Transgender Literature in Texas

12,516 Views | 223 Replies | Last: 8 hrs ago by Harrison Bergeron
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

cowboycwr said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

DancinBear09 said:

It's always George Soros…just like the left always blames the Koch brothers. You are right, no one has been caught red handed but this stinks to high heaven of a right wing maneuver to get people pissed and out to the polls. What would Soros have to gain if it helped Paxton in any way?

Soros funds literally billions of dollars each year to radical groups.

Read my posts above. I do not need to try and re-explain it to you.

Sorry, player. This is a right wing funded effort.


Again you have no proof. Just wild accusations.


Man, you know it's a right wing group. This is like seeing the fat kid with cake on his face. The cake is gone. Are we supposed to believe "cake face" is a common state for him even though we didn't see him eat it?


No I don't KNOW. Can I suspect who is behind it? Yes. But do I have proof? No.

Neither do you. So all you are doing is making wild accusations


In all aspects of your life, do you only need proof? I've never tried crack but I know that ain't good for you. I've never tried anal. I know I don't want to.

I've never tried lesbian three way, I know I will with Halle Berry and Charlise.

I can't prosecute and sentence with the proof I don't have. But I can internet it out.


What a weird post.

There is concrete evidence that crack is bad for a human.

There is no evidence for this mailing. And in this case yes proof is needed.


I am willing to bet "Statman's virginity" that this is right funded. What you putting up?

If it wasn't funded by the right, Greg Abbott, Dan Patrick, and most certainly AG Ken Paxton would be all over it.
Their silence tells you everything you need to know.

What a stupid response.

So using your thinking the silence from all the politicians on the left over this issue ALSO tells you everything you need to know.

Or their silence on boys beating up on girls in sports.....

Or illegals killing and raping American citizens.....

Or 100 other issues.

There is an election in Texas. The issue conservatives raise most here is the transgender scare. Who stands to benefit from this mailer? Who has the most dark money to do mass mailings? Occam's Razor.

True. But that is not PROOF. As Mitch keeps claiming. He says he KNOWS it was a right wing group that sent it. But there is NO PROOF.

Key word proof. Evidence. Only hypothesis and theory.

We aren't in court. I am relying on common sense.

Proof is not needed ONLY in court.


People make thousands of decisions a day without the benefit of admissible evidence. I can form my opinion on common sense. Until someone comes up with something that makes more sense, that is what I chose to believe. You can engage in your wishful thinking otherwise.


Then believe your fairy tale. But stop trying to force others to believe it. Stop pushing this make believe as "what happened"

If giving out facts and logic is "forcing people to believe," I plead guilty. And here is an update from today. The printing company whose mailing permit was used to send the mailers is owned by a MAGA fan and Trump donor The group whose name was used is pursuing disocvoery through pre-suit depostions to dientify who did this.

As part of that discovery, the group noted that text messages to the same effect as the mailer wnet out, The sender of the text messages distributes content for clients, but says it has no roel in that content It can't divulge teh nemae of the client absent legal proceedings. Given that there is a egal proceedingl I am guessing we will get more info soon.

Almost every consultant interviewed, GOP included, expects this to be a right wing group fro the same reason I laid out. You have your head buried deep in the sand.

https://www.expressnews.com/news/texas/article/fake-transgender-mailers-linked-to-trump-donor-22497317.php

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas-politics/transgender-education-network-of-texas-takes-legal-action-against-croatian-company-wyoming-llc/



Because I want prof before I blame anyone I have my head in the sand???

Lol. Yeah ok. Whatever.

I have never said it was not a right wing group. I have never said it couldn't be a right wing group. Or any other group.

My stance from my first post on this thread until this one is that I will wait for solid evidence and facts before declaring who did it or condemning anyone.

I am reciting facts and logic. I am not sure what sort of proof you would find acceptable. It is also interesting that when Harrison was saying this was Geroge Soros and left-wing funded, you weren't jumping in to slam him for lack of proof.


You haven't provided proof. You have cited unverified reports.

You clearly have no idea what proof means.

This all started with Mitch. Then you felt the need to interject yourself into the discussion to defend him. That is why I didn't say anything to Harrison. I was waiting for Mitch to provide his proof.

My whole work life is governed by proof. What I understand is this: (1) there is hardly ever any one fact that proves a whole case. It is many small facts and the conclusions the jury draws from them. (2) If you want verified declarations from witnesses, I don't have time to collect them for the sake on an internet forum. I am giving you an observation-this was right wing funded and executed. If you don't see that as the overwhelming likelihood, you are acively hiding from it.

I love this post so much. This is the perfect illustration of what I have been constantly preaching - the lack of self-awareness and low-EQ among most LWNJs.

Take a moment to read the post. It starts with how is "live governed by proof." And then he concludes that 100% it was done by a right-wing group without offering a single shed off proof other than his feelings.

One could not do a better illustration of "facts don't care about your feelings." He seems to really think that whatever he believes must be true regardless of any facts to support his position, or he has just in his mind redefined "truth" as "agrees with me."

While not surprising, he completely misses the irony he claims to be "governed by truth" but then is convinced of something without a shed of proof.

From a motive POV, of course if it was done by a right-wing group is reasonable.

Also, from a motive POV, it is just as likely it was done by a Groomer group with the dual goal of getting out the message as well as providing red meat rage-bait for the LWNJs. What points to this is:
1. The Talking Points basically were mailed concurrently - I mean all the LWNJs were singing the same song within minutes
2. The left-wing media continues to be just apoplectic over it as if it is the most important story of the year

Notice how to left-wing media completely has ignored to story about how a fake polling company was used to run an anti-democratic demoralization campaign against Republican candidates but they're losing their mind over this - which is completely in line with Groomers as the literature was copied perfectly from the group's site.

we know now that the people sending out deceptive text messafges n the subjext was the Republican Women's Caucas. Still think it was a "groomer group."

i never said who I thought did it. I simply laid out affirmative cases for several possibilities. The difference is I let facts shape my opinion not my opinion shape my facts.

Why do you think Democrats are so outraged about their agenda being shared with Texans? It's not like anything on the flyer was misrepresented ... are Democrats so desperately trying to hide their views that thi s is what gets you so butthurt?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there more to GOP messaging this cycle beyond Dems want to turn boys into girls?

We have lost the damn plot.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA for Trannies! you know, the .001% of people that occupy MAGA's brain. Par.

Turns out a Republican Women's Group was 100% responsible and supports Paxton. Can't make it up. Viva la Cheesecake Factory!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dems also want open borders plus amnesty, higher taxes, the green new scam (making energy and everything else more expensive), defunding the police and freeing criminals (meaning another Dem crime wave), helping Iran get nukes (they tried under Obama & Autopen), aid for terrorists in general, boys in girls sports (more misogyny), and so on. The GOP is running on the opposite of each and have a positive record of accomplishments on each.

So there's a lot more than the state sponsored abuse of children. That's getting more attention because it's dramatic and personal and the Dems still support the delusional cases, the perverts, the groomers, and the pedos.
redfish961
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

DAC said:

FormerFlash said:

Why is TENT so upset with someone spending millions of dollars to promote their website and their actual agenda?

Exactly and why is any Democrat so upset with some allegedly free advertising for their own agenda. Makes no sense

They apparently were sent to Republicans who voted in the primary

This is not accurate, at least in my case.

Neither me nor her mother voted in any primaries.

In addition, my stepdaughters last name is completely different from both me and her mother.

Her information was gathered from somewhere by somebody, but I have no idea where that information was gathered from and how.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still no one can answer - what is the outrage if someone is sending out information consistent with mainstream Democrat positions ... can anyone explain why any Democrat would be upset about this?

As I noted, children are exponentially more likely to find the web site than snail mail - what's the problem?

If Democrats sent Pro Life messages to Texas, I would be thrilled.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Still no one can answer - what is the outrage if someone is sending out information consistent with mainstream Democrat positions ... can anyone explain why any Democrat would be upset about this?

As I noted, children are exponentially more likely to find the web site than snail mail - what's the problem?

If Democrats sent Pro Life messages to Texas, I would be thrilled.

It's simple.

"People should not use my name, image, and likeness without my consent. Mailing my position to people who will use the mailing to stop my position from being adopted will not get my consent. In addition, I should not be blamed for "exposing children" to the subject when it is you who did the exposing. Finally, ragebating is bad in all forms."
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redfish961 said:

Osodecentx said:

DAC said:

FormerFlash said:

Why is TENT so upset with someone spending millions of dollars to promote their website and their actual agenda?

Exactly and why is any Democrat so upset with some allegedly free advertising for their own agenda. Makes no sense

They apparently were sent to Republicans who voted in the primary

This is not accurate, at least in my case.

Neither me nor her mother voted in any primaries.

In addition, my stepdaughters last name is completely different from both me and her mother.

Her information was gathered from somewhere by somebody, but I have no idea where that information was gathered from and how.

Good to know. Maybe you voted in the R primary in the past or live in a R precinct
I voted in the R primary this yesr
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The Dems also want open borders plus amnesty, higher taxes, the green new scam (making energy and everything else more expensive), defunding the police and freeing criminals (meaning another Dem crime wave), helping Iran get nukes (they tried under Obama & Autopen), aid for terrorists in general, boys in girls sports (more misogyny), and so on. The GOP is running on the opposite of each and have a positive record of accomplishments on each.

So there's a lot more than the state sponsored abuse of children. That's getting more attention because it's dramatic and personal and the Dems still support the delusional cases, the perverts, the groomers, and the pedos.

ah, where did you miss that the Rs were responsible for the ****** mailer? This has nothing to do with democrats. Stay focused, stay on point. Manage your meandering.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that organization made that information public, then it falls under fair use. If they don't want people to see it they shouldn't publicize it. And they have no reason to complain if someone shines a spotlight on their radicalism. Whomever sent it is not lying about their agenda.

The problem is the Leftists don't like being called out for their insane and perverted ideas so they are throwing a tantrum. They are acting like toddlers.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again with the stupid assumption and no evidence. It doesn't matter who sent it. The flier represents the views of that group which they themselves publicized. Whining over normal people having a sane reaction to insane and perverted ideas is doubling down on stupid.

Leftists keep acting like toddlers.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Still no one can answer - what is the outrage if someone is sending out information consistent with mainstream Democrat positions ... can anyone explain why any Democrat would be upset about this?

As I noted, children are exponentially more likely to find the web site than snail mail - what's the problem?

If Democrats sent Pro Life messages to Texas, I would be thrilled.

It's simple.

"People should not use my name, image, and likeness without my consent. Mailing my position to people who will use the mailing to stop my position from being adopted will not get my consent. In addition, I should not be blamed for "exposing children" to the subject when it is you who did the exposing. Finally, ragebating is bad in all forms."


Did you realize you just posted telling people what you believe will cause people to oppose your beliefs ... so you acknowledge the inherent deception required by Democrats to win. Interesting take.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Another left-wing propaganda piece making claims with zero evidence.

Again, what in the literature was untrue? What in the literature misrepresented the views of this group or of Democrats in general?

That's why the controversy around this is stupid - regardless of who sent it, the content literally was taken directly from the Groomer's web site.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.