Laura Bush says separating children and parents at the border "breaks my heart"

25,692 Views | 309 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Florda_mike
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never expected to see an opinion by Laura Bush in the Washington Post, but here it is, and she doesn't like the Trump/Sessions immigration policy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/laura-bush-separating-children-from-their-parents-at-the-border-breaks-my-heart/2018/06/17/f2df517a-7287-11e8-9780-b1dd6a09b549_story.html?utm_term=.993f78533215

And pls don't reply that this policy is the Democrats fault. Laura, a classy first lady if there ever was one, knows better, and you should too.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is a terrible policy and I don't know what the solution is to handle the complicated issue when people break the law. But it is ignorant to ignore the fact that this was the policy in place during the Obama administration. This is a failure by both parties, which tends to be the case for most of the major issues we face. But yes, please keep playing the two-party game and just blame the other party for all of the problems we have and nothing will get done.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am interested in hearing the last time any leftists on here gave a rats ass about the opinion of Laura Bush. Anyone? I am pretty sure she has almost exclusively been the object of ridicule from the people who are quoting the woman who is likely a very talented librarian but not a legislator, now as an authority on immigration policy.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oops...

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where was the outrage in 2009? 2010? 2011? 2012? 2013? 2014? 2015? 2016? Because this is not new.

riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree that it's terrible when children get separated from their parents because their parents have committed one or more crimes and have to suffer the consequences, but where is all of the weeping and gnashing of teeth over the children of actual citizens that get separated from their parents every day in the USA? Those children also aren't responsible for their parents' actions, but we don't hear a word of concern from the libs or anyone else (like Laura Bush) about those kids. The hard truth is and always will be that a person that enters the USA illegally is an illegal alien and therefore by definition a criminal - regardless of whatever their motivation was in coming here. Yes, again, it's bad for their kids, but no worse than it is for the child of a citizen criminal that is being incarcerated.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

I agree that it's terrible when children get separated from their parents because their parents have committed one or more crimes and have to suffer the consequences, but where is all of the weeping and gnashing of teeth over the children of actual citizens that get separated from their parents every day in the USA? Those children also aren't responsible for their parents' actions, but we don't hear a word of concern from the libs or anyone else (like Laura Bush) about those kids. The hard truth is and always will be that a person that enters the USA illegally is an illegal alien and therefore by definition a criminal - regardless of whatever their motivation was in coming here. Yes, again, it's bad for their kids, but no worse than it is for the child of a citizen criminal that is being incarcerated.
They want something to be outraged about because they think it will win their party some votes. They do this while knowing for a fact that they weren't outraged about it when their party endorsed it.

The thing they don't understand anymore is that we live in an age of ease of access to information and people can see right through their BS.

Their outrage now backfires on them.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Triggered
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Triggered
I don't think belly laughs were what you meant to trigger.
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

Oops...




Maybe, maybe not. In either case, she's not advocating separating families.

These last three years have surprised me at how imponderable conservative values are.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

riflebear said:

Oops...




Maybe, maybe not. In either case, she's not advocating separating families.

These last three years have surprised me at how imponderable conservative values are.
Before assuming anything, I'm all for changing this law 100%. If it was easy, then it would have been done already. What do you propose? It's not like a criminal in the U.S. can take their kid to jail, can they?

I'll bet any liberal on here $100 that the Democrats won't do anything to help solve this issue before Nov. They literally have nothing to run on so this is their golden ticket (even though they started it). I think the GOP does something but we all know the Dems keep kicking the can on illegal immigration because they know it's the one issue they can keep bringing up.

There was even a NYTimes article during Obama Admin that talked about sex trafficking from this issue and how bad it was getting. Please don't tell me about 'conservative values'. Everyone wants to fix it but it takes Congress (and Democrats) to do it.

Do you want to end up like several countries in Europe right now that are being flipped upside down and in crisis from allowing so many illegals into their countries. Biblical values also call everyone to follow THE LAW. Doesn't mean it can't be changed which I hope they do.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
illegal entry = misdemeanor

illegal RE-ENTRY = Felony
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

tommie said:

riflebear said:

Oops...




Maybe, maybe not. In either case, she's not advocating separating families.

These last three years have surprised me at how imponderable conservative values are.
Before assuming anything, I'm all for changing this law 100%. If it was easy, then it would have been done already. What do you propose? It's not like a criminal in the U.S. can take their kid to jail, can they?

I'll bet any liberal on here $100 that the Democrats won't do anything to help solve this issue before Nov. They literally have nothing to run on so this is their golden ticket (even though they started it). I think the GOP does something but we all know the Dems keep kicking the can on illegal immigration because they know it's the one issue they can keep bringing up.

There was even a NYTimes article during Obama Admin that talked about sex trafficking from this issue and how bad it was getting. Please don't tell me about 'conservative values'. Everyone wants to fix it but it takes Congress (and Democrats) to do it.

Do you want to end up like several countries in Europe right now that are being flipped upside down and in crisis from allowing so many illegals into their countries. Biblical values also call everyone to follow THE LAW. Doesn't mean it can't be changed which I hope they do.


This is not a law. This is policy. When a guy kills 10 people on a church, we arrest, give a trial, convict THEN make sure we execute humanely. Odd, but that's what we do.

Because we strive to be better even through out shortcomings.

This is policy to force funding for the wall. And it shouldn't be done. Especially in our name.

The president can treat this like DACA. He can say we won't separate children form their mothers.

He won't.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

It is a terrible policy and I don't know what the solution is to handle the complicated issue when people break the law. But it is ignorant to ignore the fact that this was the policy in place during the Obama administration. This is a failure by both parties, which tends to be the case for most of the major issues we face. But yes, please keep playing the two-party game and just blame the other party for all of the problems we have and nothing will get done.
Actually the statute existed during not only Obama's administration but also Bush's, however this was not the policy of either of those administrations. There is discretion as to how something like this would be implemented administrations of both parties until Trump handled their discretion similarly. Trump himself handled it similarly to how they both did until the past few months. Putting hispanic kids in mass in internment camps frankly really is unprecedented. Keep in mind this is also without due process. These kids are not getting adlitems appointed etc. there arent any hearings etc.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

contrario said:

It is a terrible policy and I don't know what the solution is to handle the complicated issue when people break the law. But it is ignorant to ignore the fact that this was the policy in place during the Obama administration. This is a failure by both parties, which tends to be the case for most of the major issues we face. But yes, please keep playing the two-party game and just blame the other party for all of the problems we have and nothing will get done.
Actually the statute existed during not only Obama's administration but also Bush's, however this was not the policy of either of those administrations. There is discretion as to how something like this would be implemented administrations of both parties until Trump handled their discretion similarly. Trump himself handled it similarly to how they both did until the past few months. Putting hispanic kids in mass in internment camps frankly really is unprecedented. Keep in mind this is also without due process. These kids are not getting adlitems appointed etc. there arent any hearings etc.
So were the photos from pre-2016 fabricated? And the stories from pre-2016 fake news?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?
Have you traveled the Texas Border? Especially Big Bend
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ To bad downvotes can't be used to send someone packing
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

Doc Holliday said:

Triggered
I don't think belly laughs were what you meant to trigger.
It's hard to tell what will trigger some people.

If Doc or a few other posters had posted the exact same thing, quash would have called it triggered. So there's that.
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good article that seems to cover things fairly.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/6/11/17443198/children-immigrant-families-separated-parents
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quash, Bubba, Cinque, Waco47 and their ilk don't care about USA
SicEmHeels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

Allow them to come in legally and this won't happen. Restricting where someone can and can't live and work, thus preventing them from pursuing a better life for themselves and their families, based upon where they were born is immoral.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

PartyBear said:

contrario said:

It is a terrible policy and I don't know what the solution is to handle the complicated issue when people break the law. But it is ignorant to ignore the fact that this was the policy in place during the Obama administration. This is a failure by both parties, which tends to be the case for most of the major issues we face. But yes, please keep playing the two-party game and just blame the other party for all of the problems we have and nothing will get done.
Actually the statute existed during not only Obama's administration but also Bush's, however this was not the policy of either of those administrations. There is discretion as to how something like this would be implemented administrations of both parties until Trump handled their discretion similarly. Trump himself handled it similarly to how they both did until the past few months. Putting hispanic kids in mass in internment camps frankly really is unprecedented. Keep in mind this is also without due process. These kids are not getting adlitems appointed etc. there arent any hearings etc.
So were the photos from pre-2016 fabricated? And the stories from pre-2016 fake news?
I'm not sure what photos you are referring to. As I said this is happening in mass. I'm sure there were some detentions and seperations before but not huge numbers and they were returned. Not kids being taken for bath and then never being heard from again. Just that tactic alone should sound familiarly horrible.

You do a good job by the way being a Trumper but trying to cloak it like you are not and that Trumpism has been bipartisan ideas and policies up until Trump. It hasnt been. Trumpism hasnt even been the GOP's real ideas and policies until now.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

contrario said:

PartyBear said:

contrario said:

It is a terrible policy and I don't know what the solution is to handle the complicated issue when people break the law. But it is ignorant to ignore the fact that this was the policy in place during the Obama administration. This is a failure by both parties, which tends to be the case for most of the major issues we face. But yes, please keep playing the two-party game and just blame the other party for all of the problems we have and nothing will get done.
Actually the statute existed during not only Obama's administration but also Bush's, however this was not the policy of either of those administrations. There is discretion as to how something like this would be implemented administrations of both parties until Trump handled their discretion similarly. Trump himself handled it similarly to how they both did until the past few months. Putting hispanic kids in mass in internment camps frankly really is unprecedented. Keep in mind this is also without due process. These kids are not getting adlitems appointed etc. there arent any hearings etc.
So were the photos from pre-2016 fabricated? And the stories from pre-2016 fake news?
I'm not sure what photos you are referring to. As I said this is happening in mass. I'm sure there were some detentions and seperations before but not huge numbers and they were returned. Not kids being taken for bath and then never being heard from again. Just that tactic alone should sound familiarly horrible.

You do a good job by the way being a Trumper but trying to cloak it like you are not and that Trumpism has been bipartisan ideas and policies up until Trump. It hasnt been. Trumpism hasnt even been the GOP's real ideas and policies until now.
Same old Bona Fide Bear despite attempt at rebranding.
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SicEmHeels said:

Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

Allow them to come in legally and this won't happen. Restricting where someone can and can't live and work, thus preventing them from pursuing a better life for themselves and their families, based upon where they were born is immoral.
This can't be a serious post? Even Bernie Sanders said this was crazy.

There has been over 200k family units released into the U.S. since 2016. How can we pay for that, where do these people go, what do they do?

There is a legal way for them to come in, but liberals are coaching these people who to take advantage of our system which everyone agrees is severely broken because as usual both parties kick the can and don't solve it. Hopefully they can now.

I also don't want to end up like Europe & countries like Germany.

Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I understand it, the current problems come from the administration's decision to end "catch and release." For decades we have released either arrestees or asylum seekers into the population. If those cases ended up with a deportation order, there was a good chance that parent and child would be separated at the time of the deportation. In addition, in the minority of cases where we did not release an arrestee or asylum seeker, the government entered into a consent decree to maintain the children of the incarcerated person in the "least restrictive" manner, also usually meaning separation from a parent or both parents. By ending catch and release (the Jeff Sessions' zero-tolerance policy) we have greatly multiplied the number of separations and almost infinitely multiplied the number of separations where there has been no finding of guilt. If I am wrong about any of that factually, I am sure someone will tell me.

Assuming I have the basic background right, there are a couple of points worth noting.

First, catch and release allowed us to largely avoid forced, no or little-notice separations, but at the cost of seeing the immigration laws were often not enforced. That was the "policy" under the past three presidents at least. The Trumpets' argument that family separation was existing law or policy and the President is just enforcing it is an intentional distortion of the truth, otherwise known as a lie. Almost universally the United States was avoiding forced separations, particularly before conviction or denial of asylum.

Second, ending catch and release is not by itself intellectually abhorrent. President Trump made the idea a centerpiece of his campaign and we elected him. When flight is an inherent part of a crime, "release" becomes more problematic. For asylum seekers, there is a great potential for abuse of the system by people who say they are seeking asylum when in reality they are just seeking a better life.

Third, the real problem in my mind is not what the administration has done, but how it has done it. If you are going to end catch and release, you build an infrastructure that allows families to be treated humanely while in custody and you get hundreds more immigration judges, support staff and appointed lawyers to move the court cases at a rate much faster than what happens now. As with the first travel ban, it seems like those in the administration just woke up one day and decided--today is the day we are going to do a 180 on established policy. Lets see what happens. And what happens is a whole bunch of awful crap.

Fourth, if a wall would fix all of this, why don't we just get on the phone and find out when those Mexican wall payments will be getting here?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

As I understand it, the current problems come from the administration's decision to end "catch and release." For decades we have released either arrestees or asylum seekers into the population. If those cases ended up with a deportation order, there was a good chance that parent and child would be separated at the time of the deportation. In addition, in the minority of cases where we did not release an arrestee or asylum seeker, the government entered into a consent decree to maintain the children of the incarcerated person in the "least restrictive" manner, also usually meaning separation from a parent or both parents. By ending catch and release (the Jeff Sessions' zero-tolerance policy) we have greatly multiplied the number of separations and almost infinitely multiplied the number of separations where there has been no finding of guilt. If I am wrong about any of that factually, I am sure someone will tell me.

Assuming I have the basic background right, there are a couple of points worth noting.

First, catch and release allowed us to largely avoid forced, no or little-notice separations, but at the cost of seeing the immigration laws were often not enforced. That was the "policy" under the past three presidents at least. The Trumpets' argument that family separation was existing law or policy and the President is just enforcing it is an intentional distortion of the truth, otherwise known as a lie. Almost universally the United States was avoiding forced separations, particularly before conviction or denial of asylum.

Second, ending catch and release is not by itself intellectually abhorrent. President Trump made the idea a centerpiece of his campaign and we elected him. When flight is an inherent part of a crime, "release" becomes more problematic. For asylum seekers, there is a great potential for abuse of the system by people who say they are seeking asylum when in reality they are just seeking a better life.

Third, the real problem in my mind is not what the administration has done, but how it has done it. If you are going to end catch and release, you build an infrastructure that allows families to be treated humanely while in custody and you get hundreds more immigration judges, support staff and appointed lawyers to move the court cases at a rate much faster than what happens now. As with the first travel ban, it seems like those in the administration just woke up one day and decided--today is the day we are going to do a 180 on established policy. Lets see what happens. And what happens is a whole bunch of awful crap.

Fourth, if a wall would fix all of this, why don't we just get on the phone and find out when those Mexican wall payments will be getting here?


On the wall, my understanding is that the Mexico gofundme page has only raise $12 billion. They are $8 billion short. After the July election, we'll have it.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?


100% correct

Some folks get all wrapped up in a 'feel good' snap response without examine the practical realities.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?
Have you traveled the Texas Border? Especially Big Bend


I have been to Big Ben.

My farm is 1 mile from the Mexican border.

The 64 mile long wall separating El Paso from Juarez has been a huge success .

But you and other nut cases keep choosing to ignore this massive example of the success of border walls.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?


100% correct

Some folks get all wrapped up in a 'feel good' snap response without examine the practical realities.
The irony is rich on this as that is exactly what the wall is intended to be for you folks.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Waco1947 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Build the wall and this won't happen.

It blows my mind how people don't (or refuse to) understand that this is really for the safety of the children in the grand scheme of things. You separate the children from where ALL the adults are being held. It's the same reason why we don't put juveniles into actual prisons. Would you want to keep your 5 year old daughter in the same locked room as 50+ potential rapists, child traffickers, murderers, abusers, etc.?
Have you traveled the Texas Border? Especially Big Bend


I have been to Big Ben.

My farm is 1 mile from the Mexican border.

The 64 mile long wall separating El Paso from Juarez has been a huge success .

But you and other nut cases keep choosing to ignore this massive example of the success of border walls.
Big Ben is in London, not on the Mexican border.
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Walls work dude.

The El Paso Wall is one mile from my farm. Been a huge success .

Part of what is so irritating. Those of use who are intimately associated with the border and its problems get lectured by folks hundreds or even thousands of miles away.

Walls work

bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:



Walls work


So do tunnels
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.