Vivek Ramaswamy talk

4,359 Views | 96 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by boognish_bear
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ohio ad where he has his opponents mom say she's unqualified is "tre le sujet de tous les / de la conversation" (talk of the town.)



Background: in 1978 Dr. Amy Actin was removed from her moms custody at the age of twelve because her step dad was (yep he did) for three years. Mom supported the step dad.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vivek sucks
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blown up in his face so bad. This add is just sad and pathetic . And Piggy has told him he loves it and to keep running it. suprised? We have reached a new low and that is saying sumpin.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's against birthright citizenship even though that's how he became a citizen.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For some reason between Ramaswamy, Donalds, Rogers, and Paxton the GOP decided to promote the candidacy of four really lousy individuals in high profile races.

Ramaswamy chose to insult his voter base and now has run this ad and taken a swing at Amy Acton, dismissing her molestation by her step father at age 12 as her "complaining about other people doing things to her." He's going to lose.

Donalds, with a criminal background that includes bank fraud and selling drugs, is clinging to a 3% point lead in a red state where Republicans have a six figure advantage in registrations.

Rogers is one of the swampiest swamp creatures in the Congress, never missing an opportunity to sell out his constituents for donations from foreign lobbies.

Paxton has been discussed extensively here.

I can't say that I understand the party's logic, but so it goes.

I volunteered for Trump 2016. I voted for the man 6 times (three primaries, three general elections). He has turned into an existential threat to the nation with this unnecessary war on Iran. I can't emphasize how critical it is to install a congressional majority in November that will remove him from office before he can make this bad situation he has created worse. Unfortunately, purging him and Susie Wiles are the only solutions here. Neither will listen to reason.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

For some reason between Ramaswamy, Donalds, Rogers, and Paxton the GOP decided to promote the candidacy of four really lousy individuals in high profile races.

Ramaswamy chose to insult his voter base and now has run this ad and taken a swing at Amy Acton, dismissing her molestation by her step father at age 12 as her "complaining about other people doing things to her." He's going to lose.

Donalds, with a criminal background that includes bank fraud and selling drugs, is clinging to a 3% point lead in a red state where Republicans have a six figure advantage in registrations.

Rogers is one of the swampiest swamp creatures in the Congress, never missing an opportunity to sell out his constituents for donations from foreign lobbies.

Paxton has been discussed extensively here.

I can't say that I understand the party's logic, but so it goes.

I volunteered for Trump 2016. I voted for the man 6 times (three primaries, three general elections). He has turned into an existential threat to the nation with this unnecessary war on Iran. I can't emphasize how critical it is to install a congressional majority in November that will remove him from office before he can make this bad situation he has created worse. Unfortunately, purging him and Susie Wiles are the only solutions here. Neither will listen to reason.


I think Schumer and Jeffries must be ousted once Dems take control.

In the next president, I want boring. I miss when people were mad about a tan suit. There should not be this much chaos.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.
BearWithMe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yikes
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

I volunteered for Trump 2016. I voted for the man 6 times (three primaries, three general elections). He has turned into an existential threat to the nation with this unnecessary war on Iran. I can't emphasize how critical it is to install a congressional majority in November that will remove him from office before he can make this bad situation he has created worse. Unfortunately, purging him and Susie Wiles are the only solutions here. Neither will listen to reason.

Can you expand on the existential threat Trump supposedly poses because of Iran?

This is not a full-scale war. At this point, we're talking about occasional targeted strikes, not an invasion. Do you believe he is about to commit American troops to a major ground war? If so, on what evidence?

I am no fan of this conflict, and I think Trump's performance over the last couple of years has been fairly poor, with the tariffs being among his biggest blunders. But I think you may be acting a bit like a drama queen here. Calling Trump an "existential threat" to the nation over a limited military action seems wildly disproportionate to the facts presently available.

I suspect this is really all about Israel for you.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

blown up in his face so bad. This add is just sad and pathetic . And Piggy has told him he loves it and to keep running it. suprised? We have reached a new low and that is saying sumpin.

And the resident liberal democrat weighs in.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A new low is moving to Thailand t engage in underage promiscuity but yeah JR, good one
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donut }

- el UF

D!

Go Bears!!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

I have seen that mentioned. I know nothing about her other than this story and that she was Ohio's COVID chief. It seems like there is plenty of evidence to support her allegations against her stepfather; her brother supports her, the state removed them from custody, and the stepdad fled rather than face charges.

So what else has she imagined?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


Indeed. All of these folks who think they are "moderate" and voting for the "better person" (who they don't actually know anything about) are in for a rude awakening once these folks get in office and go hard left. Eg Scott Galloway being so hurt that Mamdami actually came after him.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.


Not in Ohio so I can't tell you what Vivek's policies are. Looking at his history, not sure I see a code he goes by.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Realitybites said:

For some reason between Ramaswamy, Donalds, Rogers, and Paxton the GOP decided to promote the candidacy of four really lousy individuals in high profile races.

Ramaswamy chose to insult his voter base and now has run this ad and taken a swing at Amy Acton, dismissing her molestation by her step father at age 12 as her "complaining about other people doing things to her." He's going to lose.

Donalds, with a criminal background that includes bank fraud and selling drugs, is clinging to a 3% point lead in a red state where Republicans have a six figure advantage in registrations.

Rogers is one of the swampiest swamp creatures in the Congress, never missing an opportunity to sell out his constituents for donations from foreign lobbies.

Paxton has been discussed extensively here.

I can't say that I understand the party's logic, but so it goes.

I volunteered for Trump 2016. I voted for the man 6 times (three primaries, three general elections). He has turned into an existential threat to the nation with this unnecessary war on Iran. I can't emphasize how critical it is to install a congressional majority in November that will remove him from office before he can make this bad situation he has created worse. Unfortunately, purging him and Susie Wiles are the only solutions here. Neither will listen to reason.


I think Schumer and Jeffries must be ousted once Dems take control.

In the next president, I want boring. I miss when people were mad about a tan suit. There should not be this much chaos.


And thankfully Pelosi is leaving
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.

I still am trying to clarify - is it a "sin" to have family members speak out against a candidate? Is that forboden?
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.

I still am trying to clarify - is it a "sin" to have family members speak out against a candidate? Is that forboden?

Not forbidden. In this case, it is stupid. Hitching yourself to a woman who chose an abuser over her children? Good call, there Vivek.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting liberal lunatics as yourself Franky now are concerned about hitching to a woman who has committed some heinous things aka Nancy Clancy

But yeah, selective feelings when it comes to a Republican
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Let's not pretend the Democrats haven't cared about that for decades. And the problem is your party no longer has any sense of normal. It's expelled the normies in favor of radical leftists and socialists. That's the direction it's headed.

And that crowd has always been about tyranny and vilification. So it's a bit rich to complain of human decency.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Like calling anyone you disagree with a racist, sexist, fascist, islamaphobic, transphobic, etc.? Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling Gov. Abbot "hot wheels?" Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling anything you don't like a THREAT TO DEMOCRACY? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like needlessly terrorizing Jews and running them out of public spaces? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like knowingly calling President Trump a racist or pedophile? Does they seem decent and integrous?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.

I still am trying to clarify - is it a "sin" to have family members speak out against a candidate? Is that forboden?

Not forbidden. In this case, it is stupid. Hitching yourself to a woman who chose an abuser over her children? Good call, there Vivek.

Can you post a link to his conviction for abusing the fabulist?

Being a bad mother does not mean she's lying about nutjob Acton, who has a long record of being a fabulist.

No doubt you supported murder Ed Kennedy, no?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Like calling anyone you disagree with a racist, sexist, fascist, islamaphobic, transphobic, etc.? Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling Gov. Abbot "hot wheels?" Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling anything you don't like a THREAT TO DEMOCRACY? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like needlessly terrorizing Jews and running them out of public spaces? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like knowingly calling President Trump a racist or pedophile? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Of course there is a double standard. Will be interesting to see if Frank acknowledges it. I've found him to be one of the more reasonable and honest left leaning posters.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Weird you never felt that way in the Nancy Clancy case but you do now because it is a Republican.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Like calling anyone you disagree with a racist, sexist, fascist, islamaphobic, transphobic, etc.? Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling Gov. Abbot "hot wheels?" Does that seem decent and integrous?

Like calling anything you don't like a THREAT TO DEMOCRACY? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like needlessly terrorizing Jews and running them out of public spaces? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Like knowingly calling President Trump a racist or pedophile? Does they seem decent and integrous?

Of course there is a double standard. Will be interesting to see if Frank acknowledges it. I've found him to be one of the more reasonable and honest left leaning posters.

I think I have realized that it's not a double standard - the LWNJs generally believe whatever they do is morally right regardless of what it is ... that's why they believe things like "tolerating diversity" means only the diversity they like and destroying everything else.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Let's not pretend the Democrats haven't cared about that for decades. And the problem is your party no longer has any sense of normal. It's expelled the normies in favor of radical leftists and socialists. That's the direction it's headed.

And that crowd has always been about tyranny and vilification. So it's a bit rich to complain of human decency.

Your double negative is showing.

I am a very normal person and a Democrat. Most of the Democrats I know are very normal people.

Contrary to that, I do not know one Democrat who has the sort of zealous allegiance to a politician that MAGA displays to Trump. Those people are abnormal. People who spend their lives obsessing about non-issues like the coming prominence of Sharia law, the epidemic of transitioning children, the swarms of non-citizens voting, the curse of vaccines, and on and on are abnormal.

And if you want to talk about policy, here is why I voted mostly for Democrats. I want a Congress that will act like the equal branch of government the Constitution calls for. The war in Iran is stupid and harmful, the failure to support Ukraine is stupid and harmful, Trump's tariffs are stupid and harmful, Trump's refusal to even consider the harm that AI, unregulated crypto, and climate change can do is stupid and harmful, the combination of tax cuts and drunken sailor spending is stupid and harmful, and Trump's lawfare is stupid and harmful. I could go on, but that is enough.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Let's not pretend the Democrats haven't cared about that for decades. And the problem is your party no longer has any sense of normal. It's expelled the normies in favor of radical leftists and socialists. That's the direction it's headed.

And that crowd has always been about tyranny and vilification. So it's a bit rich to complain of human decency.

Your double negative is showing.

I am a very normal person and a Democrat. Most of the Democrats I know are very normal people.

Contrary to that, I do not know one Democrat who has the sort of zealous allegiance to a politician that MAGA displays to Trump. Those people are abnormal. People who spend their lives obsessing about non-issues like the coming prominence of Sharia law, the epidemic of transitioning children, the swarms of non-citizens voting, the curse of vaccines, and on and on are abnormal.

And if you want to talk about policy, here is why I voted mostly for Democrats. I want a Congress that will act like the equal branch of government the Constitution calls for. The war in Iran is stupid and harmful, the failure to support Ukraine is stupid and harmful, Trump's tariffs are stupid and harmful, Trump's refusal to even consider the harm that AI, unregulated crypto, and climate change can do is stupid and harmful, the combination of tax cuts and drunken sailor spending is stupid and harmful, and Trump's lawfare is stupid and harmful. I could go on, but that is enough.


Frank, be intellectually honest for a moment. Your party has gone from treating self-described democratic socialists as fringe figures to elevating them to national prominence. Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, and Zohran Mamdani aren't fringe voices. They're some of the most celebrated figures on the left. Mamdani is one of the most celebrated figures in your party.

And the pipeline isn't slowing down. In just this cycle, Democratic voters nominated or seriously advanced candidates such as Melat Kiros in Colorado, Chris Rabb in Pennsylvania, Claire Valdez in New York, Darializa Avila Chevalier in New York, and Donavan McKinney in Michigan, all associated with democratic-socialist politics.

So spare me the lecture about "normal" and "human decency." The Democratic Party of Bill Clinton believed in welfare reform, border enforcement, balanced budgets, and political pragmatism. Today's party increasingly celebrates activists, ideologues, and socialists while treating disagreement as a moral failing.

That's why I said the normies have been pushed out. The radicals weren't expelled. They got promoted
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Frank Galvin said:

Mothra said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

So it is an outrage to use a candidate's family in an ad?

That Acton chick is a certified fabulist loon - totally incompetent nut job. Proves women cannot handle pressure - she'll pull a Lindsey Clancy on Ohio.

Indeed, she is a leftist nut, but it's all about the feelings for voters nowdays.

That said, it was a poor political calculation by V.


The problem isn't her mom in the ad. It's THIS mom in an ad. She hasn't seen this woman (allegedly) since 1978. If it's my mom? I'm a dirty scoundrel. This woman? Yuk!

This is one of those "differences" none of us can relate to. Raped by our stepdad and mom standing by him.

I don't disagree that the ad was a mistake. My comment was directed generally toward those that put feelings over policy.

My "feeling" is that there is a baseline of human decency and integrity we should expect of elected officials. Both parties often fail that test, but it seems like the GOP has stopped caring about it. After decades as casting itself as the values party. to boot.

Let's not pretend the Democrats haven't cared about that for decades. And the problem is your party no longer has any sense of normal. It's expelled the normies in favor of radical leftists and socialists. That's the direction it's headed.

And that crowd has always been about tyranny and vilification. So it's a bit rich to complain of human decency.


And if you want to talk about policy, here is why I voted mostly for Democrats. I want a Congress that will act like the equal branch of government the Constitution calls for. The war in Iran is stupid and harmful, the failure to support Ukraine is stupid and harmful, Trump's tariffs are stupid and harmful, Trump's refusal to even consider the harm that AI, unregulated crypto, and climate change can do is stupid and harmful, the combination of tax cuts and drunken sailor spending is stupid and harmful, and Trump's lawfare is stupid and harmful. I could go on, but that is enough.


Fine, Frank. And I voted Republican because I opposed open-border policies, millions of illegal crossings, the Afghanistan debacle, COVID business shutdowns and vaccine mandates, biological males competing in girls' sports, promoting kids gender preferences over their parents wishes, massive spending, crushing inflation, identity politics, and the increasing influence of socialists in the Democratic Party.

See how this works? You have a list. I have a list.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.