Just to be clear, your experience is valid but his is half bull*****Canada2017 said:TexasScientist said:Again, I don't hate Catholics (as individuals). You're missing my point. It is the Catholic Church as an institution that I have issue. Consider non religious charities if you want - atheists does not equate to being a charity. I give to non religious charities. Why does anybody post on this board, be it political or religious? I don't need a link to proof. I've seen first hand how the Church in Latin America (Europe also) exploits their parishioners, selling them absolution, praying their deceased family into heaven for a fee, charging them for prayers to be answered for a fee - convincing them to make pilgrimages for mythical spiritual benefits. I've seen elderly women crawl long distances to reach a cathedral in order to donate money they can ill afford in expectation of spiritual benefit. Yes, I think they are exploiting people.Canada2017 said:TexasScientist said:Again, I don't hate Catholics. It seems to me the Church as an institution has a record of systemic abuse, cover up of abuse, and retribution. Additionally, it financially exploits people of impoverished countries preying upon their ignorance. How would you quantify the charitable work and expenditures of Catholic Charities (or their capacity for charitable work) as a percentage of the organization's financial assets and income in order to make any judgment about their charitable activities? The Church's finances are shrouded in secrecy with no transparency. Other non-religious charities are required to disclose their finances.Canada2017 said:TexasScientist said:I don't hate Catholics. I just point out that the organization is seriously flawed, is not transparent, exploits people, and is a man made organization whose focus is to protect and benefit the clergy.Canada2017 said:TexasScientist said:Either you're infallible or your not.quash said:TexasScientist said:Isn't the idea once infallible, always infallible?quash said:That wrongly implies that he was infallible as pope. He only ever did that when speaking ex cathedra, which is rare for any pope. Less is more of you omit "infallible".TexasScientist said:
Former infallible Pope Benedict blames the collapse of Catholic moral theology, the absence of God, and the 60's for the rampant sexual abuse of the Catholic clergy and the Catholic Church.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/04/11/pope-benedict-church-abuse-crisis-tied-to-homosexuality/3433465002/
Then we could talk about the article and the lack of accountability.
No. Not at all.
My friend if you are determined to hate Catholics and Catholicism you should learn the details .
The Pope is 'infallible' only in a very rarely used format ....involving exceptionally narrow areas of doctrine.
Not fact...your opinion......expressed over and over again .
Meanwhile inform me which atheistic organization does anything approaching the volume of work ( world wide ) for the poor and forgotten as Catholic Charities.
Of course you hate the Catholic Church.
You make unsubstantiated accusations constantly .
Link to proof the Church 'exploits' the poor ?
Again what do you atheists do to help the poor around the world to even 10% of the efforts of Catholic Charities ?
Again ....what is the point to your silliness ? Who around here constantly slams YOUR atheism?
Sorry ....but I call bull**** on at least half of what you claim to have seen.
I have hiked over 100 miles on the Way of Saint James in northern Spain, seen miracles first hand at Sainte Anne du Beaupre in Quebec and in the intensive care unit in Loveland Colorado.....been to dozens of cathedrals all over the world and dealt with hundreds of the homeless and mentally ill individuals provided for by Catholic Charities...
and have never seen one single instance of what you describe.
Nada
Something's eating at you my friend .....and it's not the Catholic Church .
Religious elitism.