Doc Holliday said:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Doc Holliday said:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Sam Lowry said:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Sam Lowry said:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
So Hitler was a good nationalist as he conducted the Rhom Purge and Kristallnacht, whipped up a frenzy by claiming immigrants were causing a huuge burden and to blame national problems? Thoughts praising this type of nationalism is much scarier to me that some big tittied woman talking about greening up America.
That's obviously not what she meant. Owens is not a fascist or an advocate of fascist policies. AOC identifies as a socialist and just released a serious legislative proposal that reads like a dystopian sci-fi novel. You sure Candace is the scary one?
Yes. AOC' proposal is not serious. It is wildly extreme. It's a first attempt at negotiating what she thinks needs to be done. I haven't studied her beyond admiring her dance moves but I am sure she realizes not all the buildings in America will be rebuilt featuring green tech. Maybe she thinks if you ask a lot and get a little it's better than asking for a little and getting nothing. I am against almost everything she says but it's not scary. Isn't this similar to the grand ideas Pres T had starting with a 30+ foot wall from the Pacific to the gulf?
On the other hand saying someone is ok with a nationalist Hitler wanting to make Germany great does scare me. Hitler did horrible things in Germany before he turn global. He committed crimes and used his patriotism as an excuse. He made immigrants scapegoats for national problems and convinced the natives to condone his jack booted thugs crimes. I know a Christian America would never fall for this but its still scary to say it was ok.
.
No. I don't think a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf is remotely like the Green New Deal. It's not even in the same universe of things.
Imo a 30 foot (at times it was going to be taller ) for 2000 miles payed for by Mexico is extreme. That's not the wall P. Trump is pitching now. AOC's ideas are also extreme.
If the Presidential election came down to AOC and Trump, which is not possible, who are you voting for between the two?
The libertarian candidate
Trump is the closest to being a libertarian in 2020. I fully expect you to vote for him.
Trump is like a libertarian that doesn't care about shrinking the size, scope, and spending of the federal government. Totally new breed of libertarian, I suppose.
If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?
Frédéric Bastiat