Have they released any transcripts of the meeting or was it covert?HuMcK said:cBUrurenthusism said:You mean like the part where the transcripts read like a timeline of exactly what he said happened?HuMcK said:I'm open to being convinced that he's not telling the truth, but as far as I'm concerned there is a rebuttable presumption that Avenatti is credible as it relates to these matters, and it hasn't been rebutted yet. Contrast that with your unflinching belief in whatever Don Jr says about the Trump Tower meeting, despite his demonstrable lies about it at every step of the way.. Like I said, as far as I know Avenatti has told the (sometimes sensationalized) truth about everything else in this case so far, most of the time he even has the receipts. In case you haven't figured it out yet, Avenatti is not on some meandering stroll through the legal weeds where he makes a bunch of baseless accusations hoping it will stick, he knows what he's doing and he probably knows exactly where he's trying to take things. Hell, I'm willing to bet that the Qatari's are a source for a lot of his info at this point.cBUrurenthusism said:HuMcK said:
I know this is a foreign concept to Trump supporters, but Avenatti has built up a cache of something called "credibility". If/when he gets caught lying or making things up it'll evaporate his credibility, but as far as I can tell that hasn't happened yet, so he gets the benefit of the doubt that Trump doesn't.
Avenatti and credibility in the same sentence.....LOL
So your idea of lawfare is believe everything you hear until it is disproven?
I bet if you interrogated Bill and Loretta Lynch they'd both agree their tarmac meeting was to discuss grandkids, they could probably even lay out a timeline.