Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Brickhead said: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

I can explain it to you but I cannot understand it for you.

---

He can't see the forest for the trees.

A leftist calls out the left’s hostility to menhttps://t.co/mW2gd6jhLl pic.twitter.com/ByZ4BcJ1Wg

— Matthew Schmitz (@matthewschmitz) October 27, 2026

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

Ban fraternities? A new report released today shows that campuses without them often report 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 sex offenses, not fewer 👀

I believe calling to abolish fraternities because of the bad actions of a few young men is not only lazy, but it also ignores all the positives that… pic.twitter.com/dEgvHyUTzZ

— Lisa Britton (@LisaBritton) October 29, 2026

Leftists cannot deal with reality and have the maturity of toddlers. The op-Ed was probably correct so naturally all the fascist snowflakes threw a tantrum.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask Toni women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

Why? Women lie all the time. But then, so do you so it's not surprising you don't care about that.

Waco1947 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

---

What gives me the the giggles is that you completely ignore any reason response. You go all phone red earrings also and personal attacks on which mean you lost

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

he's a priest, or so he says. It's been normal to him for decades

Waco1947 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

---

What gives me the the giggles is that you completely ignore any reason response. You go all phone red earrings also and personal attacks on which mean you lost

---

1. That you giggle so much is somehow not a surprise.

2. You really can't make claims about reasonable responses, given the sort of posts you usually drop on the screen in this forum.

3. By now, I had hoped that English would be familiar enough for you, that your posts would not display such a hatred of proper grammatical structure, yet you continue to make Borat look intellectual by comparison.

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask Toni women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

Why? Women lie all the time. But then, so do you so it's not surprising you don't care about that.

---

Men lie all day he time too. But you did ask 20 women what it means to a woman alone.

trey3216 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

he's a priest, or so he says. It's been normal to him for decades

---

Retired Pastor.

Waco1947 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

he's a priest, or so he says. It's been normal to him for decades

---

Retired Pastor.

---

Thank God

Given your lunatic beliefs, you should not be lecturing anyone!

Waco1947 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

d: I think this might be just example 1 million that the sexual revolution was a mistake

It's almost impossible to figure out cases of drunk, drug-drugged young men and women…policing their constant sexual hookups….and finding out who consented to what & when, and who did not

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
And notice the sleight of hand: you haven't demonstrated that the Sexual Revolution caused these problems. You've simply listed problems that have always existed and attached them to a cultural movement you already dislike.
If you want to argue that today's hookup culture, attitudes toward casual sex, or substance use have made sexual misconduct more common, then make that case with evidence. But "young people are drunk, drugged, and having hookups, therefore the Sexual Revolution was a mistake" is not an argument. It's a conclusion looking for a justification.
By that standard, any social change that doesn't eliminate human stupidity is a failure.

---

You have to be the stupidest poster on this forum.

Let's just hope you're not around kids when the Sexual Revolution you fancy to make diddling kids normal becomes reality.

I could ask you to demonstrate how more guns leads to more gun deaths, but we both know you're too stupid to do that or notice your contradictory stupidity.

---

---

What gives me the the giggles is that you completely ignore any reason response. You go all phone red earrings also and personal attacks on which mean you lost

---

Moron. I literally asked you a question that you ignored: do more guns lead to more gun deaths? Does liberalizing gun ownership lead to more gun deaths?

We know you want answer because it defeats your argument, but at least your stupidity is on public display.

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask Toni women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

Why? Women lie all the time. But then, so do you so it's not surprising you don't care about that.

---

you did ask 20 women what it means to a woman alone.

---

Can you define what a woman is for us?

Just so we can all be on the same page. I am sure you can answer a simple question like that

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

Once you realize the LWNJs evaluate everything based on race, gender, class, etc., it makes sense. Like the Baylor "rape" scandal, minorities bonding white girls really trigger liberals.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

This is a remarkably lazy argument. You take the existence of difficult sexual situations and somehow leap to "the Sexual Revolution was a mistake." That isn't reasoning; it's nostalgia masquerading as an argument.
Were there no drunk people having sex before the Sexual Revolution? No drug use? No sexual coercion? No rape? No confusion about consent? Of course there were. Human beings have been making disastrous decisions about sex for thousands of years.
.

---

Before the sexual revolution we did not have colleges (controlled overwhelmingly by the Left) encouraging kids to have group sex.

Libertines can not now claim to be against the breaking down of sexual restraints and traditional sexual norms

This is insane: Cornell’s sex education involves feminist porn awards and group-sex checklists.

What exactly are parents paying Cornell $90k a year for? https://t.co/te0N073Hy5

— Jared Lederman (@jared_lederman1) October 6, 2026

News flash: Universities have promoted sexual debauchery for more than a decade. We have receipts.

Exhibit A: An article from, wait for it -- 2014 -- in The College Fix informed the world that Cornell debuted its Sex Week observance, complete with sex-toy demonstrations, porn… pic.twitter.com/A3bErEU5n6

— The College Fix (@CollegeFix) October 18, 2026

Cornell health educators, like health educators at colleges and high schools across America, promote pornography, group sex, open relationships, bondage, and S&M as normal and healthy in chipper instructional materials bearing the school's official endorsement. pic.twitter.com/iTiFzesT3L

— Wesley Yang (@wesyang) October 6, 2026

---

So, in other words they word for word promote what they also condemn.

LWNJs have this unique ability to just create a reality in real time to support whatever they're trying to promote in the moment - they are completely divorced from reality and reason ... just whatever supports the agenda in the moment.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

---

I do agree there is a biological difference between the sexes

Males in general are large and stronger than females.

But if you accept the rather obvious biological differences between the genders….then we might just have to rethink our modern sexual norms and cultural practices.

Maybe young men and young women should not be living in the same mixed gender dorms. Or being over at fraternity or sorority houses after hours. And maybe just maybe we should not be celebrating the idea of consensual orgies

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

---

I do agree there is a biological difference between the sexes

Males in general are large and stronger than females.

But if you accept the rather obvious biological differences between the genders….then we might just have to rethink our modern sexual norms and cultural practices.

Maybe young men and young women should not be living in the same mixed gender dorms. Or being over at fraternity or sorority houses after hours. And maybe just maybe we should not be celebrating the idea of consensual orgies

---

It's so simple.

Notice he keeps ignoring my simple gun question because it undermines his position on this issue.

Only a LWNJ would be stupid enough to be surprised when behavior they encourage actual takes place.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

---

I do agree there is a biological difference between the sexes

Males in general are large and stronger than females.

But if you accept the rather obvious biological differences between the genders….then we might just have to rethink our modern sexual norms and cultural practices.

Maybe young men and young women should not be living in the same mixed gender dorms. Or being over at fraternity or sorority houses after hours. And maybe just maybe we should not be celebrating the idea of consensual orgies

---

or maybe men should simply understand no is no.

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

---

I do agree there is a biological difference between the sexes

Males in general are large and stronger than females.

But if you accept the rather obvious biological differences between the genders….then we might just have to rethink our modern sexual norms and cultural practices.

Maybe young men and young women should not be living in the same mixed gender dorms. Or being over at fraternity or sorority houses after hours. And maybe just maybe we should not be celebrating the idea of consensual orgies

---

or maybe men should simply understand no is no.

---

And what if it's "yes" until a couple weeks later?

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Could be true

But we have seen so many of these panics happen over the last decade plus…. I would 100% wait for more info before making a judgment

Duke lacrosse "gang rape"
UVA "frat rape" in Rolling stone
Columbia University "mattress girl"
Etc.

---

ask 20 women before you shoot your mouth off about what's true and what's not true about rape

---

I have sisters, Aunts, a wife, and a daughter.

I take rape very seriously.

I also take the concept of "innocent until proven guilt" and the justice system seriously.

This situational at Cornell could be rape....that is possible.

The Duke Lacrosse case, UVA fraternity case, and Columbia Mattress incident.... also prove to us not everyone tells the truth about sexual assault. And some people lie and claim to be victims when they are not.

I hope you don't have a problem with giving people their day in Court. Or the concept of the State having to prove accusations with evidence.

---

I didn't ask if you take rape seriously. Rather, I did to talk to 20 women about what it means to be a woman and the precautions they need to take that you and I, as men, don't worry about

---

I do agree there is a biological difference between the sexes

Males in general are large and stronger than females.

But if you accept the rather obvious biological differences between the genders….then we might just have to rethink our modern sexual norms and cultural practices.

Maybe young men and young women should not be living in the same mixed gender dorms. Or being over at fraternity or sorority houses after hours. And maybe just maybe we should not be celebrating the idea of consensual orgies

---

or maybe men should simply understand no is no.

---

And what if it's "yes" until a couple weeks later?

---

Who wants to tell him that Lucy Craig admitted to raping one of the guys?