes and an SRY gene? Awesome. Now just get the WNBA to officially adopt that policy and all of this will go away.


The CBA doesn't have ambiguity. It clearly states only women are eligible to play in the WNBA. Not identify as women.

This is all performative garbage. I'm mad for the WNBA. I hope they sue White and Kanter.
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

90sBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vdhxPq/

As this person has XY chromosomes and has an SRY gene, this makes them genetically male.

As such they should not be eligible to compete as a woman in any organization that divides men and women and has a strict definition of what a woman is.

Does that suck for that person? Yes!

Does it make me want to change my views on fair play and athletics opportunities for women? Absolutely not.


That's my definition of why White and Kanter can't play in WNBA.

That they have XY chromosomes and an SRY gene? Awesome. Now just get the WNBA to officially adopt that policy and all of this will go away.


The CBA doesn't have ambiguity. It clearly states only women are eligible to play in the WNBA. Not identify as women.

This is all performative garbage. I'm mad for the WNBA. I hope they sue White and Kanter.

And how does the State of New York, where the WNBA HQ is located, define "women"? If White and Kanter can qualify as women under New York State law, and the WNBA doesn't provide any definition or limitation beyond that, then legally could they be eligible? That sounds to me like something that could be argued in court.

https://dhr.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2026/07/2026-genda-guidance_2.pdf

Unlawful discrimination because of gender identity or expression can include:
  • Questions about gender identity or expression, or assigned sex at birth, such as in a job or housing interview;
  • Refusing to hire for a job or to rent an apartment
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keep speaking facts, my brother

These liberal lunatics will mental gymnastics around it with their lunacy
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.