Vivek Ramaswamy talk

8,521 Views | 133 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by Danielsjackson114
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

If so, it is outrageous.

If not, it's par for the course.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.



Once they tossed you, they should've curb stomped your sorry ass.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.



Once they tossed you, they should've curb stomped your sorry ass.


lol what kind of scumbag supports Lyndsey Graham?

His sexual improprieties were just another reflection of his lack of character...
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.



Once they tossed you, they should've curb stomped your sorry ass.


lol what kind of scumbag supports Lyndsey Graham?

His sexual improprieties were just another reflection of his lack of character...

What in the blue hell does Lindsey Graham using/not using escorts have to do with this election? He's dead, dude, and he cannot respond for himself.

I hope Darline loses, but this clown is trash and should be called such.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.



Once they tossed you, they should've curb stomped your sorry ass.


lol what kind of scumbag supports Lyndsey Graham?

His sexual improprieties were just another reflection of his lack of character...

What in the blue hell does Lindsey Graham using/not using escorts have to do with this election? He's dead, dude, and he cannot respond for himself.

I hope Darline loses, but this clown is trash and should be called such.


Alright.

Sorry.

I misunderstood where you were coming from.
OffshoreBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

The Ohio ad where he has his opponents mom say she's unqualified is "tre le sujet de tous les / de la conversation" (talk of the town.)



Background: in 1978 Dr. Amy Actin was removed from her moms custody at the age of twelve because her step dad was (yep he did) for three years. Mom supported the step dad.
Don't Republicans know only liberals can use family members to attack a candidate? Ask RFK.
I came for the rumors, stayed for the overreactions.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

fubar said:

The_barBEARian said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.



Once they tossed you, they should've curb stomped your sorry ass.


lol what kind of scumbag supports Lyndsey Graham?

His sexual improprieties were just another reflection of his lack of character...

What in the blue hell does Lindsey Graham using/not using escorts have to do with this election? He's dead, dude, and he cannot respond for himself.

I hope Darline loses, but this clown is trash and should be called such.


Alright.

Sorry.

I misunderstood where you were coming from.

Appreciate that.

Now we can go back to yelling at each other via keyboard, but thank you.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OffshoreBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

The Ohio ad where he has his opponents mom say she's unqualified is "tre le sujet de tous les / de la conversation" (talk of the town.)



Background: in 1978 Dr. Amy Actin was removed from her moms custody at the age of twelve because her step dad was (yep he did) for three years. Mom supported the step dad.
Don't Republicans know only liberals can use family members to attack a candidate? Ask RFK.



I encourage all republicans to use family members in ads if it will have this effect on their candidacy.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

cms186 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.

I still am trying to clarify - is it a "sin" to have family members speak out against a candidate? Is that forboden?

Not forbidden. In this case, it is stupid. Hitching yourself to a woman who chose an abuser over her children? Good call, there Vivek.

IMO this is the dumbest political ad I've ever seen and it says more about Vivek's lack of judgement than anything else. I think Acton is a bad candidate, even somewhat unstable, but this ad almost guarantees she will be the winner.

They bring on a woman who hasn't seen her child for 47 years, a woman that sided with her pedo husband who assaulted her own child. What kind of freaking idiot would approve such an ad.

In fairness, I do not believe her stepfather was ever convicted of assaulting Acton. I just think we should stay rooted in facts. Not that her mom was "Mother of the Year" - cannot imagine choosing a boyfriend over your child ... but Acton also seems like a fabulous fabulist.

If not obvious, I have not position on the ad, but it annoys me that Democrats do this all the time and the left-wing media is silent but when a Republican does it then it becomes a national hysteria.

No, because he fled the state, he was charged and had warrants out for his arrest.

I hope you're sitting down. I am about to blow your mind ... are you sure you can handle it?



You better take a few minutes to compose yourself ....




I don't want you to have a heart attack ...



Okay ... you think you're ready ...



3 ...



2 ...



1....



States regularly issue warrants to arrest people charged in other states ... fleeing a state does not prevent one from being arrested ....



Assuming your "mind" had not exploded, look forward to another brilliant response.

Actually, it does. Once a warrant is issued, there aren't "warrant police" chasing dudes around the country. The way people on the run get arrested is by committing another crime (speeding, etc.) You should remember, this is still 1970s, 1980s technology in play. Integrated state systems didn't come into play until the 1990s.

Back in the day. In the 70's there was no internet, few CCT's very limited DNA capabilities, you could flee and just get away. No doubt people still "get away with it" today, but 50 years ago it was much easier.

You keep telling yourself that ... I look forward to seeing you on the pedestal for the Mental Gymnastics Olympics.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.

They are quite distinguishable. If a campaign creates, sponsors, or coordinates content, the candidate owns it. If not, candidates can't be held to everything their supporters say and do.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

OffshoreBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

The Ohio ad where he has his opponents mom say she's unqualified is "tre le sujet de tous les / de la conversation" (talk of the town.)



Background: in 1978 Dr. Amy Actin was removed from her moms custody at the age of twelve because her step dad was (yep he did) for three years. Mom supported the step dad.

Don't Republicans know only liberals can use family members to attack a candidate? Ask RFK.



I encourage all republicans to use family members in ads if it will have this effect on their candidacy.

She looks like a character from the movie Gremlins. This was the dumbest political move I've seen, probably born of desperation because they were already fading.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.

They are quite distinguishable. If a campaign creates, sponsors, or coordinates content, the candidate owns it. If not, candidates can't be held to everything their supporters say and do.

Come on "Frank" they are throwing this in his sisters face at political events. Please do not pretend there is anything virtuous about the democrats, they are as low as a snake's belly. Going after the dead is possibly as bad as going after children.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

OffshoreBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

The Ohio ad where he has his opponents mom say she's unqualified is "tre le sujet de tous les / de la conversation" (talk of the town.)



Background: in 1978 Dr. Amy Actin was removed from her moms custody at the age of twelve because her step dad was (yep he did) for three years. Mom supported the step dad.

Don't Republicans know only liberals can use family members to attack a candidate? Ask RFK.



I encourage all republicans to use family members in ads if it will have this effect on their candidacy.

She looks like a character from the movie Gremlins. This was the dumbest political move I've seen, probably born of desperation because they were already fading.

I'm 1500 miles away, and I can see something is off about her.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

cms186 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.

I still am trying to clarify - is it a "sin" to have family members speak out against a candidate? Is that forboden?

Not forbidden. In this case, it is stupid. Hitching yourself to a woman who chose an abuser over her children? Good call, there Vivek.

IMO this is the dumbest political ad I've ever seen and it says more about Vivek's lack of judgement than anything else. I think Acton is a bad candidate, even somewhat unstable, but this ad almost guarantees she will be the winner.

They bring on a woman who hasn't seen her child for 47 years, a woman that sided with her pedo husband who assaulted her own child. What kind of freaking idiot would approve such an ad.

In fairness, I do not believe her stepfather was ever convicted of assaulting Acton. I just think we should stay rooted in facts. Not that her mom was "Mother of the Year" - cannot imagine choosing a boyfriend over your child ... but Acton also seems like a fabulous fabulist.

If not obvious, I have not position on the ad, but it annoys me that Democrats do this all the time and the left-wing media is silent but when a Republican does it then it becomes a national hysteria.

No, because he fled the state, he was charged and had warrants out for his arrest.

I hope you're sitting down. I am about to blow your mind ... are you sure you can handle it?



You better take a few minutes to compose yourself ....




I don't want you to have a heart attack ...



Okay ... you think you're ready ...



3 ...



2 ...



1....



States regularly issue warrants to arrest people charged in other states ... fleeing a state does not prevent one from being arrested ....



Assuming your "mind" had not exploded, look forward to another brilliant response.

Actually, it does. Once a warrant is issued, there aren't "warrant police" chasing dudes around the country. The way people on the run get arrested is by committing another crime (speeding, etc.) You should remember, this is still 1970s, 1980s technology in play. Integrated state systems didn't come into play until the 1990s.

Back in the day. In the 70's there was no internet, few CCT's very limited DNA capabilities, you could flee and just get away. No doubt people still "get away with it" today, but 50 years ago it was much easier.

You keep telling yourself that ... I look forward to seeing you on the pedestal for the Mental Gymnastics Olympics.

Sure, 50 years ago it was easier to avoid detection and apprehension from a crime if you ran away. Much easier to disappear into the background. There wasn't a cctv or public camera around every corner, there wasn't the internet to make a regional news story "viral" like so many today, there wasn't dna evidence to track with precision. It's really just common sense.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.

They are quite distinguishable. If a campaign creates, sponsors, or coordinates content, the candidate owns it. If not, candidates can't be held to everything their supporters say and do.

Come on "Frank" they are throwing this in his sisters face at political events. Please do not pretend there is anything virtuous about the democrats, they are as low as a snake's belly. Going after the dead is possibly as bad as going after children.

The guy at the event is an idiot and an a--hole. Show me a connection to the campaign, and I will agree about what "they" are doing. Until then, it is what "he" is doing.

Plenty of right-wingers took unbelievably offensive shots at Michelle Obama. The difference is that GOP candidates encouraged it.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
'vivek vivek vivek vivek...' P. Donahue*

* tapping mic to forehead over and over w/ one foot on chair.

- el UF



pro ecclesia, pro javelina
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

'vivek vivek vivek vivek...' P. Donahue*

* tapping mic to forehead over and over w/ one foot on chair.

- el UF






My mom was on Donahue once and asked a question from the crowd.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

'vivek vivek vivek vivek...' P. Donahue*

* tapping mic to forehead over and over w/ one foot on chair.

- el UF





Finally, someone we can trust!
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.

They are quite distinguishable. If a campaign creates, sponsors, or coordinates content, the candidate owns it. If not, candidates can't be held to everything their supporters say and do.

Come on "Frank" they are throwing this in his sisters face at political events. Please do not pretend there is anything virtuous about the democrats, they are as low as a snake's belly. Going after the dead is possibly as bad as going after children.

The guy at the event is an idiot and an a--hole. Show me a connection to the campaign, and I will agree about what "they" are doing. Until then, it is what "he" is doing.

Plenty of right-wingers took unbelievably offensive shots at Michelle Obama. The difference is that GOP candidates encouraged it.

R's are equally as scummy. Vivek certainly verifies this. I sure hope you don't really think D's don't encourage offensive attacks on candidates or their families. They are not morally superior in any way.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Democrats are running ads with make hookers claiming Lindsey Graham paid for butt sex - libeling a dead man. Spare me the stupid selective outrage from LWNJs.

I know there is a documentary out. Has the Democratic candidate actually run an ad? Highly doubt it.

There indistinguishable ... you think the movie makers just decided they wanted to do a show about Lindsey Graham's butt sex because they think butt sex is bad ... please ... the naivety ... of course tell us about how Juicy Smalls was attacked and Bubba Wallace had a noose in his garage.

They are quite distinguishable. If a campaign creates, sponsors, or coordinates content, the candidate owns it. If not, candidates can't be held to everything their supporters say and do.

Come on "Frank" they are throwing this in his sisters face at political events. Please do not pretend there is anything virtuous about the democrats, they are as low as a snake's belly. Going after the dead is possibly as bad as going after children.

The guy at the event is an idiot and an a--hole. Show me a connection to the campaign, and I will agree about what "they" are doing. Until then, it is what "he" is doing.

Plenty of right-wingers took unbelievably offensive shots at Michelle Obama. The difference is that GOP candidates encouraged it.

R's are equally as scummy. Vivek certainly verifies this. I sure hope you don't really think D's don't encourage offensive attacks on candidates or their families. They are not morally superior in any way.

I am sure some do. There is no evidence that Andrews did, however. There is no doubt that Vivek did.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is how they blackmailed Lyndsey Graham:

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adios Vivek
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Adios Vivek


There are a lot of silver linings tonight Boog!
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good. That ad was the worst ever. He deserves to get his teeth kicked in.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Governor Ron DeSantis:

"How bad did they beat Vivek like a drum? Now, part of that was Vivek, quite frankly. I don't know why they would have pushed him to be the candidate there.

Ohio is a working-class state, very blue-collar. You know, Vivek, he's like a tech guy, did this Alzheimer's drug, and he wants to bring in people, foreign worker on visas.
That is not the type of person that's going to sell. x.com/ReOpenChris/st…
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
now - post erection - we can be honest and say .....

vivek, kennyp and graham sister - likely others - were bad choices.

- el UF

D!

Onward!!

Go Bears!!!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What about for all of the weird sht you do in Thailand?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.