She had ZERO EVIDENCE to support her story. None. Her testimony was absent any facts, etc.quash said:You said, in caps, zero evidence, in a case where there was testimonial evidence. Just plain wrong.fadskier said:Can't believe I am having to explain this....you need evidence to back up your testimony...especially when accusing someone who says they are innocent.quash said:fadskier said:Again, if I were the young man, I would have pled as he did. You get this girl in front of a jury crying, and they'll believe her whether the evidence proves it or not. Just look at the wackos who insist on supporting Blasey-Ford in light of the fact that she had ABSOLUTELY ZERO evidence.90sBear said:
From a conversation on this topic in the Bear Cave
From a Trib Reporter:
"The woman's claims that she was choked is "absolutely contrary" to the physical evidence and her statements to police and medical personnel that night, they said. They also disputed her claim that she was drugged, saying no drugs were found in her system.
"She drank significantly before she ever came to the party, but her blood-alcohol level was barely above intoxication level (0.12) at the hospital," Daniel said. "She made statements to two separate male students that this may have been consensual. Those boys said she seemed fine, seemed calm and collected immediately afterward as if nothing had happened. She appears in a photograph in the hospital an hour and a half later. She is smiling and eating a cheese cracker with a full grin on her face.""
As others have noted, physical evidence contradictory to testimony evidence probably makes putting this case to a jury a lot more difficult.
Can't believe I have to say this again: testimony is evidence.
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden